1887
Volume 15, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, we report on how authors of academic writing in Chinese (AWC) refer to themselves as single authors in the area of language studies. We find that AWC writers rely on the 1st-person plural 我们 “we,” 3rd-person NPs such as 作者/笔者 “this author,” and inanimate NPs such as 本文 “this article/paper” for self-reference. Based on these findings and subsequent surveys of journal style guides and interviews of authors, we propose that (1) these self-referring expressions are a set of conventions; (2) the motivation for these conventions is modesty, a deep-routed value of Chinese society; and (3) these expressions serve as indexicals to the writers’ identity of a modest scholar in the particular discursive context: the genre of academic writing. By so doing, our work links language use to social values, to identity studies, as well as to genre analysis, thus contributing to the literature in all these fields of investigation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.19065.che
2023-05-10
2024-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bazerman, Charles
    1994 “Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions.” Genre and the New Rhetoric, ed. byAviva Freeman and Peter Medway, 79–101. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse Studies7 (4–5): 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, Rong
    1993 “Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American and Chinese speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics201: 49–75. 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90106‑Y
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90106-Y [Google Scholar]
  4. 2001 “Self-politeness: A proposal.” Journal of Pragmatics331: 87–106. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00124‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00124-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2020 “Single-author self-reference: Identity construction and pragmatic competence.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes451: 1–14. 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100856
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100856 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2022Toward a Motivation Model of Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110787702
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110787702 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2023Chinese Politeness: Diachrony, Variation, and Universals in Politeness theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Rong and Dafu Yang
    2010 “Responding to compliment in Chinese: Has it changed?” Journal of Pragmatics42 (7): 1951–1963. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Fina, A.
    2007 “Code switching and the construction of ethnic identity in a community of practice.” Language in Society361: 371–392. 10.1017/S0047404507070182
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070182 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dueñas, Pilar Mur
    2007 “‘I/we focus on…’: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes6 (2): 143–162. 10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 “Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics14 (2): 37–257. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  12. 2011 “Modern Chinese politeness revisited.” InPoliteness across Cultures, ed. byFrancesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Daniel Kádár, 128–148. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230305939_7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305939_7 [Google Scholar]
  13. Harwood, Nigel
    2005 “‘Nowhere has anyone attempted… In this article I aim to do just that’: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines.” Journal of Pragmatics, 37 (8): 1207–1231. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hyland, Kenneth
    2001 “Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles.” English for Specific Purposes201: 207–226. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00012‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2002 “Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing.” Journal of Pragmatics341: 1091–1112. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00035‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2005 “Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.” Discourse Studies7 (2): 173–192. 10.1177/1461445605050365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2008 “Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing.” English Text Construction1 (1): 5–22. 10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl [Google Scholar]
  18. Ivanic, Roz
    1994 “I is for interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing.” Linguistics and Education6 (1): 3–15. 10.1016/0898‑5898(94)90018‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(94)90018-3 [Google Scholar]
  19. 1995 “Writer identity.” Prospect10 (1): 8–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1998 “Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing.” Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kádár, Daniel
    2008 “Terms of (im)politeness: A study of communication properties of traditional Chinese (im)polite terms of address.” Journal of Politeness Research4 (2): 327–330.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kiesling, Scott
    2004 “Dude.” American Speech79 (3): 281–305. 10.1215/00031283‑79‑3‑281
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-79-3-281 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuo, Chih-Hua
    1999 “The use of personal pronouns: role relationships in scientific journal articles.” English for Specific Purposes18 (2): 121–138. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(97)00058‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6 [Google Scholar]
  24. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lewis, David
    1969Convention: A Philosophical Study. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lillis, Theresa and Mary Scott
    2007 “Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy.” Journal of Applied Linguistics4 (1): 5–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Miller, Carolyn R., Amy J. Devitt, and Victoria J. Gallagher
    2018 “Genre: Permanence and change.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly481: 269–277. 10.1080/02773945.2018.1454194
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2018.1454194 [Google Scholar]
  28. Morgan, Jerry
    1978 “Two types of convention in indirect speech acts.” InSyntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, ed. byPeter Cole, 261–280. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368873_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368873_010 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ochs, Elenor
    1990 “Indexicality and socialization.” InCultural psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development, ed. byJames W. Stigler, Richard A. Shweder, and Gilbert Herdt, 287–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173728.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173728.009 [Google Scholar]
  30. 1992 “Indexing gender.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. byAlessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 335–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2012 “Experiencing language.” Anthropological Theory, 12 (2): 142–160. 10.1177/1463499612454088
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499612454088 [Google Scholar]
  32. Olinger, Andrea R.
    2011 “Constructing identities through ‘discourse’: Stance and interaction in collaborative college writing.” Linguistics and Education22 (3): 273–286. 10.1016/j.linged.2011.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pan, Yu and Daniel Kádár
    2011Politeness in Historical dnd Contemporary Chinese. Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Precht, Kristen
    2001 Patterns of Stance in English. Dissertation Abstracts International: The Humanities and Social Sciences. A-3149-A.
  35. Ren, Yuxin
    2020 “Committee chair as a jointly constructed identity at Chinese PhD dissertation defenses.” East Asian Pragmatics5 (1): 67–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Swales, John
    1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tang, Ramona and Suganthi John
    1999 “The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun.” English for Specific Purposes181: S23–S39. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(99)00009‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhou, Ling and Shaojie Zhang
    2018 “Reconstructing the politeness principle in Chinese: A response to Gu’s research.” Intercultural Pragmatics15.51: 693–271. 10.1515/ip‑2018‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0024 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.19065.che
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.19065.che
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error