Reduction in and out of context

References

1. Al-Sa’di, Rami and Jihad M. Hamdan
   (2005) Synchronous online chat in English: Computer-mediated communication. World Englishes24(4): 409–424. 10.1111/j.0883‑2919.2005.00423.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0883-2919.2005.00423.x [Google Scholar]
2. Androutsopolous, Jannis
   2000 Non-standard spellings in media texts: The case of German fanzines. Journal of Sociolinguistics4(4): 514–533. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00128
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00128 [Google Scholar]
3. Bieswanger, Mark
   2007 2 abbrevi8 or not 2 abbrevi8: A contrastive analysis of different shortening strategies in English and German text messages. Texas Linguistic Forum501. Available from: studentorgs.utexas.edu/salsa/proceedings/2006/Bieswanger.pdf. Retrieved5th March, 2014.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Crystal, David
   (2008) Txting: The gr8 db8. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Herring, Susan
   2012 Grammar and electronic communication. InEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. byCarol Chapelle, 2338–2346. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0466
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0466 [Google Scholar]
6. Hård af Segerstad, Ylva
   2002 Use and adaptation of written language to the conditions of computer-mediated communication. PhD thesis, Göteborgs Universitet.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kul, Malgorzata
   2007a Metaphonology in text messages. InThe Media and International Communication: Lodz Studies in Language151, ed. byBarbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Tomasz Pludowski and Dolores Valencia Tanno, 429–442. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kul, Malgorzata
   2007b Phonology in text messages. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics43(2): 43–57. 10.2478/v10010‑007‑0013‑4
   https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-007-0013-4 [Google Scholar]
9. Lee, Carmen
   2002 Literacy practices in computer-mediated communication in Hong Kong. The Reading Matrix2(2): 1–25.
   [Google Scholar]
10. López Rúa, Paula
    2005 Shortening devices in text messaging. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen106(2): 139–155.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Lotherington, Heather and Yejun Xu
    2004 How to chat in English and Chinese: Emerging digital language conventions. ReCALL16(2): 308–329. 10.1017/S0958344004000527
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344004000527 [Google Scholar]
12. Murray, Denise
    2000 Protean communication: The language of computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly34(3): 397–421. 10.2307/3587737
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587737 [Google Scholar]
13. Tagg, Caroline
    (2016) Heteroglossia in text-messaging: Performing identity and negotiating relationships in a digital space. Journal of Sociolinguistics20(1), 59–85. 10.1111/josl.12170
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12170 [Google Scholar]
14. Thurlow, Crispin
    2003 Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online 1, 11. Available fromextra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003-paper.html. Retrieved10th November, 2013.
15. Werry, Christopher
    1996 Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. InComputer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives, ed. bySusan Herring, 47–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.39.06wer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.06wer [Google Scholar]
16. White, Jonathan R.
    2014a Standardisation of Reduced Forms in English in an Academic Community of Practice. Pragmatics and Society5(1): 105–127. 10.1075/ps.5.1.05whi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.1.05whi [Google Scholar]
17. White, Jonathan R.
    2014b The Pragmatics of Reduced Forms in an Internet Community of Practice. InLodz Studies in Language 33: Cognitive and Pragmatics Aspects of Speech Actions, ed. byIwona Witczak-Plisiecka, 167–183. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑03213‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03213-0 [Google Scholar]
18. White, Jonathan R.
    2015 Processes and Variations in Language Economisation. Ampersand21: 72–82. 10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.001 [Google Scholar]
19. White, Jonathan R.
    2016 Local Norms in CALL Language Practice. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Technology6(1): 40–54. 10.4018/IJCALLT.2016010103
    https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2016010103 [Google Scholar]
20. White, Jonathan R.
    2017 Exploration of Textual Interactions in CALL Learning Communities: Emerging Research and Opportunities. Hershey, Penn.: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑5225‑2142‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2142-6 [Google Scholar]
21. White, Jonathan R.
    2018 Individual Variation in Reduction Processes in L2 English Academic Textchat. Ampersand51: 18–28. 10.1016/j.amper.2018.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2018.03.001 [Google Scholar]
22. Yus, Francisco
    2011 Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.213
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]