1887
Volume 13, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Over the past decade, Islamic State (ISIS) has made numerous attempts to propagate their beliefs on a global scale via a range of social media platforms (e.g. ), enabling them to reach an extensive audience within a very short time span; when successful, people enlist as supporters of their ideas and, essentially, become radicalised. ISIS also achieve this through publishing propaganda materials, such as the two online magazines and (Heidarysafa et al. 2019). In this paper, our focus lies with the former. Through a analysis of three issues from , this paper explores how the in-group (the believers) and the Other (the non-believers) are represented in the magazine. The framework is useful here because it exposes the linguistic choices that people make and, in turn, reveals how they perceive their world. To retrieve both quantitative and qualitative findings, the UAM Corpus Tool (O’Donnell 2016) is employed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.21014.bar
2022-07-21
2022-08-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Awan, Imran
    2017 “Cyber-extremism: Isis and the Power of Social Media”. Social Science and Public Policy54: 138–149. 10.1007/s12115‑017‑0114‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-017-0114-0 [Google Scholar]
  2. Azzam Dhiab-Hassan, Miguel Ángel Benítez-Castro & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
    (2018) Nutcracker: The JIHAD Corpus. University of Granada.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19 (3): 273–306. 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul and Rachelle Vessey
    2018 A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics3 (1): 255–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartley, Leanne
    2017 transitivity, No Stone Left Unturned: Introducing Flexibility and Granularity into the Framework for the Analysis of Courtroom Discourse. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. University of Granada. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/48043
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhatia, Aditi
    2009 “The Discourses of Terrorism.” Journal of Pragmatics41 (2): 279–289. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.05.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.05.016 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brookes, Gavin and Tony McEnery
    2020 “Correlation, Collocation and Cohesion: A Corpus-Based Critical Analysis of Violent Jihadist Discourse.” Discourse & Society31 (4): 351–373. 10.1177/0957926520903528
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520903528 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cottee, Simon and Keith Hayward
    2011 “Terrorist (E)motives: The Existential Attractions of Terrorism.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism32 (12): 963–986. 10.1080/1057610X.2011.621116
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2011.621116 [Google Scholar]
  9. Crenshaw, Martha
    2011 “The Psychology of Terrorism: An Agenda for the 21st Century.” Political Psychology21 (2): 405–420. 10.1111/0162‑895X.00195
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00195 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fairclough, Norman
    1995Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak
    1997 Critical Discourse Analysis. InDiscourse as Social Interaction, Teun A. van Dijk (ed), 258–284. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fawcett, Robin P.
    1987 “The Semantics of Clause and Verb for Relational Processes in English.” InNew Developments in Systemic Linguistics, Vol 1: Theory and Description, Michael A. K. Halliday and Robin P. Fawcett (eds), 130–183. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fontaine, Lise
    2013Analysing English Grammar: A Systemic Functional Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gambhir, Harleen
    2014 “Dabiq: the Strategic Messaging of the Islamic State”. Institute for the Study of War. www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/Dabiq%20Backgrounder_Harleen%20Final.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Georges, Amaryllis Maria
    2016 “ISIS Rhetoric for the Creation of the Ummah.” InPolitical Discourse in Emergent, Fragile, and Failed Democracies, Daniel Ochieng Orwenjo, Omondi Oketch and Asiru Hameed Tunde (eds), 178–198. Hershey, Penn.: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑5225‑0081‑0.ch010
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0081-0.ch010 [Google Scholar]
  16. Halliday, Michael A. K. and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Fourth Edition. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hardt-Mautner, Gerlinde
    1995 “‘Only Connect. Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics’.” Unit for Computer Research on the English Language Technical Papers 6. Lancaster University. www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/research/ucrel/papers/techpaper/vol6.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heidarysafa, Mojtaba, Kamran Kowsari, Tolu Odukoya, Philip Potter, Laura E. Barnes, and Donald E. Brown
    2019Women in ISIS Propaganda: A Natural Language Processing Analysis of Topics and Emotions in a Comparison with Mainstream Religious Group. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03804v1
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Holbrook, Donald
    2014The Al-Qaeda Doctrine. The Framing and Evolution of the Leadership’s Public Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ingram, Haroro J.
    2016 “An Analysis of Islamic State’s Dabiq Magazine.” Australian Journal of Political Science51 (3): 458–477. 10.1080/10361146.2016.1174188
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2016.1174188 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2017 An analysis of Inspire and Dabiq: Lessons from AQAP and Islamic State’s propaganda war. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism40 (5): 357–375. 10.1080/1057610X.2016.1212551
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2016.1212551 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Anina Kinsel and Luke Walker
    2018 “Representing the West and “Non-Believers” in the Online Jihadist Magazines Dabiq and Inspire.” Critical Studies on Terrorism11 (3): 521–536. 10.1080/17539153.2018.1471081
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2018.1471081 [Google Scholar]
  23. MacDonald, Stuart
    2017 “Radicalisers as Regulators: An Examination of Dabiq Magazine”. InTerrorists’ Use of the Internet: Assessment and Response, Maura Conway, Lee Jarvis, Orla Lehane, Stuart Macdonald, and Lella Nouri (eds), 146–157. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. MacDonald, Stuart and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
    2019 “Visual Jihad: Constructing the ‘Good Muslim’ in Online Jihadist Magazines.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. 10.1080/1057610X.2018.1559508
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1559508 [Google Scholar]
  25. Milton, Daniel
    2016 “Communication Breakdown: Unraveling the Islamic State’s Media’s Efforts.” Combating Terrorism Centre at West Point. https://www.stratcomcoe.org/milton​-d​-communication-breakdown-unraveling-islamic-states-media-efforts
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Musial, Julia
    2017 “’My Muslim Sister, Indeed You Are a Mujahidah’ – Narratives in the Propaganda of the Islamic State to Address and Radicalize Western Women. An Exemplary Analysis of the Online Magazine Dabiq.” Journal for Deradicalization9: 39–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nguyen, Hanh Thu
    2012 Transitivity Analysis of “Heroic Mother” by Hoa Pham. International Journal of English Linguistics2 (4): 85–100. 10.5539/ijel.v2n4p85
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n4p85 [Google Scholar]
  28. Oddo, John
    2011 “War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential Addresses.” Discourse & Society22 (3): 287–314. 10.1177/0957926510395442
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395442 [Google Scholar]
  29. O’Donnell, Michael
    2016The UAM Corpus Tool (Version 3.3). www.corpustool.com
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Romero-Trillo, Jesús, and Cristina Mayor-Goicoechea
    2020 “’They Cowardly Attack US, So We Nobly Eliminate Them…’ The Emergence of the Translocal Group in the Propaganda of the Islamic State.” Pragmatics and Society11 (2): 292–315. 10.1075/ps.18072.may
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18072.may [Google Scholar]
  31. Salazar, Philippe-Joseph
    2017Words are Weapons: Inside ISIS’s Rhetoric of Terror. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Strnad, Vladislav and Nik Hynek
    2020 “ISIS’s Hybrid Identity: A Triangulated Analysis of the Dabiq Narrative.” Defence Studies20 (1): 82–100. 10.1080/14702436.2020.1720513
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2020.1720513 [Google Scholar]
  33. Tan, Sabine, Kay L. O’Halloran, Peter Wignell, Kevin Chai and Rebecca Lange
    2018 “A Multimodal Mixed Methods Approach for Examining Recontextualisation Patterns of Violent Extremist Images in Online Media.” Discourse, Context & Media21: 18–35. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  34. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2006 “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse and Society17 (2): 359–383. 10.1177/0957926506060250
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250 [Google Scholar]
  35. Vergani, Matteo and Ana-Maria Bliuc
    2015 “The Evolution of the ISIS’ Language: A Quantitative Analysis of the Language of the First Year of Dabiq Magazine.” Sicurezza, Terrorismo e Società2: 7–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Watkins, Amy-Louise and Sean Looney
    2019 “’The Lions of Tomorrow’: A News Value Analysis of Child Images in Jihadi Magazines.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism42 (1–2): 120–140. 10.1080/1057610X.2018.1513696
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1513696 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wignell, Peter, Sabine Tan, Kay L. O’Halloran, and Rebecca Lange
    2017 “A Mixed Methods Empirical Examination of Changes in Emphasis and Style in the Extremist Magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah.” Perspectives on Terrorism11 (2): 2–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wodak, Ruth
    2015The Politics of Fear. What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.21014.bar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.21014.bar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): CDA; corpus linguistics; Dabiq; ideology; systemic functional linguistics; transitivity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error