On the nature of pragmatic constituents

References

1. Baron-Cohen, Simon, and Patricia Howlin
   1993 “The theory of mind deficit in autism: some questions for teaching and diagnosis.” InUnderstanding other minds: perspectives from autism, ed. bySimon Baron-Cohen, Helen Tager-Flusberg, and Donald J. Cohen. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baron-Cohen, Simon, Alan M. Leslie, and Uta Frith
   1985 “Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?” Cognition, 211: 37–46. 10.1016/0010‑0277(85)90022‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8 [Google Scholar]
3. Baron-Cohen, Simon, Helen Tager-Flusberg, and Donald J. Cohen
   2000 “A note on nosology.” InUnderstanding other minds: perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience, ed. bySimon Baron-Cohen, Helen Tager-Flusberg, and Donald J. Cohen. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brentano, Franz
   1874 Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Burton-Roberts, Noel
   2010 “Cancellation and intention.” InExplicit Communication: Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics, ed. byBelén Soria and Esther Romero. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230292352_9
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292352_9 [Google Scholar]
6. Capone, Alessandro
   2005 “Pragmemes : A study with reference to English and Italian.” Journal of Pragmatics371: 1355–1371. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.013 [Google Scholar]
7. Capone, Alessandro
   2006 “On Grice’s circle. (Further considerations on the semantics/pragmatics debate).” Journal of Pragmatics381: 645–669. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.02.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.02.005 [Google Scholar]
8. Capone, Alessandro
   2009 “Are explicatures cancellable?” Journal of Intercultural Pragmatics61: 55–83.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Capone, Alessandro
   2010 “What can modularity of mind tell us about the semantics/pragmatics debate?” Australian Journal of linguistics301: 497–522. 10.1080/07268602.2010.522971
   https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2010.522971 [Google Scholar]
10. Capone, Alessandro
    2016 The pragmatics of indirect reports. Socio-philosophical considerations. Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Capone, Alessandro
    2018 “Embedding explicatures in implicit indirect reports: simple sentences, and substitution failure cases.” InFurther Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy, ed. byAlessandro Capone, Marco Carapezza, and Franco Lo Piparo. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑72173‑6_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72173-6_6 [Google Scholar]
12. Capone, Alessandro
    2018 “Pragmemes (again).” Lingua2091: 89–104. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.004 [Google Scholar]
13. Capone, Alessandro
    2019 Pragmatics and Philosophy. Connections and Ramifications. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑19146‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19146-7 [Google Scholar]
14. Carston, Robyn
    2008 “Linguistic Communication and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.” Synthese1651: 321–345. 10.1007/s11229‑007‑9191‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9191-8 [Google Scholar]
15. Cummings, Louise
    2009 Clinical pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511581601
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581601 [Google Scholar]
16. Dennett, Daniel
    1987 The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Devitt, Michael
    2021 Overlooking conventions. The trouble with linguistic pragmatism. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑70653‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70653-1 [Google Scholar]
18. Donnellan, Keith S.
    1966 “Reference and definite descriptions”. Philosophical Review75(3): 291–304. 10.2307/2183143
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2183143 [Google Scholar]
19. Goodwin, Charles
    2003 “Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia.” InConversation and brain damage, ed. byCharles Goodwin. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jaszczolt, Kasia M.
    2005 Default Semantics. Foundations of a compositional theory of acts of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261987.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261987.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
21. Jaszczolt, Kasia M.
    2010 “Situated temporal reference: A case for compositional pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics421: 2898–2909. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.007 [Google Scholar]
22. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1988 “Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation.” InErving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order, ed. byPaul Drew and Anthony Wootton. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2000 Presumptive meanings. The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
24. Lewis, Geoffrey L.
    1967 Turkish grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lyons, John
    1981 Language and Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511809859
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809859 [Google Scholar]
26. Mey, Jacob L.
    2001 Pragmatics. An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. (Second ed.)
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mey, Jacob L.
    2010 “Reference and the pragmeme.” Journal of Pragmatics421: 2882–2888. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.009 [Google Scholar]
28. Olness, Gloria S., and Hanna, Ulatowska H.
    2016 “Aphasias.” InResearch in Clinical Pragmatics, ed. byLouise Cummings. Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Perry, John
    1986 “Thought without Representation.” Supplementary Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society601: 263–83. 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/60.1.137
    https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/60.1.137 [Google Scholar]
30. Pietroski, Paul
    2005 “Meaning before truth.” InContextualism in philosophy, ed. byGerhard Preyer, and Georg Peter. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sodian, Beate, and Uta Frith
    1992 “Deception and sabotage in autistic, retarded and normal children.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry331: 591–605. 10.1111/j.1469‑7610.1992.tb00893.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00893.x [Google Scholar]
32. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1995 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Stainton, Robert J.
    2005 “In defense of non-sentential assertion.” InSemantics versus pragmatics, ed byZoltan Gendler Szabo. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251520.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251520.003.0011 [Google Scholar]