Dialogic language and meta-language in a conflictual discourse

References

1. Bakhtin, Mikhail
   1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated byMichael Holquist and Caryl Emerson. Austin: The University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bergman, Shmuel Hugo
   1959 “The dialogic thinking of M. Buber.” InThe Dialogue on Man and Being, byMartin M. Buber. Hebrew translation byShmuel Hugo Bergman. 11–46. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute. [in Hebrew].
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
   1978 “Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena.” InQuestions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
5. Buber, Martin
   1959 The Dialogue on Man and Being. Hebrew translation byShmuel Hugo Bergman. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Buber, Martin
   1970 I and Thou. English translation byWalter Kaufman. New York: Touchstone.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bublitz, Wolfram
   1988 Supportive Fellow-Speakers and Cooperative Conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.32
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.32 [Google Scholar]
8. Cherlow, Yuval
   2018 Leshem Shamayim – On Ethics and Dispute. Sifrei Magid, Koren Publishing. [In Hebrew].
   [Google Scholar]
9. Culpeper, Jonathan
   2011 “Politeness and impoliteness.” InPragmatics and Society, ed. byKarin Aijmer and Gisle Andersen, 393–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214420.393
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214420.393 [Google Scholar]
10. Fleshman, Aharon
    2013 “What does Buber have to do with the 21st century?” Translator’s Musings onMartin Buber, I and Thou. Hebrew translation byAharon Fleshman. 149–159. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute. [In Hebrew].
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gardiner, Michael
    1996 “Alterity and ethics: a dialogic perspective.” Theory, Culture and Society131: 121–143. 10.1177/026327696013002009
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026327696013002009 [Google Scholar]
12. Goffman, Erving
    1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gurevitch, Zali D.
    1990 “The dialogic connection and the ethics of dialogue.” The British Journal of Sociology41 (2): 181–196. 10.2307/590869
    https://doi.org/10.2307/590869 [Google Scholar]
14. Gurevitch, Zali D.
    2001 “Dialectical dialogue: the struggle for speech, repressive silence, and the shift to multiplicity.” The British Journal of Sociology52 (1): 87–104. 10.1080/00071310020023046
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020023046 [Google Scholar]
15. Habermas, Jürgen
    1984 The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol.I1. Translated byTim McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haugh, Michael and Jonathan Culpeper
    2018 “Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory.” InPragmatics and its interfaces, ed. byCornelia Ilie and Neal Norrick. 213–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.294.10hau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.10hau [Google Scholar]
17. Hyland, Ken
    1996 “Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles.” Applied Linguistics17 (4): 433–454. 10.1093/applin/17.4.433
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.433 [Google Scholar]
18. Kádár, Daniel Z.
    2019 “Introduction: Advancing linguistic politeness theory by using Chinese data.” Acta Linguistica Academica66 (2): 149–164. 10.1556/2062.2019.66.2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2019.66.2.1 [Google Scholar]
19. Kampf, Zohar, Lee Aldar, Roni Danziger & Mia Schreiber
    2019 “The pragmatics of amicable interstate communication.” Intercultural Pragmatics16 (2): 123–151. 10.1515/ip‑2019‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0007 [Google Scholar]
20. Lakoff, George
    1972 “Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts.” Chicago Linguistic Society81: 183–228.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Levinas, Emmanuel
    1969 Totality and Infinity, Translated byA. Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Levinas, Emmanuel
    1984 “A dialogue.” InDialogue with Contemporary Continental Thinkers, ed. byR. Kearney. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Locher, Miriam and Richard Watts
    2005 “Politeness theory and relational work.” Journal of Politeness Research11: 9–33. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
25. Myers, Greg
    1989 “The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles.” Applied Linguistics10 (1): 1–35. 10.1093/applin/10.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.1 [Google Scholar]
26. Nuyts, Jan
    2001 Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
27. Palmer, Frank R.
    1979 Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman
    [Google Scholar]
28. Peleg, Muli
    2010 “In search of substantial community: Israeli society and the merit of normative dialogue.” Israel Studies in Language and Society3 (2), 13–32. [In Hebrew].
    [Google Scholar]
29. Scollon, Ron and Susan W. Scollon
    1995 Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. New York & Oxford: John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2000 “Rapport management: a framework for analysis.” InCulturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures, ed. byHelen Spencer-Oatey, 11–46. London: Continuum. 10.5040/9781350934085
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350934085 [Google Scholar]
31. Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Wenying Jiang
    2003 “Explaining cross-cultural pragmatic findings: moving from politeness maxims to sociopragmatic interactional principles (SIPs).” Journal of Pragmatics35 (10–11): 1633–1650. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00025‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00025-0 [Google Scholar]
32. Spokoiny, Ohala
    2019 An Argumentative Discourse that Promotes Dialogue: Rhetorical Linguistic Strategies and Characteristics, Ph.D. Thesis, Bar-Ilan University. [In Hebrew].
    [Google Scholar]
33. Thompson, Geoff, and Susan Hunston
    2001 “Evaluation: An introduction.” InEvaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. bySusan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Von Wright, Georg H.
    1951 An Essay in Modal Logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Watts, Richard J.
    1989 “Relevance and relational work: linguistic politeness as politic behavior.” Multilingua8 (2–3): 131–166. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.131 [Google Scholar]