What makes a good story?

References

1. Albeck, Ulla
   1939 Dansk stilistik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aristotle
   1958 Poetik. P. Helms (trans). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Beaugrande, Robert-Alain de, and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler
   1981 Introduction to Text Linguistics. London & New York: Longman. 10.4324/9781315835839
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835839 [Google Scholar]
4. Diderichsen, Paul
   1964 Sproget, virkeligheden, fantasien. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dijk, Teun van, and Walter Kintsch
   1983 Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gallagher, Shaun
   2013 “Phenomenology and experimental design: Toward a phenomenologically enlightened experimental science.” Journal of Consciousness Studies10: 85–99.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
   1976 Cohesion in English. English Language Series. London & New York: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Halliday, Michael A. K.
   2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammared. byChristian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Hodder Arnold.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hansen, Erik and Lars Heltoft
   2011 Grammatik over det danske sprog. Copenhagen: Det danske sprog og litteraturselskab.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Iser, Wolfgang
    1971 “Indeterminacy and the Reader’s Response in Prose Fiction”. InAspects of Narrative. English Institute Essays, ed. byJ. Hillis Miller, 1–45. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Iser, Wolfgang
    1975 Die Appellstruktur der Texte. Rezeptionsästhetik. Theorie und Praxis, ed. byRainer Warning. 228–252. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lagerlöf, Selma
    1956 Gösta Berlings saga. I. Falbe-Hansen (trans). Copenhagen: Gyldendal [1891].
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lundquist, Lita
    2003a “Tekstlingvistik”. InSprog og Sprogbeskrivelseed. byMichael Herslund and Bente Lihn Jensen, 227–254. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lundquist, Lita
    1988 “Tekstlingvistik: regelmæssigheder og love”. Hermes. Journal of Language and Communication in Business1(8):85–96.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Mayer, Mercer
    1969 Frog – Where Are You?New York: Dial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Nølke, Henning
    2008 “Argumentationsanalyse. Grundtræk af en modulær sprogvidenskabelig tilgang”. Hermes. Tidsskrift for sprogforskning21: 15–38.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Nølke, Henning & Michel Olsen
    2000 “Noter om lingvistisk og litterær polyfoni og MAIS hos Flaubert”. The Electronic Journal of Combinatories2: 1–38.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Onions, Charles T.
    1974 The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymologyed. byCharles Onions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Parnas, Josef
    2012 “The core Gestalt of schizophrenia”. World Psychiatry11: 67–69. 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.002 [Google Scholar]
20. Petersen, Charlotte
    2011 Attitude i sproget ved tidlige skizofrene tilstande. Empirisk undersøgelse af sprogbrugen hos prodromale, førstegangsindlagte og yngre patienter med flere indlæggelserRoskilde: Roskilde University.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Petersen, Charlotte
    2017 “Exploring a lay Gestalt of schizophrenia? A Danish background population’s explanations on why and how first-episode schizophrenia patients’ narratives were intuitively sensed as contextually inappropriate”. Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology5(2): 64–76. 10.21307/sjcapp‑2017‑008
    https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2017-008 [Google Scholar]
22. Petersen, Charlotte
    . (submitted 2018) Pragmatic meaning and pragmatic markers in early schizophrenia. An empirical study on social sensitivity to contextual inappropriateness in narratives from first episode schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Skafte Jensen, Eva
    2006 “‘Egentlig’ og ‘faktisk’ og to slags spørgsmål polyfoniteoretisk anskuet”. Sproglig polyfoni. Arbejdspapirer6: 27–52.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sass, Louis
    : Madness and Modernism. Insanity in the Light of Modern Art, Literature, and Thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Searle, John
    1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
26. Therkelsen, Rita
    1995: “Tid og tempus”. In5. møde om udforskningen af dansk sproged. byMette Kunøe and Erik Vive Larsen. 266–277.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ulbæk, Ib
    2003 “Ikonicitet og plausibilitet i tekstforståelse”. InCopenhagen Working Papers in LSP. Tekster: struktur, forløb og forståelse. Tre tekst- og psykolingvistiske undersøgelser. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Urfer-Parnas, Annich, Erik L. Mortensen, and Josef Parnas
    2010 “Core of schizophrenia: Estrangement, dementia or neurocognitive disorder?”. Psychopathology43:300–311. 10.1159/000318814
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000318814 [Google Scholar]
29. WHO
    WHO 1994 ICD-10. Psykiske lidelser og adfærdsmæssige forstyrrelser. Klassifikation og dia-gnostiske kriterier. 1st edition (10th revision 2003). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
    [Google Scholar]