1887
Volume 14, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The paper examines the metaphor in the online news articles published in three Western Balkans’ countries (Serbia, Montenegro, and Bosnia and Hercegovina), in the context of their accession to the EU. Through the methodological lens of the conceptual metaphor theory and critical metaphor analysis, our study shows that the conceptualisation of the accession as a race might purport different, even mutually conflicted political stances, i.e. it can have a laudatory function praising those at the forefront of the “race”, while at the same time calling for patience invoking the picture of the race as a marathon, long and exhausting, demanding in both time and stamina. Without delving further into the political reasons, concerns and vested interests of the stakeholders involved, what can be said with much certainty is that both the EU and the regional officials have made some creative excuses for the excessive duration of the EU integration process for the WB’s countries, and these have been analysed in the present study. The analysis has shown that the “finish line” of the race (the accession itself), long or short, is far less important in the regional news discourse than reaching further out than your co-runners, i.e. your immediate neighbours and competitors.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.20002.bab
2023-04-06
2024-05-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bijelić, Dušan
    2002 “Introduction: Blowing up the Bridge”. InBalkan as Metaphor: between Globalisation and Fragmentation, ed. byDušan Bijelić and Obrad Savić, 1–22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1508.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1508.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Callies, Marcus
    2009 “Within-culture variation in English sports metaphors: A window to history, culture, and national identity?” Paper presented at the conference: Bi-directional Perspectives in the Cognitive Sciences. Marburg, Feb 26–28, 2009. Available at: www.cognitive-sciences.de/docs/presentations/Callies.BPCS.FINAL.pdf
  3. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2004Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmilan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2006 “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign.” Discourse & Society17(6): 563–582. 10.1177/0957926506066345
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506066345 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2011Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9780230319899
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899 [Google Scholar]
  6. Đurović, Tatjana, and Nadežda Silaški
    2014 “The TEACHER-STUDENT Metaphor in Serbian EU Accession Discourse–A Case of Cognitive Marginalisation.” InJezik, književnost, marginalizacija: Jezička istraživanja, ed. byBiljana Mišić-Ilić, and Vesna Lopičić, 47–59. Niš: Filozofski fakultet.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Drulák, Petr, and Lucie Königová
    2007 “Figuring out Europe: EU Metaphors in the Minds of Czech Civil Servants.” Perspectives15(1): 5–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gatti, Lauren, and Theresa Catalano
    . “The Business of Learning to Teach: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of One Teacher’s Journey.” Teaching and Teacher Education451 (2015): 149–160. 10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldsworthy, Vesna
    2002 “Invention and In(ter)vention: The Rhetoric of Balkanisation.” InBalkan as Metaphor: between Globalisation and Fragmentationed. byDušan Bjelić, and Obrad Savić. 25–38. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hart, Christopher
    2008 “Critical Discourse Analysis and Metaphor: Toward a Theoretical framework.” Critical Discourse Studies5 (2): 91–106. 10.1080/17405900801990058
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990058 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hellín-García, María José
    2014 “Politics at Play: Game Metaphors in Spanish Political Discourse.” Hipertexto191: 132–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Horolets, Anna
    2003 “Conceptualising Europe through Metaphors: A Way to Identity Formation?” Polish Sociological Review: 115–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Howe, Nicholas
    1988 “Metaphor in Contemporary American Political Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity3 (2): 87–104. 10.1207/s15327868ms0302_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0302_2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2010Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lakoff, George
    1991 “Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used justify war in the Gulf”. Peace Research: 25–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, George
    2004Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Freame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Linkeviciute, Vilma
    2018 “Conceptual Metaphors in Donald Trump’s Political Discourse: Politics Domain.” Studies About Languages341: 46–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Musolff, Andreas
    2000 “Political imagery of Europe: A house without exit doors?” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development21 (3): 216–229. 10.1080/01434630008666402
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630008666402 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2004Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230504516
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2012 “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical discourse studies9 (3): 301–310. 10.1080/17405904.2012.688300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688300 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2016Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London, Oxford, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2017 “The Metaphorisation of European Politics: Movement on the Road to Europe.” InAttitudes Towards Europe: Language in the Unification Process, ed. byAndreas Musolff , 179–200. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315096742‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315096742-7 [Google Scholar]
  24. Petraškaite-Pabst, Sandra
    2010 “Metaphors in German and Lithuanian Discourse concerning the Expansion of the European Union.” InContesting Europe’s Eastern Rim: Cultural Identities in Public Discourse, ed. byLjiljana Šarić, Andreas Musolff, Stefan Manz and Ingrid Hudabiunigg, 33–50. Toronto, CA: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847693259‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847693259-006 [Google Scholar]
  25. Petrović, Tanja
    2009A Long Way Home: Representations of the Western Balkans in Political and Media Discourses. Ljubljana: Peace Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Group, Pragglejaz
    2007 “MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol22.1: 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  27. Radić-Bojanić, Biljana, and Nadežda Silaški
    2008 “Sportizacija političkog diskursa–kako metafore prikrivaju političku stvarnost Srbije.” Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku51(1–2): 139–155.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2012 “Metaphors of Hegemonic Masculinity–Women’s Understanding of Sport Metaphors in Political Discourse.” Gender Studies11 (1): 245–257. 10.2478/v10320‑012‑0043‑4
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10320-012-0043-4 [Google Scholar]
  29. Semino, Elena, and Michela Masci
    1996 “Politics is Football: Metaphor in the Discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy.” Discourse & Society7 (2): 243–269. 10.1177/0957926596007002005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007002005 [Google Scholar]
  30. Semino, Elena
    2008Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Silaški, Nadežda, and Tatjana Đurović
    2014 “One Step Forward, Two Steps back: Conceptualising Serbia’s EU Accession in Serbian and EU Discourse.” InMetaphor and Intercultural Communication, ed. byAndreas Musolff, Fiona MacArthur, and Guilio Pagani, 167–184. London/New York: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781472593610.ch‑010
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593610.ch-010 [Google Scholar]
  32. Van Dijk, Teun
    2001 “Critical Discourse Analysis. InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byDeborah Tannen, Deborah Schiffrin, and Heidi Hamilton, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Werkmann, Ana, and Gabrijela Buljan
    2013 Knocking on EU’s Door: on the Changing and Conflicting Metaphorical Images of Croatia in Selected EU Press. Jezikoslovlje14(2–3): 337–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Yu, Ning
    1998The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. A Perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.1 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.20002.bab
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.20002.bab
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conceptual metaphor; critical metaphor analysis; EU; sport metaphors; WB
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error