Multimodal membership categorization and storytelling in a guided tour

References

1. Bilmes, Jack
   2009 “Kinship categories in a Northern Thai narrative.” InTalk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives, ed. byHahn Nguyen and Gabriele Kasper, 29–56. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Burdelski, Matthew
   2016 “We-focused and I-focused stories of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum.” Discourse & Society, 27(2): 156–171. 10.1177/0957926515611553
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515611553 [Google Scholar]
3. Burdelski, Matthew, Michie Kawashima, and Keiichi Yamazaki
   2014 “Storytelling in Guided Tours: Practices, Engagement, and Identity at a Japanese American Museum.” Narrative Inquiry24(2): 328–346. 10.1075/ni.24.2.08bur
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24.2.08bur [Google Scholar]
4. Day, Dennis
   2012 “Conversation analysis and membership categories.” InThe Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. byCarol A. Chapelle, 1050–1055. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0211
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0211 [Google Scholar]
5. Day, Dennis, and Johannes Wagner
   2014 “Objects as Tools for Talk.” InInteracting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity, ed. byMaurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 101–124.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Eglin, Peter
   2002 “Members’ Gendering Work: ‘Women,’ ‘Feminists’ and Membership Categorization Analysis.” Discourse & Society13: 819–25. 10.1177/0957926502013006759
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013006759 [Google Scholar]
7. Freed, Alice F., and Susan Ehrlich
   (eds) 2010 “Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ford, Cecilia E.
   2010 “Questioning in Meetings: Participation and Positioning.” In“Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. byAlice F. Freed and Susan Ehrlich, 211–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fukuda, Chie
   2017 “Gaijin performing gaijin (‘A foreigner performing a foreigner’): Co-construction of foreigner stereotypes in a Japanese talk show as a multimodal phenomenon.” Journal of Pragmatics109: 12–28. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.012
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.012 [Google Scholar]
10. Fukuda, Chie
    2014 “Identities and Linguistic Varieties in Japanese: An Analysis of Language Ideologies as Participants’ Accomplishment.” Pragmatics24(1): 35–62. 10.1075/prag.24.1.02fuk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.1.02fuk [Google Scholar]
11. Fukuda, Chie, and Matthew Burdelski
    . 2019. “Multimodal demonstrations of understanding of visible, imagined, and tactile objects in guided tours.” Research on Language and Social Interaction52(1): 20–40. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1572857
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1572857 [Google Scholar]
12. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Goodwin, Charles
    2018 Co-operative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Goodwin, Charles
    2007 “Environmentally coupled gestures.” InGesture and the Dynamic Dimensions of Language, S. D. Duncan, Justine Cassell, and Elena T. Levy, 195–212. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.1.18goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.1.18goo [Google Scholar]
15. Goodwin, Charles
    1981 Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Goodwin, Marjorie H., Asta Cekaite, and Charles Goodwin
    2012 “Emotion as stance.” InEmotion in Interaction, ed. byAnssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
17. Heritage, John
    2012 “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 1–29. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
18. Heritage, John
    2005 “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk.” InHandbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. byKristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 103–47. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byMaxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
    (eds) 1997 Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hosoda, Yuri, and David Aline
    2018 “Embodied departure from focal objects in a Lingua Franca campus tour.” Pragmatics and Society9(3): 454–484. 10.1075/ps.16033.hos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16033.hos [Google Scholar]
22. Kasper, Gabriele
    2009 “Categories, Context, and Comparison in Conversation Analysis.” InTalk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives, ed. byHahn Nguyen and Gabriele Kasper, 1–28. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kasper, Gabriele, and Matthew T. Prior
    2014 “Analyzing storytelling in TESOL interview research.” TESOL Quarterly. Published online26 May 2014. doi:  10.1002/tesq.169
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.169 [Google Scholar]
24. Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky
    1967 “Narrative Analysis: Oral Version of Personal Experience.” InEssays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. byJune Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mandelbaum, Jenny
    2012 “Storytelling in Conversation” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 492–508. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch24
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch24 [Google Scholar]
26. McNeill, David
    1992 Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mondada, Lorenza
    2013 “Displaying, Contesting and Negotiating Epistemic Authority in Social Interaction: Descriptions and Questions in Guided Visits.” Discourse Studies15 (5): 597–626. 10.1177/1461445613501577
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501577 [Google Scholar]
28. Mondada, Lorenza
    2011 “Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction” Journal of Pragmatics43(2): 542–552. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.019 [Google Scholar]
29. Mondada, Lorenza
    2007 “Multimodal resources for turn-taking: pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9, 194–225. 10.1177/1461445607075346
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346 [Google Scholar]
30. Morimoto, Toyotomi
    2012 “Okinawa to ‘kenkeijin’ to no chuutai [Bonds between Okinawa and its immigrants overseas].” InToransunashonaruna ‘nikkeijin’ no kyooiku, gengo, bunka [Transnational ‘nikkei’ and their education, language, and culture], ed. byToyotomi Morimoto and Sachio Negawa, 188–202. Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Nevile, Maurice, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa
    (eds) 2014 Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.186
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186 [Google Scholar]
32. Norrick, Neal R.
    2013 “Stories of Vicarious Experience in Speeches by Barack Obama.” Narrative Inquiry23(2): 283–301. 10.1075/ni.23.2.04nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23.2.04nor [Google Scholar]
33. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation, ed. byGail Jefferson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language50(4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
35. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 “Categories in Action: Person-Reference and Membership Categorization.” Discourse Studies9: 433–461. 10.1177/1461445607079162
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607079162 [Google Scholar]
36. Seo, Mi Suk, and Irene A. Koshik
    2010 “A conversation analytic study of gestures and engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring.” Journal of Pragmatics42(8): 2219–2239. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021 [Google Scholar]
37. Stivers, Tanya
    2008 “Stance, Alignment and Affiliation during Story Telling: When Nodding is a Token of Preliminary Affiliation.” Research on Language in Social Interaction41(1): 29–55. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
38. Stivers, Tanya, Nick J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson
    (eds) 2010 “Question-Response Sequences in Conversation across Ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics42(10): 2615–2619. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002 [Google Scholar]
39. Stokoe, Elizabeth H.
    2003 “Doing gender, doing categorization: Recent developments in language and gender research.” International Sociolinguistics2(1): 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Yaguchi, Yujin
    2002 Hawai no rekishi to bunka [History and culture in Hawai‘i]. Tokyo: Chuuookooronsha.
    [Google Scholar]