1887
Volume 14, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the role of assessments in the design of interviewees’ answers in news interviews settings on two Arabic networks. It employs a Conversation Analysis approach, in addition to quantitative analysis, to observe the most recurrent positions for emerging assessments in interviewees’ answers. In addition, it examines the role of these assessments in providing evasive answers to interviewers’ questions. The data consists of twenty-eight hours of recorded Arab news interviews from four shows: (Special Interview) and (Without Bounds) on Aljazeera and (Point of Order) and (Special Interview) on Al-Arabiya. The findings reveal that assessments emerge in recurrent positions in interviewees’ answers and play a role in their design. Likewise, they show the role of assessments in the design of evasive answers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.21056.alr
2023-04-11
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdullah, Saeed and Mokhtar Elareshi
    2015 “Building narratives: A study of terrorism framing by Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya TV networks”. Arab Media & Society211: 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alroumi, Abdulrahman and El Mustapha Lahlali
    2022 “The accountability of assessments in news interviews”. Discourse & Communication15(6): 3–20. 10.1177/17504813211026563
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211026563 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bednarek, Monika
    2009 “Dimensions of evaluation: Cognitive and linguistic perspectives”. Pragmatics and Cognition7(1): 146–175. 10.1075/pc.17.1.05bed
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.1.05bed [Google Scholar]
  4. Carranza, Ariel
    2016 “Evading and resisting answering”. Pragmatics and Society7(4): 570–594. 10.1075/ps.7.4.03car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.4.03car [Google Scholar]
  5. Chovanec, Jan
    2020 “‛Those are not my words’: Evasion and metalingual accountability in political scandal talk.” Journal of Pragmatics1581: 66–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clayman, Steven
    2001 “Answers and evasions”. Language in Society30(3): 403–442. 10.1017/S0047404501003037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501003037 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2012 “Conversation nalysis in the news interview.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 630–656. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch31
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch31 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2017 “The micropolitics of legitimacy: Political positioning and journalistic scrutiny at the boundary of the mainstream”. Social Psychology Quarterly80(1): 41–64. 10.1177/0190272516667705
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516667705 [Google Scholar]
  9. Clayman, Steven and John Heritage
    2002The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
  10. Clift, Rebecca
    2016Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter
    2012Descriptions and Assessments [paper presentation]. Conference on Discourse-Communication-Conversation, Loughborough, United Kingdom, March 20–22 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2017 “Some uses of subject-side assessments”. Discourse Studies19(5): 497–514. 10.1177/1461445617715171
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617715171 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ekström, Mats, Monika Djerf-Pierre, Bengt Johansson, and Nicklas Håkansson
    2016 “Negotiating politicians’ responsibilities in news interviews”. Journalism Practice10(8): 983–1004. 10.1080/17512786.2015.1071675
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1071675 [Google Scholar]
  14. Emmertsen, Sofie
    2007 “Interviewers’ challenging questions in British debate interviews”. Journal of Pragmatics39(3): 570–591. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.011 [Google Scholar]
  15. Englebretson, Robert
    2007Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fox, Barbara A. and Sandra A. Thompson
    2010 “Responses to Wh-questions in English conversation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction43(2): 133–156. 10.1080/08351811003751680
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351811003751680 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gabrielsen, Jonas, Heidi Jønch-Clausen, and Chrisina Pontoppidan
    2020 “Answering without answering: Shifting as an evasive rhetorical strategy”. Journalism21(9): 1355–1370. 10.1177/1464884917738412
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917738412 [Google Scholar]
  18. Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    1987 “Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assesments”. Papers in Pragmatics1(1): 1–54. 10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo [Google Scholar]
  19. Heritage, John and David Greatbatch
    1986 “Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences”. American Journal of Sociology921: 110–157. 10.1086/228465
    https://doi.org/10.1086/228465 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hunston, Susan and John Sinclair
    2000 “Towards a local grammar of evaluation.” InEvaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. bySusan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lahlali, Mustapha
    2011Contemporary Arab broadcast media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge Universiy Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  23. Liddicoat, Anthony J.
    2011An introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lindström, Anna and Lorenza Mondada
    2009 “Assessments in social interaction: Introduction to the special issue”. Research on Language & Social Interaction42(4): 299–308. 10.1080/08351810903296457
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903296457 [Google Scholar]
  25. Martin, James and Peter White
    2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  26. Piirainen-Marsh, Arja
    2005 “Managing adversarial questioning in broadcast interviews”. Journal of Politeness Research1(2): 193–217. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.193
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.193 [Google Scholar]
  27. Piirainen-Marsh, Arja and Heidi Jauni
    2012 “Assessments and the social construction of expertise in political TV interviews”. Text and Talk32(5): 637–660. 10.1515/text‑2012‑0030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0030 [Google Scholar]
  28. Pomerantz, Anita M.
    1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” InStructures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, ed. byMaxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Raymond, Geoffrey
    2003 “Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding”. American Sociological Review68(6): 939–967. 10.2307/1519752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752 [Google Scholar]
  30. Raymond, Geoffrey and John Heritage
    2006 “The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren”. Language in Society35(5), 677–705. 10.1017/S0047404506060325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening up closings”. Semiotica8(4): 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  32. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  33. Stivers, Tanya and Makoto Hayashi
    2010 “Transformative answers: One way to resist a questions constraints”. Language in Society39(1): 1–25. 10.1017/S0047404509990637
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509990637 [Google Scholar]
  34. Thompson, Geoff and Laura Alba-Juez
    2014Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.242
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wilkinson, Sue and Celia Kitzinger
    2008 “Conversation analysis”. InThe Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, ed. byWendy Stainton-Rogers and Carla Willig, 54–72. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781848607927.n4
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607927.n4 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.21056.alr
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error