Rhetorical strategies for the construction of a corporate identity

References

1. Anderson, Claire and Giovanna Imperia
   1992 “The corporate annual report: A photo analysis of male and female portrayals.” The Journal of Business Communication22 (2): 113–128. 10.1177/002194369202900201
   https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369202900201 [Google Scholar]
2. Atakan-Dumana, Sirin, and Emel Ozdora-Aksak
   2014 “The role of corporate social responsibility in online identity construction: An analysis of Turkey’s banking sector.” Public Relations Review40 (5): 862–864. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.004 [Google Scholar]
3. Balmer, John
   2001 Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing—seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing35(3–4): 248–291. 10.1108/03090560110694763
   https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560110694763 [Google Scholar]
4. Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe
   2006 Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748626533
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626533 [Google Scholar]
5. Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann
   1966 The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bhatia, Vijay K., and Jane Lung
   2006 “Corporate identity and generic integrity in business discourse.” InIntercultural and international business communication, ed. byJuan Carlos Plamer-Silveria, Miguel F. Ruiz-Garrido and Immaculada Fortanet-Gomez, 265–285. Bern: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bhatia, Vijay K.
   2010 “Interdiscursivity in professional communication.” Discourse & Communication21 (1): 32–50. 10.1177/1750481309351208
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309351208 [Google Scholar]
8. Bhatia, Vijay K.
   2011 “Contested identities in corporate disclosure documents.” InDiscourse and identity in the professions: Legal, corporate and institutional citizenship, ed. byVijay K. Bhatia and Paola Evangelisti-Allori, 27–44. Bern: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Boltzmann, Ludwig
   1974 “The second law of thermodynamics.” InTheoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems, ed. byBrian McGinness, 13–32. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑2091‑6_2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2091-6_2 [Google Scholar]
10. Breeze, Ruth
    2013 Corporate discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Burke, Kenneth
    1969 A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley and Los Angeles, Cal.: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin and Michael Bamberg
    2006 Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511584459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584459 [Google Scholar]
13. Fairclough, Norman
    1992 Discourse and social change. Oxford: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fairclough, Norman
    2003 Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
15. Feng, Wei
    2017 Discursive constructions of corporate identities by Chinese banks on Sina Weibo: An integrated sociolinguistics approach. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑4469‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4469-4 [Google Scholar]
16. Gándara, Lelia
    2004 “‘They that sow the wind…’: Proverbs and sayings in argumentation.” Discourse & Society15(2–3): 345–359. 10.1177/0957926504041023
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041023 [Google Scholar]
17. Ihlen, Øyvind, and Robert L. Heath
    2018 The Handbook of Organization Rhetoric and Communication. HN.J.: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119265771
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119265771 [Google Scholar]
18. Hatfield, Elaine, Richard L. Rapson and Yen-Chi L. Le
    2011 “Emotional contagion and empathy.” InThe Social Neuroscience of Empathy, ed. byJean Decety and William Ickes, 19–30. Boston, Mass: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hawes, Colin, and Eng Chew
    2011 “The cultural transformation of large Chinese enterprises into internationally competitive corporations: case studies of Haier and Huawei.” Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies9 (1): 67–83. 10.1080/14765284.2011.542886
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2011.542886 [Google Scholar]
20. He, Saike, Zheng, Xiaolong, Zeng, Daniel, Luo, Chuan & Zhu Zhang
    . Exploring entrainment patterns of human emotion in social media. PLoS ONE 2016(3). 10.1371/journal.pone.0150630
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150630 [Google Scholar]
21. Hofstede, Geert, Gert J. Hofstede and Michael Minkov
    2010 Cultures and Organizations: Software of Mind. 3rd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hopwood, Anthony G.
    1996 “Introduction.” Accounting, Organizations and Society21 (1): 55–56. 10.1016/S0361‑3682(96)90026‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(96)90026-4 [Google Scholar]
23. Hunt, Lester H.
    2009 “Literature as fable, fable as argument.” Philosophy and Literature33 (2): 369–385. 10.1353/phl.0.0053
    https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.0.0053 [Google Scholar]
24. Johansen, Trine S. and Anne E. Nielsen
    2016 “Constructing non-profit identity in the midst of stakeholder complexity.” International studies of management & organization46 (4): 216–227. 10.1080/00208825.2016.1140518
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2016.1140518 [Google Scholar]
25. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lambert, Andrew
    1989 Corporate identity and facilities management. Facilities7 (12): 7–12. 10.1108/eb006515
    https://doi.org/10.1108/eb006515 [Google Scholar]
27. Liao, Mei-Zhen
    1999 “Metaphor as a textual strategy in English.” Text19 (2): 227–252.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lyons, John
    1968 Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165570
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570 [Google Scholar]
29. Lyons, John
    1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mina, Abbassi Bonabi, and Hemmati Fatemeh
    2012 “Exploring the textual variations of metaphors in terms of rank dimension and their discoursal values across different text-types.” Theory and practice in language studies2 (10): 2209–2218. 10.4304/tpls.2.10.2209‑2218
    https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.10.2209-2218 [Google Scholar]
31. Peverelli, Peter J.
    2006 Chinese Corporate Identity. London and New York, N.Y.: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203085936
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203085936 [Google Scholar]
32. Pollach, Irene
    2005 “Corporate self-representation on the WWW: Strategies for enhancing usability, credibility and utility.” Corporate Communication: An International Journal10 (4): 285–301. 10.1108/13563280510630098
    https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280510630098 [Google Scholar]
33. Rose, Margaret A.
    1979 Parody, meta-fiction: An analysis of parody as a critical mirror to the writing and reception of fiction. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Singh, Nitish, Hongxin Zhao, and Xiaorui Hu
    2003 “Cultural adaptation on the Web: A study of American companies’ domestic and Chinese websites.” Journal of Global Information Management11 (3): 63–80. 10.4018/jgim.2003070104
    https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2003070104 [Google Scholar]
35. Sommerfeldt, Erich
    2011 “Activist e-mail action alerts and identification: Rhetorical relationship building strategies in collective action.” Public Relations Review (37): 87–89. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.10.003 [Google Scholar]
36. The PAD Research Group
    The PAD Research Group 2016 “Not so ‘innocent’ after all? Exploring corporate identity construction online.” Discourse & Communication10 (3): 291–313. 10.1177/1750481315623902
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481315623902 [Google Scholar]
37. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication1 (1): 91–112. 10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
38. Welch, Mary, and Paul R. Jackson
    2007 “Rethinking internal communication: a stakeholder approach.” Corporate Communication12 (2): 177–198. 10.1108/13563280710744847
    https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280710744847 [Google Scholar]