The metapragmatics of mode choice

References

1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Andreas Stæhr
   2018 “Moving Methods Online – Researching Digital Language Practices”. InThe Routledge Handbook on Language and Superdiversity, ed. byAngela Creese and Adrian Blackledge, 118–132. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315696010‑10
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696010-10 [Google Scholar]
2. Auer, Peter
   1988 “A Conversation Analytic Approach to Code-Switching and Transfer”. InCodeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. byMonica Heller, 187–213. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110849615.187
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110849615.187 [Google Scholar]
3. Auer, Peter
   1995 “The Pragmatics of Code-Switching. A Sequential Approach”. InOne Speaker, Two Languages: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Code-Switching, ed. byLesley Milroy and Peter Muysken, 115–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620867.006
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620867.006 [Google Scholar]
4. Auer, Peter
   (ed.) 1998 Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Clark, Lynn S.
   2013 The Parent App. Understanding Families in the Digital Age. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Copland, Fiona, and Angela Creese
   2015 Linguistic Ethnography. Collecting, Analysing and Presenting Data. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781473910607
   https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910607 [Google Scholar]
7. Drotner, Kirsten
   1999 “Dangerous Media? Panic Discourses and Dilemmas of Modernity”. Paedagogica Historica35(3): 593–619. 10.1080/0030923990350303
   https://doi.org/10.1080/0030923990350303 [Google Scholar]
8. Gershon, Ilana
   2010 “Media Ideologies: An Introduction”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology20: 283–293. 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2010.01070.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01070.x [Google Scholar]
9. Goffman, Erving
   1955 “On Face-Work: Psychiatry”. Journal of Interpersonal Relations18: 213–231.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Goffman, Erving
    1963 Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goffman, Erving
    1971 Relations in Public: Micro-studies of the Public Order. London: Allen Lane, the Penguin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Asta Cekaite
    2018 Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control, Care, and Mundane Activity. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315207773
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207773 [Google Scholar]
14. Gumperz, John J.
    1982 Discourse Strategies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
15. Hutchby, Ian
    2001 “Technologies, Text and Affordances”. Sociology35 (2): 441–456. 10.1177/S0038038501000219
    https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219 [Google Scholar]
16. Jewitt, Carey
    (ed.) 2009 The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jones, Rodney H.
    2009 “Technology and Sites of Display”. InThe Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. byCarey Jewitt, 114–126. London and New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jones, Rodney. H., Alice Chik, and Christoph A. Hafner
    (eds.) 2015 Discourse and Digital Practices. Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315726465
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726465 [Google Scholar]
19. Jørgensen, Kristian M.
    2016 “The Media Go-along. Researching Mobilities with Media at Hand”. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research60: 32–49. 10.7146/mediekultur.v32i60.22429
    https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i60.22429 [Google Scholar]
20. Kress, Gunther
    2010 Multimodality. A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ling, Rich, and Jonathan Donner
    2009 Mobile communications. Cambridge: Polity Press
    [Google Scholar]
22. Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller
    2012 Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Madsen, Lian M.
    forthc. “Media panic, medical discourse and the smart phone”. In: Spaces of upset in the Nordic region: Sociolinguistics beyond cohesion and consensus in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. International Journal of the Sociology of Language.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Makoni, Sinfree, and Alastair Pennycook
    2006 “Disinventing and reconstituting languages”. In: Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages, ed. bySinfree Makoni and Alastair Pennycook, 1–41. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853599255‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599255-003 [Google Scholar]
25. Mortensen, Kristine K., and N. N. Brotherton
    2020 “Faces in Snapchat. Selfies and social media aesthetics”. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, # 266. London: King’s College London.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Norris, Sigrid
    2013 “What is a Mode? Smell, Olfactory Perception, and the Notion of Mode in Multimodal Mediated Theory”. Multimodal Communication2(2): 155–159. 10.1515/mc‑2013‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2013-0008 [Google Scholar]
27. Rampton, Ben
    1995 Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rampton, Ben, Karen Tusting, Jannet Maybin, Richard Barwell, Angela Creese, and Vally Lytra
    2004 UK Linguistic Ethnography: A Discussion Paper. Paper published atwww.ling-ethnog.org.uk
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rampton, Ben, and Louise Eley
    2018 “Goffman and the Everyday Interactional Grounding of Surveillance”. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, # 246. King’s College London.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Silverstein, Michael
    1976 “Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description”. InMeaning in anthropology, ed. byKeith H. Basso and Henry A. Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Silverstein, Michael
    1985 “Language and the Culture of Gender”. InSemiotic mediation, ed. byElizabeth Mertz and Rick Parmentier, 219–259. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑491280‑9.50016‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-491280-9.50016-9 [Google Scholar]
32. Silverstein, Michael
    1993 “Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function”. InReflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. byJohn Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004 [Google Scholar]
33. Tannen, Deborah
    2013 “The Medium is the Meta-Message”. InDiscourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. byDeborah Tannen and Anna M. Trester, 99–117. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]