1887
Volume 13, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

As modern Internet technology advances, some online medicare donation services in China have become available as a new way for the public to respond with financial assistance. This paper aims at identifying, describing, and analyzing the linguistic features of Chinese online medical crowd-funding and investigates how the online help-seekers negotiate their trustworthiness discursively. For this purpose, 500 pieces of help-seekers’ personal statements were collected from crowd-funding website (https://www.qschou.com), described and analyzed in accordance of discourse analysis. Results show that the help-seekers adopted three macro-discursive strategies to construct their trustworthiness: Embodiment-oriented strategy, evidence-motivated strategy, and emotion-oriented strategy. Detailed linguistic and para-linguistic means to realize these strategies are examined in great detail. Further research in this area is needed in order to raise awareness of trustworthiness construction and its difficulties for help-seekers in online crowd-funding scenarios

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18080.zha
2022-11-04
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acute leukemia
  2. Admin
    Admin 2018 (August). 7 quick tips on how to sustain a successful cancer fundraising. Retrieved fromhttps://dentalsummit2016.com/7-quick-tips-on-how-to-sustain-a-successful-cancer-fundraising/
  3. Adriani, Fabrizio, and Silvia Sonderegger
    2015 “Trust, Trustworthiness and the Consensus Effect: An Evolutionary Approach.” European Economic Review77 (1): 102–116. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Archer, Richard
    1988 “Empathy and its Development.” Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease176(10): 642–643. 10.1097/00005053‑198810000‑00015
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198810000-00015 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
    1986 “Speech Genres and Other Late Essays.” South Central Review5 (1): 115–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bassani, Gaia, Nicoletta Marinelli, and Silvio Vismara
    2019 “Crowdfunding in Healthcare.” Journal of Technology Transfer44 (4): 1290–1310. 10.1007/s10961‑018‑9663‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9663-7 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bombelli, Giovanni
    2018 “Emotion and Rationality in Aristotle’s Model: From Anthropology to Politics.” InAristotle on Emotions in Law and Politics, ed. byLiesbeth Huppes-Cluysenaer, and Nuno M. M. S. Coelho, 53–89. Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑66703‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66703-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  8. Buttny, Richard
    1997 “Reported Speech in Talking Race on Campus.” Human Communication Research23(4): 477–506. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1997.tb00407.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00407.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Xinren
    2017 “Cutting-edge Interdisciplinary Research: Ethical Pragmatics.” Foreign Languages in China31: 9–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, Herbert. H., and Richard J. Gerrig
    1990 “Quotation as Demonstration.” Language661: 784–805. 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
  11. Closed chest injury
  12. Craniofacial injuries
  13. Davis, Mark H.
    1996Social Psychology Series. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Doney, Patricia M., and Joseph P. Cannon
    1997 “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-seller Relationships.” Journal of Marketing61 (2): 35–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eisenberg, Nancy, Richard A. Fabes, and Tracy L. Spinrad
    2006 “Prosocial Development.” InHandbook of Child Psychology, ed. byW. Damon and N. Eisenberg, 646–718. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Elm, Malin Sveningsson
    2009 “How Do Various Notions of Privacy Influence Decisions in Qualitative Interest Research?” InInternet Inquiry: Conversations about Method, ed. byA. N. Markham and N. K. Baym, 49–76. Los Angeles: Sage. 10.4135/9781483329086.n7
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329086.n7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Eryilmaz, Evren, Terry Ryan, Jakko Van der Pol, Sumonta Kasemvilas, and Justin Mary
    2013 “Fostering Quality and Flow of Online Learning Conversations by Artifact-Centered Discourse Systems.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems14 (1): 22–48. 10.17705/1jais.00321
    https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00321 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fei, Xiaotong
    1992From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society. California: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520912489
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912489 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fukuyama, Francis
    1995Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fuoli, Matteo, and Carita Paradis
    2014 “A Model of Trust-repair Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics741: 52–69. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Garfinkel, Harold
    1963 “A Conception of, and Experiments with ‘Trust’ as a Condition of Concerted Stable Actions.” InMotivation and Social Interaction, ed. byO. Harvey, 143–186. New York: Rowald Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gray, Colin S.
    2013 “Perspectives on Strategy.” Oxford University Press22 (3): 356–357. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674275.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674275.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Herring, Susan
    2001 “Online Communication: Through the Lens of Discourse.” Internet Research Annual2 (1): 112–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2004 “Computer-mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Communities.” InDesigning for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ed. byS. A. Barab, R. Kling, and J. H. Gray, 338–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 [Google Scholar]
  25. Holt, Elizabeth
    1996 “Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction29 (3): 219–245. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Igarashi, Tasuku, Yoshihisa Kashima, Emiko S. Kashima, Tomas Farsides, Uichol Kim, Fritz Strack, Lioba Werth, Masaki Yuki
    2010 “Culture, Trust, and Social Networks.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology11 (1): 88–101. 10.1111/j.1467‑839X.2007.00246.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00246.x [Google Scholar]
  27. i-Research
    i-Research 2018 “2018 China’s Health Security Industry Report.” https://www.qschou.com/news/content?media-id=133&media-page=1
  28. Kai, Lamertz, and Devasheesh P. Bhave
    2017 “Employee Perceptions of Organizational Legitimacy as Impersonal Bases of Organizational Trustworthiness and Trust.” Journal of Trust Research7 (2): 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee, Allen S.
    1994 “Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation.” MIS Quarterly18 (2): 143–157. 10.2307/249762
    https://doi.org/10.2307/249762 [Google Scholar]
  30. Leukemia M5
  31. Lipovsky, Caroline
    2016 “Negotiating Solidarity with Potential Donors: A Study of the Images in Fundraising Letters by Not-for-profit Organizations.” Functional Linguistics, 3(1): 1–18. 10.1186/s40554‑016‑0024‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-016-0024-2 [Google Scholar]
  32. Liver cancer
  33. Majumdar, Adrija, and Indranil Bose
    2018 “My Words for Your Pizza: An Analysis of Persuasive Narratives on Online Crowdfunding.” Information & Management55(6): 781–794. 10.1016/j.im.2018.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  34. Markham, Annette, and Elizabeth Buchanan
    2012 “Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AOIR Ethics Committee (Version 2.0).” Retrieved fromwww.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
  35. Maybin, Janet
    1996 “Story Voices: The Use of Reported Speech in 10-12-year-olds’ Spontaneous Narratives.” Current Issues in Language and Society3 (1): 36–48. 10.1080/13520529609615451
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13520529609615451 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mayer, Roger C., James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman
    1995 “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” Academy of Management Review20 (3): 709–734. 10.2307/258792
    https://doi.org/10.2307/258792 [Google Scholar]
  37. Metzger, Miriam J., and Andrew J. Flanagin
    2013 “Credibility and Trust of Information in Online Environments: The Use of Cognitive Heuristics.” Journal of Pragmatics59 (Part B): 210–220. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mitchell-Kiernan, Claudia
    1972 “Signifying and Marking: Two Afro-American Speech Acts.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed byJohn Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 163–179. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Moulton, Liz
    2007The Naked Consultation: A Practical Guide to Primary Care Consultation Skills. Abingdon, UK: Radcliffe.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Myers, Greg
    1999 “Functions of Reported Speech in Group Discussions.” Applied Linguistics20 (3): 376–401. 10.1093/applin/20.3.376
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.376 [Google Scholar]
  41. Nagy, Peter, and Gina Neff
    2015 “Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory.” Social Media Society1(2): 122–134. 10.1177/2056305115603385
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nie, Jingbao, Yu Cheng, Xiang Zou, Ni Gong, Joseph D. Tucker, Bonnie Wong, and Arthur Kleinman
    2018 “The Vicious Circle of Patient-physician Mistrust in China: Health Professionals’ Perspectives, Institutional Conflict of Interest, and Building Trust Through Medical Professionalism.” Developing World Bioethics18 (1): 26–36. 10.1111/dewb.12170
    https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12170 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pell, John W.
    2010 “(An) Other Way: Pragmatic Empathy as Response to Discursive Conflict.” PhD diss., https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/Pell_uncg_0154D_10460.pdf
  44. Ramsey, Lydia
    2017 “Almost Half of All Money Raised through Crowdfunding is Going Toward Medical Expenses.” https://www.businessinsider.com/crowdfunding-for-medical-expenses-2017-6
  45. Rectal cancer
  46. Santibáñez, Cristián
    2012 “The Principle of Relevance in the Light of Cooperation and Trust.” Pragmatics & Cognition20 (3): 483–504. 10.1075/pc.20.3.03san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.20.3.03san [Google Scholar]
  47. Schoorman, F. David, Roger C. Mayer and James H. Davis
    2007 “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future.” Academy of Management Review20 (3): 709–734. 10.5465/amr.2007.24348410
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24348410 [Google Scholar]
  48. Shenton, Andrew K.
    2004 “Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects.” Education for Information22(2): 63–75. 10.3233/EFI‑2004‑22201
    https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201 [Google Scholar]
  49. Shuman, Amy
    1993 “Get out My Face: Entitlement and Authoritative Discourse.” InResponsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse, ed. byJ. Hill and J. Irvine, 324–351. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2011 “Conceptualizing ‘the Relational’ in Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics43 (14): 3565–3578. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stevens, Jennifer L., Brain I. Spaid, Michael Breazeale, and Carol L. Esmark-Jones
    2018 “Timeliness, Transparency, and Trust: A Framework for Managing Online Customer Complaints.” Business Horizons61 (3): 375–384. 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tannen, Deborah
    1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. TLBL
  54. Vaast, Emmanuelle, and Geoff Walsham
    2013 “Grounded Theorizing for Electronically Mediated Social Contexts.” European Journal of Information Systems22 (1): 9–25. 10.1057/ejis.2011.26
    https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.26 [Google Scholar]
  55. Vaast, Emmanuelle, Elizabeth J. Davidson, and Thomas Mattson
    2013 “Talking About Technology: The Emergence of a New Actor Category Through New Media.” MIS Quarterly37 (4): 1069–1092. 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.04
    https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.04 [Google Scholar]
  56. Vaish, Amrisha, Malinda Carpenter and Michael Tomasello
    2009 “Sympathy Through Affective Perspective Taking and its Relation to Prosocial Behavior in Toddlers.” Developmental Psychology45 (2): 534–543. 10.1037/a0014322
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014322 [Google Scholar]
  57. Vreekea, G.
    2003 “Empathy: An Integrative Model.” New Ideas in Psychology211: 34–45. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2003.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2003.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wood, Donna J.
    1972 “Ingroups and Outgroups.” American Sociologist7 (8): 5–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Xin, Bin, and Jia Shi
    2018 “A Comparative Analysis of Reported Speech of People’s Daily and New York Times on the South China Sea Arbitration.” Foreign Language Education39 (5): 17–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Yamagishi, Toshio, and Midori Yamagishi
    1994 “Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan.” Motivation and Emotion181: 129–166. 10.1007/BF02249397
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249397 [Google Scholar]
  61. Yao, Jingjing, Zhixue Zhang, and Jeanne Brett
    2017 “Understanding the Trust Deficit in China: Mapping Positive Experience and Trust in Strangers.” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes1431: 85–97. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  62. Yao, Xiaodong and Yaxun Qin
    2018 “Expectations for Cooperation and Trust in Communication.” Modern Foreign Languages41 (3): 344–353.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhou, Tao, Yaobin Lu, and Bin Wang
    2015 “Examining Online Consumers’ Initial Trust Building from an Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective.” Winter Simulation Conference31: 1678–1692.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18080.zha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.18080.zha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error