1887
Volume 12, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The practice of joint fantasizing concerns interacting participants’ collective construction of imaginary realities with internal consistency and coherence. Based on a corpus of conversations held by an informal Italian prayer community of elderly Catholic women, this contribution aims to show that joint fantasizing is not necessarily a humorous activity and is embedded in the participants’ social and personal background. The analysis also indicates that through joint fantasizing the participants conceptualize themselves as victims and idealized opponents of the unfair present and past societies. Framing joint fantasizing as a cross-contextual activity of social criticism allows us to understand that the participants use this interactional practice as an activity endowed with moral suffering and responsibility. This rhetorical seriousness contrasts with other studies in which joint fantasies are generally connected with playful, jocular and laughable practices.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18043.ind
2021-07-05
2021-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Béal, Christine and Kerry Mullan
    2013 “Issues in conversational humour from a cross-cultural perspective: comparing French and Australian corpora”. In: C. Béal, K. Mullan & B. Peeters (Eds.), Cross-culturally Speaking, Speaking Cross-culturally:107–140. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berk, Ronald A.
    2001 The active ingredients in humor: Psychophysiological benefits and risks for older adults. Educational Gerontology27 (3–4): 323–339. 10.1080/036012701750195021
    https://doi.org/10.1080/036012701750195021 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertrand, Roxane and Béatrice Priego-Valverde
    2011 Does prosody play a specific role in conversational humour?. Pragmatics & Cognition19: 333–356. 10.1075/pc.19.2.08ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.2.08ber [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre
    2002/1977Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, Herbert H.
    1996Using Language. Cambridge: University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, Herbert H. and Mija M. Van Der Wege
    2001 “Imagination in discourse”. In: Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. H. (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 772–786. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chovanec, Jan
    2012 “Conversational humour and joint fantasising in online journalism”. Language and Humour in the Media, ed. byJ. Chovanec & I. Ermida, 139–161. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coupland, Nikolas, Justine Coupland, and Howard Giles
    1991Language, society and the elderly: Discourse, identity and ageing. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dalby, Padmaprabha
    2006 Is there a process of spiritual change or development associated with ageing? A critical review of research. Aging & mental health1 (1): 4–12. 10.1080/13607860500307969
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860500307969 [Google Scholar]
  10. Damianakis, Thecla and Elsa Marziali
    2011 Community-dwelling older adults’ contextual experiencing of humour. Ageing & Society3 (1): 110–124. 10.1017/S0144686X10000759
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10000759 [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, Catherine Evans
    1984 Joint joking. Improvisational humorous episodes in conversation. Berkeley Linguist. Soc. 10: 360–371. 10.3765/bls.v10i0.3177
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v10i0.3177 [Google Scholar]
  12. De Fina, Anna
    2008 Who tells which story and why? Micro and macro contexts in narrative. Text & Talk28 (3): 421–442. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.020 [Google Scholar]
  13. De Fina, Anna and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
    2008 Analysing narratives as practices. Qualitative Research8 (3): 379–387. 10.1177/1468794106093634
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106093634 [Google Scholar]
  14. Duranti, Alessandro and Charles Goodwin
    (eds) 1992Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dynel, Marta
    2011 “Joker in the pack. Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversations”. In: Dynel, M. (Ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, 217–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.210.15dyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.210.15dyn [Google Scholar]
  16. 2018a “No child’s play: A philosophical pragmatic view of overt pretence as a vehicle for conversational humour”. Villy Tsakona, Jan Chovanec (eds). The Dynamics of Interactional Humour: Creating and Negotiating Humour in Everyday Encounters, 205–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.7.09dyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.09dyn [Google Scholar]
  17. 2018bIrony, Deception and Humour: Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert Untruthfulness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501507922
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507922 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dynel, Marta, and Fabio Indìo Massimo Poppi
    2018 In tragoedia risus: Analysis of dark humour in post-terrorist attack discourse. Discourse and Communication12 (4): 382–400. 10.1177/1750481318757777
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318757777 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2019 Risum teneatis, amici?: The socio-pragmatics of RoastMe humour. Journal of Pragmatics139: 1–21. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  20. Frankl, Viktor
    1984Man’s Search for Meaning. New York: Washington Square Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goodson, Ivor, Shawn Moore, and Shawn Hargreaves
    2006 Teacher nostalgia and the sustainability of reform: The generation and degeneration of teachers’ missions, memory, and meaning. Educational Administration Quarterly42 (1): 42–61. 10.1177/0013161X05278180
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05278180 [Google Scholar]
  22. Goodwin, Charles
    2006 “Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves”. Text & Talk26: 443–461. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.018 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness and Charles Goodwin
    1987 “Children’s arguing”. In: S. U. Philips, S. Steele & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, Gender & Sex in Comparative Perspective, 200–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hall, Frank
    1974 “Conversational joking: a look at applied humour”. In: J. McDowell (Ed.), Folklore Annual of the University Folklore Association6. 24–45. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hay, Jennifer
    1995 Gender and Humour: Beyond a Joke. Victoria University of Wellington. (Unpublished MA thesis).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Haugh, Michael
    2012 “Conversational interaction”. In: K. Allan & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, 251–274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139022453.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022453.014 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2017 “Jocular language play, social action and (dis)affiliation in conversational interaction”. In: Bell, N. (Ed.), Multiple Perspectives on Language Play, 143–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Heritage, John
    1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Holmes, Janet and Meredith Marra
    2002 Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friend. Humor15: 65–87. 10.1515/humr.2002.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2002.006 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jefferson, Gail
    1988 On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems35: 418–441. 10.2307/800595
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800595 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jefferson, Gail and John R. Lee
    1981 The rejection of advice: managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. Journal of Pragmatics: 399–422. 10.1016/0378‑2166(81)90026‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kotthoff, Helga
    1999 “Coherent keying in conversational humour: contextualising joint fictionalisation”. In: W. Bublitz, U. Lenk, E. Ventola (Eds.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse, 125–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.63.10kot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.63.10kot [Google Scholar]
  33. 2007 Oral genres of humour: on the dialectic of genre knowledge and creative authoring. Pragmatics17: 263–296. 10.1075/prag.17.2.04kot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.2.04kot [Google Scholar]
  34. Labov, William and Joshua Waletzky
    2003Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Washington, D.C.: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lasch, Christopher
    1991The true and only heaven: Progress and its critics. New York: WW Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Leary, James P.
    1980 Recreational talk among white adolescents. West Folklore39: 284–299. 10.2307/1499997
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1499997 [Google Scholar]
  37. Linde, Charlotte
    1993Life stories: The creation of coherence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. MacKinlay, Elizabeth
    2004 Humor: a way to transcendence in later life?. Journal of Religious Gerontology16 (3–4): 43–58. 10.1300/J078v16n03_04
    https://doi.org/10.1300/J078v16n03_04 [Google Scholar]
  39. Matsumoto, Yoshiko
    2009 Dealing with life changes: humour in painful self-disclosures by elderly Japanese women. Ageing & Society29 (6): 929–952. 10.1017/S0144686X0900885X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X0900885X [Google Scholar]
  40. Norrick, Neal
    1993Conversational Joking. Humour in Everyday Talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2000Conversational Narrative: Storytelling in Everyday Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.203
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.203 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ochs, Elinor and Lisa Capps
    2009Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Polanyi, Livia
    1985Telling the American story A structural and cultural analysis of conversational storytelling. New York: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Poppi, Fabio Indìo Massimo
    2020 Vincit Amor: Narratives of Sexual Promiscuity. Sexuality & Culture24, 922–945. 10.1007/s12119‑019‑09672‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09672-w [Google Scholar]
  45. Poppi, Fabio Indìo Massimo
    2021 Pro domo sua: Narratives of sexual abstinence. Sexuality & Culture, 25(2), 540–561. 10.1007/s12119‑020‑09782‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09782-w [Google Scholar]
  46. Poppi, Fabio Indìo Massimo and Pietro Castelli Gattinara
    2018 Aliud pro alio: Context and narratives within a neo-Nazi community of practice. Journal of language and politics17 (4): 552–572. 10.1075/jlp.17014.pop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17014.pop [Google Scholar]
  47. Poppi, Fabio Indìo Massimo and Sveinung Sandberg
    2020 A bene placito: Narratives of sex work. Narrative Inquiry, 30(2), 294–315. 10.1075/ni.18053.pop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18053.pop [Google Scholar]
  48. Poppi, Fabio Indìo Massimo, and Alfredo Ardila
    2021 In Nomine Diaboli: The Ideologies of Organized Crime. European Journal of Criminology. 10.1177/14773708211006642
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211006642 [Google Scholar]
  49. Priego-Valverde, Béatrice
    2006 How funny it is when everyone gets going! A case of co-construction of humour in conversation. CÍRCULO de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación27.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stallone, Leticia and Michael Haugh
    2017 Joint fantasising as relational practice in Brazilian Portuguese interactions. Language & Communication1 (55): 10–23. 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.08.012 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tannen, Deborah
    2007Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
  53. Thompson, Heather
    2004 Lift up your hearts: humor and despair in later life. Journal of Religious Gerontology16 (3–4): 29–41. 10.1300/J078v16n03_03
    https://doi.org/10.1300/J078v16n03_03 [Google Scholar]
  54. Vincent, Jocelyne and Michael Castelfranchi
    1981 “On the art of deception: how to lie while saying the truth”. In: H. Parret, M. Sbisà, J. Verschueren (Eds.), Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, July8–14 1979 749–777. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Amsterdam. 10.1075/slcs.7.39vin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.7.39vin [Google Scholar]
  55. Wenger, Etienne
    2001Communities of practice a brief introduction. Retrieved fromwww.ewenger.com/theory
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wetherell, Margaret
    2013 Affect and discourse – What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity6 (4): 349–368. 10.1057/sub.2013.13
    https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.13 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18043.ind
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error