1887
Volume 13, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Employing Wodak’s discourse-historical approach, this paper examines how Ghana’s independence leader – Kwame Nkrumah – in his creation of the Unite or Perish myth constructed ‘the African people’ in a manner in sync with populist performance. It argues that Nkrumah’s discourse, in its focus on the formation of a Union Government of Africa as the only means of Africa’s peace, progress, security and survival in the post-independence era, can be characterized as a form of populist rhetoric that presupposes an antagonistic relationship between two homogeneous social groups. To this end, the paper analyzes three discursive strategies utilized by Nkrumah in promoting anti-establishment sentiments while celebrating or valorizing ‘the ordinary people’: nomination and predication of social actors and actions, the construction of a man of the people image and the exploitation of familiarity and historical memory. It concludes with a discussion on the implications of the study for political discourse analysis in terms of the interrelationship between political myth and populist performance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.19023.nar
2022-11-04
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aslanidis, Paris
    2016 “Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective”. Political Studies64(15): 88–104. 10.1111/1467‑9248.12224
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barthes, Roland
    1993Mythologies. London: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bishop, Hywel and Adam Jaworski
    2003 “‘We beat ‘em’: Nationalism and the hegemony of homogeneity in the British press reportage of Germany versus England during Euro 2000”. Discourse & Society14(3): 243–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Botwe-Asamoah, Kwame
    2005Kwame Nkrumah’s politico-cultural thought and policies. An African centered paradigm for the second phase of the African revolution. New York & London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Canovan, Margaret
    2005The people, key concepts. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2005Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230501706
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2014Analyzing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑36833‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1 [Google Scholar]
  8. De Cleen, Benjamin and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2017 “Distinctions and articulations: a discourse theoretical framework for the study of populism and nationalism”. Javnost Public, 1–19. 10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083 [Google Scholar]
  9. Demata, Massimiliano
    2017 “‘A great and beautiful wall’. Donald Trump’s populist discourse on immigration”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict5(2): 274–294. 10.1075/jlac.5.2.06dem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.2.06dem [Google Scholar]
  10. Flood, Christopher
    1996Political myth: a theoretical introduction. New York and London: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2002Political myth. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gastil, John
    1992 “Undemocratic discourse: a review of theory and research on political discourse”. Discourse & Society3(4): 469–500. 10.1177/0957926592003004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003004003 [Google Scholar]
  13. Geis, Michael
    1987The language of politics. New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑4714‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4714-2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hawkins, Kirk
    2009 “Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective”. Comparative Political Studies42(8): 1040–1067. 10.1177/0010414009331721
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721 [Google Scholar]
  15. Heywood, Andrew
    2000Political ideologies. An introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hofstadter, Richard
    1966The paranoid style in American politics and other essays. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kelsey, Darren
    2013 “The myth of the ‘Blitz spirit’ in British newspaper responses to the July 7th bombings”. Social Semiotics23(1): 83–99. 10.1080/10350330.2012.707034
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2012.707034 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2016 “Hero mythology and right-wing populism”. Journalism Studies17(8): 971–988. 10.1080/1461670X.2015.1023571
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1023571 [Google Scholar]
  19. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005On populist reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mény, Yves and Yves Surel
    (eds.) 2002Democracies and the populist challenge. New York: Palgrave. 10.1057/9781403920072
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403920072 [Google Scholar]
  21. Moffitt, Benjamin
    2016The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2020Populism. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Moffitt, Benjamin and Simon Tormey
    2014 “Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatization and political style”. Political Studies621: 381–397. 10.1111/1467‑9248.12032
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032 [Google Scholar]
  24. Nartey, Mark
    2019 “‘We must Unite now or Perish!’ Kwame Nkrumah’s creation of a mythic discourse?” Journal of Language and Politics18(2): 252–271. 10.1075/jlp.17051.nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17051.nar [Google Scholar]
  25. 2020a “Metaphor and Kwame Nkrumah’s construction of the Unite or Perish myth: A discourse-mythological analysis”. Social Semiotics30(5): 646–664. 10.1080/10350330.2019.1568220
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1568220 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2020b Voice, agency and identity: A positive discourse analysis of ‘resistance’ in the rhetoric of Kwame Nkrumah. Language & Intercultural Communication20(2): 193–205. 10.1080/14708477.2020.1722686
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1722686 [Google Scholar]
  27. Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak
    2016 The discourse-historical approach (DHA). InR. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (pp.23–26). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Stanley, Ben
    2008 “The thin ideology of populism”. Journal of Political Ideologies13(1): 95–110. 10.1080/13569310701822289
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289 [Google Scholar]
  29. Taggart, Paul
    2000Populism. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008Discourse and practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 The discourse-historical approach. InR. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (pp.63–94). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2011The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. 2nd ed.Basingstoke: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2015The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
  34. Wodak, Ruth and Salomi Boukala
    2015 “European identities and the revival of nationalism in the European Union: A discourse historical approach”. Journal of Language and Politics14(1): 87–109. 10.1075/jlp.14.1.05wod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.05wod [Google Scholar]
  35. Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cilia, Martin Reisigl and Karin Liebhart
    2009The discursive construction of national identity (2nd ed.) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ylä-Anttila, Tuukka
    2017 “Familiarity as a tool of populism: Political appropriation of shared experiences and the case of Suvivirsi”. Acta Sociologica60(4): 342–357. 10.1177/0001699316679490
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699316679490 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.19023.nar
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error