A cognitive-pragmatic study of non-scalar implicatures

References

1. Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green
   2006 Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.4324/9781315864327
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315864327 [Google Scholar]
2. Hamawand, Zeki
   2016 Semantics: A Cognitive Account of Linguistic Meaning. Sheffield: Equinox. 10.19130/iifl.adel.5.2.2017.1459
   https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.adel.5.2.2017.1459 [Google Scholar]
3. Hirschberg, Julia
   1991 A Theory of Scalar Implicature. New York: Garland.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Horn, Laurence
   1984 “Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q- and R- based implicature”. InMeaning, Form, and Use in Context, ed. byD. Schiffrin, 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 10.1007/BF00631074
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00631074 [Google Scholar]
5. Horn, Laurence
   2009 “WJ-40: Implicature, truth, and meaning”. International Review of Pragmatics1: 3–34. 10.1163/187731009X455820
   https://doi.org/10.1163/187731009X455820 [Google Scholar]
6. Huang, Yan
   2014 Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Jaszczolt, Kasia
   2005 Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261987.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261987.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
8. Langacker, Ronald
   1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Langacker, Ronald
   1991 Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857733
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857733 [Google Scholar]
10. Langacker, Ronald
    1996 “An introduction to cognitive grammar”. Cognitive Sciences10: 1–40. 10.1207/s15516709cog1001_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1001_1 [Google Scholar]
11. Langacker, Ronald
    2001 “Discourse in cognitive grammar”. Cognitive Linguistics12 (2): 143–188. 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
12. Langacker, Ronald
    2008 Cognitive grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
13. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
14. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
15. Récanati, François
    2004 Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615382
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615382 [Google Scholar]
16. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2012 “Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable. Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context”. InCognitive Pragmatics, ed. byH. Schmid, 3–22. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214215.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215.3 [Google Scholar]
17. Taylor, John
    2002 Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Zhang, Shaojie and Yanfei Zhang
    2015 “Scalar implicature: A Saussurean system-based approach”. Language Sciences51: 43–53. 10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.003 [Google Scholar]
19. Zhang, Yanfei and Shaojie Zhang
    2017 “Explicature versus default meaning”. Journal of Pragmatics117: 264–272. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.011 [Google Scholar]