Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



People do things with words, but words also touch people. Aiming to analyze socially preferable linguistic characteristics, the present study exemplifies and explicates the text-linguistically salient characteristics in a narrative most frequently evaluated as ‘appropriate’ by the majority of a Danish population. Asked what is appropriate or inappropriate in a narrative context, the background population repeatedly explained “coherence”, “fiction” and “details” as contextually appropriate (Appendix 1). Salient in the preferred narrative was the use of co-textual enhancement, in which one clause enhances the meaning of another one by qualifying it in various ways. In particular, meaning was enhanced by having cause and effect rationally explicated by subordinating specifications prompting coherence, cohesion, and details. Additionally, a considerable level of social realism was salient in this narrative, while the background population’s preference for fiction may allude to the socio-contextual recognizability that made the narrative easily imaginable as a possible world.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Albeck, Ulla
    1939Dansk stilistik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aristotle
    1958Poetik. P. Helms (trans). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beaugrande, Robert-Alain de, and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler
    1981Introduction to Text Linguistics. London & New York: Longman. 10.4324/9781315835839
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835839 [Google Scholar]
  4. Diderichsen, Paul
    1964Sproget, virkeligheden, fantasien. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dijk, Teun van, and Walter Kintsch
    1983Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gallagher, Shaun
    2013 “Phenomenology and experimental design: Toward a phenomenologically enlightened experimental science.” Journal of Consciousness Studies10: 85–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976Cohesion in English. English Language Series. London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2004An Introduction to Functional Grammared. byChristian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Hodder Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hansen, Erik and Lars Heltoft
    2011Grammatik over det danske sprog. Copenhagen: Det danske sprog og litteraturselskab.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Iser, Wolfgang
    1971 “Indeterminacy and the Reader’s Response in Prose Fiction”. InAspects of Narrative. English Institute Essays, ed. byJ. Hillis Miller, 1–45. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1975Die Appellstruktur der Texte. Rezeptionsästhetik. Theorie und Praxis, ed. byRainer Warning. 228–252. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lagerlöf, Selma
    1956Gösta Berlings saga. I. Falbe-Hansen (trans). Copenhagen: Gyldendal [1891].
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lundquist, Lita
    2003a “Tekstlingvistik”. InSprog og Sprogbeskrivelseed. byMichael Herslund and Bente Lihn Jensen, 227–254. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1988 “Tekstlingvistik: regelmæssigheder og love”. Hermes. Journal of Language and Communication in Business1(8):85–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mayer, Mercer
    1969Frog – Where Are You?New York: Dial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nølke, Henning
    2008 “Argumentationsanalyse. Grundtræk af en modulær sprogvidenskabelig tilgang”. Hermes. Tidsskrift for sprogforskning21: 15–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Nølke, Henning & Michel Olsen
    2000 “Noter om lingvistisk og litterær polyfoni og MAIS hos Flaubert”. The Electronic Journal of Combinatories2: 1–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Onions, Charles T.
    1974The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymologyed. byCharles Onions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Parnas, Josef
    2012 “The core Gestalt of schizophrenia”. World Psychiatry11: 67–69. 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Petersen, Charlotte
    2011Attitude i sproget ved tidlige skizofrene tilstande. Empirisk undersøgelse af sprogbrugen hos prodromale, førstegangsindlagte og yngre patienter med flere indlæggelserRoskilde: Roskilde University.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2017 “Exploring a lay Gestalt of schizophrenia? A Danish background population’s explanations on why and how first-episode schizophrenia patients’ narratives were intuitively sensed as contextually inappropriate”. Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology5(2): 64–76. 10.21307/sjcapp‑2017‑008
    https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2017-008 [Google Scholar]
  22. . (submitted 2018) Pragmatic meaning and pragmatic markers in early schizophrenia. An empirical study on social sensitivity to contextual inappropriateness in narratives from first episode schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Skafte Jensen, Eva
    2006 “‘Egentlig’ og ‘faktisk’ og to slags spørgsmål polyfoniteoretisk anskuet”. Sproglig polyfoni. Arbejdspapirer6: 27–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sass, Louis
    : Madness and Modernism. Insanity in the Light of Modern Art, Literature, and Thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Searle, John
    1969Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  26. Therkelsen, Rita
    1995: “Tid og tempus”. In5. møde om udforskningen af dansk sproged. byMette Kunøe and Erik Vive Larsen. 266–277.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ulbæk, Ib
    2003 “Ikonicitet og plausibilitet i tekstforståelse”. InCopenhagen Working Papers in LSP. Tekster: struktur, forløb og forståelse. Tre tekst- og psykolingvistiske undersøgelser. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Urfer-Parnas, Annich, Erik L. Mortensen, and Josef Parnas
    2010 “Core of schizophrenia: Estrangement, dementia or neurocognitive disorder?”. Psychopathology43:300–311. 10.1159/000318814
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000318814 [Google Scholar]
  29. WHO
    WHO 1994 ICD-10. Psykiske lidelser og adfærdsmæssige forstyrrelser. Klassifikation og dia-gnostiske kriterier. 1st edition (10th revision 2003). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error