1887
Volume 12, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

For a few decades now and most prominently promoted by the US, neoliberal economics have been on the rise, epitomized in recent austerity policies with regard to countries that have met financial trouble. In particular the drive for privatization of core public services relating to basic human needs, such as water, social services or pensions, has been increasingly criticized because of a perceived incompatibility between the profit motive and social solidarity. This article uses a corpus-based analysis of the discourse on privatization in the US of proponents supporting, respectively opposing it, with an overall corpus size of about 230,000 tokens. It examines how the two groups conceptualize privatization differently and which strategies are applied to fore- or background particular aspects of it.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18078.sch
2021-10-29
2021-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Buchheit, Paul
    2012, August13. Five Ways Privatization Degrades America. Common Dreams. Retrieved fromhttps://www.commondreams.org
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2013, October21. Privatization Benefits the 1%; Public Services Benefit Everyone. Truthout. Retrieved fromwww.truth-out.org
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carroll, William K.
    2010The making of a transnational capitalist class: Corporate power in the 21st century. London: Zed Books. 10.5040/9781350223257
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350223257 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chomsky, Noam
    2017Requiem for the American Dream. The 10 Principles of Concentration of Wealth and Power. New York: Seven Stories Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fairclough, Norman
    1989/2015Language and Power. 3rd ed.New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1995/2010Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed.Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1968 “The Case for Case.” InUniversals in Linguistic Theory, ed. byEmmon Bach and Robert T. Harms, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilroy, Leonard and Adrian Moore
    2010Ten Principles of Privatization. Chicago: The Heartland Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Graham, Philip
    2000 “Hypercapitalism: A political economy of informational idealism.” New Media and Society2 (2): 131–156. 10.1177/14614440022225742
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440022225742 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2005Hypercapitalism: New Media, Language and Social Perceptions of Value. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gray, John
    2010, January7. “The Neoliberal State.” New Statesman. Retrieved fromwww.newstatesman.com
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hardt-Mautner, Gerlinde
    1995 “‘Only Connect’: Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics.” UCREL Technical Paper 6. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Harvey, David
    2005A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. In The Public Interest
    In The Public Interest 2013, December. “Out of Control: The Coast-to-Coast Failures of Outsourcing Public services to For-Profit Corporations.” InThe Public Interest. Retrieved fromwww.inthepublicinterest.org
    [Google Scholar]
  16. In The Public Interest
    In The Public Interest 2016, September. “How Privatization Increases Inequality.” InThe Public Interest. Retrieved fromwww.inthepublicinterest.org
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jessop, Bob
    2002 “Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State-Theoretical Perspective.” Antipode34 (3): 452–472. 10.1111/1467‑8330.00250
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00250 [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson, Dave
    2011, November17. “Privatization Nightmare: 5 Public Services That Should Never Be Handed Over to Greedy Corporations.” AlterNet. Retrieved fromwww.alternet.org
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones, Daniel S.
    2012Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kamasa, Victoris
    2017 “Corpus Linguistics for Critical Discourse Analysis. What can we do better?” InLanguage, Corpora and Cognition, ed.Pjotr Pęzik and Jacek T. Waliński, 221–240. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kessler, Tim
    2003 “From social contract to private contracts: The privatisation of health, education and basic infrastructure.” Social Watch Report 2003. Retrieved fromwww.socialwatch.org
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Klein, Naomi
    2008The Shock Doctrine. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Marko, Georg
    2008Penetrating Language – A Critical Discourse Analysis of Pornography. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2012 “My Painful Self. Health Identity Construction in Discussion Forums on Headaches and Migraines.” Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik (AAA)37 (2): 243–270.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2015 “Making informed healthy lifestyle choices. Analysing aspects of patient-centred and doctor-centred healthcare in self-help books on cardiovascular diseases.” InYearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015, ed. byJesús Romero-Trillo, 65–88. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17948‑3_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_4 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mautner, Gerlinde
    2009 “Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics can Contribute to CDA.” InMethods for Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 122–143. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. McDonald, Alyssa
    2010, September13. “The NS Interview: Noam Chomsky.” The New Statesman. Retrieved fromwww.newstatesman.com
    [Google Scholar]
  28. McEnery, Tony and Andrew Wilson
    1996Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mirowski, Philip and Dieter Plehwe
    eds. 2009The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of Neoliberal Reason. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674054264
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054264 [Google Scholar]
  30. Oxford Dictionaries
    Oxford Dictionaries. n.d. “Privatize.” Retrieved fromwww.oxforddictionaries.com
  31. Peck, Jamie
    2013Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. PFAW
    PFAW 2012Predatory Privatization: Exploiting Financial Hardship, Enriching the 1 Percent, Undermining Democracy. Washington, D.C.: People for the American Way.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Scott, Mike
    2016WordSmith Tools version 7. Stroud, UK: Lexical Analysis Software.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Springer, Simon
    2012 “Neoliberalism as discourse: between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism.” Critical Discourse Studies9 (2): 133–147. 10.1080/17405904.2012.656375
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.656375 [Google Scholar]
  35. Springer, Simon, Kean Birch and Julie MacLeavy
    eds. 2016The Handbook of Neoliberalism. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315730660
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730660 [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu, Jiajin
    . n.d. “Log-likelihood ratio Calculator.” Excel spreadsheet. [Online]https://www.academia.edu/6050773/Log_likelihood_calculation_Excel_spreadsheet (3April 2018).
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18078.sch
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18078.sch
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): CDA; corpus linguistics; neoliberalism; privatization; public services
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error