Volume 11, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Although there are growing attempts to equip learners with strategies in the ESL/EFL classroom, there has not been much effort to implement strategies to assist learners in the learning of speech acts (e.g., Cohen & Ishihara, 2005). This study investigated the impact and effectiveness of instruction on EFL learners’ use of speech act strategies. A group of 131 Iranian undergraduate students were instructed through deductive consciousness-raising (C-R), inductive C-R, and L1-based C-R tasks for seven weeks. The results obtained through Cohen and Ishihara’s (2005) speech act strategy inventory indicated that instruction had a significant impact on participants’ utilization of speech act strategies. It also came to light that the learners were generally receptive to deductive and L1-based pragmatic C-R tasks. The findings suggest that pragmatic C-R tasks and especially L1-based tasks are effective means for applying strategies to supporting learners in the acquisition of speech acts.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alcon Soler, Eva and Alicia Martínez-Flor
    2008 “Pragmatics in Foreign Language Contexts.” InInvestigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing, ed. by Eva Alcon Soler and Alicia Martínez-Flor . 3–21. Buffalo, Canada: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847690869‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690869-003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen and Zoltan Dornyei
    1998 “Do Language Learners Recognize Pragmatic Violations? Pragmatic Versus Grammatical Awareness in Instructed L2 Learning.” TESOL Quarterly, 32 (2): 233–262. 10.2307/3587583
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen , and Rebbeca Mahan-Taylor
    2003 Teaching Pragmatics. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of State. RetrievedMay 7, 2011, fromexchanges.state.gov/education/engteaching/pragmatics_htm
  4. Chamot, Anna Uhl
    2008 “Strategy Instruction and Good Language Learners.” InLessons from Good Language Learners, ed. by Carol Griffiths . 266–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511497667.024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497667.024 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng, Ta Pei
    2013 “Codeswitching and Participant Orientations in a Chinese as a Foreign Language Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal97 (4): 869–886. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12046.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12046.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen, Andrew D.
    2005 “Strategies for Learning and Performing L2 Speech Acts.” Intercultural Pragmatics, 2 (3): 275–301. 10.1515/iprg.2005.2.3.275
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.3.275 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen, Andrew. D.
    2007 “Coming to Terms with Language Learner Strategies: Surveying the Experts.” InLanguage Learner Strategies: 30 Years of Research and Practice, ed. by Andrew D. Cohen and Ernesto Macaro . 29–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen, Andrew D.
    2010 “Strategies for Learning and Performing Speech Acts.” InTeaching and Learning Pragmatics, ed. by Noriko Ishihara and Andrew D. Cohen . 227–243. Harlow, UK: Longman/Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen, Andrew D. and Noriko Ishihara
    2005 A Web-Based Approach to Strategic Learning of Speech Acts. Minneapolis, Minn.: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota. RetrievedJuly 11, 2013, fromwww.carla.umn.edu/speechacts/Japanese%20Speech%20Act%20Report%20Rev.%20June05.pdf
  10. Cohen, Andrew D. , Michael R. Paige , Rachel L. Shively , Holly A. Emert , and Joseph G. Hoff
    2005 Maximizing Study Abroad through Language and Culture Strategies: Research on Students, Study Abroad Program Professionals, and Language Instructors. Minneapolis: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.
  11. Ellis, Rod
    1997SLA Research and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2002 “Grammar Teaching: Practice or Consciousness-Raising?” inMethodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice, ed. by Jack C. Richards and Willy A. Renandya . 167–174. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667190.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190.023 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2003Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2008The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eslami-Rasekh, Zohreh
    2005 “Raising the Pragmatic Awareness of Language Learners.” ELT Journal, 59 (3): 199–208. 10.1093/elt/cci039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci039 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eslami-Rasekh, Zohreh , Abbas Eslami-Rasekh and Azizollah Fatahi
    2004 “Using Metapragmatic Instruction to Improve Advanced EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Awareness.” TESL EJ, 8 (2): 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferrer, Vincent
    2005 The Use of the Mother Tongue in the Classroom: Cross-Linguistic Comparisons, Noticing and Explicit Knowledge. Retrieved fromwww.teachenglishworldwide.com/Articles.htm
  18. Gass, Susan Mackey and Larry Selinker
    2008Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis. 10.4324/9780203932841
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932841 [Google Scholar]
  19. Grim, Frédérique
    2010 “L1 in the L2 Classroom at the Secondary and College Levels: A Comparison of Functions and Use by Teachers.” Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching7 (2): 193–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Guk, Iju , and David Kellogg
    2007 “The ZPD and Whole Class Teaching: Teacher-Led and Student-Led Interactional Mediation of Tasks.” Language Teaching Research11 (3): 281–299. 10.1177/1362168807077561
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807077561 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hawkins, Samantha
    2015 “Guilt, Missed Opportunities, and False Role Models: A Look at Perceptions and Use of the First Language in English Teaching in Japan.” JALT Journal, 37 (1): 29–42. 10.37546/JALTJJ37.1‑2
    https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ37.1-2 [Google Scholar]
  22. Horst, Marlise , Joanna White , and Philippa Bell
    2010 “First and second language knowledge in the language classroom.” International Journal of Bilingualism14 (3): 331–349. 10.1177/1367006910367848
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006910367848 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ishihara, Noriko
    2010 “Instructional pragmatics: Bridging Teaching, Research, and Teacher Education”. Language and Linguistics Compass4 (10): 938–953. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00242.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00242.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Kasper, Gabi . and Carsten Roever
    2005 “Pragmatics in second language learning.” InHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning, ed. by Eli Hinkel . 317–334. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, Jang Ho , and Ernesto Macaro
    2013 “Investigating Age in the Use of L1 or English-Only Instruction: Vocabulary Acquisition by Korean EFL Learners.” The Modern Language Journal97 (4): 887–901. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12044.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12044.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Leeming, Paul
    2011 “Japanese High School Students’ Use of L1 during Pair-Work.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics21(3): 360–382. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2011.00284.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2011.00284.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Levine, Glenn S.
    2003 “Student and Instructor Beliefs and Attitudes about Target Language Use, First Language Use, and Anxiety: Report of a Questionnaire Study.” Modern Language Journal87 (3): 343–364. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00194
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00194 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2012 “Principles for Code Choice in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Focus on Grammaring.” Language Teaching47 (3): 332–348. 10.1017/S0261444811000498
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000498 [Google Scholar]
  29. Littlewood, William and Baohua Yu
    2011 First Language and Target Language in the Foreign Language Classroom. Language Teaching44 (1): 64–77. 10.1017/S0261444809990310
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809990310 [Google Scholar]
  30. Macaro, Ernesto
    2009 “Teacher Use of Codeswitching in the Second Language Classroom: Exploring ‘Optimal’ Use.” InFirst Language Use in Second and Foreign Language Learning, ed. by Miles Turnbull and Jennifer Dailey-O’Cain . 35–49. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691972‑005
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691972-005 [Google Scholar]
  31. Martínez-Flor, Alicia
    2008 “The Effect of an Inductive-Deductive Teaching Approach to Develop Learners’ Use of Request Modifiers in the EFL.” InLearning How to Request in an Instructed Language Learning Context, ed. by Eva Alcon . 191–225. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Martînez-Flor, Alicia
    2012 “Examining EFL Learners’ Long-Term Instructional Effects When Mitigating Requests.” InInterlanguage Request Modification, ed. by Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis and Helen Woodfield . 243–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.217.08mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.217.08mar [Google Scholar]
  33. Martínez-Flor, Alicia and Esther Usó-Juan
    2010 “The Teaching of Speech Acts in Second and Foreign Language Instructional Contexts.” InPragmatics across Languages and Cultures, ed. by Anna Trosborg . 423–442. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mohamed, Naashia
    2004 “Consciousness-raising tasks: A learner perspective.” ELT Journal58 (3): 228–237. 10.1093/elt/58.3.228
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.3.228 [Google Scholar]
  35. Niezgoda, Kimberly and Carsten Roever
    2001 “Pragmatic and grammatical awareness.” InPragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. by K. R. Rose and G. Kasper . 63–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524797.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797.008 [Google Scholar]
  36. Oxford, Rebecca
    2011Teaching and researching language learning strategies. New York: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2017Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Rubin, Joan , Anna Uhl Chamot , Vee Harris and Neil J. Anderson
    2007 “Intervening in the Use of Strategies.” InLanguage Learner Strategies: 30 Years of Research and Practice, ed. by Andrew D. Cohen and Ernesto Macaro . 141–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Safont, M. Pilar
    2003 “Instructional Effects on the Use of Request Acts Modification Devices by EFL Learners.” InPragmatic Competence and Foreign Language Teaching, ed. by Alicia Martínez-Flor , Esther Usó-Juan , and Ana Fernández Guerra . 211–232. Castello de la Plana, Spain: Universitat Jaume I.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2004 “An Analysis of EAP Learners’ Pragmatic Production: A Focus on Request Forms.” Iberica8: 23–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schauer, Gila A.
    2009Interlanguage Pragmatic Development: The Study Abroad Context. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmidt, Richard
    1995 “Consciousness and Foreign Language Learning: A Tutorial on the Role of Attention and Awareness in Learning.” InAttention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning, ed. by Richard Schmidt . 1–63. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Scott, Virginia M. and Maria José de la Fuente
    2008 “What’s the Problem? L2 Learners’ Use of the L1 during Consciousness-Raising, Form-Focused Tasks.” The Modern Language Journal, 92 (1): 100–113. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00689.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00689.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Sifianou, Maria
    1999Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece. A Crosscultural Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Storch, Neomy and Gillian Wigglesworth
    2003 “Is There a Role for the Use of the L1 in an L2 Setting?” TESOL Quarterly37(4): 760–770. 10.2307/3588224
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588224 [Google Scholar]
  46. Takahashi, Satomi
    2010 “Assessing Learnability in Second Language Pragmatics.” InPragmatics across Languages and Cultures, ed. by Anna Trosborg . 391–423. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Takimoto, Masahiro
    2006 “The Effects of Explicit Feedback and Form–Meaning Processing on the Development of Pragmatic Proficiency in Consciousness-Raising Tasks.” System34 (4): 601–614. 10.1016/j.system.2006.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2009 “The Effect of Input-Based Tasks on the Development of Learners’ Pragmatic Proficiency.” Applied Linguistics30 (1): 1–25. 10.1093/applin/amm049
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm049 [Google Scholar]
  49. Trosborg, Anna
    1995Interlanguage Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110885286
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
  50. Usó-Juan, Esther
    2010 “Requests: A Sociopragmatic Approach.” InSpeech Act performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues, ed. by Alicia Martínez-Flor and Esther Usó-Juan . 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.26.14uso
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.26.14uso [Google Scholar]
  51. Yu, Ming-Chung
    2008 Teaching and Learning Sociolinguistic Skills in University EFL Classes in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly42 (1): 31–52. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00206.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00206.x [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error