1887
Volume 10, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate how the collaborative and sequential unfolding of a story ties into the constitution of a membership categorization device which we have glossed as ‘us and them’. The data come from a focus group activity where first and second generation immigrants to Denmark have been asked to discuss their situation in Denmark. Using Ethnomethodological Conversation and Membership Categorization Analysis, we present one story which involves a story-teller and his family and an elderly Danish couple living in the same block of flats. In the telling of the story, co-participants align and affiliate, and disalign and disaffiliate, at sequentially relevant junctions. We will argue that not only do such phenomena indicate listenership and possible agreement to the moral of the story in its telling, but also to the morally implicative categorical work involved in the story’s telling.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18010.day
2019-10-22
2019-11-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, Carolyn. D.
    1997 “Ticketing Rules: Categorization and Moral ordering in a School Staff Meeting”. InCulture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. byPeter Eglin & Stephen Hester, 77–98. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cuff, Edward C.
    1993Problems of Versions in Everyday Situations. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cuff, Edward C. & David W. Francis
    1978 “Some Features of ‘invited stories’ about Marriage Breakdown”. International Journal for the Sociology of Language (Special issue on Conversation Analysis) 18: 111–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Day, Dennis
    1998 “Being Ascribed, and Resisting, Membership of an Ethnic Group”. InIdentities in Talk, ed. byCharles Antaki & Sue Widdicombe. London: Sage, 151–170.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2013a “Editorial: Positioning in Narrative Interaction”. Narrative Inquiry23 (1): 1–15. 10.1075/ni.23.1.01dep
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23.1.01dep [Google Scholar]
  6. 2013b “How to Get a Grip on Identities-in-Interaction: (What) Does ‘Positioning’ Offer More than ‘Membership Categorization’? Evidence from a Mock Story”. Narrative Inquiry23 (1): 62–88. 10.1075/ni.23.1.04dep
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23.1.04dep [Google Scholar]
  7. Eglin, Peter & Stephen Hester
    1999 “Moral order and the Montreal massacre: a Story of Membership Categorization Analysis”. InMedia Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches, ed. byPaul L. Jalbert, 195–230. Lanham, Md & Oxford: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fitzgerald, Richard
    2012 “Categories, Norms and Inferences: Generating Entertainment in a Daytime Talk Show”. Discourse, Context and Media1(4): 151–159. 10.1016/j.dcm.2012.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2012.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fitzgerald, Richard & William Housley
    2002 “Identity, Categorization and Sequential Organization: The Sequential and Categorial Flow of Identity in a Radio Phone-in”. Discourse & Society13(5): 579–602. 10.1177/0957926502013005275
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013005275 [Google Scholar]
  10. Francis, David & Christopher Hart
    1997 “Narrative intelligibility and membership categorization in a television commercial”. InCulture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis, ed. byPeter Eglin and Stephen Hester, 123–151. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hepburn, Alexa & Galina B. Bolden
    2012 “The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription”. InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  12. Housley, William & Richard Fitzgerald
    2009 “Membership Categorization, Culture and Norms in Action”. Discourse & Society20: 345–362. 10.1177/0957926509102405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509102405 [Google Scholar]
  13. Jayyusi, Lena
    1984Categorization and the Moral Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jefferson, Gail
    1978 “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation”. InStudies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. byJim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kjærbeck, Susanne & Asmuss, Birte
    2005 “Negotiating Meaning in Narratives: An Investigation of the Post-punchline Sequence”. Narrative Inquiry15(1): 1–24. 10.1075/ni.15.1.01kja
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.15.1.01kja [Google Scholar]
  16. Kjærbeck, Susanne
    2008 “Narratives as a Resource to Manage Disagreement: Examples from a Parents’ Meeting in an Extracurricular Activity Center”. Text & Talk28(3): 307–326. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.015 [Google Scholar]
  17. Mühlhäusler, Peter & Rom Harré
    1990Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sacks, Harvey
    1974 “An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation”. InExplorations in the ethnography of speaking, ed. byR. Bauman & J. Sherzer, 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1992Lectures on conversation. (2vols.ed. byGail Jefferson, with introductions byEmanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Steensig, Jakob
    2012 “Conversation Analysis and Affiliation and Alignment”. In, The encyclopedia of applied linguistics: Conversation analysis, ed. byCarol Chapelle. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0196
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0196 [Google Scholar]
  21. Stivers, Tanya
    2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction41(1): 31–57. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  22. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2006 “Public Intimacy in Neighbour Relationships and Complaints. Sociological Research Online11(3): 1–21. 10.5153/sro.1383
    https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1383 [Google Scholar]
  23. Stokoe, Elizabeth & Derek Edwards
    2009 “Accomplishing Social Action with Identity Categories: Mediating and Policing Neighbour Disputes.” InMargaret Wetherell (ed.) Theorizing Identities and Social Action, 95–115. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230246942_6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246942_6 [Google Scholar]
  24. Watson, Rod
    1997 “Some General Reflections on ‘Categorization’ and ‘Sequence’ in the Analysis of Conversation”. InCulture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysised. byStephen Hester & Peter Eglin, 49–76. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18010.day
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error