1887
Volume 12, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents a local grammar based diachronic investigation of apology in spoken British English, aiming to offer an alternative approach for diachronic speech act analysis and to further explore what the changing patterns of apology would suggest about the social-cultural changes happened and/or happening in the British society. The paper shows that the proposed local grammar approach can contribute to a more delicate and finer-grained speech act annotation scheme, which in turn facilitates a more reliable quantification of speech act realisations across contexts or time. The subsequent investigation shows that apologies in spoken British English are becoming more formulaic and less explicit, which suggests that either social distance has been reduced or that Britain might have become an even more stratified society.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18031.su
2021-07-05
2021-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adolphs, Svenja
    2008Corpus and Context: Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.30
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.30 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aijmer, Karin
    1996Conversational Routines in English. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aijmer, Karin, and Christoph Rühlemann
    (eds) 2015Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139057493
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057493 [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen, Christopher M.
    2005 “A Local Grammar of Cause and Effect: A Corpus-Driven Study.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Allen, James, and Mark Core
    1997 “Draft of DAMSL: Dialog Act Markup in Several Layers.” Available atwww.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/projects/eagles/restrict/manual.htm
  6. Battistella, Edwin L.
    2014Sorry About That: The Language of Public Apology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnbrook, Geoff
    2002Defining Language: A Local Grammar of Definition Sentences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.11 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bednarek, Monika
    2007 “Local Grammar and Register Variation: Explorations in Broadsheet and Tabloid Newspaper Discourse.” Empirical Language Research1(1): 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2008Emotion Talk across Corpora. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230285712
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285712 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bella, Spyridoula
    2014 “A Contrastive Study of Apologies Performed by Greek Native Speakers and English Learners of Greek as a Foreign Language.” Pragmatics24(4): 679–713. 10.1075/prag.24.4.01bel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.4.01bel [Google Scholar]
  11. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
    (eds) 1989Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bunt, Harry, Jan Alexanderson, Jean Carletta, et al
    2010 Towards an ISO standard for dialogue act annotation. InProceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2548–2555.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Burdelski, Matthew
    2013 “I’m Sorry, Flower: Socializing Apology, Relationships, and Empathy in Japan.” Pragmatics and Society4(1): 54–81. 10.1075/ps.4.1.03bur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.4.1.03bur [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng, Dongmei
    2017 “Communication is a Two-Way Street: Instructors’ Perceptions of Student Apologies.” Pragmatics27(1): 1–32. 10.1075/prag.27.1.01che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.1.01che [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheng, Winnie, and Tiffany Ching
    2018 “Not a Guarantee of Future Performance: The Local Grammar of Disclaimers.” Applied Linguistics39(3): 263–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Mathew Gillings
    2018 “Politeness Variation in English: A North-South Divide?” InCorpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech, ed. byVaclav Brezina, Robbie Love, and Karin Aijmer, 33–59. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315268323‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315268323-5 [Google Scholar]
  18. Deutschmann, Mats
    2003 “Apologising in British English.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Umeå University, Sweden.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Drew, Paul, Alexa Hepburn, Piera Margutti, and Renata Galatolo
    (eds) 2016 “Special Issue on Apologies in Discourse.” Discourse Processes53(1–2): 1–131. 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056689
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056689 [Google Scholar]
  20. Goffman, Erving
    1971Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Held, Gudrun
    1999 “Submission Strategies as an Expression of the Ideology of Politeness: Reflections on the Verbalization of Social Power Relations.” Pragmatics9(1): 5–20. 10.1075/prag.9.1.03hel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.03hel [Google Scholar]
  22. Hunston, Susan
    2002aCorpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2002b “Pattern Grammar, Language Teaching, and Linguistic Variation: Applications of a Corpus-Driven Grammar.” InUsing Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, ed. byRandi Reppen, Susan Fitzmaurice, and Douglas Biber, 167–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.9.11hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.9.11hun [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunston, Susan, and Hang Su
    2019 “Patterns, Constructions, and Local Grammar: A Case Study of ‘Evaluation’.” Applied Linguistics40(4): 567–593. 10.1093/applin/amx046
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx046 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hunston, Susan, and John Sinclair
    2000 “A Local Grammar of Evaluation.” InEvaluation in Text, ed. bySusan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ifert Johnson, Danette, Michael E. Roloff, and Melissa A. Riffee
    2004 “Politeness Theory and Refusals of Requests: Face Threat as a Function of Expressed Obstacles.” Communication Studies55(2): 227–238. 10.1080/10510970409388616
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388616 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2009 “Speech Act Research Between Armchair, Field and Laboratory: The Case of Compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics41: 1611–1635. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2018 “Apologies in the History of English: Evidence from the Corpus of Historical American English.” Corpus Pragmatics2(4): 375–398. 10.1007/s41701‑018‑0038‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-018-0038-y [Google Scholar]
  29. 2019 “Speech Act Attenuation in the History of English: The Case of Apologies.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics4(1): 1–25. 10.5334/gjgl.878
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.878 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jucker, Andreas H., Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt
    (eds) 2009Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789042029101
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029101 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen
    2008 “Apologies in the History of English: Routinized and Lexicalized Expressions of Responsibility and Regret.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English, ed. byAndreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 229–443. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.12juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.12juc [Google Scholar]
  32. Kohnen, Thomas
    2000 “Explicit Performatives in Old English: A Corpus-Based Study of Directives.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics1(2): 301–321. 10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh [Google Scholar]
  33. 2008 “Tracing Directives Through Text and Time: Towards a Methodology of a Corpus-Based Diachronic Speech-Act Analysis.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English, ed. byAndreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.16koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.16koh [Google Scholar]
  34. Kondo, Sachiko
    2010 “Apologies: Raising Learners’ Cross-Cultural Awareness.” InSpeech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues, ed. byAlicia Martínez-Flor, and Esther Usó-Juan, 145–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.26.09kon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.26.09kon [Google Scholar]
  35. Kopytko, Roman
    1995 “Linguistic Politeness Strategies in Shakespeare’s Plays.” InHistorical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, ed. byAndreas H. Jucker, 515–540. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.27kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.27kop [Google Scholar]
  36. Leech, Geoffrey
    2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Leech, Geoffrey, and Martin Weisser
    2003 “Generic Speech Act Annotation for Task-oriented Dialogues.” InProceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conferences 2003, 441–446.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Love, Robbie, Clair Dembry, Andrew Hardie, Vaclav Brezina, and Tony McEnery
    2017 “The Spoken BNC 2014: Designing and Building a Spoken Corpus of Everyday Conversations.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics22(3): 319–344. 10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov [Google Scholar]
  39. Lutzky, Ursula, and Andrew Kehoe
    2017 “Oops, I Didn’t Mean to Be So Flippant: A Corpus Pragmatic Analysis of Apologies in Blog Data.” Journal of Pragmatics116: 27–36. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mey, Jacob L.
    2017 “Corpus Linguistics: Some (Meta-)Pragmatic Reflections.” Corpus Pragmatics1(3): 185–199. 10.1007/s41701‑017‑0017‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0017-8 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rayson, Paul, Geoffrey Leech, and Mary Hodges
    1997 “Social Differentiation in the Use of English Vocabulary: Some Analyses of the Conversational Component of the British National Corpus.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics2(1): 120–132. 10.1075/ijcl.2.1.07ray
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.2.1.07ray [Google Scholar]
  42. Rieger, Caroline L.
    2018 “I Want a Real Apology: A Discursive Pragmatics Perspective on Apologies.” Pragmatics27(4): 553–590. 10.1075/prag.27.4.04rie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.4.04rie [Google Scholar]
  43. Romero-Trillo, Jesús
    (ed) 2008Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199024 [Google Scholar]
  44. Spolsky, Bernard
    1998Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Su, Hang
    2017 “Local Grammars of Speech Acts: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Pragmatics111: 72–83. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2018 “Thank Bloody God It’s Friday: A Local Grammar of Thanking.” Corpus Pragmatics2(1): 83–105. 10.1007/s41701‑017‑0024‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0024-9 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2019 “Patterns, Local Grammars, and the Design of English Teaching Materials.” ELT Journal: 1–10. Advance access. doi:  10.1093/elt/ccz046
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz046 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2020 “Local Grammars and Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: A Case Study of Apology in the History of American English.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics21(1). 10.1075/jhp.00038.su
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00038.su [Google Scholar]
  49. Su, Hang, and Lei Zhang
    2020 “Local Grammars and Discourse Acts in Academic Writing: A Case Study of Exemplification in Linguistics Research Articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes43: 1–11. doi:  10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100805
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100805 [Google Scholar]
  50. Su, Hang, and Naixing Wei
    2018 “I’m Really Sorry About What I Said: A Local Grammar of Apology.” Pragmatics28(3): 439–462. 10.1075/prag.17005.su
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17005.su [Google Scholar]
  51. Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H. Jucker
    2008 “Speech Acts Now and Then: Towards a Pragmatic History of English.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English, ed. byAndreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.02taa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.02taa [Google Scholar]
  52. Taavitsainen, Irma, Andreas H. Jucker, and Jukka Tuominen
    (eds) 2014Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.243
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.243 [Google Scholar]
  53. Trosborg, Anna
    1995Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110885286
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
  54. Viana, Vander, Sonia Zyngier, and Geoff Barnbrook
    (eds) 2011Perspectives on Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.48 [Google Scholar]
  55. Weisser, Martin
    2003 “SPAACy – A Semi-Automated Tool for Annotating Dialogue Acts.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8(1): 63–74. 10.1075/ijcl.8.1.03wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.1.03wei [Google Scholar]
  56. 2015 “Speech Act Annotation.” InCorpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. byKarin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 84–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139057493.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057493.005 [Google Scholar]
  57. 2016 “DART – The Dialogue Annotation and Research Tool.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory12(2): 355–388. 10.1515/cllt‑2014‑0051
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0051 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2018How to Do Corpus Pragmatics on Pragmatically Annotated Data. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.84
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.84 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2019 “The DART Annotation Scheme: Form, Appliability & Application.” Studia Neophilologica91(2): 131–153. 10.1080/00393274.2019.1616218
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2019.1616218 [Google Scholar]
  60. Wichmann, Anne
    2004 “The Intonation of Please-requests: A Corpus-based Study.” Journal of Pragmatics36: 1521–1549. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18031.su
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18031.su
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error