Volume 13, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper studies dialogicity in posts and their comments. Focusing on political slogans in the Facebook page of Israel PM Binyamin Netanyahu, we examine the ways comments meta-represent the posts in various degrees of resemblance. Starting with the premise that comments/post interactions are dialogic in the Bakhtinian sense, we argue that comments are dialogic in yet another way, which is related to the form and degree of resemblance between them. The conceptualization draws on the notion of meta-representation supplemented by insights gained from accommodation theory and Bakhtin’s dialogism. We argue that through resemblance, the propositional content, ideology and viewpoint conveyed by the initiating slogan are incorporated in the comment, and a tacit dialogue is constructed between them. An additional layer of polyphony is added to the multiplicity of ratified voices otherwise manifest in the interaction between separate posts and comments.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Atifi, Hassan and Michel Marcoccia
    2015 “Follow-ups and dialogue in online discussions on French politics.” InThe Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. byAnita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin, 109–140. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.259.05ati
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.259.05ati [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkin, Hila
    2019 Interactivity in Readers’ Ironic Comments to On-Line Op-Eds. on the Website of the “Haaretz” Newspaper: Threads and Ripples. Unpublished PhD dissertation, submitted to theSenate of Bar-Ilan University, supervised by Elda Weizman (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1981 InThe Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. ed. byMichael Holquist, trans. byCaryl Emerson. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1984Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, ed. and trans. byCaryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
    https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 [Google Scholar]
  5. 1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. byCaryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, trans. byVern W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chartrand, Tanya L. and John L. Bargh
    1999 “The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76 (6): 893–91. 10.1037/0022‑3514.76.6.893
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 [Google Scholar]
  7. Condit, Celeste and John Lucaites
    1993Crafting Equality: America’s Anglo-African Word. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226922485.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922485.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Cristian, Michael Gamon and Susan Dumais
    2011 “Mark my Words! Linguistic Style Accommodation in Social Media”. WWW 2011, March28–April1 2011, Hyderabad, India. ACM 978-1-4503-0632-4/11/03.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Galois, Cindy, Tania Ogay and Howard Giles
    2006 “Communication Accommodation Theory: A Look Back and a Look Ahead.” InTheorizing about communication and culture, ed. byW. B. Gudykunst, 121–148. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gitay, Yehoshua
    2016 “Netanyahu in the USA Congress”. Israel Studies in Language and Society9 (1–2): 20–28 (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ireland, Molly E., Richard B. Slatcher, Paul W. Eastwick, Lauren E. Scissors, Eli J. Finkel and James W. Pennebaker
    2011 “Language Style Matching Predicts Relationship Initiation and Stability.” Psychological Science22 (1): 39–44. 10.1177/0956797610392928
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610392928 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ishak, Wan Irham and Shameem Rafik-Galea
    2015 “Speech Accommodation Strategies in the Selling of Life Insurance.” Pertanika, Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities231: 143–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Johansson, Marjut
    2015 “Bravo for this editorial! Users’ comments in discussion forums.” InFollow-ups in Political Discourse. Explorations across contexts and discourse domains, ed. byElda Weizman and Anita Fetzer, 83–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.60.04joh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.60.04joh [Google Scholar]
  14. Kohn, A.
    2003, “Comic strip, poem, and journal article: Three models of image/text.” InHebrew – A Living Language 3, ed. byRina Ben-Shahar and Gideon Toury, 167–189. Tel-Aviv: Hakibbutz Hamehuchad and the Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics. (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kohn, Ayelet
    2011 “From a slight smile to scathing sarcasm: Shades of humor as means of criticism in Israeli photojournalism.” Misgarot Media71: 29–54. (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2016 “The Polyphonic Framing of Ehud Olmert.” Israel studies in Language and Society9 (1–2): 116–141. [In Hebrew.]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2019 “Iconic Televised Situations.” InHebrew – A Living Language 8, ed. byRina Ben-Shahar and Nitsa Ben-Ari, 153–176. Tel-Aviv: Hakibbutz Hamehuchad and the Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics. (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lakin, Jessica L., Valerie E. Jefferis, Clara Michelle Cheng, and Tanya L. Chartrand
    2003 “The Chameleon Effect as Social Glue: Evidence for the Evolutionary Significance of Nonconscious Mimicry.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior271:145–162. 10.1023/A:1025389814290
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025389814290 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lerner, Anat, Oren Miara, Sarit Malayev, and Vered Silber-Varod
    2018 “The Influence of the Interlocutor’s Gender on the Speaker’s Role Identification”. In: Speech and Computer (SPECOM 2018). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.110961, ed. byAlexey Karpov, Oliver Jokisch and Rodmonga Potapova, 321–330. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑99579‑3_34
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99579-3_34 [Google Scholar]
  20. Litt, Eden, and Eszter Hargittai
    2016 “The Imagined Audience on Social Network Sites.” Social Media and Society2(1): 1–12. 10.1177/2056305116633482
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116633482 [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, Xing
    1999 “An Ideological/Cultural Analysis of Political Slogans in Communist China.” Discourse & Society10(4): 487–508. 10.1177/0957926599010004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Livnat, Zohar and Beverly Lewin
    2016 “The Interpersonal Strand of Political Speech: Recruiting the Audience in PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s Speeches”. Language and Dialogue6(20): 275–305. 10.1075/ld.6.2.04liv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.2.04liv [Google Scholar]
  23. Mukherjee, Sankar, Alessandro D’Ausilio, Noël Nguyen, Luciano Fadiga, and Leonardo Badino
    2017 The Relationship Between F0 Synchrony and Speech Convergence in Dyadic Interaction. Interspeech, August 2017: 2341–2345. 10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑795
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-795 [Google Scholar]
  24. Niederhoffer, Kate G. and James W. Pennebaker
    2002 “Linguistic style matching in social interaction.” Journal of language and Social Psychology21(4): 337–360. 10.1177/026192702237953
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237953 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pardo, Jennifer S.
    2006 “On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America19 (4): 2382–2393. 10.1121/1.2178720
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2178720 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pardo, Jennifer S., Adelya Urmanche, Sherilyn Wilman, Jaclyn Wiener, Nicholas Mason, Keagan Francis, and Melanie Ward
    2018 “A comparison of phonetic convergence in conversational interaction and speech shadowing.” Journal of Phonetics691: 1–11. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Park-Fuller, Linda M.
    1986 “Voices: Bakhtin’s Heteroglossia and Polyphony, and the Performance of Narrative Literature”, Literature in Performance7 (1):1–12. Online at: www.csun.edu/~vcspc00g/604/voices-lpf.html (accessed17 November 2020). 10.1080/10462938609391621
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10462938609391621 [Google Scholar]
  28. Perelman, Chaïm et Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    1958Le Traité de l’argumentation, la nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Reddy, Michael
    1979 “The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language.” InMetaphor and thought, ed. byAndrew Ortony, 284–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2019 “’Well, Yair? When Will You Be Prime Minister?’: Different Readings of Ordinariness in a Politician’s Facebook Post as a Case in Point.” InThe Construction of Ordinariness across Media Genres, ed. byAnita Fetzer and Elda Weizman, 103–129. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.307.05shu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.05shu [Google Scholar]
  31. 2020a “The Right to Speak and the Request to Remain Silent: Who Own Politicians’ Facebook Pages?” Israel Affairs26 (1): 26–43. 10.1080/13537121.2020.1697483
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2020.1697483 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2020b “Hero, genius, king and Messiah”: Ironic echoing in pro-ethos and anti-ethos readers’ comments on Facebook posts”. InThe Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, voices and functions, ed. byZohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar and Galia Hirsch, 59–82. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.316.03shu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.316.03shu [Google Scholar]
  33. 2021 “Constructed General Truths against Specific Political Rivals in Politicians’ Facebook Posts”. Journal of Pragmatics1721: 79–88. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  34. Silber-Varod, Vered, Sarit Malayev, and Anat Lerner
    2020 “Positioning oneself in different roles: Structural and lexical measures of power relations between speakers in map task corpus.” Speech Communication1171:1 – 12. 10.1016/j.specom.2020.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2020.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sperber, Dan
    2000 “Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective”. InMetarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. byDan Sperber, 117–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1981 “Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction.” InPeter Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics, 295–318. New York : Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
    1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
    2020 “Reconceptualizing mirroring: Sound imitation and rapport in naturally occurring interaction”. Journal of Pragmatics1671: 131–151. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  39. Weise, Andreas and Rivka Levitan
    2018 “Looking for structure in lexical and acoustic-prosodic entrainment behaviors.” Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2018, 297–302. New Orleans, Louisiana, June1 – 6 2018 Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/N18‑2048
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-2048 [Google Scholar]
  40. Weise, Andreas, Vered Silber-Varod, Anat Lerner, Julia Hirschberg and Rivka Levitan
    2021 “’Talk to me with left, right, and angles’: Lexical entrainment in spoken Hebrew dialogue”. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2021), Online conference, 19–23 April, 2021. 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl‑main.23
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.23 [Google Scholar]
  41. Weizman, Elda
    1984 “Some register characteristics of discourse structure in journalisitic language.” Applied LinguisticsV/11: 39-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2008Positioning in Media Dialogue: The Case of News Interviews on Israeli Television. Amsterdam/PhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2012 “Irony in news interviews: Dialogism and intertexuality”. InSlovo a Slovesnost, Special Issue on Intertexuality, Polyphony, Heteroglossia, ed. bySvetla Cmejrková and Jana Hoffmannová, 253–262. Prague: Charles University.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2015 “Irony in and through follow-ups: talk and meta-talk in online commenting.” InThe Dynamics of Political Discourse, ed. byAnita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin, 173–194. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.259.07wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.259.07wei [Google Scholar]
  45. 2016 “Ironic commenting on op-eds: obstructing discussion.” Israel Studies in Language and Society9(1–2): 184–208 (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2019 “The discursive pattern ‘claim+ indirect quotation in quotation marks’: Strategic uses in French and Hebrew online journalism.” Journal of Pragmatics1571: 131–141. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.012 [Google Scholar]
  47. Weizman, Elda and Gonen Dori-Hacohen
    2017 “Commenting on opinion editorials in on-line journals: A cross-cultural examination of face-work in the Washington Post (USA) and NRG (Israel).” Discourse, Context & Media191: 39–48. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer
    (eds.) 2019Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations Across Contexts and Discourse Domains. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wilson, Deirdre
    2012 “Metarepresentation in linguistic communication.” inMeaning and Relevance, ed. byDeirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber, 230–258, Cambridge University Press. [First published inDan Sperber (ed.) 2000 Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford University Press 2000, 411–48]. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.014 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    1992 “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua871: 53–76. 10.1016/0024‑3841(92)90025‑E
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90025-E [Google Scholar]
  51. 2012 “Explaining irony”, inMeaning and Relevance, ed. byDeirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber, 123–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error