Doing business and constructing identities through small talk in workplace instant messaging

References

1. Anandarajan, Murugan, Maliha Zaman, Qizhi Dai, and Bay Arinze
   2010 “Generation Y Adoption of Instant Messaging: An Examination of the Impact of Social Usefulness and Media Richness on Use Richness.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication53 (2): 132–143. 10.1109/TPC.2010.2046082
   https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2010.2046082 [Google Scholar]
2. Bakhtin, Mikhail
   1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baron, Naomi S.
   2004 “See you Online: Gender Issues in College Student Use of Instant Messaging.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology23 (4): 397–423. 10.1177/0261927X04269585
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04269585 [Google Scholar]
4. Baron, Naomi S.
   2010 “Discourse Structures in Instant Messaging: The Case of Utterance Breaks.” Language@Internet7: article 4. Retrieved fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2651
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baron, Naomi S.
   2013 “Instant Messaging.” InPragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. bySusan C. Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 135–162. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214468.135
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.135 [Google Scholar]
6. Barron, Anne, and Emily Black
   2015 Constructing Small Talk in Learner-Native Speaker Voice-Based Telecollaboration: A Focus on Topic Management and Backchanneling. System48: 112–128. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.009 [Google Scholar]
7. Barton, David, and Carmen Lee
   2013 Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203552308
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203552308 [Google Scholar]
8. Beinstein, Judith
   1975 “Conversations in Public Places.” Journal of Communication25 (1): 85–95. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1975.tb00557.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1975.tb00557.x [Google Scholar]
9. Benwell, Bethan, and May McCreaddie
   2016 “Keeping ‘Small Talk’ Small in Health-Care Encounters: Negotiating the Boundaries between On- and Off-Task Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction49 (3): 258–271. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1196548
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1196548 [Google Scholar]
10. Bezemer, Jeff, and Gunther Kress
    2008 “Writing in Multimodal Texts: A Social Semiotic Account of Designs for Learning.” Written Communication25 (2): 166–195. 10.1177/0741088307313177
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307313177 [Google Scholar]
11. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
    2000 “Gossipy Events at Family Dinners: Negotiating Sociability, Presence and the Moral Order.” InSmall Talk, ed. byJustine Coupland, 213–240. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cameron, A. Frances, and Jane Webster
    2005 “Unintended Consequences of Emerging Communication Technologies: Instant Messaging in the Workplace.” Computers in Human Behavior21: 85–103. 10.1016/j.chb.2003.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.12.001 [Google Scholar]
13. Cheng, Winnie, and Martin Warren
    2005 “A Corpus-Driven Study of Disagreement in Hong Kong Business Discourse.” InAsian Business Discourse, ed. byFrancesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Maurizio Gotti, 241–270. Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chung, Donghun, and Chang Soo Nam
    2007 “An Analysis of the Variables Predicting Instant Messenger Use.” New Media and Society9 (2): 212–234. 10.1177/1461444807072217
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807072217 [Google Scholar]
15. Clifton, Jonathan
    2012 “Doing Trust in Workplace Interaction.” InProfessional Communication across Languages and Cultures, ed. byMǎda Stanca, and Rǎzvan Sǎftoiu, 107–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.17.07cli
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.17.07cli [Google Scholar]
16. Coates, Jennifer
    1988 “Gossip Revisited”. InWomen in their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, ed. byJennifer Coates and Deborah Cameron, 94–122. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Coposescu, Liliana T.
    2012 “Discursive Hybridity at Work.” InProfessional Communication across Languages and Cultures, ed. byMǎda Stanca, and Rǎzvan Sǎftoiu, 83–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.17.06cop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.17.06cop [Google Scholar]
18. Coupland, Justine
    2000 “Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Small Talk.” InSmall Talk, ed. byJustine Coupland, 1–25. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Coupland, Justine
    2003 “Small Talk: Social Functions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction36 (1): 1–6. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_1 [Google Scholar]
20. Coupland, Justine, Nikolas Coupland, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
    1992 “‘How are you?’: Negotiating Phatic Communion.” Language in Society21 (2): 207–230. 10.1017/S0047404500015268
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015268 [Google Scholar]
21. Crystal, David
    2006 Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511487002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002 [Google Scholar]
22. Cui, Xia
    2015 “Small Talk: A Missing Skill in the Chinese Communicative Repertoire.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics38 (1): 3–23. 10.1075/aral.38.1.01cui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.38.1.01cui [Google Scholar]
23. Darics, Erika
    2010 “Relational Work in Synchronous Text-Based CMC of Virtual Teams.” InHandbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. byRotimi Taiwo, 830–851. Hershey, Penn.: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2.ch053
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch053 [Google Scholar]
24. Darics, Erika
    (ed.) 2015 Digital business discourse. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9781137405579
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137405579 [Google Scholar]
25. DiFonzo, Nicholas, Martin J. Bourgeois, Jerry Suls, Christopher Homan, Noah Stupak, Bernard P. Brooks, David S. Ross, and Prashant Bordia
    2013 “Rumor Clustering, Consensus, and Polarization: Dynamic Social Impact and Self-Organization of Hearsay.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology49: 378–399. 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.010 [Google Scholar]
26. Drew, Paul, and Kathy Chilton
    2000 “Calling just to Keep in Touch: Regular and Habitualised Telephone Calls as an Environment for Small Talk.” InSmall Talk, ed. byJustine Coupland, 137–162. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
    1992 “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” InTalk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ellwardt, Lea, Rafael Wittek, and Rudi Wielers
    2012 “Talking about the Boss: Effects of Generalized and Interpersonal Trust on Workplace Gossip.” Group and Organization Management37 (4): 521–549. 10.1177/1059601112450607
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112450607 [Google Scholar]
29. Gee, James P.
    2011 An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gibson, James J.
    1979 The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Guo, Zixiu, Felix B. Tan, Tim Turner, and Huizhong Xu
    2008 “An Exploratory Investigation into Instant Messaging Preferences in Two Distinct Cultures.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication51 (4): 396–415. 10.1109/TPC.2008.2007869
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2008.2007869 [Google Scholar]
32. Hall, Stuart
    2000 “Who needs ‘identity’?” InIdentity: A Reader, ed. byPaul du Gay, Jessica Evans, and Peter Redman, 15–30. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Herring, Susan C.
    1999 “Interaction Coherence in CMC.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication4 (4). Retrieved fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html
    [Google Scholar]
34. Herring, Susan C.
    2010 “Computer-Mediated Conversation: Introduction and Overview.” Language@Internet, 7: article 2. Retrieved fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2801
    [Google Scholar]
35. Holmes, Janet
    2000 “Doing Collegiality and Keeping Control at Work: Small Talk in Government Departments.” InSmall Talk, ed. byJustine Coupland, 32–61. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Holmes, Janet
    2005 “When Small talk is a Big Deal: Sociolinguistic Challenges in the Workplace.” InSecond Language Needs Analysis, ed. byMichael H. Long, 344–372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667299.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667299.012 [Google Scholar]
37. Holmes, Janet
    2006 “Workplace Narratives, Professional Identity and Relational Practice.” InDiscourse and Identity, ed. byAnna de Fina, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg, 166–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511584459.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584459.009 [Google Scholar]
38. Holmes, Janet
    2014 “Doing Discourse Analysis in Sociolinguistics.” InResearch Methods in Sociolinguistics, ed. byJanet Holmes and Kirk Hazen, 177–193. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Holmes, Janet, and Rose Fillary
    2000 “Handling Small Talk at Work: Challenges for Workers with Intellectual Disabilities.” International Journal of Disability, Develop and Education47 (3): 273–291. 10.1080/713671114
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713671114 [Google Scholar]
40. Holmes, Janet, Sharon Marsden, and Meredith Marra
    2013 “Doing Listenership: One Aspect of Sociopragmatic Competence at Work.” Pragmatics and Society4 (1): 26–53. 10.1075/ps.4.1.02hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.4.1.02hol [Google Scholar]
41. Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe
    2015 Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work (2nd ed.). London: Longman. 10.4324/9781315750231
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750231 [Google Scholar]
42. Iversen, T. Buschmann, Line Melby, and Pieter Toussaint
    2013 “Instant Messaging at the Hospital: Supporting Articulation Work?” International Journal of Medical Informatics82: 753–761. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.004 [Google Scholar]
43. Jones, Rodney H.
    2004 “The Problem of Context in Computer-Mediated Communication.” InDiscourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis, ed. byPhilip LeVine and Ron Scollon, 20–33. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Jones, Rodney H.
    2010 “Cyberspace and Physical Space: Attention Structures in Computer Mediated Communication.” InSemiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, ed. byAdam Jaworski and Crispin Thurlow, 151–167. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Kiernan, Patrick
    2017 Language, Identity and Cycling in the New Media Age: Exploring Interpersonal Semiotics in Multimodal Media and Online Texts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Koester, Almut
    2010 Workplace Discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Kulkarni, Dipti
    2014 “Exploring Jakobson’s ‘Phatic Function’ in Instant Messaging Interactions.” Discourse and Communication8 (2): 117–136. 10.1177/1750481313507150
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313507150 [Google Scholar]
48. Ladegaard, Hans J.
    2011a “‘Doing Power’ at Work: Responding to Male and Female Management Styles in a Global Business Corporation.” Journal of Pragmatics43: 4–19. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.006 [Google Scholar]
49. Ladegaard, Hans J.
    2012b “The Discourse of Powerlessness and Repression: Identity Construction in Domestic Helper Narratives.” Journal of Sociolinguistics16 (4): 450–482. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2012.00541.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2012.00541.x [Google Scholar]
50. Lazzaro-Salazar, Virginia M., Meredith Marra, Janet Holmes, and Bernadette Vine
    2015 “Doing Power and Negotiating through Disagreement in Public Meetings.” Pragmatics and Society6 (3): 444–464. 10.1075/ps.6.3.06laz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.3.06laz [Google Scholar]
51. Mak, Chun Nam Bernie, and Hin Leung Chui
    2013 “A Cultural Approach to Small Talk: A Double-Edged Sword of Sociocultural Reality during Socialization into the Workplace.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses8 (2): 118–133. 10.1080/17447143.2012.753078
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2012.753078 [Google Scholar]
52. Mak, Chun Nam Bernie, Hin Leung Chui, and Yiqi Liu
    2012 “Instant Messaging and Microblogging: Situated-Learning Platforms for Educationists and Workplace Mentors.” Social and Behavioral Sciences51: 392–399.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Mak, Chun Nam Bernie, and Carmen Lee
    2015 “Swearing is e-Business: Expletives in Instant Messaging in Hong Kong Workplaces.” InDigital Business Discourse, ed. byErika Darics, 124–143. London: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Malinowski, Bronislaw
    1923 “The problem of meaning in primitives.” InThe Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, ed. byCharles K. Ogden and Ivor A. Richards, 296–336. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
55. McCarthy, Michael
    2000 “Mutually Captive Audiences: Small Talk and the Genre of Close-Contact Service Encounters”. InSmall Talk, ed. byJustine Coupland, 84–109. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Nabeth, Thierry
    2009 “Social Web and Identity: A Likely Encounter.” Identity in the Information Society2 (1): 1–5. 10.1007/s12394‑009‑0029‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12394-009-0029-z [Google Scholar]
57. Nardi, Bonnie, Steve Whittaker, and Erin Bradner
    2000 “Interaction and Outeraction: Instant messaging in Action.” InCSCW’00 Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 79–88. New York: ACM Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Norman, Donald A.
    1988 The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Perry, Fred L.
    2011 Research in Applied Linguistics: Becoming a Discerning Consumer (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9780203839027
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839027
60. Provine, Robert R., Robert J. Spencer, and Darcy Mandell
    2007 “Emotional Expression Online: Emoticons Punctuate Website Text Messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology26 (3): 299–307. 10.1177/0261927X06303481
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06303481 [Google Scholar]
61. Quan-Haase, Anabel, Joseph Cothrel, and Barry Wellman
    2005 “Instant Messaging for Collaboration: A Case Study of a High-Tech Firm.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10 (4). Retrieved fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/quan-haase.html. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2005.tb00276.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00276.x [Google Scholar]
62. Ragan, Sandra L.
    2000 “Sociable Talk in Women’s Health Care Contexts: Two Forms of Non-Medical Talk.” InSmall Talk, ed. byJustine Coupland, 269–287. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Ready, Douglas A.
    2002 “How Storytelling Builds Next-Generation Leaders.” MIT Sloan Management Review43 (4): 63–69.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Richards, Keith
    2006 Language and Professional Identity: Aspects of Collaborative Interaction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230505049
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505049 [Google Scholar]
65. Rosnow, Ralph L.
    1977 “Gossip and Marketplace Psychology.” Journal of Communication27 (1): 158–163. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1977.tb01811.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01811.x [Google Scholar]
66. Sǎftoiu, Rǎzvan
    2012 “Small Talk – A Work of Frame.” InProfessional Communication across Languages and Cultures, ed. byMǎda Stanca and Rǎzvan Sǎftoiu, 213–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.17.12saf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.17.12saf [Google Scholar]
67. Schnurr, Stephanie
    2013 Exploring Professional Communication: Language in Action. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Sheer, Vivian C.
    2010 “Hong Kong Adolescents’ Use of MSN vs. ICQ for Developing Friendships Online: Considering Media Richness and Presentational Control.” Chinese Journal of Communication3 (2): 223–240. 10.1080/17544751003740409
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17544751003740409 [Google Scholar]
69. Stephens, Keri K.
    2008 “Optimizing Costs in Workplace Instant Messaging Use.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication51 (4): 369–380. 10.1109/TPC.2008.2007864
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2008.2007864 [Google Scholar]
70. Stubbe, Maria, Chris Lane, Jo Hilder, Elaine Vine, Bernadette Vine, Meredith Marra, Janet Holmes, and Ann Weatherall
    2003 “Multiple Discourse Analyses of Workplace Interaction.” Discourse Studies5 (3): 351–388. 10.1177/14614456030053004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030053004 [Google Scholar]
71. Tagg, Caroline
    2016 “Heteroglossia in Text-messaging: Performing Identity and Negotiating Relationships in a Digital Space”. Journal of Sociolinguistics20 (1): 59–85. 10.1111/josl.12170
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12170 [Google Scholar]
72. Thurlow, Crispin
    2001 “The Internet and Language.” InThe Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics, ed. byRajend Mesthrie, 287–289. London: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Tracy, Karen, and Julie M. Naughton
    2000 “Institutional Identity-Work: A Better Lens.” InSmall Talk, ed. byJustine Coupland, 32–83. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Valkenburg, Patti M., and Jochen Peter
    2009 “The Effects of Instant Messaging on the Quality of Adolescents’ Existing Friendships: A Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Communication59: 79–97. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2008.01405.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01405.x [Google Scholar]
75. Van De Mieroop, Dorien
    2016 “Small Talk in Interpreted Interactions in a Medical Setting.” Language and Intercultural Communication16 (2): 292–312. 10.1080/14708477.2015.1117483
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2015.1117483 [Google Scholar]
76. Vine, Bernadette, Susan Kell, Meredith Marra, Janet Holmes
    2009 “Boundary-Marking Humour: Institutional, Gender and Ethnic Demarcation in the Workplace.” InHumor in Interaction, ed. byNeal R. Norrick and Delia Chiaro, 125–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.182.06vin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.182.06vin [Google Scholar]
77. Yates, Lynda, and George Major
    2015 “‘Quick-Chatting’, ‘Smart Dogs’, and How to ‘Say without Saying’: Small talk and Pragmatic Learning in the Community”. System48: 141–152. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.011 [Google Scholar]