Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The semantics of slur terms has provoked some debate within the philosophy of language, and different analysis models have been proposed to account for the complex meaning of these terms. The present paper acknowledges the complexity of the matter and presents an analysis model that is inspired by multiple-component approaches to slurs, such as those by Camp (2018) and Jeshion (2018). The Multi-Component Model for the semantic analysis of slurs (MCM) tracks down altogether four meaning components in group-based slur terms: a referential and a pejorative meaning component (), as well as a scalar component capturing the term’s individual degree of offensiveness, and an expressive component indexing heightened emotions in all contexts of use. The notion of individual offensiveness degrees (that are fed by a multitude of semantic, pragmatic, and/or extralinguistic sources) allows us to account for the differences between slurs for the same ethnic group (such as for Blacks); and the separation of the expressive component from the pejorative component can (1) explain the high frequency of non-pejorative uses, and (2) correctly describe these uses as expressive.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anderson, Luvell, and Ernie Lepore
    2013 “What did You Call Me? Slurs as Prohibited Words.” Analytic Philosophy54 (3): 350–363. 10.1111/phib.12023
    https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12023 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach, Kent
    1999 “The Myth of Conventional Implicature.” Linguistics and Philosophy22 (4): 327–366. 10.1023/A:1005466020243
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005466020243 [Google Scholar]
  3. Camp, Elisabeth
    2013 “Slurring Perspectives.” Analytic Philosophy54 (3): 330–349. 10.1111/phib.12022
    https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12022 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2018 “A Dual Act Analysis of Slurs.” Bad Words: Philosophical Perspectives on Slurs, ed. byDavid Sosa, 29–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cepollaro, Bianca
    2015 “In Defence of a Presuppositional Account of Slurs.” Language Sciences52: 36–45. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  6. Croom, Adam M.
    2013 “How to Do Things with Slurs: Studies in the Way of Derogatory Words.” Language & Communication33: 177–204. 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2015a “Slurs, Stereotypes, and In-equality: A Critical Review of ‘How Epithets and Stereotypes are Racially Unequal’.” Language Sciences52: 139–154. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2015b “The Semantics of Slurs: A Refutation of Coreferentialism.” Ampersand2: 30–38. 10.1016/j.amper.2015.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2018 “Asian Slurs and Stereotypes in the USA: A Context-sensitive Account of Derogation and Appropriation.” Pragmatics and Society9: 495–517. 10.1075/ps.14027.cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.14027.cro [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cupkovic, Gordana
    2015 “Diachronic Variations of Slurs and Levels of Derogation: On Some Regional, Ethnic and Racial Slurs in Croatian.” Language Sciences52: 215–230. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dudenredaktion
    Dudenredaktion 1994Duden, das große Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache [Duden, The big Dictionary of the German language]. Mannheim: Duden Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dudenredaktion
    Dudenredaktion 2004Die deutsche Rechtschreibung. Auf der Grundlage der neuen amtlichen Rechtschreibregeln [German orthography. Based on the new official spelling standards]. Mannheim: Duden Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Embrick, David G., and Kasey Henricks
    2013 “Discursive Colorlines at Work. How Epithets and Stereotypes are Racially Unequal.” Symbolic Interaction36 (2): 197–215. 10.1002/symb.51
    https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.51 [Google Scholar]
  15. Frege, Gottlob
    1892 “Über Sinn und Bedeutung” [On sense and reference]. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik100: 25–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gazdar, Gerald
    1979Pragmatics. Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Grice, Paul H.
    1989 “Logic and Conversation.” Studies in the way of words, ed. byPaul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gutzmann, Daniel
    2013 “Expressives and Beyond: An Introduction to Varieties of Use-conditional Meaning.” Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-conditional Meaning, ed. byDaniel Gutzmann, 1–58. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004183988_002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004183988_002 [Google Scholar]
  19. . To appear. “Semantics vs. Pragmatics.” The Companion to Semantics ed. by Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann and Thomas Ede Zimmermann. Oxford: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hedger, Joseph
    2012 “The Semantics of Racial Slurs: Using Kaplan’s Framework to Provide a Theory of the Meaning of Derogatory Epithets.” Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations11: 74–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hom, Christopher
    2008 “The Semantics of Racial Epithets.” Journal of Philosophy105 (8): 416–440. 10.5840/jphil2008105834
    https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2008105834 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2010 “Pejoratives.” Philosophy Compass5 (2): 164–185. 10.1111/j.1747‑9991.2009.00274.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00274.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Hom, Christopher, and Robert May
    2013 “Moral and Semantic Innocence.” Analytic Philosophy54 (3): 293–313. 10.1111/phib.12020
    https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12020 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hornsby, Jennifer
    2001 “Meaning and Uselessness: How to Think about Derogatory Words.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy25 (1): 128–141. 10.1111/1475‑4975.00042
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4975.00042 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hughes, Geoffrey
    2010Political Correctness: A History of Semantics and Culture. Maldon, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jay, Timothy
    2000Why we Curse. A Neuro-psycho-social Theory of Speech. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2009 “The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words.” Perspectives on Psychological Science4 (2): 153–161. 10.1111/j.1745‑6924.2009.01115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01115.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Jay, Kristin L., and Timothy Jay
    2015 “Taboo Word Fluency and Knowledge of Slurs and General Pejoratives: Deconstructing the Poverty-of-vocabulary Myth.” Language Sciences: 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jeshion, Robin
    2013a “Expressivism and the Offensiveness of Slurs.” Philosophical Perspectives27: 231–259. 10.1111/phpe.12027
    https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12027 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2013b “Slurs and Stereotypes.” Analytic Philosophy54 (3): 314–329. 10.1111/phib.12021
    https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12021 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2018 “Slurs, Dehumanization, and the Expression of Contempt.” Bad Words: Philosophical Perspectives on Slurs, ed. byDavid Sosa, 77–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kaplan, David
    2004 “The Meaning of Ouch and Oops. Explorations in the Theory of Meaning as Use.” Unpublished manuscript: University of California, Berkeley.
  33. Meibauer, Jörg
    2013 “Expressive Compounds in German.” Word Structure6 (1): 21–42. 10.3366/word.2013.0034
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2013.0034 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mountz, Allison
    2009 “The Other.” Key Concepts in Political Geography, ed. byCarolyn Gallaher, 328–338. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446279496.n35
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279496.n35 [Google Scholar]
  35. Neufeld, Eleonore
    2019 “An Essentialist Theory of the Meaning of Slurs.” Philosophers’ Imprint19 (35): 1–29
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Nunberg, Geoffrey
    2012Ascent of the A-word: Assholism, the First 60 years. New York: PublicAffairs.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2013 “Slurs aren’t Special.” Unpublished manuscript: University of California, Berkeley.
  38. Potts, Christopher
    2005The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2007a “The Expressive Dimension.” Theoretical Linguistics33 (2): 165–197. 10.1515/TL.2007.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2007b “The Centrality of Expressive Indices. Reply to the Commentaries.” Theoretical Linguistics33 (2): 255–268. 10.1515/TL.2007.019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.019 [Google Scholar]
  41. Recanati, Francois
    2008 “Pragmatics and Semantics.” The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byLaurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 442–463. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Richard, Mark
    2008When Truth Gives Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239955.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239955.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Saka, Paul
    2007 “Hate Speech.” How to Think about Meaning, ed. byPaul Saka, 121–153. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑5857‑8_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5857-8_5 [Google Scholar]
  44. Schlenker, Philippe
    2007 “Expressive Presuppositions.” Theoretical Linguistics33 (2): 237–245. 10.1515/TL.2007.017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.017 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sileo, Roberto B.
    2018 “The Semantics and Pragmatics of Racial and Ethnic Slurs: Towards a Psychologically Real Contextualist Account.” Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics11: 86–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith, Eliot R., and Diane M. Mackie
    2010 “Intergroup Emotions.” Handbook of Emotions (3rd edition), ed. byMichael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones, and Lisa Feldman Barrett, 428–439. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Spotorno, Nicola, and Claudia Bianchi
    2015 “A Plea for an Experimental Approach on Slurs.” Language Sciences52: 241–250. 10.1016/j.langsci.2015.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  48. Technau, Björn
    2016 “The Meaning and Use of Slurs: An Account Based on Empirical Data.” Pejoration, ed. byRita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer, and Heike Wiese, 187–218. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2018aBeleidigungswörter. Die Semantik und Pragmatik pejorativer Personenbezeichnungen [Slurs. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Offensive Words]. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110563870
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110563870 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2018b “Going beyond Hate Speech: The Pragmatics of Ethnic Slur Terms.” Łódź Papers in Pragmatics14 (1): 25–43. 10.1515/lpp‑2018‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2018-0002 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2019 “Die expressive Bedeutung von Beleidigungswörtern. Tabubrüche, Sprechereinstellungen, Emotionen [The Expressive Meaning of Slurs. Breach of Taboo, Speaker Attitudes, Emotions].” Expressivität im Deutschen, ed. byFranz d’Avis, and Rita Finkbeiner, 75–107. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Vallée, Richard
    2014 “Slurring and Common Knowledge of Ordinary Language.” Journal of Pragmatics61: 78–90. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.013 [Google Scholar]
  53. Whiting, Daniel
    2013 “It’s Not What You Said, It’s the Way You Said It: Slurs and Conventional Implicatures.” Analytic Philosophy54 (3): 364–377. 10.1111/phib.12024
    https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12024 [Google Scholar]
  54. Williamson, Timothy
    2009 “Reference, Inference, and the Semantics of Pejoratives.” The philosophy of David Kaplan, ed. byJoseph Almog, and Paolo Leonardi, 137–158. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367881.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367881.003.0009 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error