The role of assessments in providing evasive answers in news interviews

References

1. Abdullah, Saeed and Mokhtar Elareshi
   2015 “Building narratives: A study of terrorism framing by Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya TV networks”. Arab Media & Society211: 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alroumi, Abdulrahman and El Mustapha Lahlali
   2022 “The accountability of assessments in news interviews”. Discourse & Communication15(6): 3–20. 10.1177/17504813211026563
   https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211026563 [Google Scholar]
3. Bednarek, Monika
   2009 “Dimensions of evaluation: Cognitive and linguistic perspectives”. Pragmatics and Cognition7(1): 146–175. 10.1075/pc.17.1.05bed
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.1.05bed [Google Scholar]
4. Carranza, Ariel
   2016 “Evading and resisting answering”. Pragmatics and Society7(4): 570–594. 10.1075/ps.7.4.03car
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.4.03car [Google Scholar]
5. Chovanec, Jan
   2020 “‛Those are not my words’: Evasion and metalingual accountability in political scandal talk.” Journal of Pragmatics1581: 66–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.003 [Google Scholar]
6. Clayman, Steven
   2001 “Answers and evasions”. Language in Society30(3): 403–442. 10.1017/S0047404501003037
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501003037 [Google Scholar]
7. Clayman, Steven
   2012 “Conversation nalysis in the news interview.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 630–656. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch31
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch31 [Google Scholar]
8. Clayman, Steven
   2017 “The micropolitics of legitimacy: Political positioning and journalistic scrutiny at the boundary of the mainstream”. Social Psychology Quarterly80(1): 41–64. 10.1177/0190272516667705
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516667705 [Google Scholar]
9. Clayman, Steven and John Heritage
   2002 The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
10. Clift, Rebecca
    2016 Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter
    2012 Descriptions and Assessments [paper presentation]. Conference on Discourse-Communication-Conversation, Loughborough, United Kingdom, March 20–22 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter
    2017 “Some uses of subject-side assessments”. Discourse Studies19(5): 497–514. 10.1177/1461445617715171
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617715171 [Google Scholar]
13. Ekström, Mats, Monika Djerf-Pierre, Bengt Johansson, and Nicklas Håkansson
    2016 “Negotiating politicians’ responsibilities in news interviews”. Journalism Practice10(8): 983–1004. 10.1080/17512786.2015.1071675
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1071675 [Google Scholar]
14. Emmertsen, Sofie
    2007 “Interviewers’ challenging questions in British debate interviews”. Journal of Pragmatics39(3): 570–591. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.011 [Google Scholar]
15. Englebretson, Robert
    2007 Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164 [Google Scholar]
16. Fox, Barbara A. and Sandra A. Thompson
    2010 “Responses to Wh-questions in English conversation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction43(2): 133–156. 10.1080/08351811003751680
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351811003751680 [Google Scholar]
17. Gabrielsen, Jonas, Heidi Jønch-Clausen, and Chrisina Pontoppidan
    2020 “Answering without answering: Shifting as an evasive rhetorical strategy”. Journalism21(9): 1355–1370. 10.1177/1464884917738412
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917738412 [Google Scholar]
18. Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    1987 “Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assesments”. Papers in Pragmatics1(1): 1–54. 10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo [Google Scholar]
19. Heritage, John and David Greatbatch
    1986 “Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences”. American Journal of Sociology921: 110–157. 10.1086/228465
    https://doi.org/10.1086/228465 [Google Scholar]
20. Hunston, Susan and John Sinclair
    2000 “Towards a local grammar of evaluation.” InEvaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. bySusan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
21. Lahlali, Mustapha
    2011 Contemporary Arab broadcast media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge Universiy Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
23. Liddicoat, Anthony J.
    2011 An introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lindström, Anna and Lorenza Mondada
    2009 “Assessments in social interaction: Introduction to the special issue”. Research on Language & Social Interaction42(4): 299–308. 10.1080/08351810903296457
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903296457 [Google Scholar]
25. Martin, James and Peter White
    2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
26. Piirainen-Marsh, Arja
    2005 “Managing adversarial questioning in broadcast interviews”. Journal of Politeness Research1(2): 193–217. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.193
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.193 [Google Scholar]
27. Piirainen-Marsh, Arja and Heidi Jauni
    2012 “Assessments and the social construction of expertise in political TV interviews”. Text and Talk32(5): 637–660. 10.1515/text‑2012‑0030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0030 [Google Scholar]
28. Pomerantz, Anita M.
    1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” InStructures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, ed. byMaxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Raymond, Geoffrey
    2003 “Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding”. American Sociological Review68(6): 939–967. 10.2307/1519752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752 [Google Scholar]
30. Raymond, Geoffrey and John Heritage
    2006 “The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren”. Language in Society35(5), 677–705. 10.1017/S0047404506060325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
31. Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening up closings”. Semiotica8(4): 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
32. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
33. Stivers, Tanya and Makoto Hayashi
    2010 “Transformative answers: One way to resist a questions constraints”. Language in Society39(1): 1–25. 10.1017/S0047404509990637
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509990637 [Google Scholar]
34. Thompson, Geoff and Laura Alba-Juez
    2014 Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.242
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242 [Google Scholar]
35. Wilkinson, Sue and Celia Kitzinger
    2008 “Conversation analysis”. InThe Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, ed. byWendy Stainton-Rogers and Carla Willig, 54–72. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781848607927.n4
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607927.n4 [Google Scholar]