One issue, two genres

References

1. Ahangari, Saeideh and Mozhgan Kazemi
   2014 “A content analysis of ‘Alice in Wonderland’ regarding metadiscourse elements.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English literature31: 10–18. 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.3p.10
   https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.3p.10 [Google Scholar]
2. Alshahrani, Ali Ayed S.
   2015 “A cross-linguistic analysis of interactive metadiscourse devices employment in native English and Arab ESL academic writings.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies5, 8 (August): 1535–1542. 10.17507/tpls.0508.01
   https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0508.01 [Google Scholar]
3. Amiryousefi, Mohammad, and Abbas Eslami Rasekh
   2010 “Metadiscourse: Definitions, issues and its implications for English teachers.” English Language Teaching3, 4 (December): 159–167. 10.5539/elt.v3n4p159
   https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p159 [Google Scholar]
4. Anthony, Laurence
   2012 AntConc (Version 3.3.2) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. AccessedNovember 30, 2017. www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/
5. Audit Bureau of Circulation (ABC)
   Audit Bureau of Circulation (ABC). n.d. “Who We Are.” AccessedApril 8, 2017https://www.abc.org.uk/aboutus/who-we-are
6. Boshrabadi, Abbas Mehrabi, Biria Reza and Zahra Zavari
   2014 “A Cross Cultural Analysis of Textual and Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers: The Case of Economic Articles in English and Persian Newspapers.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies5, 2 (April): 59–66. 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.2p.59
   https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.2p.59 [Google Scholar]
7. Bunton, David
   1999 “The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses.” English for Specific Purposes18, 1 (December): 41–56. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00022‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2 [Google Scholar]
8. Clark, H. Herbert, and Richard J. Gerrig
   1990 “Quotations as demonstrations.” Language66, 4 (December): 764–805. 10.2307/414729
   https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
9. Crismore, Avon
   1989 Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Crismore, Avon, and Rodney Farnswarth
    1990 “Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse.” InThe writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse, ed. byWalter Nash, 118–136. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Crismore, Avon, Raija Markkanen, and Margaret S. Steffensen
    1993 “Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students.” Written Communication10,1 (January): 39–71. 10.1177/0741088393010001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002 [Google Scholar]
12. Dafouz Milne, Emma
    2003 “Metadiscourse revisited: a contrastive study of persuasive writing in professional discourse. Regreso al metadiscurso: estudio contrastivo de la persuasión en el discurso professional.” Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense111 (January): 29–52.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dafouz Milne, Emma
    2008 “The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics40,1 (January): 95–113. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003 [Google Scholar]
14. Farnia, Maryam and Nahid Mohammadi
    2018 “Cross-cultural analysis of interpersonal metadiscourse markers in persuasive local newspaper articles.” Discourse and Interaction11,2: 27–44. 10.5817/DI2018‑2‑27
    https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2018-2-27 [Google Scholar]
15. Feng, Miao, Paul R. Brewer, and Barbara L. Ley
    2012 “Framing the Chinese baby formula scandal: A comparative analysis of US and Chinese news coverage.” Asian Journal of Communication22, 3 (April): 253–269. 10.1080/01292986.2012.662517
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2012.662517 [Google Scholar]
16. Fu, Xiaoli, and Ken Hyland
    2014 “Interaction in two journalistic genres: A study of interactional metadiscourse.” English Text Construction7, 1 (January): 122–144. 10.1075/etc.7.1.05fu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.7.1.05fu [Google Scholar]
17. Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro A., Marisol Velasco-Sacristán, Ascensión Arribas-Baño, and Eva Samaniego-Fernández
    2001 “Persuasion and advertising English: Metadiscourse in slogans and headlines.” Journal of Pragmatics33,8 (August): 1291–1307. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)80026‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80026-6 [Google Scholar]
18. Ho, Victor
    2016 “Discourse of persuasion: A preliminary study of the use of metadiscourse in policy documents.” Text and Talk36, 1 (April): 1–21. 10.1515/text‑2016‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0001 [Google Scholar]
19. Hu, Guangwei, and Feng Cao
    2011 “Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English-and Chinese-medium journals.” Journal of Pragmatics43, 11 (September): 2795–2809. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007 [Google Scholar]
20. Hyland, Ken
    2000 Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hyland, Ken
    2004 “Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing13, 2 (June): 133–151. 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001 [Google Scholar]
22. Hyland, Ken
    2005a Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hyland, Ken
    2005b “Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.” Discourse Studies7, 2 (May): 173–192. 10.1177/1461445605050365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
24. Hyland, Ken
    2007 “Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse.” Applied Linguistics28, 2 (June): 266–285. 10.1093/applin/amm011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm011 [Google Scholar]
25. Jensen, Astrid
    2009 “Discourse strategies in professional e-mail negotiation: A case study.” English for Specific Purposes28, 1 (January): 4–18. 10.1016/j.esp.2008.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.10.002 [Google Scholar]
26. Khedri, Mohsen, Chan Swee Heng, and Seyed Foad Ebrahimi
    2013 “An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines”. Discourse Studies15, 3 (April): 319–331. 10.1177/1461445613480588
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613480588 [Google Scholar]
27. Malenkina, Nadezhda, and Stanislav Ivanov
    2018 “A linguistic analysis of the official tourism websites of the seventeen Spanish autonomous communities.” Journal of Destination Marketing and Management91: 204–233. 10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.01.007 [Google Scholar]
28. Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White
    2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
29. Mu, Congjun
    2010 “A Contrastive analysis of metadiscourse in Chinese and English editorials.” Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice41: 35–43.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mur-Dueñas, Pilar
    2010 Attitude markers in business management research articles: A crosscultural corpus-driven approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics20, 1 (February): 50–72. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2009.00228.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00228.x [Google Scholar]
31. Sedaghat, Azam, Reza Biria, and Yaghoub Asadi Amirabadi
    2015 “Cross cultural analysis of hedges in Persian and English editorial columns.” International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World8, 1 (January): 37–50.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Suau-Jiménez, Francisca and Rosana Dolón-Herrero
    2007 “The importance of metadiscourse in the genre ‘promotion of touristic services and/or products’: differences in English and Spanish.” InLanguage for Specific Purposes: Searching for Common Solutions, ed. byDita Gálová, 143–186. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sukma, Bayu Permana
    2017 “Interpersonal metadiscourse markers as persuasive strategies in Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign speeches.” Aksara29, 2 (December): 283–292. 10.29255/aksara.v29i2.82.283‑292
    https://doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v29i2.82.283-292 [Google Scholar]
34. Sukma, Bayu Permana, and Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna
    2014 “Interpersonal metadiscourse markers in opinion articles.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature3, 2 (March): 16–21. 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.16. [06/04/17]
    https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.16 [Google Scholar]
35. Vande Kopple, William J.
    1985 “Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse.” College Composition and Communication36, 1 (February): 82–93. 10.2307/357609
    https://doi.org/10.2307/357609 [Google Scholar]
36. Vázquez-Orta, Ignacio, and Diana Giner
    2009 “Writing with conviction: The use of boosters in modelling persuasión in academic discourses.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses221 (November): 219–237. 10.14198/raei.2009.22.14
    https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2009.22.14 [Google Scholar]
37. Vergaro, Carla
    2004 “Discourse strategies of Italian and English sales promotion letters.” English for Specific Purposes231, 21: 181–207. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(03)00003‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00003-6 [Google Scholar]
38. Yagiz, Oktay, and Cuneyt Cuneyt
    2015 A comparative study of boosting in academic texts: A contrastive rhetoric. International Journal of English Linguistics5, 4 (July): 12–28. 10.5539/ijel.v5n4p12
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v5n4p12 [Google Scholar]
39. Yazdani, Sara, Shahla Sharifi, and Mahmoud Elyassi
    2014a “Interactional metadiscourse in English and Persian news articles about 9/11.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies4, 2 (February): 428–434. 10.4304/tpls.4.2.428‑434
    https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.2.428-434 [Google Scholar]
40. Yazdani, Sara, Shahla Sharifi, and Mahmoud Elyassi
    2014b “Exploring hedges and boosters in 9/11 English front page news articles.” Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities4, 3 (March): 301–313.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Yazdani, Akram, and Hadi Salehi
    2017 “Comparing metadiscourse markers employed in English and Persian online headlines.” International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning6,4 (September): 91–97. 10.5861/ijrsll.2016.1554
    https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2016.1554 [Google Scholar]
42. Yeganeh, Maryam Tafaroji, Issa Mellati Heravi, and Abdolrasoul Sawari
    2015 “Hedge and booster in newspaper articles on Iran’s presidential election: A comparative study of English and Persian articles.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences1921 (June): 679–683. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.103
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.103 [Google Scholar]