1887
Volume 11, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines what may be learned from a semantic analysis of the discourse of criminal groups about elements of the cognitive map of the group’s members. The primary group examined comprised sex offenders who victimized children. The findings were compared with another criminal group – murderers. To examine their shared linguistic characteristics, a study was made of passages from 40 transcribed subject interviews, in which they tell their life stories. The function words from the passages were classified according to semantic fields, in order to identify what psychological and sociological insights can be gained from their use, a similar study was made of normative men’s stories. The semantic fields unique to the sex offenders are presented in this paper, and are compared with the fields used by the other two groups, together with a discussion of the significance of the words included therein.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.17014.dil
2020-07-31
2020-08-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahlmeyer, Sean, Dennis Kleinsasser, John Stoner, and Paul Retzlaff
    2003 Psychopathology of incarcerated sex offenders. Journal of Personality Disorders17: 306–318. 10.1521/pedi.17.4.306.23969
    https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.17.4.306.23969 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassey, Edem A.
    2000Terminology and language planning: An alternative framework of practice and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ben-David, Sarah, and Mali Shechory
    2008 Hateguva hachevratit la’avaryanei min: Anisha, pikuach, tipul veshikum moneiya [Social response to sex offenders: Punishment, supervision, treatment and preventive rehabilitation]. InHapikuach al avaryanei min beyisrael: Anisha o tipul? [Supervision of sex offenders in Israel: Punishment or treatment?], ed. byEfrat Shoham, 183–197. Tel Aviv: Perlstein-Ginossar.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bosson, Jennifer K, William B. Swann, and James W. Pennebaker
    2000 Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: the blind men and the elephant revisited?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79 (4): 631–643. 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.4.631
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyd, Ryan L. and James W. Pennebaker
    2015 Did Shakespeare write Double Falsehood? Identifying individuals by creating psychological signatures with text analysis. Psychological Science26 (5): 570–582.‏. 10.1177/0956797614566658
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614566658 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brinton, Laurel J.
    2000The structure of modern English: A linguistic introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.94
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.94 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bumby, Kurt M., and David J. Hansen
    1997 Intimacy deficits, fear of intimacy, and loneliness among sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior24 (3): 315–331. 10.1177/0093854897024003001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854897024003001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carruthers, Peter, and Peter K. Smith
    1996Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597985
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597985 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen, David
    2010 Ha’arakhat sikun kechelek mitahalich hatipul ba’avaryanei min bogrim [Risk evaluation as part of the treatment process for adult sex offenders]. InTipul be’avaryanei min beyisrael: Etgarim bezihui, be’ifyun uvema’aneh tipuli [The treatment of sex offenders in Israel: Challenges in identification, characterization, and treatment], ed. byMali Shechory, Sarah Ben-David, and Meir Hovav, 29–44. Jerusalem: Carmel.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Crewe, Ben
    2011 Codes and conventions: The terms and conditions of contemporary inmate values. InThe effects of imprisonment, ed. byAlison Liebling and Shadd Maruna, 177–194. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Curnoe, Suzanne, and Ron Langevin
    2002 Personality and deviant sexual fantasies: An examination of the MMPIs of sex offenders. Journal of Clinical Psychology58 (7): 803–815. 10.1002/jclp.2006
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.2006 [Google Scholar]
  12. Danesi, Marcel
    1981 Idiolect, dialect, sociolect: What about ‘psycholect’?InJames E. Copeland and Philip W. Davis (eds.), LACUS Forum7, 319–325. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. de Smit, Merlijn
    2010 Modelling mixed languages: Some remarks on the case of old Helsinki slang. Journal of Language Contact3: 1–19. 10.1163/19552629‑90000017
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-90000017 [Google Scholar]
  14. Deák, Gedeon O.
    2004 The development of cognitive flexibility and language abilities. Advances in Child Development and Behavior31: 271–327. 10.1016/S0065‑2407(03)31007‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(03)31007-9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dilmon, Rakefet
    2004Ifyunim leshoni’im shel sfat sheker behashva’ah lisfat emet [Linguistic differences between lie and truth in spoken Hebrew]. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University doctoral dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dilmon, Rakefet, and Uri Timor
    2013 The narrative of men who murder their partners: How reliable is it?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57 (9):1125-1149. doi:  10.1177/0306624X13494074
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13494074 [Google Scholar]
  17. Egan, Vincent, James Hoskinson, and David Shewan
    2011 Perverted justice: A content analysis of the language used by offenders detected attempting to solicit children for sex. InAntisocial behavior: Causes, correlations and treatments, ed. byRebecca M. Clarke, 119–134. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Elisha, Esther
    2010Chalon hizdamnuyot? Bechinat gormim chiyuvi’im bekerev asirim avaryanei min vehashpa’atam al tefisat hama’asar kehizdamnut leshinui vetikun derekh chayim [Window of opportunity? An examination of positive factors among sex crime convicts and their influence on the idea of incarceration as an opportunity for change and reform]. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University doctoral dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Garfield, Jay L., Candida C. Peterson, and Tricia Perry
    2001 Social cognition, language acquisition, and the development of theory of mind. Mind and Language16: 494–541. 10.1111/1468‑0017.00180
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00180 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gergen, Kenneth, and Mary Gergen
    1987 Narrative of relationships. InAccounting for relationships, ed. byPatrick McGhee, David Clarke, and Rosalie Burnett, 269–288. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gliozzo, Alfio
    2006 Semantic domains and linguistic theory. InProceedings of the LREC 2006 workshop “Toward computational models of literary analysis,”Genoa, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Grubin, Don
    1998 Sex offending against children: Understanding the risk. Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, library.npia.police.uk/Docs/Hopolicers/Fprs99.pdf (Accessed7 May, 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Harris, Grant T., Marnie E. Rice, N. Zoe Hilton, Martin L. Lalumiere and Vernon L. Quinsey
    2007 Coercive and precocious sexuality as a fundamental aspect of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders21: 1–27. 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  24. How, Michael
    1999A teacher’s guide to the psychology of learning. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Israel Prisons Service
    Israel Prisons Service 2011 Prisoner treatment: Data on types of prisoners, www.ips.gov.il/Shabas/TIPUL_PRISONER+Info/default.htm (11May 2011.)
  26. Johnson, Scott A.
    2007Physical abusers and sexual offenders: Forensic and clinical strategies. Boca Raton, La.: Taylor and Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kalichman, Seth C.
    1991 Psychopathology and personality characteristics of criminal sexual offenders as a function of victim age. Archives of Sexual Behavior20: 187–196. 10.1007/BF01541943
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541943 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lewandowski, Marcin
    2010 Sociolects and registers: A contrastive analysis of two kinds of linguistic variation. Investigationes Linguisticae20: 60–79. 10.14746/il.2010.20.6
    https://doi.org/10.14746/il.2010.20.6 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lotman, Yuri M.
    1981Al shira “geruah” veshira “tova” [On “bad” poetry and “good” poetry]. Trans.H. Golomb. Siman Kriah12–13: 145–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lyons, John
    1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Marshall, William L., and Geris A. Serran
    2000 Current issues in the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy7: 85–96. 10.1002/(SICI)1099‑0879(200005)7:2<85::AID‑CPP234>3.0.CO;2‑F
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(200005)7:2<85::AID-CPP234>3.0.CO;2-F [Google Scholar]
  32. Marshall, William L., Emily Cripps, D. Anderson, and Franca A. Cortoni
    1999 Self-esteem and coping strategies in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence14: 955–963. 10.1177/088626099014009003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014009003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Muchnik, Malka
    2002Lashon, chevra vetarbut [Language, society and culture]. Vol.1. Tel Aviv: Open University.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mukařovský, Jan
    1983 [1936]Funktzia, norma ve’erekh esteti’im [Function, norm, and esthetic value]. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hame’uchad, Sifriat Hapoalim.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Müller, Christian
    2007Speaker classification: Fundamentals, features, and methods. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pennebaker, James W., Matthias R. Mehl, and Kate G. Niederhoffer
    2003 Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual review of psychology54 (1): 547–577. 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rodrigue-Schwarzwald, Ora, and Michael Sokoloff
    1992Milon lemunachei balshanut vedikduk [A Hebrew dictionary of terms in linguistics and philology]. Even-Yehuda: Reches.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Samsonovich, Alexei V., and Giorgio A. Ascoli
    2007 Cognitive map dimensions of the human value system extracted from natural language. InAdvances in artificial general intelligence: Concepts, architectures and algorithms, ed. byBen Goertzel and Pei Wang. (Proceedings of the AGI Workshop 2006, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 157), 111–124. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sapir, Edward
    1921Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmidt, Gunter
    2002 The dilemma of the male pedophile. Archives of Sexual Behavior31 (6): 473–477. 10.1023/A:1020651130148
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020651130148 [Google Scholar]
  41. Seker, Zohar
    1989Yesodot stati’im betekst hashiri: Ekronot poeti’im ve’idiologi’im meyuchadim hamanchim biyesud model mishni shel mashma’uyot milim beshirat Yehuda Amichai uvnei doro [Static elements in the poetic text: Special poetic and ideological guiding principles in establishing a secondary semantic model in the poetry of Yehuda Amichai and his contemporaries]. Tel Aviv University doctoral dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Shechory, Mali
    2008 Me’afyanim mavchinim bein anasim uvein mitalelim minit beyeladim [Differentiating characteristics between rapists and sexual abusers of children]. InHapikuach al avaryanei min beyisrael: Anisha o tipul? [Supervision of sex offenders in Israel: Punishment versus treatment], ed. byEfrat Shoham, 91–112. Tel Aviv: Perlstein-Ginossar.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Shechory, Mali, and Sarah Ben-David
    2005 Aggression and anxiety in rapists and child molesters. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology49 (6): 652–661. 10.1177/0306624X05277943
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X05277943 [Google Scholar]
  44. Shechory, Mali, Sarah Ben-David, and Yael Idisis
    2008 Avaryanei min ve’aveirot min ba’aretz uva’olam: Chakika, pikuach, tipul veshikum [Sex offenders and sex offenses in Israel and the world: Legislation, supervision, treatment and rehabilitation]. InHitmakruyot, alimut ve’aveirot min: Tipul le’or hachok [Addictions, violence and sex crimes: Treatment in the light of the law], ed. byHaim Mell, Meir Hovav and Miriam Golan, 421–443. Jerusalem: Carmel.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Shenhar, Aliza, and Shlomo Sherlin
    1987Shimru nafsham! Al mitbagrim mit’abdim veshiratam [Take care of them! On suicidal adolescents and their poetry]. Haifa: Haifa University.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Simkins, Lawrence
    1993 Characteristics of sexually repressed child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence8: 3–17. 10.1177/088626093008001001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/088626093008001001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sovran, Tamar
    1994a Mashma’ut, hora’ah vesadot semanti’im shel musagim mufshatim [Meaning, reference, and the semantic fields of abstract notions]. Balshanut Ivrit [Hebrew Linguistics] 37: 41–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 1994bSadot semanti’im: Iyun balshani-philosofi bekishrei mashma’ut [Semantic fields: A lingo-philosophical study of meaning relations]. Jerusalem: Magnes.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Toch, Hans
    1998 Hypermasculinity and prison violence. InMasculinities and violence, ed. byLee H. Bowker, 168–178. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage. 10.4135/9781483328010.n9
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328010.n9 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tomasello, Michael
    2003 The key is social cognition. InLanguage in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, ed. byDedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow, 47–57. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Trier, Jost
    1931 Das sprachliche Feld: Eine Auseinandersetzung [The linguistic field: A discussion]. InJost Trier: Aufsätze und Vorträge zur Wortfeldtheorie [Jost Trier: Essays and lectures in word field theory], ed. byAnthony van der Lee and Oskar Reichmann, 150–151. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Vygotskiĭ, Lev S.
    2012 [1929]Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Ward, Tony, and Anthony R. Beech
    2006 An integrated theory of sex offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior11: 44–63. 10.1016/j.avb.2005.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ward, Tony, Stephen M. Hudson, William L. Marshall, and Richard Siegert
    1995 Attachment style and intimacy deficits in sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment7: 317–335. 10.1177/107906329500700407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329500700407 [Google Scholar]
  55. Weizman, Elda
    2008Positioning in media dialogue: Negotiating roles in the news interview (Vol.3). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.3 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1965Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Yassour, Yossi
    1995Hahachlata lirtzoach [The decision to murder]. Tel Aviv: Ramot.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.17014.dil
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.17014.dil
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cognitive map , murderers , psycholect , semantic analysis , semantic fields , sex offenders and thought processes
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error