Volume 11, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The present paper takes an ethnomethodological and conversation analytical perspective on assisted shopping as it is done by a person with acquired brain injury in collaboration with her caregiver. My interest is directed towards the interactional and embodied organization of the situated selecting and decision-making processes, while I am aiming to understand the interactional organization of assistance and agency. The embodied interaction analysis is based on two video-recorded examples in which a caregiver treats the institutional resident’s shopping choice as either unproblematic or undesirable. I will differentiate five phases in which the participants systematically organize the selection process. In these phases, the participants take different roles either as shopper or as assistant caregiver; as to the later, I will distinguish between moral and instrumental assistance. The analysis demonstrates an inherent tension in the assistance during shopping activities, as it is oriented to both the incompetence that justifies the need for assistance and to the interactional construction of a competent and independent shopper.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Antaki, Charles, Chris Walton and W. M. L. Finlay
    2007 “How Proposing an Activity to a Person With an Intellectual Disability Can Imply a Limited Identity.” Discourse & Society18 (4): 393–410. 10.1177/0957926507075473
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507075473 [Google Scholar]
  2. Antaki, Charles, and Ray Wilkinson
    2013 “Conversation Analysis and the Study of Atypical Populations.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 533–50. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beeke, Suzanne, Fiona Johnson, Firle Beckley, Claudia Heilemann, Susan Edwards, Jane Maxim & Wendy Best
    2014 “Enabling Better Conversation Between a Man With Aphasia and His Conversation Partner: Incorporating Writing Into Turn Taking.” Research on Language and Social Interaction47 (3): 292–305. 10.1080/08351813.2014.925667
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.925667 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bloch, Steven, and Suzanne Beeke
    2008 “Co-Constructed Talk in the Conversation of People with Dysarthria and Aphasia.” Clinical Linguistic & Phonetics22 (12): 974–990. 10.1080/02699200802394831
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200802394831 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, Colin, and Trevor Pinch
    2010 “Some Major Organizational Consequences of Some ‘Minor’, Organized Conduct: Evidence From a Video Analysis of Pre-Verbal Service Encounters in a Showroom Retail Store.” InOrganisation, Interaction and Practice. Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, ed. byNick Llewellyn and Jon Hindmarsh, 140–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511676512.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676512.008 [Google Scholar]
  6. De Stefani, Elwys
    2013 “The Collaborative Organisation of Next Actions in a Semiotically Rich Environment: Shopping as a Couple.” InInteraction and Mobility. Language and the Body in Motion, ed. byPentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 123–151. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110291278.123
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110291278.123 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2014 “Establishing Joint Orientation Towards Commercial Objects in a Self-Service Store. How Practices of Categorisation Matter.” InInteracting with Objects: Language, Materiality and Social Activity, ed. byMaurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 271–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goffman, Erving
    1981 “Footing.” InForms of Talk, ed. byErving Goffman, 124–159. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1982 “On Face-Work: an Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” InInteraction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, ed. byErving Goffman, 5–45. New York: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Goode, David
    1994A World Without Words: the Social Construction of Children Born Deaf and Blind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14btbtx
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Goodwin, Charles
    (ed.) 2003Conversation and Brain Damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2004 “The Competent Speaker Who Can’t Speak: the Social Life of Aphasia.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology12 (2): 151–170. 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2007a “Environmentally Coupled Gestures.” InGesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language, ed. bySusan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell, and Elena T. Levy, 202–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.1.18goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.1.18goo [Google Scholar]
  15. 2007b “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse & Society18 (1): 53–73. 10.1177/0957926507069457
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2010 “Constructing Meaning Through Prosody in Aphasia.” InProsody in Interaction, ed. byDagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, and Margaret Selting, 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.23.29goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.29goo [Google Scholar]
  17. 2013 “The Co-Operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics46 (1): 8–23. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Heath, Christian, Jon Hindmarsh, and Paul Luff
    2010Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781526435385
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435385 [Google Scholar]
  19. Heath, Christian, and Paul Luff
    2007 “Ordering Competition: the Interactional Accomplishment of the Sale of Art and Antiques at Auction.” The British Journal of Sociology58 (1), 63–85. 10.1111/j.1468‑4446.2007.00139.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00139.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Hollan, James, Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh
    2000 “Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research.” Computer-Human Interaction7 (2): 174–196. 10.1145/353485.353487
    https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hydén, Lars-Christer
    2014 “Cutting Brussels Sprouts: Collaboration Involving Persons With Dementia.” Journal of Aging Studies29: 115–123. 10.1016/j.jaging.2014.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones, Danielle
    2015 “A Family Living With Alzheimer’s Disease: the Communicative Challenges.” Dementia14 (5): 555–573. 10.1177/1471301213502213
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301213502213 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kennedy, Sarah
    2001 “Shopping.” Feminist Studies27 (2): 491. 10.2307/3178771
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3178771 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kitzinger, Celia, and Danielle Jones
    2007 “When May Calls Home: The Opening Moments of Family Telephone Conversation With an Alzheimer’s Patient.” Feminism & Psychology17 (2): 184–202. 10.1177/0959353507076550
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507076550 [Google Scholar]
  25. Klippi, Anu
    2015 “Pointing as an Embodied Practice in Aphasic Interaction.” Aphasiology29 (3): 337–354. 10.1080/02687038.2013.878451
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.878451 [Google Scholar]
  26. Krummheuer, Antonia, Anu Klippi, Pirkko Liisa Raudaskoski, and Christina Samuelsson
    2016 “Participating with Limited Communication Means: Conversation Analytical Perspectives on the Interactional Management of Participation Structures.” Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics30 (10): 721–729. 10.1080/02699206.2016.1225124
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2016.1225124 [Google Scholar]
  27. Laakso, Minna
    2015 “Collaborative Participation in Aphasic Word Searching: Comparison Between Significant Others and Speech and Language Therapists.” Aphasiology29 (3): 269–290. 10.1080/02687038.2013.878450
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.878450 [Google Scholar]
  28. Laakso, Minna, and Anu Klippi
    2010 “A Closer Look at the ‘Hint and Guess’ Sequences in Aphasic Conversation.” Aphasiology13 (4–5): 345–363.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Llewellyn, Nick, and Jon Hindmarsh
    2013 “The Order Problem. Inference and Interaction in Interactive Service Work.” Human Relations66 (11): 1401–1426. 10.1177/0018726713479622
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713479622 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mol, Annemarie
    2008The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203927076
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927076 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols
    (eds) 2010Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: transcript. 10.14361/transcript.9783839414477
    https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839414477 [Google Scholar]
  32. Parry, Ruth
    2010 “Video-Based Conversation Analysis.” InThe SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research, 373–396. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446268247.n20
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268247.n20 [Google Scholar]
  33. Peräkylä, Anssi
    1997 “Reliability and Validity in Research Based on Tapes and Transcripts.” InQualitative Research: Theory, Methods and Practices, ed. byDavid Silverman, 201–19. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pitsch, Karola
    2016 “Grocery Shopping: Embodied and Verbal Practices of Assisting a Cognitively Impaired Person to Participate in Everyday Life.” InBook of Abstracts, Conference on Atypical Interaction, July 3–5, 2016, University of Southern Denmark, Odense. https://sites.google.com/site/atypicalinteractionconference/book-of-abstracts
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Stokoe, Elizabeth, Rein Ove Sikveland, and Bogdana Huma
    2017 “Entering the Customer’s Domestic Domain: Categorial Systematics and the Identification of ‘Parties to Sale’.” Journal of Pragmatics118: 64–80. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  36. Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron
    (eds.) 2011Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. vom Lehn, Dirk
    2014 “Timing is Money: Managing the Floor in Sales Interaction at Street-Market Stalls.” Journal of Marketing Management30 (13–14): 1448–66. 10.1080/0267257X.2014.941378
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.941378 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wilkinson, Ray
    1999 “Introduction” (to the Special Issue on Conversation Analysis). Aphasiology13 (4–5): 251–258. 10.1080/026870399402082
    https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402082 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2015 “Conversation and Aphasia: Advances in Analysis and Intervention.” (Special Issue). Aphasiology29 (3): 257–421. 10.1080/02687038.2014.974138
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.974138 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wilkinson, Ray, Steven Bloch, and Michael Clarke
    2011 “On the Use of Graphic Resources in Interaction by People with Communication Disorders.” InEmbodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, ed. byJürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron, 152–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yearly, Steven, and John D. Brewer
    1989 “Stigma and Conversational Competences: a Conversation Analytical Study of the Mentally Handicapped.” Human Studies12: 97–115. 10.1007/BF00142841
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142841 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error