1887
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Whether or not non-entailment relations generate scalar implicatures is a cutting-edge issue in linguistic pragmatics. The present study intends to argue that, based on the Cognitive Grammar paradigm, non-scalar implicatures generated by non-entailment relations are manifested as cognitive defaults which are conventionally incorporated into symbolic units in schema-instance complexes. Conventions provide a shortcut for the hearer to infer non-scalar implicatures in an unconscious, effortless and automatic way. We maintain that, contrary to neo-Gricean pragmatics, non-entailment relations cannot generate (scalar) Q-implicatures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18062.zha
2020-03-30
2020-09-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green
    2006Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.4324/9781315864327
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315864327 [Google Scholar]
  2. Hamawand, Zeki
    2016Semantics: A Cognitive Account of Linguistic Meaning. Sheffield: Equinox. 10.19130/iifl.adel.5.2.2017.1459
    https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.adel.5.2.2017.1459 [Google Scholar]
  3. Hirschberg, Julia
    1991A Theory of Scalar Implicature. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Horn, Laurence
    1984 “Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q- and R- based implicature”. InMeaning, Form, and Use in Context, ed. byD. Schiffrin, 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 10.1007/BF00631074
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00631074
  5. 2009 “WJ-40: Implicature, truth, and meaning”. International Review of Pragmatics1: 3–34. 10.1163/187731009X455820
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187731009X455820 [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang, Yan
    2014Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jaszczolt, Kasia
    2005Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261987.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261987.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Langacker, Ronald
    1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1991Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857733
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857733 [Google Scholar]
  10. 1996 “An introduction to cognitive grammar”. Cognitive Sciences10: 1–40. 10.1207/s15516709cog1001_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1001_1 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2001 “Discourse in cognitive grammar”. Cognitive Linguistics12 (2): 143–188. 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2008Cognitive grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Récanati, François
    2004Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615382
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615382 [Google Scholar]
  16. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2012 “Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable. Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context”. InCognitive Pragmatics, ed. byH. Schmid, 3–22. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214215.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215.3 [Google Scholar]
  17. Taylor, John
    2002Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, Shaojie and Yanfei Zhang
    2015 “Scalar implicature: A Saussurean system-based approach”. Language Sciences51: 43–53. 10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, Yanfei and Shaojie Zhang
    2017 “Explicature versus default meaning”. Journal of Pragmatics117: 264–272. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.011 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18062.zha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18062.zha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error