Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This report uses audio recorded telephone calls and textual data from an emergency medical services call center to examine the interactional practices through which speakers produce what we call “extraordinary emergencies”, treating the events concerned as requiring moral, as well as medical, attention. Since one of the overarching institutional aims of emergency call centers is to facilitate the efficient provision of medical services, call-takers typically treat reported emergencies as routine events. However, in some instances speakers produce practices that do not contribute toward the institutional agenda of providing medical assistance, thereby treating them as extraordinary cases. These practices occurred recurrently in calls involving reports of emergencies relating to child sexuality, including sexual assaults against children and obstetric emergencies where the mother was particularly young. We discuss the implications of these findings for the situated reproduction of particular moral norms, especially with respect to the category of the child in society.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alvesson, Mats, and Dan Karreman
    2000 “Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis.” Human Relations53 (9):1125–1149. 10.1177/0018726700539002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aries, Philippe
    1962Centuries of childhood. London: Jonathan Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergmann, Jörg R.
    1992 “Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry.” InTalk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, edited byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 137–162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1998 “Introduction: Morality in discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction31 (3–4):279–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowman, Brett
    2010 “Children, pathology and politics: A genealogy of the paedophile in South Africa between 1944 and 2004.” South African Journal of Psychology40 (4):443–464. 10.1177/008124631004000407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631004000407 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clayman, Steven E., and Jack Whalen
    1988 “When the medium become the message: The case of the Rather-Bush encounter.” Research on Language and Social Interaction22 (1–4):241–272. 10.1080/08351818809389305
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818809389305 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cunningham, Hugh
    2005Children and childhood in Western society since 1500. Toronto: Pearson-Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
    1992 “Analyzing talk at work: An introduction.” InTalk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, edited byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Drew, Paul, Traci Walker, and Richard Ogden
    2013 “Self-repair and action construction.” InConversational repair and human understanding, edited byMakato Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond and Jack Sidnell, 71–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Duranti, Alessandro, Elinor Ochs, and Bambi B. Schieffelin
    2012The handbook of language socialization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Egan, R. Danielle, and Gail L. Hawkes
    2008 “Imperiled and perilous: Exploring the history of childhood sexuality.” Journal of Historical Sociology21 (4):355–367. 10.1111/j.1467‑6443.2008.00341.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.2008.00341.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, Michel
    1978The history of sexuality: Volume I: An introduction. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Freud, Sigmund
    2014 [1908]On the sexual theories of children. Redditch, UK: Read Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Garcia, Angela Cora, and Penelope Ann Parmer
    1999 “Misplaced mistrust: The collaborative construction of doubt in 911 emergency calls.” Symbolic Interaction22 (4):297–324. 10.1525/si.1999.22.4.297
    https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1999.22.4.297 [Google Scholar]
  15. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gumperz, John J.
    1982Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  17. Heritage, John
    1984Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 “The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly68 (1):15–38. 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
  19. Holzscheiter, Anna
    2011 “Power of discourse or discourse of the powerful?: The reconstruction of global childhood norms in the drafting of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.” Journal of Language and Politics10 (1):1–28. 10.1075/jlp.10.1.01hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.10.1.01hol [Google Scholar]
  20. Jayyusi, Lena
    1984Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” InConversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, edited byGene H. Lerner, 13–23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  22. Kameo, Nahoko, and Jack Whalen
    2015 “Organizing documents: Standard forms, person production and organizational action.” Qualitative Sociology38 (2):205–229. 10.1007/s11133‑015‑9302‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-015-9302-7 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kincaid, James Russell
    1992Child-loving: The erotic child and Victorian culture. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lerner, Gene H.
    2013 “On the place of hesitating in delicate formulations: A turn-constructional infrastructure for collaborative indiscretion.” InConversational repair and human understanding, edited byJack Sidnell, Makoto Hayashi and Geoffrey Raymond, 95–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Luckmann, Thomas
    2002 “Moral communication in modern societies.” Human Studies25 (1):19–32. 10.1023/A:1014838423896
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014838423896 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mathews, Shanaaz, and Patrizia Benvenuti
    2014 “Violence against children in South Africa: Developing a prevention agenda.” South African Child Gauge1:26–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. McCormick, Kay
    2002Language in Cape Town’s District Six. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rafaely, Daniella
    2017 “The making of childhood mortality in modern South Africa.” Children and Society31 (2):110–119. 10.1111/chso.12170
    https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12170 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rasmussen, Gitte
    2016 “The International Classification of Disability, Functioning and Health (ICF): An example of research methods and language in describing “social functioning” in medical research.” Pragmatics and Society7 (2):217–238. 10.1075/ps.7.2.03ras
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.2.03ras [Google Scholar]
  30. Raymond, Geoffrey
    2004 “Prompting action: The stand-alone “so” in ordinary conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction37:185–218. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_4 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sacks, Harvey
    1992Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking in conversation.” Language50:696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  33. Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
    1977 “The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.” Language53 (2):361–382. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1979 “The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation in discourse and syntax.” InSyntax and semantics, edited byTalmy Givon, 261–286. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 1992 “In another context.” InRethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, edited byA. Duranti and C. Goodwin, 191–228. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1997 “Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair.” Discourse Processes23 (3):499–545. 10.1080/01638539709545001
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545001 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2007aSequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2007b “A Tutorial on membership categorization.” Journal of Pragmatics39:462–482. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  39. Seedat, Mohamed, Ashley Van Niekerk, Rachel Jewkes, Shahnaaz Suffla, and Kopano Ratele
    2009 “Violence and injuries in South Africa: Prioritising an agenda for prevention.” The Lancet374 (9694):1011–1022. 10.1016/S0140‑6736(09)60948‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60948-X [Google Scholar]
  40. Stephens, Sharon
    1995 “Children and the politics of culture in ‘Late Capitalism’.” InChildren and the politics of culture, edited bySharon Stephens, 3–48. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Tracy, Karen, and Sarah J. Tracy
    1998 “Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing face and face attack.” Human Communication Research25 (2):225–251. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1998.tb00444.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00444.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Wakin, Michele A., and Don H. Zimmerman
    1999 “Reduction and specialization in emergency and directory assistance calls.” Research on Language and Social Interaction32 (4):409–437. 10.1207/S15327973rls3204_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973rls3204_4 [Google Scholar]
  43. Whalen, Jack, and Don H. Zimmerman
    1998 “Observations on the display and management of emotion in naturally occurring activities: The case of “hysteria” in calls to 9–1–1.” Social Psychology Quarterly:141–159. 10.2307/2787066
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2787066 [Google Scholar]
  44. Whalen, Jack, Don H. Zimmerman, and Marilyn R. Whalen
    1988 “When words fail: A single case analysis.” Social problems35 (4):335–362. 10.2307/800591
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800591 [Google Scholar]
  45. Whalen, M., and Don H. Zimmerman
    1990 “Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police.” Language in Society19:465–492. 10.1017/S0047404500014779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014779 [Google Scholar]
  46. Whalen, Marilyn R., and Don H. Zimmerman
    1987 “Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help.” Social Psychology Quarterly:172–185. 10.2307/2786750
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786750 [Google Scholar]
  47. Whitehead, Kevin A.
    (in press).“The problem of context in the analysis of talk-in-interaction: The case of implied whiteness in post-apartheid South Africa”. Social Psychological Quarterly.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Zimmerman, Don H.
    1992 “The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance.” InTalk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, edited byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error