1887
Volume 14, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article seeks to explore the mechanisms of holding others accountable for a perceived deviation from moral order through public complaints on Chinese social media as well as the influences of emotional stance and social positioning when people perceive a breach of the moral order and try to restore it. Our data consists of a transcribed complaint narrative (CN) widely deemed morally transgressive, and a corpus of web-based news comments (WNC), displaying public counter-offensive actions to the CN. A contextualized discourse analysis reveals that abundant context-spanning impoliteness formulae in WNC are strategies for constructing collective identities and magnifying the condemnation of immorality. In the process of moral order appeal, using various emotive impoliteness formulae appear to be a situated norm.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.20003.xie
2023-04-28
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca
    2003 “Face and Politeness: (New) Insights for (Old) Concepts.” Journal of Pragmatics35(10–11): 1453–1469. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00173‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00173-X [Google Scholar]
  2. Bös, Birte, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin, and Nuria Hernández
    (eds.) 2018The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal – Group – Collective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.78
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.78 [Google Scholar]
  3. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  4. Daly, Nicola, Janet Holmes, Jonathan Newton, and Maria Stubbe
    2004 “Expletives as Solidarity Signals in FTAs on the Factory Floor.” Journal of Pragmatics361: 945–964. 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Drew, Paul
    1998 “Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction31(3–4): 295–325. 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595 [Google Scholar]
  6. Drew, Paul, and Traci Walker
    2009 “Going Too Far: Complaining, Escalating, and Disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics411: 2400–2414. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046 [Google Scholar]
  7. Douglas, Jack D.
    1970 “Deviance and Respectability: The Social Construction of Moral Meanings.” InDeviance and Respectability: The Social Construction of Moral Meanings, ed. byJack D. Douglas, 3–30. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fetzer, Anita
    2017 “Context.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byYan Huang, 259–276. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2022 “Moral Emotions, Good Moral Panics, Social Regulation, and Online Public Shaming.” Language & Communication841: 61–75. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1978 “Response Cries.” Language541: 787–815. 10.2307/413235
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413235 [Google Scholar]
  12. 1979 “Footing.” Semiotica25(1/2):1–30. 10.1515/semi.1979.25.1‑2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gordon, Cynthia
    2008 “A(p)parent Play: Blending Frames and Reframing in Family Talk.” Language in Society371: 319–349. 10.1017/S0047404508080536
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404508080536 [Google Scholar]
  14. Günthner, Susanne
    1995 “Exemplary Stories: The Cooperative Construction of Moral Indignation.” Versus70–711: 147–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1997 “Complaint Stories: Constructing Emotional Reciprocity among Women.” InCommunicating Gender in Context, ed. byHelga Kotthoff, and Ruth Wodak, 179–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.42.10gun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.42.10gun [Google Scholar]
  16. Haberland, Hartmut
    2007 “Language Shift in Conversation as a Metapragmatic Comment.” InMetapragmatics in Use, ed. byWolfram Bublitz, and Axel Hübler, 129–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.165.09hab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165.09hab [Google Scholar]
  17. Hatfield, Elaine, John. T. Cacioppo, and Richard L. Rapson
    1993 “Emotional Contagion.” Current Directions in Psychological Science2(3): 96–100. 10.1111/1467‑8721.ep10770953
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953 [Google Scholar]
  18. Haugh, Michael
    2013 “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics581: 52–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2022 “(Online) Public Denunciation, Public Incivilities and Offence.” Language & Communication871: 44–59. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones, Tracia S.
    2001 “Emotional Communication in Conflict: Essence and Impact.” InThe Language of Conflict and Resolution, ed. byWilliam F. Eadie, and Paul E. Nelson, 81–104. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Joseph, John E.
    2016 “Historical Perspectives on Language and Identity.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity, ed. bySiân Preece, 19–33. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kádár, Daniel Z., and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kádár, Daniel Z., and Rosina Márquez-Reiter
    2015 “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research11(2): 239–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kádár, Daniel Z., Puyu Ning, and Yongping Ran
    2018 “Public Ritual Apology – A Case Study of Chinese.” Discourse, Context & Media261: 21–31. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kramer, Adam D. I., Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffery T. Hancock
    2014 “Experimental Evidence of Massive-Scale Emotional Contagion through Social Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America111(24): 8788–8790. 10.1073/pnas.1320040111
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111 [Google Scholar]
  26. Laforest, Marty
    2009 “Complaining in front of a Witness: Aspects of Blaming Others for Their Behavior in Multi-party Family Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics411: 2452–2464. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.043
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.043 [Google Scholar]
  27. Langlotz, Andreas, and Miriam A. Locher
    2012 “Ways of Communicating Emotional Stance in Online Disagreements.” Journal of Pragmatics441: 1591–1606. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Malle, Bertram F., Steve Giuglielmo, and Andrew E. Monroe
    2014 “A Theory of Blame.” Psychological Inquiry25(2): 147–186. 10.1080/1047840X.2014.877340
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.877340 [Google Scholar]
  29. Márquez-Reiter, Rosina, and Michael Haugh
    2019 “Denunciation, Blame and the Moral Turn in Public Life.” Discourse, Context & Media281: 35–43. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Márquez Reiter, Rosina, and Sara Orthaber
    2018 “Exploring the Moral Compass: Denunciations in a Facebook Carpool Group.” Internet Pragmatics1(2): 241–270. 10.1075/ip.00012.mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00012.mar [Google Scholar]
  31. Mey, Jacob L.
    2010 “Reference and the Pragmeme.” Journal of Pragmatics421: 2882–2888. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  32. Murphy, James
    2019The Discursive Construction of Blame: The Language of Public Inquiries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑50722‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50722-8 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pan, Yuling, and Daniel Z. Kádár
    2011Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ran, Yongping, and Linsen Zhao
    2018 “Building Mutual Affection-based Face in Conflict Mediation: A Chinese Relationship Management Model.” Journal of Pragmatics1291: 185–198. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.013 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sinkeviciute, Valeria
    2018 “‘Ya bloody drongo!!!’: Impoliteness as Situated Moral Judgement on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics1(2): 271–302. 10.1075/ip.00013.sin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00013.sin [Google Scholar]
  36. 2019 “Juggling Identities in Interviews: The Metapragmatics of ‘Doing Humour’.” Journal of Pragmatics1521: 216–227. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  37. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2007 “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics391: 639–656. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  38. Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Jianyu Xing
    2019 “Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Interpersonal Relations and the Evaluation Process: Culture, Norms, and the Moral Order.” Journal of Pragmatics1511: 141–154. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.015 [Google Scholar]
  39. Stewart, Maya, and Ulrike Schultze
    2019 “Producing Solidarity in Social Media Activism: The Case of My Stealthy Freedom.” Information and Organization291: 1–23. 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  40. Terkourafi, Marina
    2002 “Politeness and Formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek.” Journal of Greek Linguistics31: 179–201. 10.1075/jgl.3.08ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.08ter [Google Scholar]
  41. Tracy, Karen, and Sarah J. Tracy
    1998 “Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing Face and Face Attack.” Human Communication Research25(2): 225–251. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1998.tb00444.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00444.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Traverso, Véronique
    2009 “The Dilemmas of Third-party Complaints in Conversation Between Friends.” Journal of Pragmatics411: 2385–2399. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.047
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.047 [Google Scholar]
  43. Triandafyllidou, Anna, and Ruth Wodak
    2003 “Conceptual and Methodological Questions in the Study of Collective Identity: An Introduction.” Journal of Language and Politics2(2): 205–223. 10.1075/jlp.2.2.02tri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.2.2.02tri [Google Scholar]
  44. Xie, Chaoqun
    2020a(Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.107
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.107 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2020b “Internet Memes We Live By (and Die By).” Internet Pragmatics3(2): 145–173. 10.1075/ip.00066.xie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00066.xie [Google Scholar]
  46. 2021 “Philosophizing (Im)politeness: Lived Experience, Desire and Human Nature.” InThe Philosophy of (Im)politeness, ed. byChaoqun Xie, 225–252. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑81592‑9_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81592-9_13 [Google Scholar]
  47. Xu, Ke
    1984清稗类钞 [Classified Collection of Qing Notes] (131volumes). Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Zimmerman, Don H.
    1998 “Identity, Context, and Interaction.” InIdentities in Talk, ed. byCharles Antaki, and Sue Widdicombe, 87–106. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhao, Linsen, and Yongping Ran
    2019 “Impoliteness Revisited: Evidence from Qingmian Threats in Chinese Interpersonal Conflicts.” Journal of Politeness Research15(2): 257–291. 10.1515/pr‑2017‑0027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0027 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.20003.xie
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.20003.xie
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error