Identity gatekeeping in New Work Order organizations

References

1. Alvesson, Mats, and Hugh Willmott
   2002 “Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual.” Journal of Management Studies39 (5): 619–644. 10.1111/1467‑6486.00305
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00305 [Google Scholar]
2. Asmuß, Birte
   2008 “Performance appraisal interviews: Preference Organization in assessment sequences.” Journal of Business Communication45 (4): 408–429. 10.1177/0021943608319382
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608319382 [Google Scholar]
3. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
   2005 “Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse Studies7 (4–5):585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
4. Buttny, Richard
   1997 “Reported Speech in Talking Race on Campus.” Human Communication Research23 (4): 477–506. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1997.tb00407.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00407.x [Google Scholar]
5. Buttny, Richard
   2001 “Therapeutic humor in retelling the clients’ tellings.” Text21 (3):303–327.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cameron, Deborah
   2000 Good to talk: Living and working in a communication culture. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446217993
   https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217993 [Google Scholar]
7. Cameron, Deborah
   2005 “Communication and commodification: Global economic change in sociolinguistic perspective.” InLanguage, Communication and the Economy, ed. byGuido Erreygers, and Geert Jacobs, 9–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.16.04cam
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.16.04cam [Google Scholar]
8. Clifton, Jonathan
   2012 “Conversation Analysis in Dialogue With Stocks of Interactional Knowledge: Facework and Appraisal Interviews.” Journal of Business Communication49 (4): 283–311. 10.1177/0021943612436974
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612436974 [Google Scholar]
9. Erickson, Frederick
   2011 “The gatekeeping encounter as a social form and as a site for face work.” InHandbook of Communication in Organisations and Professions, ed. byChristopher N. Candlin, and Srikant Sarangi, 433–454. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214222.433
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214222.433 [Google Scholar]
10. Fletcher, Clive
    2001 “Performance appraisals and management: The developing research agenda.” Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology74 (4): 473–487. 10.1348/096317901167488
    https://doi.org/10.1348/096317901167488 [Google Scholar]
11. Gee, James Paul, Glynda Hull, and Colin Lankshear
    1996 The New Work Order. London: Saint Leonards Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gumperz, John J.
    1992 “Interviewing in intercultural situations.” InTalk at work – Interaction in institutional settings, ed. byPaul Drew, and John Heritage, 302–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hall, Stuart
    2000 “Who needs ‘identity’?” InIdentity: a reader, ed. byPaul du Gay, Jessica Evans, and Peter Redman, 15–30. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Heller, Monica
    2010 “The Commodification of Language.” Annual Review of Anthropology39 (1): 101–114. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951 [Google Scholar]
15. Holmes, Janet
    2005 “Leadership talk: How do leaders ‘do mentoring’, and is gender relevant?” Journal of Pragmatics37 (11): 1779–1800. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.013 [Google Scholar]
16. Holmes, Janet
    2007 “Monitoring organisational boundaries: Diverse discourse strategies used in gatekeeping.” Journal of Pragmatics39 (11): 1993–2016. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.009 [Google Scholar]
17. Holmes, Janet
    2018 “Negotiating the culture order in New Zealand workplaces.” Language in Society47 (1): 33–56. 10.1017/S0047404517000732
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000732 [Google Scholar]
18. Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra
    2017 “You’re a proper tradesman mate: Identity struggles and workplace transitions in New Zealand.” InIdentity struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the world, ed. byDorien Van De Mieroop, and Stephanie Schnurr, 127–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.69.07hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.69.07hol [Google Scholar]
19. Holmes, Janet, Meredith Marra, and Bernadette Vine
    2011 Leadership, Discourse and Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730759.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730759.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
20. Hull, Glynda
    2001 “Constructing Working Selves: Silicon Valley Assemblers Meet the New Work Order.” Anthropology of Work ReviewXXII (1):17–22. 10.1525/awr.2001.22.1.17
    https://doi.org/10.1525/awr.2001.22.1.17 [Google Scholar]
21. Iedema, Rick
    1999 “Formalizing Organizational Meaning.” Discourse & Society10 (1): 49–65. 10.1177/0957926599010001003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010001003 [Google Scholar]
22. Iedema, Rick, and Hermine Scheeres
    2003 “From doing work to talking work: renegotiating knowing, doing, and identity.” Applied Linguistics24 (3):316–337. 10.1093/applin/24.3.316
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.3.316 [Google Scholar]
23. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” InConversation Analysis; Studies from the first generation, ed. byGene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
24. Mikkola, Piia, and Esa Lehtinen
    2014 “Initiating activity shifts through use of appraisal forms as material objects during performance appraisal interviews.” InInteracting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity, ed. byPentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, Maurice Nevile, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 57–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.186.03mik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.03mik [Google Scholar]
25. Pälli, Pekka, and Esa Lehtinen
    2014 “Making objectives common in performance appraisal interviews.” Language & Communication391: 92–108. 10.1016/j.langcom.2014.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.09.002 [Google Scholar]
26. Peräkylä, Anssi
    2011 “Validity in research on naturally occurring interaction.” InQualitative Research, ed. byDavid Silverman, 365–382. London, England: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Prince, Ellen F., Joel Frader, and Charles Bosk
    1982 “On hedging in physician-physician discourse.” InLinguistics and the Professions, ed. byRobert J. Di Pietro, 83–97. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Roberts, Celia
    2011 “Gatekeeping discourse in employment interviews.” InHandbook of Communication in Organisations and Professions, ed. byChristopher N. Candlin, and Srikant Sarangi, 407–432. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214222.407
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214222.407 [Google Scholar]
29. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
30. Sandlund, Erica, Christina Olin-Scheller, Lina Nyroos, Liselotte Jakobsen, and Cecilia Nahnfeldt
    2011 “The Performance Appraisal Interview: An Arena for the Reinforcement of Norms for Employeeship.” Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies1 (2): 59–75. 10.19154/njwls.v1i2.2345
    https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v1i2.2345 [Google Scholar]
31. Sarangi, Srikant
    2005 “Social Interaction, Social Theory and Work-related Activities.” Calidoscopio3 (3): 160–169.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Sarangi, Srikant, and Celia Roberts
    1999 “Introduction.” InTalk, work and institutional order; discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, ed. bySrikant Sarangi, and Celia Roberts, 61–74. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110208375.2.61
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375.2.61 [Google Scholar]
33. Schegloff, Emmanuel A.
    1979 “The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. byTalmy Givón, 261–286. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368897_012
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_012 [Google Scholar]
34. Scheuer, Jann
    2014 “Managing employees’ talk about problems in work in performance appraisal interviews.” Discourse Studies16 (3): 407–429. 10.1177/1461445613519018
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613519018 [Google Scholar]
35. Schnurr, Stephanie, and Angela Chan
    2011 “Exploring another side of co-leadership: Negotiating professional identities through face-work in disagreements.” Language in Society40 (2): 187–209. 10.1017/S0047404511000030
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404511000030 [Google Scholar]
36. Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright
    2000 “Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education.” InAudit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy, ed. byMarilyn Strathern, 57–89. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sidnell, Jack
    2010 Conversation analysis: an introduction. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Strathern, Marilyn
    1997 “‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system.” European Review5 (3): 305–321. 10.1002/(SICI)1234‑981X(199707)5:3<305::AID‑EURO184>3.0.CO;2‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4 [Google Scholar]
39. Van De Mieroop, Dorien, and Jonathan Clifton
    2017 “Corporate settings.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplaceed. byBernadette Vine, 127–137. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315690001‑12
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315690001-12 [Google Scholar]
40. Van De Mieroop, Dorien, and Stephanie Schnurr
    2014 “Negotiating meaning and co-constructing institutionalisable answers: Leadership through gate-keeping in performance appraisal interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics671: 1–16. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.008 [Google Scholar]
41. Van De Mieroop, Dorien, and Eveline Vrolix
    2014 “A discourse analytical perspective on the professionalization of the performance appraisal interview.” International Journal of Business Communication51 (2): 159–182. 10.1177/2329488414525197
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525197 [Google Scholar]