Would you like a bag for that?

References

1. Arminen, Ilkka, and Petra Auvinen
   2013 “Environmentally coupled repairs and remedies in the airline cockpit: Repair practices of talk and action in interaction.” Discourse Studies15 (1):19–41. 10.1177/1461445612466463
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612466463 [Google Scholar]
2. Bergmann, Jörg R.
   1998 “Introduction: Morality in Discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction31 (3–4):279–94. 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594 [Google Scholar]
3. Broth, Mathias, and Lorenza Mondada
   2013 “Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics47 (1):41–58. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016 [Google Scholar]
4. Button, Graham
   1987 “Moving out of closings.” InTalk and social organization, edited byGraham Button and John R. E. Lee, 101–51. Clevedon, UK & Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Curl, Traci S.
   2006 “Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design.” Journal of Pragmatics38 (8):1257–80. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004 [Google Scholar]
6. Davidson, Judy
   1990 “Modifications of invitations, offers and rejections.” InInteraction competence, edited byGeorge Psathas, 149–79. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey Sacks
   1986 “On formal structures of practical actions.” InEthnomethodological studies of work, edited byHarold Garfinkel, 160–93. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hazel, Spencer, Kristian Mortensen, and Gitte Rasmussen
   2014 “Introduction: A body of resources – CA studies of social conduct.” Journal of Pragmatics651:1–9. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.007
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.007 [Google Scholar]
9. Heath, Christian
   1986 Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge & Paris: Cambridge University Press & Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme. 10.1017/CBO9780511628221
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628221 [Google Scholar]
10. Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina B. Bolden
    2012 “The conversation analytic approach to transcription.” InThe Blackwell handbook of conversation analysis, edited byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch4 [Google Scholar]
11. Heritage, John
    1988 “Explanations as accounts: A conversation analytic perspective.” InAnalysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods, edited byCharles Antaki, 127–44. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Heritage, John, and Anna Lindstrom
    1998 “Motherhood, medicine, and morality: Scenes from a medical encounter.” Research on Language & Social Interaction31 (3–4):397–438. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3103&4_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3103&4_5 [Google Scholar]
13. Hofstetter, Emily, and Elizabeth Stokoe
    2015 “Offers of assistance in politician–constituent interaction.” Discourse Studies17 (6):724–51. 10.1177/1461445615602376
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615602376 [Google Scholar]
14. Kristiansen, Elisabeth Dalby, Elisabeth Muth Andersen, and Gitte Rasmussen
    2018 “Transfer sequences involving persons with dementia: Instrumental tasks as opportunities for conversation.” Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders9 (2):191–214. 10.1558/jircd.38225
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.38225 [Google Scholar]
15. Kärkkäinen, Elise, and Tiina Keisanen
    2012 “Linguistic and embodied formats for making (concrete) offers.” Discourse Studies14 (5):587–611. 10.1177/1461445612454069
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612454069 [Google Scholar]
16. Lindström, Jan K., Catrin Norrby, Camilla Wide, and Jenny Nilsson
    2017 “Intersubjectivity at the counter: Artefacts and multimodal interaction in theatre box office encounters.” Journal of Pragmatics1081:81–97. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.11.009 [Google Scholar]
17. Mondada, Lorenza
    2014 “The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics651:137–56. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar]
18. Robinson, Jeffrey D.
    2006 “Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair.” Communication Monographs73 (2):137–61. 10.1080/03637750600581206
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750600581206 [Google Scholar]
19. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1992a “On talk and its institutional occasions.” InTalk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settingsedited byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 101–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1992b “Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation.” American Journal of Sociology11:295–345. 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
21. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1996 “Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action.” American Journal of Sociology102 (1):161–216. 10.1086/230911
    https://doi.org/10.1086/230911 [Google Scholar]
22. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1997 “Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair.” Discourse Processes23 (3):499–545. 10.1080/01638539709545001
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545001 [Google Scholar]
23. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
24. Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
    1977 “The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.” Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America531:361–82. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
25. Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening up closings.” Semiotica: Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies/Revue de l’Association Internationale de Sémiotique8 (4):289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
26. Sidnell, Jack
    2011 Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
    2006 “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society35 (3):367–92. 10.1017/S0047404506060179
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060179 [Google Scholar]
28. Ticca, Anna Claudia
    2012 “Reconfiguring the interactional space: Organising the closing of encounters in an Italian travel agency.” Bulletin VALS-ASLA961:91–116.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ventola, Eija
    1987 The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]