Defining openness in teachers’ ‘open’ questions

References

1. Alexander, Robin
   2008 Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aukerman, Maren
   2013 “Rereading Comprehension Pedagogies : Toward a Dialogic Teaching Ethic That Honors Student Sensemaking Rereading Comprehension Pedagogies : Toward a Dialogic Teaching Ethic That Honors Student Sensemaking.” Dialogic Pedagogy11: 1–31. 10.5195/dpj.2013.9
   https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2013.9 [Google Scholar]
3. Austin, John L.
   1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barnes, Douglas
   1976 From Communication to Curriculum. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bellack, Arno A., Herbert M. Kliebard, Ronald T. Hyman, and Frank L. Smith
   1966 The Language of the Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boyd, Maureen P.
   2016 “Connecting ‘ Man In The Mirror ’: Developing A Classroom Dialogic Teaching And Learning Trajectory.” L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature161: 1–26. 10.17239/L1ESLL‑2016.16.02.03
   https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2016.16.02.03 [Google Scholar]
7. Boyd, Maureen Patricia, and William C. Markarian
   2011 “Dialogic Teaching: Talk in Service of a Dialogic Stance.” Language and Education25 (6): 515–34. 10.1080/09500782.2011.597861
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.597861 [Google Scholar]
8. Breen, Michael
   1998 “Navigating the Discourse: On What Is Learned in the Language Classroom.” InLearners and Language Learning, edited byWilly Renandya and George Jacobs, 115–43. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Carlsen, Williams
   1991 “Questioning In Classrooms: A Sociolinguistic Perspective.” Review of Educational Research611: 157–78. 10.3102/00346543061002157
   https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002157 [Google Scholar]
10. Carlson, Lauri
    1983 Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis. Vol.171. Dordrecht: Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cazden, Courtney B.
    2001 Classroom Discourse: The Language Of Teaching And Learning. 2nd ed.Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chin, Christine
    2006 “Classroom Interaction In Science: Teacher Questioning And Feedback To Students’ Responses.” International Journal of Science Education281: 1315–46. 10.1080/09500690600621100
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621100 [Google Scholar]
13. Chin, Christine, and Jonathan Osborne
    2010 “Students’ Questions and Discursive Interaction: Their Impact on Argumentation during Collaborative Group Discussions in Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching47 (7): 883–908. 10.1002/tea.20385
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20385 [Google Scholar]
14. Chisholm, James S., and Amanda J. Godley
    2011 “Learning About Language Through Inquiry-Based Discussion: Three Bidialectal High School Students’ Talk About Dialect Variation, Identity, and Power.” Journal of Literacy Research43 (4): 430–68. 10.1177/1086296X11424200
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11424200 [Google Scholar]
15. Christodoulou, Andri, and Jonathan Osborne
    2014 “The Science Classroom as a Site of Epistemic Talk: A Case Study of a Teacher’s Attempts to Teach Science Based on Argument.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching51 (10): 1275–1300. 10.1002/tea.21166
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21166 [Google Scholar]
16. Clark, Herbert H., and Edward F. Schaefer
    1989 “Contributing to Discourse.” Cognitive Science131: 259–94. 10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7 [Google Scholar]
17. Crowell, Amanda, and Deanna Kuhn
    2014 “Developing Dialogic Argumentation Skills : A 3-Year Intervention Study.” Journal of Cognition and Development15 (2): 363–81. 10.1080/15248372.2012.725187
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725187 [Google Scholar]
18. Ewald, Helen R., and David L. Wallace
    1994 “Exploring Agency In Classroom Discourse, Or, Should David Have Told His Story.” College Composition and Communications45 (3): 342–68. 10.2307/358815
    https://doi.org/10.2307/358815 [Google Scholar]
19. Felton, Mark, and Deanna Kuhn
    2001 “The Development of Argumentive Discourse Skill.” Discourse Processes32 (2): 135–53. 10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_03
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_03 [Google Scholar]
20. Filipi, Anna, and Anne-Marie Barraja-Rohan
    2015 “An Interaction-Focused Pedagogy Based On Conversation Analysis For Developing L2 Pragmatic Competence.” InTeaching, Learning And Investigating Pragmatics: Principles, Methods And Practices, edited bySara Gesuato, Francesca Bianchi, and Winnie Cheng, 231–52. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Freed, Alice F., and Susan Ehrlich
    2010 “Why Do You Ask?” The Function Of Questions In Institutional Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Garton, Sue
    2012 “Speaking Out Of Turn? Taking The Initiative In Teacher-Fronted Classroom Interaction.” Classroom Discourse3 (1): 29–45. 10.1080/19463014.2012.666022
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2012.666022 [Google Scholar]
23. Gregory, Maughn
    2007 “A Framework For Facilitating Classroom Dialogue.” Teaching Philosophy30 (1): 59–84. 10.5840/teachphil200730141
    https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil200730141 [Google Scholar]
24. Harjunen, Elina
    2009 “How Do Teachers View Their Own Pedagogical Authority?” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice15 (1): 109–29. 10.1080/13540600802661345
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600802661345 [Google Scholar]
25. Haugh, Michael
    2008 “Intention in Pragmatics.” Intercultural Pragmatics5 (2): 99–110. 10.1515/IP.2008.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2008.006 [Google Scholar]
26. Haugh, Michael, and Katarzyna Jaszczolt
    2012 “Speaker Intentions And Intentionality.” InThe Cambridge Handbook Of Pragmatics, edited byKeith Allan and Katarzyna Jaszczolt, 87–112. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139022453.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022453.006 [Google Scholar]
27. Hennessy, Sara, Sylvia Rojas-Drummond, Rupert Higham, Ana María Márquez, Fiona Maine, Rosa María Ríos, Rocío García-Carrión, Omar Torreblanca, and María José Barrera
    2016 “Developing a Coding Scheme for Analysing Classroom Dialogue across Educational Contexts.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction91: 16–44. 10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001 [Google Scholar]
28. Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
    2012 “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” InQuestions: Formal, Functional And Interactional Perspectives, edited byJan P. De Ruiter, 179–90. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139045414.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.013 [Google Scholar]
29. Howe, Christine, Sara Hennessy, Neil Mercer, Maria Vrikki, and Lisa Wheatley
    2019 “Teacher–Student Dialogue During Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes.” Journal of the Learning Sciences4–51: 465–512. 10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730 [Google Scholar]
30. Howe, Christine, and Neil Mercer
    2007 “Children’s Social Development, Peer Interaction and Classroom Learning (Primary Review Research Survey 2/1b).” Cambridge, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Howe, C., & Abedin, M.
    (2013) Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge journal of education, 43(3), 325–356. 10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024 [Google Scholar]
32. Kuhn, Deanna, and Wadiya Udell
    2003 “The Development Of Argument Skills.” Child Development74 (5): 1245–60. 10.1111/1467‑8624.00605
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00605 [Google Scholar]
33. Lefstein, Adam, Julia Snell, and Mirit Israeli
    2015 “From Moves to Sequences : Expanding the Unit of Analysis in the Study of Classroom Discourse.” British Educational Research Journal41 (5): 866–85. 10.1002/berj.3164
    https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3164 [Google Scholar]
34. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
35. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1992 “Activity Types and Language.” InTalk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, edited byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
37. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2006 “Cognition at the Heart of Human Interaction.” Discourse Studies8 (1): 85–93. 10.1177/1461445606059557
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059557 [Google Scholar]
38. Macagno, Fabrizio
    2008 “Dialectical Relevance And Dialogical Context In Walton’s Pragmatic Theory.” Informal Logic28 (2): 102–128. 10.22329/il.v28i2.542
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v28i2.542 [Google Scholar]
39. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Sarah Bigi
    2017 “Analyzing the Pragmatic Structure of Dialogues.” Discourse Studies19 (2): 148–68. 10.1177/1461445617691702
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617691702 [Google Scholar]
40. Mann, William C.
    1988 “Dialogue Games: Conventions of Human Interaction.” Argumentation2 (4): 511–32. 10.1007/BF00128990
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128990 [Google Scholar]
41. Matusov, Eugene
    2009 Journey into Dialogic Pedagogy. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Matusov, Eugene, Ana Marjanovic-Shane, and Michael Gradovski
    2019 Dialogic Pedagogy and Polyphonic Research Art: Bakhtin By And For Educators. New York: Palgrave McMillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑58057‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58057-3 [Google Scholar]
43. Mehan, Hugh
    1979 “‘What Time Is It, Denise?”: Asking Known Information Questions in Classroom Discourse.” Theory into Practice18 (4): 285–94. 10.1080/00405847909542846
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846 [Google Scholar]
44. Mercer, Neil
    2002 “The Art of Interthinking.” Teaching Thinking71: 8–11.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Mercer, Neil
    2005 “Sociocultural Discourse Analysis: Analysing Classroom Talk as a Social Mode of Thinking.” Journal of Applied Linguistics1 (2): 137–68. 10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137 [Google Scholar]
46. Mercer, Neil, and Karen Littleton
    2007 Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203946657
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657 [Google Scholar]
47. Mercer, Neil, Rupert Wegerif, and Lyn Dawes
    1999 “Children’ s Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom.” British Educational Research Journal25 (1): 95–111. 10.1080/0141192990250107
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107 [Google Scholar]
48. Mey, Jacob L.
    2007 “Developing Pragmatics Interculturally.” InExplorations in Pragmatics, edited byIstvan Kecskes and Laurence R. Horn, 165–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198843.3.165
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198843.3.165 [Google Scholar]
49. Muhonen, Heli, Eija Pakarinen, Anna-Maija Poikkeus, Marja-Kristiina Lerkkanen, and Helena Rasku-Puttonen
    2018 “Quality of Educational Dialogue and Association with Students’ Academic Performance.” Learning and Instruction551: 67–79. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.007 [Google Scholar]
50. Nassaji, Hossein, and Gordon Wells
    1995 “What’s the Use of ‘Triadic Dialogue’?: An Investigation of Teacher-Student Interaction.” Applied Linguistics21 (3): 376–406. 10.1093/applin/21.3.376
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.376 [Google Scholar]
51. Netz, Hadar, and Adam Lefstein
    2016 “A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Disagreements in Classroom Discourse: Comparative Case Studies from England, the United States, and Israel.” Intercultural Pragmatics13 (2): 211–55. 10.1515/ip‑2016‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2016-0009 [Google Scholar]
52. Nikulin, Dmitri
    2010 Dialectic and Dialogue. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Nystrand, Martin, Lawrence L. Wu, Adam Gamoran, Susie Zeiser, and Daniel A. Long
    2003 “Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse.” Discourse Processes35 (2): 135–98. 10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3 [Google Scholar]
54. Nystrand, Martin
    2006 “Research on the Role of Classroom Discourse as It Affects Reading Comprehension.” Research in the Teaching of English401: 392–412.
    [Google Scholar]
55. O’Connor, M. Catherine, and Sarah Michaels
    1996 “Shifting Participant Frameworks: Orchestrating Thinking Practices in Group Discussion.” InDiscourse, Learning, and Schooling, edited byDeborah Hicks, 63–103. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511720390.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720390.003 [Google Scholar]
56. Rapanta, Chrysi
    2019 Argumentation Strategies in the Classroom. Wilmington, DE: Vernon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Rapanta, Chrysi, and Andri Christodoulou
    2022 “Walton’s Types of Argumentation Dialogues as Classroom Discourse Sequences.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction361. 10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100352
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100352 [Google Scholar]
58. Rapanta, Chrysi, and Fabrizio Macagno
    2023 “Authentic Questions as Prompts for Productive and Constructive Sequences: A Pragmatic Approach to Classroom Dialogue and Argumentation.” Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal11 (3): A65–A87. 10.5195/dpj.2023.546
    https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2023.546 [Google Scholar]
59. Reznitskaya, Alina
    2012 “Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Language Use During Literature Discussions.” The Reading Teacher65 (7): 446–56. 10.1002/TRTR.01066
    https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01066 [Google Scholar]
60. Reznitskaya, Alina, Monica Glina, Brian Carolan, Olivier Michaud, Jon Rogers, and Lavina Sequeira
    2012 “Examining Transfer Effects from Dialogic Discussions to New Tasks and Contexts.” Contemporary Educational Psychology37 (4): 288–306. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.003 [Google Scholar]
61. Richards, Jack C., and Charles Lockhart
    1994 Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667169
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667169 [Google Scholar]
62. Rowe, Mary Budd
    1986 “Wait Time: Slowing down May Be a Way of Speeding Up!” Journal of Teacher Education37 (1): 43–50. 10.1177/002248718603700110
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718603700110 [Google Scholar]
63. Russell, Thomas L.
    1983 “Analyzing Arguments in Science Classroom Discourse: Can Teachers’ Questions Distort Scientific Authority?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching20 (1): 27–45. 10.1002/tea.3660200104
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200104 [Google Scholar]
64. Sarangi, Srikant
    1998 “‘I Actually Turn My Back on [Some] Students’: The Metacommunicative Role of Talk in Classroom Discourse.” Language Awareness7 (2–3): 90–108. 10.1080/09658419808667103
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419808667103 [Google Scholar]
65. Sbisà, Marina
    2002 “Speech Acts in Context.” Language and Communication22 (4): 421–36. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(02)00018‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00018-6 [Google Scholar]
66. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversational Analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
67. Schmit, John S.
    2002 “Different Questions, Bigger Answers: Matching the Scope of Inquiry to Students’ Needs.” InInquiry and the Literary Text: Constructing Discussions in the English Classroom, edited byJames Holden and John S. Schmit, 72–78. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Scott, Philip H., Eduardo F. Mortimer, and Orlando G. Aguiar
    2006 “The Tension between Authoritative and Dialogic Discourse: A Fundamental Characteristic of Meaning Making Interactions in High School Science Lessons.” Science Education90 (4): 605–31. 10.1002/sce.20131
    https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131 [Google Scholar]
69. Searle, John R.
    1985 Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Searle, John R.
    1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
71. Sedova, Klara, Martin Sedlacek, and Roman Svaricek
    2016 “Teacher Professional Development as a Means of Transforming Student Classroom Talk.” Teaching and Teacher Education571: 14–25. 10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.005 [Google Scholar]
72. Seedhouse, Paul
    2004 The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Sidnell, Jack
    2012 “‘Who Knows Best?’: Evidentiality and Epistemic Asymmetry in Conversation.” Pragmatics and Society3 (2): 294–320. 10.1075/ps.3.2.08sid
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.3.2.08sid [Google Scholar]
74. Sidorkin, Alexander
    1999 Beyond Discourse: Education, the Self, and Dialogue. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Sinclair, John H., and Malcolm Coulthard
    1975 Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Pupils and Teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Skidmore, David
    2006 “Pedagogy and Dialogue.” Cambridge Journal of Education36 (4): 503–14. 10.1080/03057640601048407
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640601048407 [Google Scholar]
77. Skidmore, David, and Kyoko Murakami
    2016 Dialogic Pedagogy: The Importance of Dialogue in Teaching and Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783096220
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096220 [Google Scholar]
78. Tytler, Russell, and George Aranda
    2015 “Expert Teachers ’ Discursive Moves in Science Classroom Interactive Talk.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education13 (2): 425–46. 10.1007/s10763‑015‑9617‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9617-6 [Google Scholar]
79. Vrikki, Maria, Lisa Wheatley, Christine Howe, Sara Hennessy, and Neil Mercer
    2019 “Dialogic Practices in Primary School Classrooms.” Language and Education33 (1): 85–100. 10.1080/09500782.2018.1509988
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1509988 [Google Scholar]
80. Walsh, Steve
    2011 Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203827826
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826 [Google Scholar]
81. Walton, Douglas
    2008 Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge University Press. www.cambridge.org/9780521713801
    [Google Scholar]
82. Walton, Douglas
    2009 “Argumentation Theory: A Very Short Introduction.” InArgumentation in Artificial Intelligence, edited byIyad Rahwan and Guillermo R. Simari, 1–22. Boston: Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑98197‑0_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_1 [Google Scholar]
83. Walton, Douglas, and Erik Krabbe
    1995 Commitment in Dialogue. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Wells, Gordon and Rebeca M. Arauz
    2006 “Dialogue in the Classroom.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences15 (3): 379–428. 10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3 [Google Scholar]
85. Wells, Gordon
    2000 “Dialogic Inquiry in Education: Building on the Legacy of Vygotsky.” InVygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research, edited byRoy Pea, Carol D. Lee and Peter Smagorinsky, 51–85. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Zee, Emily H. van, Marletta Iwasyk, Akiko Kurose, Dorothy Simpson, and Judy Wild
    2001 “Student and Teacher Questioning during Conversations about Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching38 (2): 159–90. 10.1002/1098‑2736(200102)38:2<159::AID‑TEA1002>3.0.CO;2‑J
    https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<159::AID-TEA1002>3.0.CO;2-J [Google Scholar]