Face attributes in interviews with Iranian politicians

References

1. Arundale, Robert B.
   2010 “Constituting face in conversation: face, facework, and interactional achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics421: 2078–2105. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021 [Google Scholar]
2. Bardi, Anat, Rusi Jaspal, Ela Polek, and Shalom H. Schwartz
   2014 “Values and Identity Process Theory: theoretical integration and empirical interactions.” InIdentity Process Theory: Identity, Social Action and Social Change, ed. byRusi Jaspal, and Glynis M. Breakwell, 175–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139136983.013
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136983.013 [Google Scholar]
3. Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos
   2013 “Face, identity and im/politeness. Looking backward, moving forward: From Goffman to practice theory.” Journal of Politeness Research29 (1): 1–33. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0001
   https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Bousfield, Derek
   2013 “Face in conflict.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict1 (1): 37–57. 10.1075/jlac.1.1.03bou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.03bou [Google Scholar]
5. Brewer, Marilynn B.
   2007 “Social identity and close relationships: What is the Connection?” Paper presented at theSydney Symposium of Social Psychology, Sydney, Australiawww.sydneysymposium.unsw.edu.au/2007/Chapters/BrewerSSSP07
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brewer, Marilynn B., and Wendy L. Gardner
   1996 “Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71(1): 83–93. 10.1037/0022‑3514.71.1.83
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 [Google Scholar]
7. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
8. Bull, Peter, Judy Elliot, Derrol Palmer, and Libby Walker
   1996 “Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews.” British Journal of Social Psychology351: 267–284. 10.1111/j.2044‑8309.1996.tb01097.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01097.x [Google Scholar]
9. Bull, Peter, and Kate Mayer
   1993 “How not to answer questions in political interviews.” Political Psychology14 (4): 651–666. 10.2307/3791379
   https://doi.org/10.2307/3791379 [Google Scholar]
10. Chang, Wei-Lin M., and Michael Haugh
    2011 “Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics431: 2948–2963. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.009 [Google Scholar]
11. Chen, Rong, and Kwang-Kuo Hwang
    2016 “Nation, face, and identity: An initial investigation of national face in East Asia.” Frontiers in Psychology7 (1557) 1–11. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01557
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01557 [Google Scholar]
12. Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
    2002 The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
13. David, Ohad, and Daniel Bar-Tal
    2009 “A sociopsychological conception of collective identity: The case of national identity as an example.” Personality and Social Psychology Review131: 354–379. 10.1177/1088868309344412
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309344412 [Google Scholar]
14. Emmertsen, Sofie
    2007 “Interviewers’ challenging questions in British debate interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics391: 570–591. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.011 [Google Scholar]
15. Franey, James
    2014, November7. Iran’s Larijani slams West’s ‘bias’ on human rights. https://www.youtube.com/watch?​v=roV0Yi​_CxBI (accessed20 July 2018).
16. Goffman, Erving
    1955 “On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements of social interaction.” Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes18(3): 213–231. Reprinted inGoffman (2005, pp.5–46). 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
17. Goffman, Erving
    1967 On Face Work. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face- to- face Behaviour. New York: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hogg, Michael, and Dominic Abrams
    1988 Social Identification: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Human Rights Watch
    Human Rights Watch. Country summary: Iran. January 2015 https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/iran_7.pdf (accessed4 July 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jaspal, Rusi, and Adrian Coyle
    2009 “Reconciling social psychology and sociolinguistics can have some benefits: Language and identity among second generation British Asians.” Social Psychological Review11 (2): 3–14. 10.53841/bpsspr.2009.11.2.3
    https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsspr.2009.11.2.3 [Google Scholar]
21. Jenkins, Richard
    1996 Social Identity. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203292990
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203292990 [Google Scholar]
22. Joseph, John E.
    2013 “Identity work and face work across linguistic and cultural boundaries.” Journal of Politeness Research9 (1): 35–54. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0002 [Google Scholar]
23. Jucker, Andreas H.
    1986 News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.vii.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vii.4 [Google Scholar]
24. Katzman, Kenneth
    2017 “Iran: Politics, human rights, and U.S. policy.” Congressional Research Service, 1–40. https://www.google.de/search?q=​Katzman,+​Kenneth.+​2017.+​Iran:+​Politics,+​human+​rights,+​and+​U.S.+​policy.+​Congressional+​Research+​Service.+​1-40.+​Iran:+​Politics,+​Human+​Rights,+​and+​U.S.+​Policy+​(unt.edu)+​(accessed+​on+​6+​September+​2015&​sa=​X&​ved=​2ahUKE​wjT​ksrug​Nz9AhXNi​_0HHQl5​A0wQ​gwN6​BAgIEAE (accessed6 September 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lim, Tae-Seop
    1994 “Facework and Interpersonal Relationships.” InThe challenge of facework, ed. byStella Ting-Toomey, 209–229. New York: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mavaddat, Fariba
    2013, March15. Euronews interview – Mohammad Larijani, responsable du Haut-conseil Iranien aux droits de l’hommehttps://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=​fariba+​mavaddat+​and+​larijani&​&​view=​detail&​mid=​4465AA​8E4C8427​50AB5A​4465AA8​E4C842​750AB5A&​&​FORM=​VRDGAR&​ru=​%2F​videos%2F​search​%3Fq​%3Dfariba​%2Bmavaddat​%2Band​%2Blarijani​%26FORM​%3DHDRSC3 (accessed18 October 2019).
27. Mohammadi, Majid
    2007 “Iranian women and the civil rights movement in Iran: Feminism interacted.” Journal of International Women’s Studies9 (1): 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Oyserman, Daphna, Kristen Elmore, and George Smith
    2012 “Self, Self-Concept, and Identity.” InHandbook of Self and Identity, eds. byMark R. Leary, and June Price Tangney (Chap. 4). New York: The Guildford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rose, Charlie
    2011, November18. Mohammad-Javad Larijani, head of Iran’s Human Rights Council, joins Charlie at the table for a full hour to tackle the Iranian nuclear deal and tensions between the U.S. and his country. https://charlierose.com/videos/14322 (accessed22 July 2016).
30. Rose, Charlie
    2014, January8. Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations Mohammad Khazaee examines the relationship between the United States and Iran and its evolution in recent years. https://charlierose.com/videos/17284 (accessed16 August 2016).
31. Rose, Charlie
    2015, April29. Part two of a discussion with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif about ongoing nuclear negotiations and the relationship between Iran and the United States. https://charlierose.com/videos/20391 (accessed14 August 2017).
32. Salehi, Ali A.
    2012 February 28. Iran has best human rights record in the Muslim world. Tehran Times. https://en.irna.ir/news/80010665/Salehi-Iran-most-successful-Islamic (accessed15 July 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
33. Schwartz, Shalom H.
    1992 “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” InAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. byMark P. Zanna, 251: 1–65. San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Schwartz, Shalom H.
    2011 “Values: Cultural and Individual.” InFundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology, ed. byFons J. R. van de Vijver, Athanasios Chasiotis, and Seger. M. Breugelmans, 463–493. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511974090.019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974090.019 [Google Scholar]
35. Schwartz, Shalom H.
    2012 “An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture2 (1): 1–20. 10.9707/2307‑0919.1116
    https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116 [Google Scholar]
36. Schwartz, Shalom H.
    2015 “Basic Individual Values: Sources and Consequences.” InHandbook of Value: Perspectives from Economics, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Psychology and Sociology, ed. byTobias Brosch and David Sander. Oxford: UK: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716600.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716600.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
37. Schwartz, Shalom H.
    2017 “The Refined Theory of Basic Values.” InValues and Behavior: Taking a Cross Cultural Perspective, ed. bySonia Roccas and Lilach Sagiv, 51–72. Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑56352‑7_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56352-7_3 [Google Scholar]
38. Schwartz, Shalom H., and Anat Bardi
    2001 “Value hierarchies across cultures. Taking a similarities perspective.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology32 (3): 268–290. 10.1177/0022022101032003002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002 [Google Scholar]
39. Schwartz, Shalom H., Jan Cieciuch, Michele Vecchione, Eldad Davidov, Ronald Fischer, Constanze Beierlein, Alice Ramos, Markku Verkasalo, Jan-Erik Lönnqvist, Kursad Demirutku, Ozlem Dirilen-Gumus and Mark Konty
    2012 “Refining the theory of basic individual values.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology103 (4): 663–688. 10.1037/a0029393
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393 [Google Scholar]
40. Simon, Bernd
    2004 Identity in Modern Society: A Social Psychological Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470773437
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773437 [Google Scholar]
41. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2007 “Theories of identity and the analysis of face.” Journal of Pragmatics391: 639–656. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
42. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2009 “Face, identity and interactional goals”. InFace, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. byFrancesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Michael Haugh, 137–154. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Jiayi Wang
    2019 “Culture, context, and concerns about face: Synergistic insights from pragmatics and social psychology.” The Journal of Language and Social Psychology38 (4): 423–440. 10.1177/0261927X19865293
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19865293 [Google Scholar]
44. Tajfel, Henri and John C. Turner
    1986 “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour”. InThe Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. byStephen Worchel and William G. Austin, 33–47. CA: Brooks/Cole, Monterey.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wang, Jiayi, and Helen Spencer-Oatey
    2015 “The gains and losses of face in ongoing intercultural interaction: A case study of Chinese participant perspectives.” Journal of Pragmatics891: 50–65. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.007 [Google Scholar]
46. Wendt, Alexander
    1992 “Anarchy is what stated make of it.” International Organisation461: 391–426. 10.1017/S0020818300027764
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764 [Google Scholar]