1887
Volume 14, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study takes as its analytic topic the identification of different sequentially organized phenomena endemic to initiation of reason-for-the call action in Farsi mobile calls. Using Conversation Analysis, through fine-grained analysis of participants’ observable orientation to the formulation of the reason for the call, it documents the trajectory of talk and the sequential phenomena associated with the statement of the reason for Farsi mobile phone calls. The findings suggest callers routinely perform the task of warranting their calls either by overtly announcing the reason, using the discourse marker of ‘ () and its permutations or non-overtly, by positioning the reason for initiating the contact in anchor position, enabling their co-participants to pinpoint the warrant prompting the call out of various things said by callers and to relevantly respond to it. In addition, location enquiries figure in the reason-for-the-call, if seeking geographic information has localization purposes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.19030.kaz
2023-03-21
2024-05-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arminen, Ilkka
    2006 “Social functions of location in mobile telephony.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing10(5): 319–323. 10.1007/s00779‑005‑0052‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0052-5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arminen, Ilkka, and Minna Leinonen
    2006 “Mobile phone call openings: tailoring answers to personalized summonses.” Discourse studies8(3): 339–368. 10.1177/1461445606061791
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061791 [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage
    (eds.) 1984Structure of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolden, Galina B.
    2008 “So What’s Up?: Using the Discourse Marker So to Launch Conversational Business.” Research on Language and Social Interaction41(3): 302–337. 10.1080/08351810802237909
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802237909 [Google Scholar]
  5. Button, Graham, and Neil Casey
    1988/89 “Topic initiation: Business-at-hand.” Research on Language and Social Interaction22(1–4): 61–92. 10.1080/08351818809389298
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818809389298 [Google Scholar]
  6. Comrie, Bernard, Martin Haspelmath, and Balthasar Bickel
    2015The Leipzig Rules: Conventions for Interlinear Morpheme-by-Morpheme Glosses. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    2001a “Constructing reason-for-the-call turns in everyday telephone conversation.” Interaction and Linguistic Structures (InLiSt), 251: 1–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2001b “Interactional prosody: High onsets in reason-for-the-call turns.” Language in Society30(1): 29–53. 10.1017/S0047404501001026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501001026 [Google Scholar]
  9. Heritage, John and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    1994 “Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: and-prefacing as a feature of question design.” Language in Society, 23(1): 1–29. 10.1017/S0047404500017656
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017656 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hopper, Robert, and Chia-Hui Chen
    1996 “Language, cultures, relationships: Telephone openings in Taiwan.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(4): 291–313. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2904_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2904_1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hutchby, Ian, and Simone Barnett
    2005 “Aspects of the sequential organization of mobile phone conversation.” Discourse studies7(2): 147–171. 10.1177/1461445605050364
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050364 [Google Scholar]
  12. Laurier, Eric
    2001 “Why people say where they are during mobile phone calls.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19(4): 485–504. 10.1068/d228t
    https://doi.org/10.1068/d228t [Google Scholar]
  13. Laursen, Ditte, and Margaret. H. Szymanski
    2013 “Where are you? Location talk in mobile phone conversations.” Mobile Media and Communication1(3): 314–334. 10.1177/2050157913493773
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157913493773 [Google Scholar]
  14. Laursen, Ditte
    2012 “Sequential organization of text messages and mobile phone calls in interconnected communication sequences.” Discourse and Communication6(1): 83–99. 10.1177/1750481311432517
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311432517 [Google Scholar]
  15. Sacks, Harvey
    1992Lectures on Conversation, (Vol.21), edited byG. Jefferson, with an introduction byE. A. Schegloff. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Schegloff, Emanuel
    1972 “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.” InStudies in Social Interaction, edited byD. Sudnow, 75–119. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1979 “Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited byG. Psathas, 23–78. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1980 “Preliminaries to preliminaries: ‘Can I ask you a question?’.” Sociological Inquiry50(3–4): 104–152. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00018.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00018.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Schegloff, Emanuel
    1986 “The routine as achievement.” Human Studies9(2): 111–151. 10.1007/BF00148124
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148124 [Google Scholar]
  20. 1996 “Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction.” InInteraction and Grammar, edited byE. Ochs, E. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2002a “Beginnings in the Telephone.” InPerpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance, edited byJames E. Katz, and Mark A. Aakus, 284–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511489471.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489471.022 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2002b “Reflections on research on telephone conversation: Issues of cross-cultural scope and scholarly exchange, interactional import and consequences.” InTelephone Calls: Unity and Diversity in Conversational Structure across Languages and Cultures, edited byK. Kwong Luke and T.-S. Pavlidou, 249–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.101.16sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.101.16sch [Google Scholar]
  23. 2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  24. Schegloff, Emanuel, and Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening up closings.” Semiotica8(4): 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  25. Sidnell, Jack
    2007 “Look-prefaced turns in first and second position: launching, interceding and redirecting action.” Discourse Studies9(3): 387–408. 10.1177/1461445607076204
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607076204 [Google Scholar]
  26. Szymanski, Margaret, Erik Vinkhuyzen, Paul Aoki, and Allison Woodruff
    2006 “Organizing a remote state of incipient talk: push-to-talk mobile radio interaction.” Language in Society35(3): 393–418.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen
    2002 “Telephone Calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures.” InTelephone Calls: Unity and Diversity in Conversational Structure across Languages and Cultures, edited byK. Kwong Luke, and T.-S. Pavlidou, 87–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.101.08tal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.101.08tal [Google Scholar]
  28. ten Have, Paul
    2002 “Comparing Telephone Call Openings: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections.” InTelephone Calls: Unity and Diversity in Conversational Structure across Languages and Cultures, edited byK. Kwong Luke and T.-S. Pavlidou, 233–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.101.15ten
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.101.15ten [Google Scholar]
  29. Weilenmann, Alexandra
    2003 “I Can’t Talk Now, I’m in a Fitting Room: Formulating Availability and Location in Mobile-Phone Conversations.” Environment and Planning A35(9):1589–1605. 10.1068/a34234
    https://doi.org/10.1068/a34234 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.19030.kaz
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): action initiation; anchor position; Farsi; mobile telephony; reason for call
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error