Political language gaffes and the importance of Hearer’s meaning

References

1. Carston, Robyn
   2002 Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470754603
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
2. Carston, Robyn, and Alison Hall
   2012 “Implicature and Explicature.” InCognitive Pragmatics, ed. byHans-Jörg Schmid, 47–84. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214215.47
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215.47 [Google Scholar]
3. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
   2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Gibbs, Raymond W., Julia Kushner, and Rob Mills III
   1991 “Authorial Intentions and Metaphor Comprehension.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research20 (1): 11–30. 10.1007/BF01076917
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01076917 [Google Scholar]
5. Gibbs, Raymond W., and Herbert H. Colston
   2020 “Pragmatics Always Matters: An Expanded Vision of Experimental Pragmatics.” Frontiers in Psychology111: 1619. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01619
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01619 [Google Scholar]
6. Gil, José María
   2019 “A Relational Account of Communication on the Basis of Slips of the Tongue.” Intercultural Pragmatics16 (2): 153–183. 10.1515/ip‑2019‑0008
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0008 [Google Scholar]
7. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard, and Marina Terkourafi
   2023 “We Need to Talk about Hearer’s Meaning!” Journal of Pragmatics2081: 99–114. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.015
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.015 [Google Scholar]
8. Haugh, Michael
   2013 “Speaker Meaning and Accountability in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics48 (1): 41–56. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.009 [Google Scholar]
9. Hutchby, Ian
   2016 “Infelicitous Talk: Politicians’ Words and the Media Ecology in Three British Political Gaffes.” Journal of Language and Politics15 (1): 667–687. 10.1075/jlp.15.6.01hut
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.6.01hut [Google Scholar]
10. Kádár, Dániel
    2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
11. Kádár, Dániel, and Michael Haugh
    2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
12. Kecskes, Istvan
    2010 “The Paradox of Communication: Socio-cognitive Approach to Pragmatics.” Pragmatics and Society1 (1): 50–73. 10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec [Google Scholar]
13. Kecskes, Istvan
    2012 “Sociopragmatics and Cross-cultural and Intercultural Studies.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byKeith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 599–616. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139022453.033
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022453.033 [Google Scholar]
14. Kecskes, Istvan
    2013 “Why Do We Say What We Say the Way We Say It?” Journal of Pragmatics48 (1): 71–83. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.010 [Google Scholar]
15. Kecskes, Istvan
    2014 “A Response to the Paper “Metaphor Interpretation and Motivation in Relevance theory” by Huaxin Huang and Xiaolong Yang.” Journal of Pragmatics601: 274–278. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.004 [Google Scholar]
16. Kecskes, Istvan
    2019 “The Interplay of Prior Experience and Actual Situational Context in Intercultural First Encounters.” Pragmatics and Cognition26 (1): 112–134. 10.1075/pc.19008.kec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19008.kec [Google Scholar]
17. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
18. Maillat, Didier
    2023 “On the Manifestness of Assumptions: Gaining Insights into Commitment and Emotions.” Pragmatics33 (3): 460–485. 10.1075/prag.21069.mai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21069.mai [Google Scholar]
19. Mazzarella, Diana
    2013 “Optimal Relevance as a Pragmatic Criterion: The Role of Epistemic Vigilance.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics251: 20–45.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mazzarella, Diana, and Edoardo Vaccargiu
    2024 “Communication: Inferring Speaker Intentions or Perceiving the World? Insights from Developmental Research.” Journal of Pragmatics2211: 123–136. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.014 [Google Scholar]
21. McVittie, Chris, and Andy McKinlay
    2019 “‘Alternative facts are not facts’: Gaffe-announcements, the Trump Administration and the Media.” Discourse & Society30 (2): 172–187. 10.1177/0957926518816196
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518816196 [Google Scholar]
22. Moeschler, Jacques
    2009 “Pragmatics, Propositional and Non-propositional Effects: Can a Theory of Utterance Interpretation Account for Emotions in Verbal Communication?” Social Science Information48 (3): 447–464. 10.1177/0539018409106200
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018409106200 [Google Scholar]
23. Ruiz de Mendoza, Ibáñez, Francisco José, and María Sandra Peña Cervel
    2023 “Structural Similarity in Figurative Language: A Preliminary Cognitive Analysis.” Lingua2901, 103541. 10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103541
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103541 [Google Scholar]
24. Sheinheit, Ian, and Cynthia Bogard
    2016 “Authenticity and Carrier Agents: The Social Construction of Political Gaffes.” Sociological Forum31 (4): 970–993. 10.1111/socf.12292
    https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12292 [Google Scholar]
25. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Stockwell, Peter
    2020 Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Timpe-Laughlin, Veronika, Ashley Green, and Oh Saerhim
    2021 “Raising Pragmatic Awareness: A Think-aloud Study.” System981: art. 102470. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102470
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102470 [Google Scholar]
28. Tincheva, Nelly
    2019 Language gaffes (Linguistic, Discursive and Cognitive Aspects of ‘Language Bloopers’). Sofia: Polis Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Tincheva, Nelly
    2021 “Blurring the Boundaries between Real Worlds, Discourse Worlds and Text Worlds.” Slavia Meridionalis211: art. 2381. 10.11649/sm.2381
    https://doi.org/10.11649/sm.2381 [Google Scholar]
30. Tincheva, Nelly
    2022 “Political Speeches: Conceptual Metaphor Meets Text Worlds and Gestalt Psychology’s Shifts in Profiling.” InFigurativity and Human Ecology, ed. byAlexandra Bagasheva, Bozhil Hristov, and Nelly Tincheva, 85–106. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.17.04tin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.17.04tin [Google Scholar]
31. Tincheva, Nelly
    2023 “‘Narrative structure’, ‘rhetorical structure’, ‘text structure’: A Conceptual Complex Meets Text- and Discourse-world Profiling Shifts.” English Text Construction16 (1): 30–58. 10.1075/etc.21016.tin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.21016.tin [Google Scholar]
32. Verschueren, Jef
    2000 Understanding Pragmatics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Werth, Paul
    1999 Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    2012 Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370 [Google Scholar]
35. Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston
    2019 “Pragmatics and the Challenge of ‘Non-propositional’ Effects.” Journal of Pragmatics1451: 31–38. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005 [Google Scholar]
36. Yus, Francisco
    2017 “Contextual Constraints and Non-propositional Effects in WhatsApp Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics1141: 66–86. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.003 [Google Scholar]
37. Zhang, Jian
    2021 “A Tentative Analysis of Pragmatic Failure from the Perspective of Relevance Theory.” The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology3 (3): 41–48. 10.25236/FSST.2021.030306
    https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2021.030306 [Google Scholar]
38. Zimmerman, Don H.
    1998 “Identity, Context and Interaction.” In: Identities in Talk, ed. byPeter Chua, Charles Antaki, and Sue Widdicombe, 87–106. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]