Multivaried acceptance of post-editing in China

References

1. Báez, M. C. Toledo
   2018 “Machine translation and post-editing: Impact of training and directionality on quality and productivity.” Revista Tradumàtica (16): 24–34.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Daems, Joke, and Lieve Macken
   2020 “Post-editing human translations and revising machine translations: impact on efficiency and quality.” InTranslation Revision and/or Post-editing: Industry Practices and Cognitive Processes, ed. byMaarit Koponen, Brian Mossop, Isabelle S. Robert, and Giovanna Scocchera, 50–70. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003096962‑5
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003096962-5 [Google Scholar]
3. Daems, Joke, Sonia Vandepitte, Robert J. Hartsuiker, and Lieve Macken
   2017 “Identifying the machine translation error types with the greatest impact on post-editing effort”. Frontiers in Psychology8(1282): 1–15. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01282
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01282 [Google Scholar]
4. Drugan, Jo, and Bogdan Babych
   2010 “Shared resources, shared values? Ethical implications of sharing translation resources.” InProceedings of the Second Joint EM +/CNGL Workshop: Bringing MT to the User, ed. byVentsislav Zhechev, 3–9. Denver, Colo.: Association for Machine Translation in the Americas.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Feng, Quangong, and Huiyu Zhang
   2015 “To train post-editors in the background of the global language services industry.” Foreign Language World166 (1): 65–72.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Feng, Quangong, and Jiawei Li
   2016 “Investigation on post-editing of machine-translated news.” Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education172(6): 74–79.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ginovart Cid, Clar, and Carmen Colominas Ventura
   2020 “The MT post-editing skill set: course descriptions and educators’ thoughts.” InTranslation Revision and Post-editing: Industry Practices and Cognitive Processes, ed. byMaarit Koponen, Brian Mossop, Isabelle S. Robert, and Giovanna Scocchera, 226–246. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ISO
   ISO 2017 Translation Services: Post-editing of Machine Translation Output-Requirements (ISO/DIS 18587). https://www.iso.org/standard/62970.html (consulted8 April 2019).
9. Jia, Yanfang, Michael Carl, and Xiangling Wang
   2019 “How does the post-editing of neural machine translation compare with from-scratch translation? A product and process study.” The Journal of Specialised Translation311: 60–86.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kenny, Dorothy, and Stephen Doherty
    2014 “Statistical machine translation in the translation curriculum: Overcoming obstacles and empowering translators.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer8(2): 276–294. 10.1080/1750399X.2014.936112
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2014.936112 [Google Scholar]
11. Koponen, Maarit, and Leena Salmi
    2017 “Post-editing quality: Analysing the correctness and necessity of post-editor corrections.” Linguistica Antverpiensia16 (1):137–148.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Läubli, Samuel, Chantal Amrhein, Patrick Düggelin, Beatriz Gonzalez, Alena Zwahlen, and Martin Volk
    2019 “Post-editing productivity with neural machine translation: An empirical assessment of speed and quality in the banking and finance domain.” InProceedings of MT Summit XVII (Volume 1): Research Track, ed. byMikel Forcada, Andy Way, Barry Haddow, and Rico Sennrich, 267–272. Dublin: European Association for Machine Translation.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lu, Zhi, and Juan Sun
    2018 “An eye-tracking study of cognitive processing in human translation and post-editing.” Foreign Language Teaching and Research50(5): 760–769.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Moorkens, Joss, and Sharon O’Brien
    2015 “Post-Editing Evaluations: Trade-offs between Novice and Professional Participants.” InProceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, ed. byİlknur Durgar El-Kahlout, Mehmed Özkan, Felipe Sánchez-Martínez, Gema Ramírez-Sánchez, Fred Hollowood and Andy Way, 75–81. Stroudsburg, Penn.: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Moorkens, Joss, Antonio Toral, Sheila Castilho, and Andy Way
    2018 “Translators’ perceptions of literary post-editing using statistical and neural machine translation.” Translation Spaces7(2):240–262. 10.1075/ts.18014.moo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.18014.moo [Google Scholar]
16. O’Brien, Sharon, Laura W. Balling, Michael Carl, Michel Simard and Lucia Specia
    2014 Post-editing of Machine Translation: Processes and Applications. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ortiz-Boix, Carla, and Anna Matamala
    2017 “Assessing the quality of post-edited wildlife documentaries.” Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice25(4):571–593. 10.1080/0907676X.2016.1245763
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2016.1245763 [Google Scholar]
18. Pilos, Spyridon
    2011 “Machine Translation at the European Commission.” InMeta-Forum 2011-Solutions for Multilingual Europe. Budapest: Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Rossi, Caroline
    2017 “Introducing statistical machine translation in translator training: from uses and perceptions to course design, and back again.” Revista Tradumàtica151: 48–62. 10.5565/rev/tradumatica.195
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/tradumatica.195 [Google Scholar]
20. Rossi, Caroline, and Jean-Pierre Chevrot
    2019 “Uses and perceptions of Machine Translation at the European Commission.” The Journal of Specialised Translation (31): 177–200.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Screen, Benjamin
    2017 “Productivity and quality when editing machine translation and translation memory outputs: an empirical analysis of English to Welsh translation.” Studia Celtica Posnaniensia2(1):1–24. 10.1515/scp‑2017‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/scp-2017-0007 [Google Scholar]
22. Shao, Nan
    2020 Analysis of Machine Translation Errors and Corresponding Pre-editing and Post-editing Strategies. Beijing: Beijing International Studies University.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sismat, Muhamad A. B. H.
    2016 “Quality and productivity: A comparative analysis of human translation and post-editing with Malay learners of Arabic and English”. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sosoni, Vilelmini, Maria Stasimioti, and Katia-Lida Kermanidis
    2018 “On post-editing effort: Testing translator perceptions.” InTranslating Europe Workshop “The Changing Profile of the Translator Profession: Technology, Competences and Fit-for-market Training”, 23–24. Corfu: Ionian University.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Sun, Dongyun
    2017 “Application of Post-Editing in Foreign Language Teaching: Problems and Challenges.” Canadian Social Science13(7): 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
26. TAUS
    TAUS 2013 Pricing machine translation post-editing guidelines. https://www.taus.net/academy/best-practices/postedit-best-practices/pricing-machine-translation-post-editing-guidelines (consulted8 April 2019).
27. TAUS
    TAUS 2015 Machine translation post-editing guidelines. https://www.taus.net/academy/best-practices/postedit-best-practices/machine-translation-post-editing-guidelines (consulted8 April 2019).
28. Translators Association of China
    Translators Association of China 2021 China Language Service Industry Development Report. Translators Association of China.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Venkatesh, Viswanath and Hillol Bala
    2008 “Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions.” Decision Sciences39(2): 273–315. 10.1111/j.1540‑5915.2008.00192.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x [Google Scholar]
30. Wang, Xiangling, and Tingting Wang
    2019 “A comparative study of human translation and machine translation post-editing in E-C Translation: Translation speed, quality and translators’ attitude.” Foreign Languages and Cultures3(4): 83–93.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Yamada, Masaru
    2015 “Can college students be post-editors? An investigation into employing language learners in machine translation plus post-editing settings.” Machine Translation29(1): 49–67. 10.1007/s10590‑014‑9167‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-014-9167-7 [Google Scholar]
32. Zhao, Shengfang
    2021 “Post-editing neural machine translation versus human translation for Chinese essays: A pilot study.” InDiverse Voices in Chinese Translation and Interpreting: Theory and Practice, ed. byRiccardo Moratto and Martin Woesler, 399–432. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑33‑4283‑5_17
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4283-5_17 [Google Scholar]