Volume 13, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The ideological discourse of Jihadist groups like Al Qaeda or Islamic State is largely built on the use of persuasive techniques which act as instruments for radicalisation and recruitment, and more generally, “convince the audience of the veracity of the doctrine presented” (Adam 2017: 5). This article explores the use of metaphor as an important rhetorical and ideological dimension to jihadist texts. Current findings suggest that religious writings often make use of rich conceptual metaphors to convey distinctive ideological perspectives (Prentice, Rayson and Taylor 2012), for instance, the well-known conceptual metaphor, with the image schemata of a path, leading towards a better life, reward in an afterlife, moral choice, hope, and a closeness to God (Jäkel 2002). Specifically, the research adopts a Critical Metaphor Analysis framework (Charteris-Black 2004), which combines Corpus Linguistics with Cognitive Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. The data for this study is taken from a collection of jihadist online magazines. The corpus has been compared against the Qur’an in order to ascertain whether jihadist propaganda writers are inspired by conventional religious tropes as a way of giving authority to their doctrines. The results show that religiously inspired concepts do indeed help the writers to anchor their message to a deeply seated and authoritative set of ideologies. At the same time, semantic and pragmatic differences in the use of these metaphors suggest an ability to manipulate pre-existing conceptualisations in order to fulfil the communicative needs of the writers, i.e. to embody the principles of jihadism. The findings presented here focus on the following domains: ; and


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adam, Martin
    2017 Persuasion in religious discourse: Enhancing credibility in sermon titles and openings. Discourse and Interaction10(2): 5–25. 10.5817/DI2017‑2‑5
    https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2017-2-5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aggarwal, Neil Krishan
    2019Media Persuasion in the Islamic State. New York: Columbia University Press. 10.7312/agga18238
    https://doi.org/10.7312/agga18238 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery
    2012 Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word ‘Muslim’ in the British press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics34(3): 255–278. 10.1093/applin/ams048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams048 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brookes, Gavin and Tony McEnery
    2020 Correlation, collocation and cohesion: A corpus-based critical analysis of violent jihadist discourse. Discourse & Society31(4): 351–373. 10.1177/0957926520903528
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520903528 [Google Scholar]
  5. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2004Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Springer. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  6. Conway, Lucian Gideon III, Laura Janelle Gornic, Mandella Chelsea, Paul Burfeind, Andrea Kuenzli, Shannon Houck, and Deven Theresa Fullerton
    2012 Does complex or simple rhetoric win elections? An integrative complexity analysis of U.S. Presidential campaigns. Political Psychology33: 599–618. 10.1111/j.1467‑9221.2012.00910.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00910.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Dhiab-Hassan, Azzam, Benítez-Casto, Miguel Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
    2018Nutcracker: The JIHAD Corpus. University of Granada.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dweik, Bader S. and Mariam M. Abu Shakra
    2010 Strategies in Translating Collocations in Religious Texts from Arabic into English. Atlas Global Journal for Studies and Research, Online Submission. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510365.pdfLast accessed: 31/03/2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. El-Sharif, Ahmad
    2011 A linguistic study of Islamic religious discourse: Conceptual metaphors in the prophetic tradition (Doctoral dissertation). Available at: https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/2417/ElSHARIFLinguisticStudy2011.pdf?sequence=1Last accessed: 31/03/2021.
  10. 2016 A Theoretical Account on the Study of Metaphor in Didactic Discourse. Advances in Language and Literary Studies7(2): 100–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fairclough, Norman
    1992 Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society3(2): 193–217. 10.1177/0957926592003002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goatly, Andrew
    1997The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203210000
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203210000 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hegghammer, Thomas
    (ed.) 2017Jihadi culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139086141
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139086141 [Google Scholar]
  14. Houck, Shannon C., Meredith A. Repke and Lucian Gideon III Conway
    2017 Understanding what makes terrorist groups’ propaganda effective: an integrative complexity analysis of ISIL and Al Qaeda. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism12(2): 105–118. 10.1080/18335330.2017.1351032
    https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2017.1351032 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jäkel, Olaf
    2002 Hypotheses revisited: The cognitive theory of metaphor applied to religious texts. Metaphorik.de2(1): 20–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2007 How can mortal man understand the road he travels? Prospects and problems of the cognitive approach to religious metaphor. InThe Bible Through Metaphor and Translation: A cognitive semantic perspective, Kurt Feyaerts (ed.), 55–86. Oxford: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Keating, John. and Belén Soria
    2019 Populist metaphorical utterances. InPopulist Discourse: Critical Approaches to Contemporary Politics, Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio; Miguel-Ángel Benítez-Castro and Francesca De Cesare (eds.), 209–216. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429026751‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429026751-13 [Google Scholar]
  18. Knepper, Timothy
    2019 Using the ‘journey metaphor’ to restructure philosophy of religion. Palgrave Communications5(1): 1–7. 10.1057/s41599‑019‑0252‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0252-7 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ladd, Brynn Elaine
    2018DiCo-Ding Radicalization: An Appraisal Analysis of Radicalized Language Based on the ANCODI Hypothesis. Hempstead L.I., NY: Hofstra University.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
    1980 The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive science4(2): 195–208. 10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Louw, Bill
    1993 Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. InText and Technology: In honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis, and Elena Tognini-Bonelli, eds., 157–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.64.11lou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.11lou [Google Scholar]
  22. Macdonald, Stuart, Nyasha Maravanyiksa, David Nezri, Elliot Parry, and Kate Thomas
    2018 Online jihadist magazines and the “religious terrorism” thesis. Critical Studies on Terrorism11(3): 537–550. 10.1080/17539153.2018.1471098
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2018.1471098 [Google Scholar]
  23. Malešević, Siniša
    2017 The organisation of military violence in the 21st century. Organization24(4): 456–474. 10.1177/1350508417693854
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417693854 [Google Scholar]
  24. Marcellino, William M. Kim Cragin, Joshua Mendelsohn, Andrew Michael Cady, Madeline Magnuson and Kathleen Reedy
    2016 Measuring the Popular Resonance of Daesh’s Propaganda. Journal of Strategic Security10(1): 32. 10.5038/1944‑0472.10.1.1527
    https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.10.1.1527 [Google Scholar]
  25. Matusitz, Jonathan and James Olufowote
    2016 Visual motifs in Islamist terrorism: Applying conceptual metaphor theory. Journal of Applied Security Research11 (1): 18–32. 10.1080/19361610.2016.1104276
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2016.1104276 [Google Scholar]
  26. O’Regan, John P. and Anne Betzel
    2016 Critical discourse analysis: a sample study of extremism. InResearch Methods in Intercultural Communication, Zhu Hua (ed.), 281–296. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Osisanwo, Ayo
    2016 Discursive representation of Boko Haram terrorism in selected Nigerian newspapers. Discourse & Communication10(4): 341–362. 10.1177/1750481316638149
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316638149 [Google Scholar]
  28. Prentice, Sheryl, Paul Rayson, and Paul J. Taylor
    2012 The language of Islamic extremism: Towards an automated identification of beliefs, motivations and justifications. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics17(2): 259–286. 10.1075/ijcl.17.2.05pre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.2.05pre [Google Scholar]
  29. Ranstorp, Magnus
    1996 Terrorism in the Name of Religion. Journal of International Affairs50(1): 41–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Scott, Mike
    2012 WordSmith Tools Manual, Version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software Ltd. Available at: https://lexically.netLast accessed: 31/03/2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sedgwick, Mark J.
    2004Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0195152972.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0195152972.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Suedfeld, Peter and Dennis A. Rank
    1976 Revolutionary leaders: Long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(2): 169. 10.1037/0022‑3514.34.2.169
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.169 [Google Scholar]
  33. Yusof, Sofia Hayati, Fauziah Hassan, Md Salleh Hassan and Mohd Nizam Osman
    2013 The framing of international media on Islam and terrorism. European Scientific Journal9(8): 104–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zelin, Aaron Y.
    2015Picture or it didn’t happen: A snapshot of the Islamic State’s official media output. Perspectives on Terrorism, 9(4): 85–97.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error