oa Both responsiveness and standardization

References

1. Caswell, Dorte, and Tanja Dall
   2022 “Using conversation analysis to develop reflective practice in social work.” Qualitative Social Work21(6): 1290–1307. 10.1177/14733250221124210
   https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250221124210 [Google Scholar]
2. Dall, Tanja, and Srikant Sarangi
   2018 “Ways of ‘Appealing to the Institution’ in Interprofessional Rehabilitation Team Decision-Making.” Journal of Pragmatics1291: 102–119. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.012
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.012 [Google Scholar]
3. Filatov, Tarja
   2013 Selvitystyö välityömarkkinoiden mahdollisuuksista tukea vaikeasti työllistyvien työelämään osallistumista ja työmarkkinoille pääsyä [Report on the Possibilities of Intermediate Labour Markets to Support Job Integration and Labour Market Entry of People Having Difficulties in Getting a Job]. Helsinki: Ministry of Employment and the Economy.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Finn, Dan, and Dave Simmonds
   2003 Intermediate Labour Markets in Britain and an International Review of Transitional Employment Programmes. London: Department for Work and Pensions.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Goffman, Erving
   1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho
   2004 Iso suomen kielioppi [Entensive Finnish Grammar]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. scripta.kotus.fi/visk
   [Google Scholar]
7. Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
   2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly68 (1): 15–38. 10.1177/019027250506800103
   https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
8. Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
   1997 “Membership Categorization Analysis: An Introduction.” InCulture in Action. Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. byStephen Hester and Peter Eglin, 1–23. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hjörne, Eva, Kirsi Juhila, and Carolus van Nijnatten
   2010 “Negotiating Dilemmas in the Practices of Street-Level Welfare Work.” International Journal of Social Welfare19 (3): 303–309. 10.1111/j.1468‑2397.2010.00721.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00721.x [Google Scholar]
10. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
11. Juhila, Kirsi, Tarja Pösö, Christopher Hall, and Nigel Parton
    2003 “Introduction. Beyond a Universal Client.” InConstructing Clienthood in Social Work and Human Services. Interaction, Identities and Practices, ed. byChristopher Hall, Kirsi Juhila, Nigel Parton, and Tarja Pösö, 11–24. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kauppinen, Timo M., Peppi Saikku, and Riitta-Liisa Kokko
    2010 “Työttömyys ja huono-osaisuuden kasautuminen [Unemployment and the Accumulation of Deprivation].” InSuomalaisten hyvinvointi 2010 [Wellbeing of the Finns 2010], ed. byMarja Vaarama, Pasi Moisio, and Sakari Karvonen, 234–250. Helsinki: Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lempiälä, Tea, Sanni Tiitinen, and Outi Vanharanta
    2023 ”Paradox as an Interactional Resource: An ethnomethodological analysis into the interconnectedness of organizational paradoxes.” Organization Studies44(11): 1825–1852. 10.1177/01708406221118671
    https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221118671 [Google Scholar]
14. Lerner, Gene H.
    2004 “Collaborative Turn Sequences.” InConversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene H. Lerner, 225–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.12ler
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.12ler [Google Scholar]
15. Matthews, Ben and Trine Heinemann
    2012 “Analysing Conversation: Studying Design as Social Action.” Design Studies33 (6): 649–672. 10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.008 [Google Scholar]
16. Meyer, Christian
    2019 “Ethnomethodology’s Culture.” Human Studies421: 281–303. 10.1007/s10746‑019‑09515‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09515-5 [Google Scholar]
17. Mäkitalo, Åsa, and Roger Säljö
    2002a “Invisible People: Institutional Reasoning and Reflexivity in the Production of Services and ‘Social Facts’ in Public Employment Agencies.” Mind, Culture, and Activity9 (3): 160–178. 10.1207/S15327884MCA0903_02
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0903_02 [Google Scholar]
18. Mäkitalo, Åsa, and Roger Säljö
    2002b “Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: Categories as situated practices.” Text & Talk22(1): 57–82. 10.1515/text.2002.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.005 [Google Scholar]
19. Nielsen, Mie Femø
    2012 “Using Artifacts in Brainstorming Sessions to Secure Participation and Decouple Sequentiality.” Discourse Studies14 (1): 87–109. 10.1177/1461445611427211
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427211 [Google Scholar]
20. Nikander, Pirjo
    2003 “The Absent Client. Case Description and Decision Making in Interprofessional Meetings.” InConstructing Clienthood in Social Work and Human Services: Identities, Interactions and Practices, ed. byChris Hall, Kirsi Juhila, Nigel Parton, and Tarja Pösö, 123–140. London: Jessica Kingsley.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Nissi, Riikka
    2016 “Spelling out consequences: Conditional constructions as a means to resist proposals in organisational planning process.” Discourse Studies18(3): 311–329. 10.1177/1461445616634556
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616634556 [Google Scholar]
22. Oosi, Olli, Jeremias Kortelainen, Noora Luomala, Jenna Siltala, Minna Mayer, Mika Ala-Kauhaluoma, Juha Klemelä, Jouni Puumalainen, and Mikko Kesä
    2023 Työkykyohjelman arviointi. Ulkoisen arvioinnin loppuraportti [Working capacity programme evaluation. External evaluation final report]. Helsinki: Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment. urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-775-5
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pomerantz, Anita
    1986 “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies91: 219–229. 10.1007/BF00148128
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
24. Potter, Jonathan, and Alexa Hepburn
    2010 “Putting Aspiration into Words: ‘Laugh Particles’, Managing Descriptive Trouble and Modulating Action.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (6): 1543–1555. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.003 [Google Scholar]
25. Riemann, Gerhard
    2005 “Trying to Make Sense of Cases: Features and Problems of Social Workers’ Case Discussions.” Qualitative Social Work4 (4): 413–430. 10.1177/1473325005058644
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325005058644 [Google Scholar]
26. Räsänen, Jenni-Mari, Suvi Raitakari, and Kirsi Juhila
    2024 ”Creating a family centre by categorising clients in a steering group meeting interaction. Qualitative Social Work23(2): 330–346. 10.1177/14733250221147027
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250221147027 [Google Scholar]
27. Saario, Sirpa, and Suvi Raitakari
    2010 “Contractual Audit and Mental Health Rehabilitation: A Study of Formulating Effectiveness in a Finnish Supported Housing Unit.” International Journal of Social Welfare19 (3): 321–329. 10.1111/j.1468‑2397.2010.00726.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00726.x [Google Scholar]
28. Sacks, Harvey
    2003 “On the Analysability of Stories by Children.” InStudying the Social Worlds of Children: Sociological Readings, ed. byFrances Chaput Waksler, 195–215. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library. Originally published 1972.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 “A Tutorial on Membership Categorization.” Journal of Pragmatics39 (3): 462–482. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007 [Google Scholar]
30. Steen, Marc, Menno Manschot, and Nicole de Koning
    2011 “Benefits of Co-Design in Service Design Projects.” International Journal of Design5(2): 53–60.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2012 “Moving Forward with Membership Categorization Analysis.” Discourse Studies14 (3): 277–303. 10.1177/1461445612441534
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534 [Google Scholar]
32. Tiitinen, Sanni, and Tea Lempiälä
    2022 “Recruitment interviews for intermediate labour markets: Identity construction under ambiguous expectations.” Discourse Studies24(6): 758–780. 10.1177/14614456221112276
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456221112276 [Google Scholar]