Volume 12, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This Special Issue on “Polymedia in interaction” theorizes and empirically investigates practices and ideologies of digitally mediated interaction under conditions of polymedia. We argue that the proliferation of mobile interpersonal communication in the 2010s calls for, and is reflected in, conceptual and methodological shifts in empirical research on digital language and communication in pragmatics and sociocultural linguistics. In this introduction, these shifts are crystallized in five interrelated themes: (1) a turn from ‘computer-mediated communication’ to ‘digitally mediated interaction’ as a bracket category; (2) a move beyond the on/offline divide and focus on the integration of mediated interaction in everyday communication in micro-units of social structure (e.g. transnational families, business or academic communication); (3) an empirical downscaling towards private and small-scale public data; (4) a shift from the study of single modes of digital communication to polymedia; and (5) a focus on semiotic repertoires and registers of digital mediation. Research that orients to (some or all of) these focal points is compared with other trends in digital language research, including computational methods. The papers in this issue flesh out these five dimensions with findings from qualitative research, based on multi-sited linguistic and digital ethnographies in various sociolinguistic settings.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Agha, Asif
    2015 Enregisterment and Communication in Social History. In: Asif Agha and Frog (eds.) Registers of communication, 27–53. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. 10.2307/j.ctvggx2qk.6
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvggx2qk.6 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agha, Asif and Frog
    2015 An Introduction to Registers of Communication. In: Asif Agha and Frog (eds.) Registers of communication, 13–23. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. 10.2307/j.ctvggx2qk.5
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvggx2qk.5 [Google Scholar]
  3. Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Andreas Stæhr
    2018 “Moving Methods Online: Researching Digital Language Practices.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity. ed. byAngela Creese and Adrian Blackledge, 118–132. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315696010‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696010-10 [Google Scholar]
  4. Antaki, Charles, Elisenda Ardévol, Francesc Núñez, and Agnès Vayreda
    2005 “’For She Who Knows Who She Is:’ Managing Accountability in Online Forum Messages.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11 (1). doi:  10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2006.tb00306.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00306.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Arminen, Ilkka, Christian Licoppe, and Anna Spagnolli
    2016 “Respecifying Mediated Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction49 (4): 290–309. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beißwenger, Michael and Steffen Pappert
    2020 Smalltalk mit Bildzeichen. Der Beitrag von Emojis zur digitalen Alltagskommunikation. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik50(1): 89–114. 10.1007/s41244‑020‑00160‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41244-020-00160-5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blommaert, Jan
    2007 Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics4(1): 1–19. 10.1515/IP.2007.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boczkowski, Pablo J., Mora Matassi, and Eugenia Mitchelstein
    2018 “How Young Users Deal with Multiple Platforms: The Role of Meaning-Making in Social Media Repertoires.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication23 (5): 245–259. 10.1093/jcmc/zmy012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy012 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bolander, Brook, and Miriam A. Locher
    2020 “Beyond the Online Offline Distinction: Entry Points to Digital Discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media35. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Blitvich
    2012 Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17:501–521. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2012.01579.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x [Google Scholar]
  11. boyd, danah and Kate Crawford
    2012 Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5): 662–679. 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown, A.
    2018 What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech?Ethnicities18(3): 297–326. 10.1177/1468796817709846
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796817709846 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bucher, Taina, and Anne Helmond
    2019 “The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.” InThe SAGE Handbook of Social Media. ed. byJean Burgess, Thomas Poell, and Alice Marwick, 233–253. London & New York: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Busch, Florian
    2018 “Digital Writing Practices and Media Ideologies of German Adolescents.” The Mouth. Critical Studies in Language, Culture and Society3: 85–103, https://themouthjournal.com
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2021 “The Interactional Principle in Digital Punctuation.” Discourse, Context & Media40: 1–10. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100481
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100481 [Google Scholar]
  16. Clarke, Isobelle, and Jack Grieve
    2019 “Stylistic Variation on the Donald Trump Twitter Account: A Linguistic Analysis of Tweets Posted between 2009 and 2018.” PLoS ONE14 (9): e0222062. 10.1371/journal.pone.0222062
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222062 [Google Scholar]
  17. Collister, Lauren B.
    2011 *-repair in Online Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics43(3): 918–921. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.025 [Google Scholar]
  18. Darics, Erika
    2020 E-Leadership or ‘How to Be Boss in Instant Messaging?’ The Role of Nonverbal Communication. International Journal of Business Communication57(1): 3–29. 10.1177/2329488416685068
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416685068 [Google Scholar]
  19. Deumert, Ana
    2014Sociolinguistics and Mobile Communication. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dynel, Marta
    2014 Participation framework underlying YouTube interaction. Journal of Pragmatics73: 37–52. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Eisenstein, Jacob
    2015 “Systematic Patterning in Phonologically Motivated Orthographic Variation.” Journal of Sociolinguistics19 (2): 161–188. 10.1111/josl.12119
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12119 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gawne, Lauren, and Gretchen McCulloch
    2019 “Emoji as Digital Gestures.” Language@Internet17. https://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2019/gawne
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    1997 Self-presentation and interactional alliances in e-mail discourse: the style- and code-switches of Greek messages. International Journal of Applied Linguistics7/2: 141–164. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.1997.tb00112.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1997.tb00112.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra and Tereza Spilioti
    (eds.) 2016The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gershon, Ilana
    2010 “Media Ideologies. An Introduction.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology20 (2): 283–293. 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2010.01070.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01070.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Giles, David, Wyke Stommel, Trena Paulus, Jessica Lester, and Darren Reed
    2015 “Microanalysis of Online Data: The Methodological Development of ‘Digital CA.’” Discourse, Context & Media7: 41–51. 10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Greschke, Heike M. and Josephine Ott
    2020 “Rethinking Community in Migration Studies: Lessons from Transnational Families for Rethinking the Relationship of ‘Community’ and ‘Society’”. In: Rethinking Community through Transdisciplinary Research, ed. byB. Jansen, 127–143. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑31073‑8_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31073-8_8 [Google Scholar]
  28. Harper, Richard, Rod Watson and Christian Licoppe
    (eds.) 2017 Interpersonal video communication as a site of human sociality. Special Issue, Pragmatics27:3. 10.1075/prag.27.3.01har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.3.01har [Google Scholar]
  29. Herring, Susan C.
    1999 “Interactional Coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication4 (4) jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html. 10.1109/HICSS.1999.772674
    https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.772674 [Google Scholar]
  30. Herring, Susan C., and Jannis Androutsopoulos
    2015 “Computer-Mediated Discourse 2.0.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis. ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, 127–151. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hutchby, Ian
    2001Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ilbury, Christian
    2019 “’Sassy Queens’: Stylistic Orthographic Variation in Twitter and the Enregisterment of AAVE.” Journal of Sociolinguistics24 (2): 245–264. 10.1111/josl.12366
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12366 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones, Rodney H.
    2004 The problem of context in computer-mediated communication. In: P. LeVine and R. Scollon (eds.) Discourse and technology: multimodal discourse analysis, 20–33. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2005 Sites of engagement as sites of attention: time, space and culture in electronic discourse. InDiscourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis, ed. bySigrid Norris and Rodney H. Jones, 141–154. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203018767‑27
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203018767-27 [Google Scholar]
  35. König, Katharina
    2019 “Stance Taking with ‘Laugh’ Particles and Emojis – Sequential and Functional Patterns of ‘Laughter’ in a Corpus of German WhatsApp Chats.” Journal of Pragmatics142: 156–170. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kusters, Annelies, Massimiliano Spotti, Ruth Swanwick, and Elina Tapio
    2017 “Beyond Languages, Beyond Modalities: Transforming the Study of Semiotic Repertoires.” International Journal of Multilingualism14 (3): 219–232. 10.1080/14790718.2017.1321651
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1321651 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, Carmen
    2011 Texts and practices of micro-blogging: status updates on Facebook. InDigital Discourse: Language in the New Media, ed. byCrispin Thurlow and Kristine Mroczek. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.110–28. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2017Multilingualism online. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Leurs, Koen, and Kevin Smets
    (eds.) 2018 “Forced Migrants and Digital Connectivities.” Social Media + SocietyJanuary-March 2018: 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lexander, Kristin Vold and Jannis Androutsopoulos
    2021 Working with mediagrams: A methodology for collaborative research on mediational repertoires in multilingual families. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development42(1): 1–18. 10.1080/01434632.2019.1667363
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1667363 [Google Scholar]
  41. Licoppe, Christian
    2004 “’Connected’ Presence: The Emergence of a New Repertoire for Managing Social Relationships in a Changing Communication Technoscape.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22 (1): 135–156. 10.1068/d323t
    https://doi.org/10.1068/d323t [Google Scholar]
  42. Lyons, Agnieszka
    2018 “Multimodal Expression in Written Digital Discourse: The case of Kineticons.” Journal of Pragmatics131: 18–29. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Madianou, Mirca
    2014a “Polymedia Communication and Mediatized Migration: An Ethnographic Approach.” InMediatization of Communication. ed. byKnut Lundby, 323–348. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110272215.323
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215.323 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2014b “Smartphone as Polymedia.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19: 667–680. 10.1111/jcc4.12069
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12069 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2016 “Ambient Co-Presence: Transnational Family Practices in Polymedia Environments.” Global Networks16 (2): 183–201. 10.1111/glob.12105
    https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12105 [Google Scholar]
  46. Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller
    2012Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Marchant, Caroline, and Stephanie O’Donohoe
    2019 Homo prostheticus? Intercorporeality and the emerging adult-smartphone assemblage. Information Technology & People32(2):453–474. 10.1108/ITP‑07‑2017‑0209
    https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2017-0209 [Google Scholar]
  48. Meredith, Joanne
    2017 “Analysing Technological Affordances of Online Interactions Using Conversation Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics115: 42–55. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Purschke, Christoph, and Dirk Hovy
    2019 “Lörres, Möppes, and the Swiss. (Re)Discovering Regional Patterns in Anonymous Social Media Data.” Journal of Linguistic Geography7 (2): 113–134. 10.1017/jlg.2019.10
    https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2019.10 [Google Scholar]
  50. Sabaté i Dalmau, M. S.
    2012 A sociolinguistic analysis of transnational SMS practices: Non-elite multilingualism, grassroots literacy and social agency among migrant populations in Barcelona. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 35(2): 318–340. 10.1075/li.35.2.10sab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.35.2.10sab [Google Scholar]
  51. Scissors, Lauren E., and Darren Gergle
    2013 “Back and Forth, Back and Forth: Channel Switching in Romantic Couple Conflict.” CSCW 2013 – Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 237–247. 10.1145/2441776.2441804
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441804 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sindoni, Maria Grazia
    2021 “Mode-Switching in Video-Mediated Interaction: Integrating Linguistic Phenomena into Multimodal Transcription Tasks.” Linguistics and Education62. 10.1016/j.linged.2019.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  53. Spilioti, Tereza
    2011 Beyond genre: Closings and relational work in text-messaging. In: Crispin Thurlow and Kristine Mroczek (eds.), Digital Discourse. Language in the New Media, 69–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tagg, Caroline
    2016 Heteroglossia in text-messaging: Performing identity and negotiating relationships in a digital space. Journal of Sociolinguistics20:1: 59–85. 10.1111/josl.12170
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12170 [Google Scholar]
  55. Tagg, Caroline and Agnieszka Lyons
    2021 Repertoires on the move: exploiting technological affordances and contexts in mobile messaging interactions. International Journal of Multilingualism18:2: 244–266. 10.1080/14790718.2020.1867150
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1867150 [Google Scholar]
  56. Tagliamonte, Sali
    2016 “So Sick or So Cool? The Language of Youth on the Internet.” Language in Society45 (1): 1–32. 10.1017/S0047404515000780
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000780 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error