1887
image of Withholding advice for rapport management in online medical counselling interactions
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates how male and female doctors manage rapport by withholding advice in online medical counselling interactions. Data were collected from 60 doctors’ replies in response to web users’ advice-seeking inquiries on the Chinese health care website ‘’. From a comparative perspective, the study examined the use of two advice withholding strategies for rapport management — challenging a patient and parading expertise. The findings show that (1) both male and female doctors use the strategies to mitigate their authoritative force and empower patients with autonomy; and (2) female doctors tend to get the patients more involved in the interaction, while male doctors remain relatively more authoritative in accounting for their withholding behaviour. This research contributes to the study of health communication and extends the investigation of advice withholding from general discussions into a comparative analysis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.19042.yan
2025-04-14
2025-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bernhardt, Jay M., Ruth Ann Weaver Lariscy, Roxanne L. Parrott, Kami J. Silk, and Elizabeth M. Felter
    2010 “Perceived barriers to Internet-based health communication on human genetics.” Journal of Health Communication(): –. 10.1080/10810730290088166
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730290088166 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertakis, Klea D.
    2009 “The influence of gender on the doctor-patient interaction.” Patient Education and Counseling(): –. 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.022 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanch, Danielle C., Judith A. Hall, Debra L. Roter, and Richard M. Frankel
    2009 “Is it good to express uncertainty to a patient? Correlates and consequences for medical students in a standardized patient visit.” Patient Education and Counseling(): –. 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
    1989Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  6. D’Angelo, Jonathan, and Anne-Lise D’Angelo
    2018 “Advice from healthcare professionals”. InThe Oxford Handbook of Advice, edited byErina L. Macgeorge and Lyn M. van Swol, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190630188.013.10
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190630188.013.10 [Google Scholar]
  7. Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
    2015The Language of Service Encounters: A Pragmatic-Discursive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139565431
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565431 [Google Scholar]
  8. He, Agnes Weiyun
    1994 “Withholding academic advice: Institutional context and discourse practice.” Discourse Processes(): –. 10.1080/01638539409544897
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544897 [Google Scholar]
  9. He, Agnes Weiyun, and Elizabeth Keating
    1991 “Counselor and student at talk: A case study.” Issues in Applied Linguistics(): –. 10.5070/L422005142
    https://doi.org/10.5070/L422005142 [Google Scholar]
  10. Heritage, John, and Douglas W. Maynard
    2006Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607172
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172 [Google Scholar]
  11. Herring, Susan C.
    2004 “Computer-mediated discourse analysis: an approach to researching online behavior”. InDesigning for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, edited byS. A. Barab, R. Kling and J. H. Gray, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 [Google Scholar]
  12. Holmes, Janet
    2006 “Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humor and gender in the workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  13. Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe
    2015Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315750231
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750231 [Google Scholar]
  14. Huffaker, David, and Sandra L. Calvert
    2005 “Gender, Identity, and Language Use in Teenage Blogs.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication(): –. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2005.tb00238.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00238.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Hutchby, Ian
    1995 “Aspects of recipient design in expert advice-giving on call-in radio.” Discourse Processes(): –. 10.1080/01638539509544915
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544915 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jiang, Jin
    2009 “The Use of maxims for cooperation in Chinese medical interviews.” Health Communication(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jin, Ying
    2018 “Small talk in medical conversations: Data from China.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.011 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kapidzic, Sanja, and Susan C. Herring
    2011 “Gender, communication, and self-presentation in teen chatrooms revisited: Have patterns changed?” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication(): –. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2011.01561.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01561.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Leech, Geoffrey
    2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Locher, Miriam A.
    2006Advice Online. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.149
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.149 [Google Scholar]
  21. Locher, Miriam A., and Sebastian Hoffmann
    2006 “The emergence of the identity of a fictional expert advice-giver in an American Internet advice column.” Text & Talk(): –. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Maíz Arévalo, Carmen
    2014 “A pragmatic and multimodal analysis of emoticons and gender in social networks”. InNew Insights into Gendered Discursive Practices: Language, Gender and Identity Construction, edited byAntonia Sánchez Macarro and Ana Belén Cabrejas Peñuelas. Valencia: Universitat de València.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Morrow, Phillip R.
    2006 “Telling about problems and giving advice in an Internet discussion forum: Some discourse features.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445606061876
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061876 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mullany, Louise
    2004 “Gender, politeness and institutional power roles: Humour as a tactic to gain compliance in workplace business meetings.” Multilingua(): –. 10.1515/mult.2004.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.002 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pérez-Sabater, Carmen
    2019 “Emoticons in relational writing practices on WhatsApp: Some reflections on gender”. InAnalyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, edited byPatricia Bou-Franch and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92663‑6_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_6 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pounds, Gabrina
    2018 “Patient-centred communication in ask-the-expert healthcare websites.” Applied Linguistics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Roter, Debra L., and Judith A. Hall
    1997 “Gender differences in patient-physician communication”. InHealth Care for Women: Psychological, Social and Behavioral Influences, edited bySheryle J. Gallant, Puryear Gwendolyn and Renée Royak-Schaler, –. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10235‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10235-004 [Google Scholar]
  28. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2008Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stommel, Wyke, Trena M. Paulus, and David P. Atkins
    2017 “‘Here’s the link’: Hyperlinking in service-focused chat interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  30. Swire-Thompson, Briony, and David Lazer
    2020 “Public Health and Online Misinformation: Challenges and Recommendations.” Annual Review of Public Health: –. 10.1146/annurev‑publhealth‑040119‑094127
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094127 [Google Scholar]
  31. Tannen, Deborah
    1996Gender and Discourse. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tseng, Ming-Yu, and Grace Zhang
    2018 “Pragmeme, adaptability, and elasticity in online medical consultations.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, Xiaojiang, Yansheng Mao, and Qian Yu
    2021 “From conditions to strategies: Dominance implemented by Chinese doctors during online medical consultations.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.011 [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, Xue-Qiang, Xiao-Tong Wang, and Jie-Jiao Zheng
    2012 “How to end violence against doctors in China.” The Lancet(): –. 10.1016/S0140‑6736(12)61367‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61367-1 [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, Waring Hansun
    2007 “The multi-functionality of accounts in advice giving.” Journal of Sociolinguistics(): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00328.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00328.x [Google Scholar]
  36. 2017 “Going general as a resource for doing advising in post-observation conferences in teacher training.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2019 “Problematizing information-seeking Wh-questions.” Language & Communication: –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang, Waring Hansun, Elizabeth Reddington, Di Yu, and Ignasi Clemente
    2018 “Going general: Responding to yes-no questions in informational webinars for prospective grant applicants.” Discourse & Communication(): –. 10.1177/1750481318757762
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318757762 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.19042.yan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.19042.yan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: online medical counselling ; Withholding advice ; rapport ; strategy ; comparative
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error