Examining the use of reflexive metadiscourse in the construction of affiliative communication in group email requests

References

1. Ädel, Annelie
   2006 Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.24
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24 [Google Scholar]
2. Ädel, Annelie
   2021 “Reflections on Reflexivity in Digital Communication: Towards a Third Wave of Metadiscourse Studies.” InMetadiscourse in Digital Communication, ed. byLarissa D’Angelo, Anna Mauranen and Stefania Maci, 37–65. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑85814‑8_3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85814-8_3 [Google Scholar]
3. Amouzadeh, Mohammad and Raha Zareifard
   2019 “Interactional metadiscourse of gender in Persian: The case of conference presentations.” Pragmatics and Society10 (4): 512–537. 10.1075/ps.16049.amo
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16049.amo [Google Scholar]
4. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   2006 “Introduction: sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Sociolinguistics10 (4): 419–438. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00286.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00286.x [Google Scholar]
5. Barber, Charles, Joan Beal and Phillip Shaw
   2009 The English Language: A Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511817601
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817601 [Google Scholar]
6. Baxter, Judith
   2010 The Language of Female Leadership. New York: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230277915
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230277915 [Google Scholar]
7. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
   1989 Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brescoll, Victoria
   2016 “Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders.” The Leadership Quarterly271: 415–428. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.005 [Google Scholar]
9. Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall
   2010 “Locating Language in Identity.” InLanguage and Identities, ed. byCarmen Llamas and Dominic Watt, 18–28. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748635788‑006
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635788-006 [Google Scholar]
10. Cameron, Deborah
    1995 Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cameron, Deborah
    2007 The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Curl, Traci, and Paul Drew
    2008 Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction41 (2): 129–153. 10.1080/08351810802028613
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613 [Google Scholar]
13. Freytag, Vera
    2020 Exploring Politeness in Business Emails: A Mixed Methods Analysis. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hyland, Ken
    2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ho, Victor
    2014 “Managing rapport through grounder in evaluation – A qualitative study.” Journal of Pragmatics43 (10): 2534–2547. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.002 [Google Scholar]
16. Ho, Victor
    2018 “Exploring metadiscourse in making persuasive attempts through workplace email requests.” Journal of Pragmatics1131: 70–81. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.015 [Google Scholar]
17. Holmes, Janet
    2006 Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity through Workplace Discourse. New York and Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470754863
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754863 [Google Scholar]
18. Holmes, Janet. and Maria Stubbe
    2003 Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jensen, Astrid
    2009 “Discourse Strategies in Professional E-mail Negotiation: A Case Study”. English for Specific Purposes281: 4–18. 10.1016/j.esp.2008.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.10.002 [Google Scholar]
20. Jiang, Feng. Kevin, and Ken, Hyland
    2021 “‘The goal of this analysis…’: Changing patterns of metadiscursive nouns in disciplinary writing.” Lingua2521: 1–13. 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103017 [Google Scholar]
21. Johnstone, Barbara
    2010 “Locating Language in Identity.” InLanguage and Identities, ed. byCarmen Llamas and Dominic Watt, 29–38. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748635788‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635788-007 [Google Scholar]
22. Jones, Deborah
    2000 “‘Gender trouble in the Workplace: ‘Language and Gender’ Meets ‘Feminist Organizational Communication’”. InGendered Speech in Social Context: Perspectives from Gown & Town, ed. byJanet Holmes, 192–210. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kádár, Daniel, and Michael Haugh
    2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
24. Koester, Almut
    2010 Workplace Discourse. New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ladegaard, Hans Jørgen
    2012 “Rudeness as a discursive strategy.” Journal of Pragmatics44 (12): 1661–1679. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.003 [Google Scholar]
26. Mauranen, Anna
    2021 “‘Gonna write about it on my blog too’. Metadiscourse in Research Blog Discussions.” InMetadiscourse in Digital Communication, ed. byLarissa D’Angelo, Anna. Mauranen, and Stefania Maci, 11–35. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑85814‑8_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85814-8_2 [Google Scholar]
27. McKeown, Jamie
    2022 A comparative investigation of metadiscursive clarifying devices in the abortion discourse of the U.S. Supreme Court. Discourse & Communication, accessed here: 10.1177/17504813221108827
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221108827 [Google Scholar]
28. McKeown, Jamie and Qilin Zhang
    2015 “Socio-pragmatic variation on opening salutation and closing valediction of British Workplace Email.” Journal of Pragmatics851: 92–107. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.012 [Google Scholar]
29. McKeown, Jamie, and Hans Jørgen Ladegaard
    2020 “Exploring the metadiscursive realisation of incivility in TV news discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media331, 1–9. 10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100367
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100367 [Google Scholar]
30. Mey, Jacob
    1993 Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mullany, Louise
    2010 “Gendered Identities in the Professional Workplace.” InLanguage and Identities, ed. byCarmen Llamas and Dominic Watt, 179–190. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748635788‑020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635788-020 [Google Scholar]
32. Ng, Catherine, and Laura Byra
    2006 “Communication Channels and Gender Structures at Work”. InGender and Communication at Work, ed. byMary Barret and Marilyn. J. Davidson, 129–141. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nieva, Veronica, and Barbara Gutek
    1980 “Sex Effects on Evaluation.” Academy of Management Review5(2): 267–276. 10.5465/amr.1980.4288749
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1980.4288749 [Google Scholar]
34. Nuyts, Jan
    2001 Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
35. Ochs, Elinor
    1992 “Indexing gender.” InSex and Gender Hierarchies, ed. ByBarbara Miller, 146–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
    2009 “Metapragmatic utterances in computer-mediated communication”. InMetapragmatics in Use, ed. byWolfram Bublitz and Axel Huber, 87–106. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.165.07tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165.07tan [Google Scholar]
37. Tse, Polly, and Ken Hyland
    2008 “Robot Kung fu: Gender and professional identity in biology and philosophy reviews.” Journal of Pragmatics401: 1232–1248. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.002 [Google Scholar]
38. Wood, Julia T.
    2014 Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, and Culture. Boston: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]