Volume 13, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Bakhtin famously argued that language-as-used is essentially dialogic. One pragmatic implication concerns how dialogicity is established in various contexts. In political discourse, polemic polyphony emerges from the juxtaposition of adversarial voices of political actors: a dialogue in which different voices index different ideological orientations. Polyphonic ensembles establish discoursal scenes and make them recognizable, enabling distinctions such as those between ‘us’ and ‘them’, and between heroes and villains. Overall, they assist speakers in the semiotic mediation of political relations.

The corpus includes eighteen speeches delivered during a dissent event that takes place after the Sheikh Jarrah weekly anti-occupation demonstration in East Jerusalem. The speeches are given in Hebrew by a Palestinian neighborhood resident and activist, to a small audience of regular Jewish-Israeli protestors. Through studying noninstitutionalized political discourse, dialogicity and polemic polyphony are illuminated in an on-the-ground, context-rich, and marginalized setting.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Badarneh, Muhammad A.
    2009 “Exploring the use of rhetorical questions in editorial discourse: a case study of Arabic editorials.” Text & Talk29 (6): 639–659. 10.1515/TEXT.2009.033
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.033 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhtin, Mikhael M.
    1973Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Translated byR. W. Rotsel. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ardis.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1981aThe Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated byCaryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1981b “Discourse in the novel.” InThe Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 1984Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Translated and edited byCaryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
    https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 [Google Scholar]
  6. 1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Translated byVern W. McGee. Edited byMichael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bazzanella, Carla
    ed. 1996Repetition in Dialogue. InBeiträge zur Dialogforschung, Vol.111. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Besnier, Niko
    1994 “Involvement in linguistic practice: An ethnographic appraisal.” Journal of Pragmatics22 (3–4): 279–299. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90113‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90113-9 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blommaert, Jan
    2004 “Writing as a problem: African grassroots writing, economies of literacy, and globalization.” Language in Society33 (5): 643–671. 10.1017/S0047404504045014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404504045014 [Google Scholar]
  10. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
    1997Dinner talk: cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum..
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Braverman, Irus
    2007 “Powers of illegality: House demolitions and resistance in East Jerusalem.” Law & Social Inquiry32 (2): 333–372. 10.1111/j.1747‑4469.2007.00062.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00062.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Buttny, Richard
    1997 “Reported speech in talking race on campus.” Human Communication Research23 (4): 477–506. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1997.tb00407.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00407.x [Google Scholar]
  13. 1998 “Putting prior talk into context: Reported speech and the reporting context.” Research on Language and Social Interaction311: 45–58. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3101_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3101_3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fløttum, Kjersti
    2010 “EU discourse: Polyphony and unclearness.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (4): 990–999. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.014 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goffman, Erving
    1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Günthner, Susanne
    1999 “Polyphony and the ‘Layering of Voices’ in reported dialogues: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech.” Journal of Pragmatics31 (5): 685–708. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00093‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00093-9 [Google Scholar]
  17. Habermas, Jürgen
    1997 “The public sphere.” InContemporary Political Philosophy, edited byR. E. Goodin and P. Petit, 105–108. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hallward, Maia Carter
    2011Struggling for a just peace: Israeli and Palestinian activism in the second Intifada. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. 10.5744/florida/9780813036526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813036526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hammami, Rama
    2012 “The exiling of Sheikh Jarrah.” The Jerusalem Quarterly, 511: 49–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heller, Monica, and Bonnie S. McElhinny
    2017Language, capitalism, colonialism: Toward a critical history. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hercbergs, Dana and Chaim Noy
    2013 “Beholding the Holy City: Changes in the iconic representation of Jerusalem in the 21th century.” Quest: Issues in Contemporary Jewish History, 61, 237–263. Retrieved fromwww.quest-cdecjournal.it/focus.php?id=345
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2015 “Mobile Cartographies and Mobilized Ideologies: The visual management of Jerusalem.” Antipode47(4): 942–962. 10.1111/anti.12137
    https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12137 [Google Scholar]
  23. Holšánová, Jana
    2017 “The use of quotations in discourse about ethnicities.” InDialoganalyse VI/2, edited bySvetla Cmejrková, Jana Hoffmannová, Olga Müllerová and Jindra Svetlá, 253–260. Berlin: Max Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Iedema, Rick
    2001 “Resemiotization.” Semiotica137 (1–4): 23–39. 10.1515/semi.2001.106
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2001.106 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jaffe, Alexandra M.
    ed. 2009Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Junka-Aikio, L.
    2016Late modern Palestine: The subject and representation of the Second Intifada. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kakavá, Christina
    2001 “Discourse and Conflict.” InThe handbook of discourse analysis, edited byDeborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi Ehernberger Hamilton, 650–670. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Katriel, Tamar
    2020Defiant discourse: Speech and action in grassroots activism. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315179360
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315179360 [Google Scholar]
  29. Keane, Webb
    1999 “Voice.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology9 (1/2): 271–273. 10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1‑2.271
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.271 [Google Scholar]
  30. Klewitz, Gabriele, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    1999 “Quote-unquote? The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences” Pragmatics9 (4): 459–485.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Laor, Nehama, Noa Elephant-Lefler, Havi Inbar-Lankeri, Amal Jamal, Rivka Neria-Ben-Shachar, Nelly Elias, and Orly Soker
    2006The Absent and the Present in Prime Time: Follow-Up. Jerusalem: The Second Authority for Television and Local Radio.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Leitch, Shirley, and Sally Davenport
    2007 “Strategic ambiguity as a discourse practice: the role of keywords in the discourse on ‘sustainable’ biotechnology.” Discourse Studies9 (1): 43–61. 10.1177/1461445607072106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607072106 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lucy, John Arthur
    ed. 1993Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621031
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031 [Google Scholar]
  34. McIlvenny, Paul
    1996 “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal audience participation in popular public discourse.” Language in Society25 (1): 27–69. 10.1017/S004740450002042X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450002042X [Google Scholar]
  35. Morson, Gary Saul, and Caryl Emerson
    1990Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9780804765961
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804765961 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nacos, Brigitte L., Robert Y. Shapiro, and Yaeli Bloch-Elkon
    2020 “Donald Trump: Aggressive rhetoric and political violence.” Perspectives on Terrorism14 (5): 2–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Noy, Chaim
    2007A Narrative Community: Voices of Israeli Backpackers. Detroit, Mich.: Wayne State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2012 “The political ends of tourism: Voices and narratives of Silwan/the City of David in East Jerusalem.” InThe Critical Turn in Tourism Studies: Creating an Academy of Hope, edited byIrena Ateljevic, Nigel Morgan, and Annett Pritchard, 27–41. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2013 “Peace activism in tourism: Two case studies (and a few reflections) in Jerusalem.” InPeace Through Tourism: Promoting Human Security through International Citizenship, edited byLynda-ann Blanchard and Freya Higgins-Desbiolles, 204–216. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2015Thank You for Dying for Our Country: Commemorative Texts and Performances in Jerusalem. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199398973.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199398973.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2019 “Towards a speech genre: Preliminary remarks on Mr. Khatib’s East Jerusalem dialogic sermons.” Paper presented at theInternational Association for Dialogue Analysis Meeting, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Noy, Chaim and Michal Hamo
    2019 “Stance-taking and participation framework in museum commenting platforms: On subjects, objects, authors and principals.” Language in Society48(2): 285–308. 10.1017/S0047404519000010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000010 [Google Scholar]
  43. Reiter, Yitzhak, and Lior Lehrs
    2010The Sheikh Jarrah Affair: The Strategic Implications of Jewish Settlement in an Arab Neighborhood in East Jerusalem. Jerusalem: The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies. www.jiis.org.il
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Savski, Kristof
    2020 “Polyphony and polarization in public discourses: hegemony and dissent in a Slovene policy debate.” Critical Discourse Studies17 (4): 377–393. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1609537
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1609537 [Google Scholar]
  45. Scalmer, Sean
    2002Dissent Events: Protest, the Media and the Political Gimmick in Australia. Kensington: University of New South Wales Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Scannell, Paddy
    1996Radio, television, and modern life: A phenomenological approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Schely-Newman, Esther
    1999 “I hear from people who read torah…”: Reported speech, genres and gender relations in personal narrative.” Narrative Inquiry9 (1): 49–68. 10.1075/ni.9.1.04sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.9.1.04sch [Google Scholar]
  48. 2015 “Reported speech.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, edited byKaren Tracy. 1–7. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi067
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi067 [Google Scholar]
  49. Shenhav, Shaul R.
    2006 “Political narratives and political reality.” International Political Science Review27 (3): 245–262. 10.1177/0192512106064474
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512106064474 [Google Scholar]
  50. Shlay, Anne B., and Gillad Rosen
    2010 “Making place: The shifting green line and the development of ‘Greater’ Metropolitan Jerusalem.” City & Community9 (4): 358–389. 10.1111/j.1540‑6040.2010.01344.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2010.01344.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Shomron, Baruch, and Amit Schejter
    2021 “Broadcast media and their social network sites: The case of Palestinian-Israeli representations and capabilities.” Television & New Media22 (5): 482–500. 10.1177/1527476419893596
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419893596 [Google Scholar]
  52. Shor, Eran, and Yuval Yonay
    2011 “‘Play and shut up’: the silencing of Palestinian athletes in Israeli media.” Ethnic and Racial Studies34 (2): 229–247. 10.1080/01419870.2010.503811
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.503811 [Google Scholar]
  53. Shulman, David Dean
    2007Dark hope: Working for peace in Israel and Palestine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226755809.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226755809.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2018Freedom and despair: Notes from the South Hebron hills. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226566795.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226566795.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  55. Symons, Alex
    2019 “Trump and Satire: America’s Carnivalesque President and His War on Television Comedians.” InTrump’s media war, edited byCatherine Happer, Andrew Hoskins and William Merrin, 183–197. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑94069‑4_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94069-4_12 [Google Scholar]
  56. Tannen, Deborah
    1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2002 “Political discourse and political cognition.” InPolitics as text and talk: analytic approaches to political discourse, edited byPaul A. Chilton and Christina Schäffner, 203–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij [Google Scholar]
  58. 2003 “Political discourse and ideology.” InAnàlisi del Discurs Polític, edited byLorda C. Ubaldina and Montserrat Ribas, 207–225. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. 10.31921/doxacom.n1a12
    https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n1a12 [Google Scholar]
  59. Vásquez, Camilla
    2012 “Narrativity and involvement in online consumer reviews: The case of TripAdvisor.” Narrative Inquiry22 (1): 105–121. 10.1075/ni.22.1.07vas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22.1.07vas [Google Scholar]
  60. Verschueren, Jef
    2001 “Pragmatics.” InThe Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, edited byPaul Cobley, 83–94. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error