1887
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines processes through which social personae are conveyed by male Japanese students at a public university in Yokohama. Focusing on the frame-setting function of first person pronominals (FPPs) in contexts where there is no intra/inter speaker variation in the choice of FPP, this paper analyzes how speakers manage identity-associated discursive alignments related to a shared Okinawa prefecture background. The common experience of being from Okinawa prefecture and attending university far from home is the primary reason that these speakers are close friends. However, analysis reveals speakers’ continual and active contention and re-formulation of this shared ‘Okinawan-ness’ and the personae to which it is linked. In particular, FPPs are implicated in speakers’ discussion of heterogeneity and/or local differences with respect to their Okinawa prefecture background. Strategic use of FPPs thus emerges as a salient tactic for speakers’ active negotiation of conversation relevant personae categories even in interactional contexts without variation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18061.kro
2022-03-21
2022-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agha, Asif
    2007Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnett, Jeffrey Jensen
    2000 “Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.” American Psychologist55(5): 469–480. 10.1037/0003‑066X.55.5.469
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall
    2004 “Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research.” Language in Society33(4): 469–515. 10.1017/S0047404504334020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404504334020 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2005 “Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse Studies7(4–5): 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook, Haruko Minegichi
    1999 “Language socialization in Japanese elementary schools: Attentive listening and reaction turns.” Journal of Pragmatics31: 1443–1465. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00110‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00110-6 [Google Scholar]
  6. Du Bois, John
    2007 “The stance triangle.” InStancetaking in discourse – Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, ed. byRobert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  7. Dunn, Cynthia Dickel
    1999 “Coming of age in Japan: Language ideology and acquisition of formal speech registers.” InLanguage and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 5th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 1, ed. byJef Verschueren, 89–97. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eckert, Penelope
    2000Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2008 “Variation and the indexical field.” Journal of Sociolinguistics12: 453–76. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Endo, Orie
    2001 “Onna no ko no ‘boku/ore’ wa okashikunai [Girls’ use of ‘boku/ore’ isn’t strange].” InOnna to kotoba [Women and language], ed. byOrie Endo, 30–39. Tokyo: Asahi Shohan.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Inoue, Miyako
    2006Vicarious Language: Gender and Linguistic Modernity in Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kiesling, Scott
    2009 “Style as Stance: Can Stance be the Primary Explanation for Patterns of Sociolinguistic Variation?.” InSociolinguistic perspectives of stance, ed. byAlexandra Jaffe, 171–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kroo, Judit and Yoshiko Matsumoto
    2018 “The case of Japanese otona ‘adult’: Mediatized gender as a marketing device.” Discourse and Communication12(4): 401–423. 10.1177/1750481318757776
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318757776 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lefebvre, Henri
    1991The production of space, trans.Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Matsumoto, Yoshiko
    1989 “Politeness and Conversational Universals – Observations from Japanese.” Multilingua8(2–3): 207–221. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.207
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.207 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2004 “Alternative femininity: Personae of middle-aged mothers.” InJapanese language, gender, and ideology: Cultural models and real people, ed. byShigeko Okamoto & Janet S. Shibamoto Smith, 240–255. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Maynard, Senko K.
    1997Japanese Communication: Language and Thought in Context. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. 10.1515/9780824863074
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824863074 [Google Scholar]
  18. Miyazaki, Ayumi
    2004 “Japanese Junior High School Girls’ and Boy’s First-Person Pronoun Use and their Social World.” InJapanese language, gender and ideology: Cultural models and real people, ed. byShigeko Okamoto and Janet S. Shibamoto Smith, 256–274. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mizumoto, Hiromi
    2001 “Terebi dorama ni okeru josei kotoba to jendaa firuta-: bunmatsushi (shuujoshi) shiyoo jittai choosai no chuukan hookoku yori [Women’s language in television dramas and the gender filter: From an interim report on actual use of sentence final particles].” Nihongo to jendaa [Japanese and gender] 5(3). www.gender.jp/journal/no5/1usami.html
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ochs, Elinor
    1993 “Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective.” Research on Language and Social Interaction26(3): 287 – 306. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3 [Google Scholar]
  21. Okamoto, Shigeko
    2013 “Variability in Societal Norms for Japanese Women’s Speech: Implications for Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua32(2): 203–223. 10.1515/multi‑2013‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2013-0010 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson
    2003 “Japanese (w)atashi/ore/boku ‘I’: They’re Not Just Pronouns.” Cognitive Linguistics14(4): 321–347. 10.1515/cogl.2003.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2003.013 [Google Scholar]
  23. Podesva, Robert
    2011a “Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals.” Journal of English Linguistics39(3): 233–264. 10.1177/0075424211405161
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424211405161 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2011b “The California vowel shift and gay identity.” American Speech86(1): 32 – 51. 10.1215/00031283‑1277501
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1277501 [Google Scholar]
  25. Preston, Dennis R.
    1999Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.hpd1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.hpd1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Saito, Junko
    2012 “Construction of Institutional Identities by Male Individuals in Subordinate Positions in the Japanese Workplace.” Pragmatics22(4): 697 – 719. 10.1075/prag.22.4.07sai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.4.07sai [Google Scholar]
  27. Silverstein, Michael
    2003 “Indexical order and the dialectics of social life.” Language and Communication23: 193 – 229. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  28. Soja, Edward W.
    1996Thirdspace. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SturtzSreetharan, Cindi
    2004 “Students, Sarariiman (pl.), and Seniors: Japanese Men’s Use of the ‘Manly’ Speech Register.” Language in Society33(1): 81–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2006 “Gentlemanly gender? Japanese Men’s Use of Clause-Final Politeness in Casual Conversations.” Journal of Sociolinguistics10(1): 70–92. 10.1111/j.1360‑6441.2006.00318.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00318.x [Google Scholar]
  31. 2009 “Ore and Omae: Japanese Men’s Uses of First and Second-Person Pronouns.” Pragmatics19(2): 253 – 278. 10.1075/prag.19.2.06stu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.2.06stu [Google Scholar]
  32. 2017 “Resignifying the Japanese father: Mediatization, commodification and dialect.” Language and Communication53: 45–58. 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Takekuro, Makiko
    2005 Attunement in Interaction: Sequential Use of Japanese Honorifics. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.
  34. Yamaguchi, Toshiko
    2015 “The Historical Development of Person Markers in Japanese: The Roles of Linguistic Signs.” Language Sciences47(1): 117 – 128. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.09.004 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18061.kro
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18061.kro
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): first person pronominals; Japanese; local identity; social personae; stance; youth culture
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error