Constructing desirable brides

References

1. Ahuja, Amit, and Susan L. Ostermann
   2016 “Crossing caste boundaries in the modern Indian marriage market.” Studies in Comparative International Development, 51 (3): 365–387. 10.1007/s12116‑015‑9178‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-015-9178-2 [Google Scholar]
2. Annamalai, E.
   2004 “Medium of Power: The Question of English in Education in India.” InMedium of Instruction Policies: Which Agenda? Whose Agenda?ed. byJames W. Tollefson, and Amy B. M. Tsui, 177–194. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, Carolyn D. and Greer Cavallaro Johnson
   2000 “Stories of Courtship and Marriage: Orientations in Openings.” Narrative Inquiry10 (2): 377–401. 10.1075/ni.10.2.05bak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.10.2.05bak [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Carolyn D.
   2004 “Membership Categorization and Interview Accounts.” InQualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (2nd Edition), ed. byDavid Silverman, 162–76. London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Batabyal, Amitrajeet A.
   2001 “On the likelihood of finding the right partner in an arranged marriage.” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 30 (3): 273–280. 10.1016/S1053‑5357(01)00095‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(01)00095-6 [Google Scholar]
6. Begum, Shahina, Balaiah Donta, Saritha Nair, and C. P. Prakasam
   2015 “Socio-demographic factors associated with domestic violence in urban slums, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.” The Indian Journal of Medical Research141 (6): 783–788. 10.4103/0971‑5916.160701
   https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.160701 [Google Scholar]
7. Bilmes, Jack
   2011 “Occasioned Semantics: A Systematic Approach to Meaning in Talk”. Hum Stud34: 129–153. 10.1007/s10746‑011‑9183‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9183-z [Google Scholar]
8. Black, Shameem
   2017 “Love marriage.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies40 (2): 345–348. 10.1080/00856401.2017.1295210
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2017.1295210 [Google Scholar]
9. Brettell, Caroline B.
   2017 “Marriage and migration.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 46: 81–97. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102116‑041237
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041237 [Google Scholar]
10. Briggs, Charles L.
    1986 Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165990
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165990 [Google Scholar]
11. Butler, Carly W., and Richard Fitzgerald
    2010 “Membership-in-Action: Operative Identities in a Family Meal”. Journal of Pragmatics42: 2462–2474. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.006 [Google Scholar]
12. Chawla, Devika
    2007 “I will speak out: Narratives of resistance in contemporary Indian women’s discourses in Hindu arranged marriages.” Women and Language30 (1): 5–20.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Desai, Sonalde, and Lester Andrist
    2010 “Gender scripts and age at marriage in India.” Demography47 (3): 667–687. 10.1353/dem.0.0118
    https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0118 [Google Scholar]
14. Donner, Henrike
    2002 “One’s own marriage’: Love marriages in a Calcutta neighbhourhood.” South Asia Research22 (1): 79–94. 10.1177/026272800202200104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026272800202200104 [Google Scholar]
15. Goli, Srinivas, Deepti Singh, and T. V. Sekher
    2013 “Exploring the myth of mixed marriages in India: evidence from a nation-wide survey.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies44 (2): 193–206. 10.3138/jcfs.44.2.193
    https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.44.2.193 [Google Scholar]
16. Grover, Shalini
    2017 Marriage, love, caste and kinship support: Lived experiences of the urban poor in India. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203732823
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203732823 [Google Scholar]
17. Heritage, John
    2012 “Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge.” Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
18. Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
    (eds.) 1997 Culture in Action. Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hester, Sally, and Stephen Hester
    2012 “Categorial Occasionality and Transformation: Analyzing Culture in Action. Human Studies35 (4): 563–581. 10.1007/s10746‑012‑9211‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-012-9211-7 [Google Scholar]
20. Holstein, James A., and Jaber F. Gubrium
    1995 The Active Interview (Vol.37). London: Sage. 10.4135/9781412986120
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986120 [Google Scholar]
21. Jayyusi, Lena
    1984 Categorization and the Moral Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jefferson, Gail
    1978 “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling.” InStudies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. byJim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
23. Johnson, Greer Cavallaro
    1999 “Telling Tales: A Complicated Narrative About Courtship.” Narrative Inquiry9 (1): 1–23. 10.1075/ni.9.1.02cav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.9.1.02cav [Google Scholar]
24. Johnson, Greer Cavallaro and Isabella Paoletti
    2004 “Orienting to the Category ‘Ordinary–But Special’ in an Australian-Italian Courtship and Marriage Narrative.” Narrative Inquiry14 (1): 191–218. 10.1075/ni.14.1.09cav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.14.1.09cav [Google Scholar]
25. Kalokhe, Ameeta, Carlos del Rio, Kristin Dunkle, Rob Stephenson, Nicholas Metheny, Anuradha Paranjape, and Seema Sahay
    2017 “Domestic violence against women in India: A systematic review of a decade of quantitative studies.” Global Public Health12 (4): 498–513. 10.1080/17441692.2015.1119293
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2015.1119293 [Google Scholar]
26. Kapur, Sonia, Anna Zajicek, and Valerie Hunt
    2017 “Immigration provisions in the Violence Against Women Act: implications for Asian Indian marriage migrants.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38 (4): 456–480. 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268872
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268872 [Google Scholar]
27. LaDousa, Chaise
    2014 Hindi is Our Ground, English is Our Sky: Education, Language, and Social Class in Contemporary India. New York: Berghahn Books.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lal, B. Suresh
    2015 “Child marriage in India: Factors and problems.” International Journal of Science and Research, 4 (4): 2993–2998.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lee, Josephine
    2016 Methodological applications of membership categorization analysis for social class research. Applied Linguistics39 (2): 532–554.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mandelbaum, Jenny
    2012 Storytelling in Conversation. InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 492–507. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch24
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch24 [Google Scholar]
31. Mishler, Elliot G.
    1986 Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Netting, Nancy S.
    2010 “Marital ideoscapes in 21st-century India: Creative combinations of love and responsibility.” Journal of Family Issues31 (6): 707–726. 10.1177/0192513X09357555
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09357555 [Google Scholar]
33. Pallikadavath, Saseendran & Tamsin Bradley
    2019 “Dowry, ‘Dowry Autonomy’ and Domestic Violence Among Young Married Women in India”. Journal of Biosocial Science51(3): 353–373. 10.1017/S0021932018000226
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932018000226 [Google Scholar]
34. Paoletti, Isabella
    2001 “Membership Categories and Time Appraisal in Interviews with Family Caregivers of Disabled Elderly.” Human Studies24 (4): 293–325. 10.1023/A:1012248710684
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012248710684 [Google Scholar]
35. Pande, Raksha
    2015 “‘I arranged my own marriage’: Arranged marriages and post-colonial feminism.” Gender, Place & Culture, 22 (2): 172–187. 10.1080/0966369X.2013.855630
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.855630 [Google Scholar]
36. Paul, Pintu
    2019 “Effects of education and poverty on the prevalence of girl child marriage in India: A district–level analysis.” Children and Youth Services Review100: 16–21. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.02.033
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.02.033 [Google Scholar]
37. Psathas, George
    1999 “Studying the Organization in Action: Membership Categorization and Interaction Analysis.” Human Studies22: 139–162. 10.1023/A:1005422932589
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005422932589 [Google Scholar]
38. Ramachandran, Vidya
    2019 “But he’s not desi: Articulating ‘Indianness’ through partnership preference in the Indian-Australian diaspora.” South Asian Diaspora1–17. 10.1080/19438192.2019.1562634
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19438192.2019.1562634 [Google Scholar]
39. Ramanathan, Vaidehi
    2013 “A Postcolonial Perspective in Applied Linguistics: Situating English and the Vernaculars.” InFraming Languages and Literacies: Socially Situated Views and Perspectives, ed. byMargaret R. Hawkins, 83–104. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Rao, Smriti, and Kade Finnoff
    2015 “Marriage migration and inequality in India, 1983–2008.” Population and Development Review41 (3): 485–505. 10.1111/j.1728‑4457.2015.00069.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00069.x [Google Scholar]
41. Rapley, Mark and Charles Antaki
    1998 “‘What Do You Think About…?’ Generating Views in an Interview.” Text18 (4): 587–608. 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.4.587
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.4.587 [Google Scholar]
42. Rapley, Timothy John
    2001 “The Art(Fulness) of Open-Ended Interviewing: Some Considerations on Analysing Interviews.” Qualitative Research1 (3): 303–23. 10.1177/146879410100100303
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100303 [Google Scholar]
43. Rapley, Timothy John
    2012 “The (Extra) Ordinary Practices of Qualitative Interviewing.” InThe Sage Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft, Volume2, ed. byJaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, Amir Marvasti, and Karyn D. McKinney, 541–554. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Roulston, Kathryn
    2000 “The Management of ‘Safe’ and ‘Unsafe’ Complaint Sequences in Research Interviews.” Text20 (3): 1–39. 10.1515/text.1.2000.20.3.307
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.3.307 [Google Scholar]
45. Roulston, Kathryn
    2006 “Close encounters of the ‘CA’ kind: a review of literature analysing Talk in research interviews.” Qualitative Research6 (4): 515–534. 10.1177/1468794106068021
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106068021 [Google Scholar]
46. Roulston, Kathryn
    2010 Reflective Interviewing: A Guide to Theory and Practice. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446288009
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288009 [Google Scholar]
47. Roulston, Kathryn, Carolyn D. Baker, and Anna Liljestrom
    2001 “Analyzing the Researcher’s Work in Generating Data: The Case of Complaints.” Qualitative Inquiry7 (6): 745–72. 10.1177/107780040100700607
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700607 [Google Scholar]
48. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on conversation, Vols I and II. (G. Jefferson, ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Sagade, J.
    2005 Child marriage in India: socio-legal and human rights dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sandhu, Priti
    2014a “‘Who does she think she is?’ Vernacular medium and failed romance.” Journal of Language, Identity, and Education13 (1): 16–33. 10.1080/15348458.2014.864210
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2014.864210 [Google Scholar]
51. Sandhu, Priti
    2014b “The interactional and narrative construction of normative and resistant discourses about Hindi and English.” Applied Linguistics35 (1): 29–47. 10.1093/applin/ams075
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams075 [Google Scholar]
52. Sandhu, Priti
    2015a “Resisting linguistic marginalization in professional spaces: Constructing multi-layered oppositional stances.” Applied Linguistics Review6 (3): 369–391. 10.1515/applirev‑2015‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0017 [Google Scholar]
53. Sandhu, Priti
    2015b “Stylizing voices, stances, and identities related to medium of education in India.” Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication34 (2): 211–235. 10.1515/multi‑2014‑1012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-1012 [Google Scholar]
54. Sandhu, Priti
    2016a Professional Identity Constructions of Indian Women. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.23 [Google Scholar]
55. Sandhu, Priti
    2016b “Negative self-categorization, stance, affect, and affiliation in autobiographical storytelling.” InTalking Emotion in Multilingual Settingsed. byMatt T. Prior and Gabriele Kasper, 153–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Sandhu, Priti
    2018 “English medium education, patriarchy, and emerging social structures: Narratives of Indian women.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language253: 55–78. 10.1515/ijsl‑2018‑0023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0023 [Google Scholar]
57. Sandhu, Priti
    2019 “English language instructors, medium of education, and professional agency: An Indian perspective.” InTheorizing and Analyzing Language Teacher Agencyed. byHayriye Kayi-Aydar, Xuesong Gao, Elizabeth R. Miller, Manka Varghese and Gergana Vitanova, 237–256. Bristol, UK and Blue Ridge Summit, Penn.: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007a “A Tutorial on Membership Categorization.” Journal of Pragmatics39: 462–482. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007 [Google Scholar]
59. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007b “Categories in Action: Person-reference and Membership Categorization.” Discourse Studies9 (4): 433–461. 10.1177/1461445607079162
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607079162 [Google Scholar]
60. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007c Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
61. Speer, Susan A., and Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2011 Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511781032
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781032 [Google Scholar]
62. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2012 Moving Forward with Membership Categorization Analysis: Methods for Systematic Analysis. Discourse Studies: 14 (3), 277–303. 10.1177/1461445612441534
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534 [Google Scholar]
63. Stokoe, Elizabeth, and Derek Edwards
    2006 “Story Formulations in Talk-in-Interaction.” Narrative Inquiry16 (1): 56–65. 10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto [Google Scholar]
64. Talmy, Steven
    2009 Resisting ESL: Categories and sequence in a critically “motivated” analysis of classroom interaction. InTalk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectivesed. byH. T. Nguyen and Gabriele Kasper, 181–213. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Talmy, Steven
    2010 “Qualitative Interviews in Applied Linguistics: From Research Instrument to Social Practice.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics30: 128–148. 10.1017/S0267190510000085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000085 [Google Scholar]
66. Vanita, Ruth
    2005 Love’s rite: Same-sex marriage in India and the West. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781403981608
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981608 [Google Scholar]
67. Wilkinson, Sue, and Celia Kitzinger
    2008 “Using Conversation Analysis in Feminist and Critical Research.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass2 (2): 555–573. 10.1111/j.1751‑9004.2007.00049.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00049.x [Google Scholar]
68. Yamaguchi, Masataka
    2003 “Complaint Sequences Reconsidered: A Consideration from ‘Crosstalk’ Research Interviews.” Texas Linguistic Forum47: 239–49.
    [Google Scholar]