Resemblance in comments/posts interaction

References

1. Atifi, Hassan and Michel Marcoccia
   2015 “Follow-ups and dialogue in online discussions on French politics.” InThe Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. byAnita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin, 109–140. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.259.05ati
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.259.05ati [Google Scholar]
2. Atkin, Hila
   2019 Interactivity in Readers’ Ironic Comments to On-Line Op-Eds. on the Website of the “Haaretz” Newspaper: Threads and Ripples. Unpublished PhD dissertation, submitted to theSenate of Bar-Ilan University, supervised by Elda Weizman (in Hebrew).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
   1981 InThe Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. ed. byMichael Holquist, trans. byCaryl Emerson. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
   1984 Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, ed. and trans. byCaryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
   https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 [Google Scholar]
5. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
   1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. byCaryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, trans. byVern W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chartrand, Tanya L. and John L. Bargh
   1999 “The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76 (6): 893–91. 10.1037/0022‑3514.76.6.893
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 [Google Scholar]
7. Condit, Celeste and John Lucaites
   1993 Crafting Equality: America’s Anglo-African Word. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226922485.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922485.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
8. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Cristian, Michael Gamon and Susan Dumais
   2011 “Mark my Words! Linguistic Style Accommodation in Social Media”. WWW 2011, March28–April1 2011, Hyderabad, India. ACM 978-1-4503-0632-4/11/03.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Galois, Cindy, Tania Ogay and Howard Giles
   2006 “Communication Accommodation Theory: A Look Back and a Look Ahead.” InTheorizing about communication and culture, ed. byW. B. Gudykunst, 121–148. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gitay, Yehoshua
    2016 “Netanyahu in the USA Congress”. Israel Studies in Language and Society9 (1–2): 20–28 (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ireland, Molly E., Richard B. Slatcher, Paul W. Eastwick, Lauren E. Scissors, Eli J. Finkel and James W. Pennebaker
    2011 “Language Style Matching Predicts Relationship Initiation and Stability.” Psychological Science22 (1): 39–44. 10.1177/0956797610392928
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610392928 [Google Scholar]
12. Ishak, Wan Irham and Shameem Rafik-Galea
    2015 “Speech Accommodation Strategies in the Selling of Life Insurance.” Pertanika, Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities231: 143–157.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Johansson, Marjut
    2015 “Bravo for this editorial! Users’ comments in discussion forums.” InFollow-ups in Political Discourse. Explorations across contexts and discourse domains, ed. byElda Weizman and Anita Fetzer, 83–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.60.04joh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.60.04joh [Google Scholar]
14. Kohn, A.
    2003, “Comic strip, poem, and journal article: Three models of image/text.” InHebrew – A Living Language 3, ed. byRina Ben-Shahar and Gideon Toury, 167–189. Tel-Aviv: Hakibbutz Hamehuchad and the Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics. (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kohn, Ayelet
    2011 “From a slight smile to scathing sarcasm: Shades of humor as means of criticism in Israeli photojournalism.” Misgarot Media71: 29–54. (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kohn, Ayelet
    2016 “The Polyphonic Framing of Ehud Olmert.” Israel studies in Language and Society9 (1–2): 116–141. [In Hebrew.]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kohn, Ayelet
    2019 “Iconic Televised Situations.” InHebrew – A Living Language 8, ed. byRina Ben-Shahar and Nitsa Ben-Ari, 153–176. Tel-Aviv: Hakibbutz Hamehuchad and the Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics. (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lakin, Jessica L., Valerie E. Jefferis, Clara Michelle Cheng, and Tanya L. Chartrand
    2003 “The Chameleon Effect as Social Glue: Evidence for the Evolutionary Significance of Nonconscious Mimicry.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior271:145–162. 10.1023/A:1025389814290
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025389814290 [Google Scholar]
19. Lerner, Anat, Oren Miara, Sarit Malayev, and Vered Silber-Varod
    2018 “The Influence of the Interlocutor’s Gender on the Speaker’s Role Identification”. In: Speech and Computer (SPECOM 2018). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.110961, ed. byAlexey Karpov, Oliver Jokisch and Rodmonga Potapova, 321–330. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑99579‑3_34
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99579-3_34 [Google Scholar]
20. Litt, Eden, and Eszter Hargittai
    2016 “The Imagined Audience on Social Network Sites.” Social Media and Society2(1): 1–12. 10.1177/2056305116633482
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116633482 [Google Scholar]
21. Liu, Xing
    1999 “An Ideological/Cultural Analysis of Political Slogans in Communist China.” Discourse & Society10(4): 487–508. 10.1177/0957926599010004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004003 [Google Scholar]
22. Livnat, Zohar and Beverly Lewin
    2016 “The Interpersonal Strand of Political Speech: Recruiting the Audience in PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s Speeches”. Language and Dialogue6(20): 275–305. 10.1075/ld.6.2.04liv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.2.04liv [Google Scholar]
23. Mukherjee, Sankar, Alessandro D’Ausilio, Noël Nguyen, Luciano Fadiga, and Leonardo Badino
    2017 The Relationship Between F0 Synchrony and Speech Convergence in Dyadic Interaction. Interspeech, August 2017: 2341–2345. 10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑795
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-795 [Google Scholar]
24. Niederhoffer, Kate G. and James W. Pennebaker
    2002 “Linguistic style matching in social interaction.” Journal of language and Social Psychology21(4): 337–360. 10.1177/026192702237953
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237953 [Google Scholar]
25. Pardo, Jennifer S.
    2006 “On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America19 (4): 2382–2393. 10.1121/1.2178720
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2178720 [Google Scholar]
26. Pardo, Jennifer S., Adelya Urmanche, Sherilyn Wilman, Jaclyn Wiener, Nicholas Mason, Keagan Francis, and Melanie Ward
    2018 “A comparison of phonetic convergence in conversational interaction and speech shadowing.” Journal of Phonetics691: 1–11. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.001 [Google Scholar]
27. Park-Fuller, Linda M.
    1986 “Voices: Bakhtin’s Heteroglossia and Polyphony, and the Performance of Narrative Literature”, Literature in Performance7 (1):1–12. Online at: www.csun.edu/~vcspc00g/604/voices-lpf.html (accessed17 November 2020). 10.1080/10462938609391621
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10462938609391621 [Google Scholar]
28. Perelman, Chaïm et Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    1958 Le Traité de l’argumentation, la nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Reddy, Michael
    1979 “The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language.” InMetaphor and thought, ed. byAndrew Ortony, 284–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2019 “’Well, Yair? When Will You Be Prime Minister?’: Different Readings of Ordinariness in a Politician’s Facebook Post as a Case in Point.” InThe Construction of Ordinariness across Media Genres, ed. byAnita Fetzer and Elda Weizman, 103–129. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.307.05shu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.05shu [Google Scholar]
31. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2020a “The Right to Speak and the Request to Remain Silent: Who Own Politicians’ Facebook Pages?” Israel Affairs26 (1): 26–43. 10.1080/13537121.2020.1697483
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2020.1697483 [Google Scholar]
32. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2020b “Hero, genius, king and Messiah”: Ironic echoing in pro-ethos and anti-ethos readers’ comments on Facebook posts”. InThe Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, voices and functions, ed. byZohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar and Galia Hirsch, 59–82. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.316.03shu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.316.03shu [Google Scholar]
33. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2021 “Constructed General Truths against Specific Political Rivals in Politicians’ Facebook Posts”. Journal of Pragmatics1721: 79–88. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.003 [Google Scholar]
34. Silber-Varod, Vered, Sarit Malayev, and Anat Lerner
    2020 “Positioning oneself in different roles: Structural and lexical measures of power relations between speakers in map task corpus.” Speech Communication1171:1 – 12. 10.1016/j.specom.2020.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2020.01.002 [Google Scholar]
35. Sperber, Dan
    2000 “Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective”. InMetarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. byDan Sperber, 117–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1981 “Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction.” InPeter Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics, 295–318. New York : Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
    1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
    2020 “Reconceptualizing mirroring: Sound imitation and rapport in naturally occurring interaction”. Journal of Pragmatics1671: 131–151. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.010 [Google Scholar]
39. Weise, Andreas and Rivka Levitan
    2018 “Looking for structure in lexical and acoustic-prosodic entrainment behaviors.” Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2018, 297–302. New Orleans, Louisiana, June1 – 6 2018 Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/N18‑2048
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-2048 [Google Scholar]
40. Weise, Andreas, Vered Silber-Varod, Anat Lerner, Julia Hirschberg and Rivka Levitan
    2021 “’Talk to me with left, right, and angles’: Lexical entrainment in spoken Hebrew dialogue”. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2021), Online conference, 19–23 April, 2021. 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl‑main.23
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.23 [Google Scholar]
41. Weizman, Elda
    1984 “Some register characteristics of discourse structure in journalisitic language.” Applied LinguisticsV/11: 39-50.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Weizman, Elda
    2008 Positioning in Media Dialogue: The Case of News Interviews on Israeli Television. Amsterdam/PhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
43. Weizman, Elda
    2012 “Irony in news interviews: Dialogism and intertexuality”. InSlovo a Slovesnost, Special Issue on Intertexuality, Polyphony, Heteroglossia, ed. bySvetla Cmejrková and Jana Hoffmannová, 253–262. Prague: Charles University.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Weizman, Elda
    2015 “Irony in and through follow-ups: talk and meta-talk in online commenting.” InThe Dynamics of Political Discourse, ed. byAnita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin, 173–194. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.259.07wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.259.07wei [Google Scholar]
45. Weizman, Elda
    2016 “Ironic commenting on op-eds: obstructing discussion.” Israel Studies in Language and Society9(1–2): 184–208 (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
46. Weizman, Elda
    2019 “The discursive pattern ‘claim+ indirect quotation in quotation marks’: Strategic uses in French and Hebrew online journalism.” Journal of Pragmatics1571: 131–141. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.012 [Google Scholar]
47. Weizman, Elda and Gonen Dori-Hacohen
    2017 “Commenting on opinion editorials in on-line journals: A cross-cultural examination of face-work in the Washington Post (USA) and NRG (Israel).” Discourse, Context & Media191: 39–48. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.02.001 [Google Scholar]
48. Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer
    (eds.) 2019 Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations Across Contexts and Discourse Domains. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wilson, Deirdre
    2012 “Metarepresentation in linguistic communication.” inMeaning and Relevance, ed. byDeirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber, 230–258, Cambridge University Press. [First published inDan Sperber (ed.) 2000 Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford University Press 2000, 411–48]. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.014 [Google Scholar]
50. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    1992 “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua871: 53–76. 10.1016/0024‑3841(92)90025‑E
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90025-E [Google Scholar]
51. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    2012 “Explaining irony”, inMeaning and Relevance, ed. byDeirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber, 123–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008 [Google Scholar]