Volume 10, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study examines multimodal membership categorization and storytelling in Japanese at an Okinawan culture center in Hawai‘i. Based on audiovisual recordings of a guided tour (112 minutes), it examines ways the guide and visitors use explicit and implicit means in constructing the membership category “immigrants of Okinawan descent in Hawai‘i” and terms of this category, such as “women of the first generation” and “children of the second generation.” The analysis focuses on visitors’ contributions to membership categorization and storytelling through posing questions, relating personal experience, and displaying stance in touching and handling objects. The findings show how practices of membership categorization and storytelling are co-constructed, and how participants draw upon multimodal resources including talk, the body, and objects in practices of membership categorization in situated interaction.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bilmes, Jack
    2009 “Kinship categories in a Northern Thai narrative.” InTalk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives, ed. byHahn Nguyen and Gabriele Kasper, 29–56. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burdelski, Matthew
    2016 “We-focused and I-focused stories of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum.” Discourse & Society, 27(2): 156–171. 10.1177/0957926515611553
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515611553 [Google Scholar]
  3. Burdelski, Matthew, Michie Kawashima, and Keiichi Yamazaki
    2014 “Storytelling in Guided Tours: Practices, Engagement, and Identity at a Japanese American Museum.” Narrative Inquiry24(2): 328–346. 10.1075/ni.24.2.08bur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24.2.08bur [Google Scholar]
  4. Day, Dennis
    2012 “Conversation analysis and membership categories.” InThe Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. byCarol A. Chapelle, 1050–1055. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0211
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0211 [Google Scholar]
  5. Day, Dennis, and Johannes Wagner
    2014 “Objects as Tools for Talk.” InInteracting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity, ed. byMaurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 101–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Eglin, Peter
    2002 “Members’ Gendering Work: ‘Women,’ ‘Feminists’ and Membership Categorization Analysis.” Discourse & Society13: 819–25. 10.1177/0957926502013006759
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013006759 [Google Scholar]
  7. Freed, Alice F., and Susan Ehrlich
    (eds) 2010“Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ford, Cecilia E.
    2010 “Questioning in Meetings: Participation and Positioning.” In“Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. byAlice F. Freed and Susan Ehrlich, 211–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fukuda, Chie
    2017 “Gaijin performing gaijin (‘A foreigner performing a foreigner’): Co-construction of foreigner stereotypes in a Japanese talk show as a multimodal phenomenon.” Journal of Pragmatics109: 12–28. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.012 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2014 “Identities and Linguistic Varieties in Japanese: An Analysis of Language Ideologies as Participants’ Accomplishment.” Pragmatics24(1): 35–62. 10.1075/prag.24.1.02fuk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.1.02fuk [Google Scholar]
  11. Fukuda, Chie, and Matthew Burdelski
    . 2019. “Multimodal demonstrations of understanding of visible, imagined, and tactile objects in guided tours.” Research on Language and Social Interaction52(1): 20–40. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1572857
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1572857 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goffman, Erving
    1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodwin, Charles
    2018Co-operative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2007 “Environmentally coupled gestures.” InGesture and the Dynamic Dimensions of Language, S. D. Duncan, Justine Cassell, and Elena T. Levy, 195–212. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.1.18goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.1.18goo [Google Scholar]
  15. 1981Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin, Marjorie H., Asta Cekaite, and Charles Goodwin
    2012 “Emotion as stance.” InEmotion in Interaction, ed. byAnssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Heritage, John
    2012 “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 1–29. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2005 “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk.” InHandbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. byKristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 103–47. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byMaxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
    (eds) 1997Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hosoda, Yuri, and David Aline
    2018 “Embodied departure from focal objects in a Lingua Franca campus tour.” Pragmatics and Society9(3): 454–484. 10.1075/ps.16033.hos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16033.hos [Google Scholar]
  22. Kasper, Gabriele
    2009 “Categories, Context, and Comparison in Conversation Analysis.” InTalk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives, ed. byHahn Nguyen and Gabriele Kasper, 1–28. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kasper, Gabriele, and Matthew T. Prior
    2014 “Analyzing storytelling in TESOL interview research.” TESOL Quarterly. Published online26 May 2014. doi:  10.1002/tesq.169
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.169 [Google Scholar]
  24. Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky
    1967 “Narrative Analysis: Oral Version of Personal Experience.” InEssays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. byJune Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mandelbaum, Jenny
    2012 “Storytelling in Conversation” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 492–508. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch24
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch24 [Google Scholar]
  26. McNeill, David
    1992Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mondada, Lorenza
    2013 “Displaying, Contesting and Negotiating Epistemic Authority in Social Interaction: Descriptions and Questions in Guided Visits.” Discourse Studies15 (5): 597–626. 10.1177/1461445613501577
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501577 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2011 “Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction” Journal of Pragmatics43(2): 542–552. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.019 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2007 “Multimodal resources for turn-taking: pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9, 194–225. 10.1177/1461445607075346
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346 [Google Scholar]
  30. Morimoto, Toyotomi
    2012 “Okinawa to ‘kenkeijin’ to no chuutai [Bonds between Okinawa and its immigrants overseas].” InToransunashonaruna ‘nikkeijin’ no kyooiku, gengo, bunka [Transnational ‘nikkei’ and their education, language, and culture], ed. byToyotomi Morimoto and Sachio Negawa, 188–202. Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nevile, Maurice, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa
    (eds) 2014Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.186
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186 [Google Scholar]
  32. Norrick, Neal R.
    2013 “Stories of Vicarious Experience in Speeches by Barack Obama.” Narrative Inquiry23(2): 283–301. 10.1075/ni.23.2.04nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23.2.04nor [Google Scholar]
  33. Sacks, Harvey
    1992Lectures on Conversation, ed. byGail Jefferson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language50(4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  35. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 “Categories in Action: Person-Reference and Membership Categorization.” Discourse Studies9: 433–461. 10.1177/1461445607079162
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607079162 [Google Scholar]
  36. Seo, Mi Suk, and Irene A. Koshik
    2010 “A conversation analytic study of gestures and engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring.” Journal of Pragmatics42(8): 2219–2239. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021 [Google Scholar]
  37. Stivers, Tanya
    2008 “Stance, Alignment and Affiliation during Story Telling: When Nodding is a Token of Preliminary Affiliation.” Research on Language in Social Interaction41(1): 29–55. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stivers, Tanya, Nick J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson
    (eds) 2010 “Question-Response Sequences in Conversation across Ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics42(10): 2615–2619. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  39. Stokoe, Elizabeth H.
    2003 “Doing gender, doing categorization: Recent developments in language and gender research.” International Sociolinguistics2(1): 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Yaguchi, Yujin
    2002Hawai no rekishi to bunka [History and culture in Hawai‘i]. Tokyo: Chuuookooronsha.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error