1887
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article examines the role played by signs in the public space of two socio-economically stratified residential neighbourhoods of Ghent (Belgium) during the first Covid-19 outbreak in 2020. On the basis of fieldwork, we explore the potential of public signs as a resourceful strategy for communicating solidarity and support and the discursive construction of a community affected by this crisis. We show that in times of lockdown and social distancing, the residential linguistic landscape in both neighbourhoods became strategically appropriated by local inhabitants to communicate with neighbours and strangers and was operationalised as a vehicle to serve new communicative functions such as the conveying of solidarity and support as well as gratitude, and collective belonging. Some differences related to emplacement, language use and quantity of signs were also observed. Overall, the article documents the affective appropriation of space through Covid-19 signs during the Covid-19 outbreak and periods of lockdown in Flanders, Belgium.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22013.van
2023-07-06
2024-06-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Backhaus, Peter
    2007Linguistic Landscapes. A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben-Rafael, Eliezer, Elana Shohamy, Muhammad Amara, and Nira Trumper-Hecht
    2006 Linguistic Landscape as Symbolic Construction of the Public Space: The Case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism3 (1): 7–30. 10.1080/14790710608668383
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668383 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blommaert, Jan, James Collins, and Stef Slembrouck
    2005 Polycentricity and Interactional Regimes in ‘Global Neighborhoods’. Ethnography6 (2): 205–235. 10.1177/1466138105057557
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138105057557 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blommaert, Jan, and Ico Maly
    2014 Ethnographic Linguistic Landscape Analysis and Social Change: A Case Study. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 100.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Collins, James, and Stef Slembrouck
    2007 Reading Shop Windows in Globalized Neighbourhoods: Multilingual Literacy Practices and Indexicality. Journal of Literacy Research39 (3): 335–356. 10.1080/10862960701613128
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960701613128 [Google Scholar]
  6. Desson, Zachary, Emmi Weller, Peter McMeekin, and Mehdi Ammi
    2020 An Analysis of the Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in France, Belgium, and Canada. Health Policy and Technology9 (4): 430–446. 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gorter, Durk
    2006 Introduction: The Study of the Linguistic Landscape as a New Approach to Multilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism3 (1): 1–6. 10.1080/14790710608668382
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668382 [Google Scholar]
  8. Huebner, Thom
    2006 Bangkok’s Linguistic Landscapes: Environmental Print, Codemixing and Language Change. International Journal of Multilingualism3 (1): 31–51. 10.1080/14790710608668384
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668384 [Google Scholar]
  9. Janssens, Rudi
    2012 The Linguistic Landscape as a Political Arena: The Case of the Brussels Periphery in Belgium. InLinguistic Landscapes, Multilingualism and Social Change, Christine Hélot, Monica Barni, Rudi Janssens and Carla Bagna (eds), 39–52. Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jaworski, Adam, and Crispin Thurlow
    2010Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jaworski, Adam, and Jackie Jia Lou
    2020 #wordswewear: Mobile Texts, Expressive Persons, and Conviviality in Urban Spaces. Social Semiotics31 (1): 108–135. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1810545
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1810545 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kailuweit, Rolf, and Aldina Quintana
    2020 The Language of Public Mourning: De- and Reterritorialization of Public Spaces as a Reaction to Terrorist Attacks. InReterritorializing Linguistic Landscapes Questioning Boundaries and Opening Space, David Malinowski and Stefania Tufi (eds), 284–306. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350077997.0023
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350077997.0023 [Google Scholar]
  13. Leeman, Jennifer, and Gabriella Modan
    2009 Commodified Language in Chinatown: A Contextualized Approach to Linguistic Landscape. Journal of Sociolinguistics13 (3): 332–362. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00409.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00409.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Maerevoet, Ellen, Denny Baert, Michaël Torfs, Floor Bruggeman, and Freek Willems
    2020 LIVEBLOG: België neemt “verregaande maatregelen” tegen corona: alleen nog “essentiële verplaatsingen” toegestaan. VRT NWS, March 17, 2020. https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2020/03/17/liveblog-17-maart/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Moriarty, Máiréad
    2014 Languages in Motion: Multilingualism and Mobility in the Linguistic Landscape. International Journal of Bilingualism18 (5): 457–463. 10.1177/1367006913484208
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913484208 [Google Scholar]
  16. Oosterlynck, Stijn, Maarten Loopmans, Nick Schuermans, Joke Vandenabeele, and Sami Zemni
    2016 Putting Flesh to the Bone: Looking for Solidarity in Diversity, Here and Now. Ethnic and Racial Studies39 (5): 764–782. 10.1080/01419870.2015.1080380
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1080380 [Google Scholar]
  17. Paelinck, Gianni
    2020 Na de eerste Belgische corona-besmetting: “Het protocol heeft zeer goed gewerkt, het virus is onder controle”. VRT NWS, February 4, 2020. https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2020/02/04/corona-protocol/
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Papen, Uta
    2012 Commercial Discourses, Gentrification and Citizen’s Protest: The Linguistic Landscape of Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin. Journal of Sociolinguistics16 (1): 56–80. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2011.00518.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00518.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Scollon, Ron, and Suzie Wong Scollon
    2003Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London and NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  20. Sebba, Mark
    2010 Discourses in Transit. InSemiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, Adam Jaworski and Crispin Thurlow (eds), 59–76. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Shohamy, Elana
    2012 Linguistic Landscapes and Multilingualism. InThe Routledge Handbook of Multilingualism, Marilyn Martin-Jones, Adrian Blackledge and Angela Creese (eds), 538–551. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stjernø, Steinar
    2004Solidarity in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tourinho, Emmanuel Zagury, Aécio Borba, Christian Vichi, and Felipe Lustosa Leite
    2011 Contributions of Contingencies in Modern Societies to “Privacy” in the Behavioral Relations of Cognition and Emotion. The Behavior Analyst34 (2): 171–180. 10.1007/BF03392247
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392247 [Google Scholar]
  24. Vandenbroucke, Mieke
    2015 Language Visibility, Functionality and Meaning Across Various TimeSpace Scales in Brussels’ Multilingual Mandscapes. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development36 (2): 163–181. 10.1080/01434632.2014.909442
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2014.909442 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2016 Socio-economic Stratification of English in Globalized Landscapes: A Market-oriented Perspective. Journal of Sociolinguistics20 (1): 86–108. 10.1111/josl.12166
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12166 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2018 Multilingualism, Urban Change and Gentrification in the Landscape of a Brussels Neighbourhood. Multilingua37 (1): 25–52. 10.1515/multi‑2015‑0103
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2015-0103 [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Mensel, Luk, Mieke Vandenbroucke, and Robert Blackwood
    2016 Linguistic Landscapes. InOxford Handbook of Language and Society, Ofelia García, Nelson Flores and Massimiliano Spotti (eds), 423–449. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wee, Lionel
    2016 Situating Affect in Linguistic Landscapes. Linguistic Landscape2 (2): 105–126. 10.1075/ll.2.2.01wee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.2.2.01wee [Google Scholar]
  29. Zeevi, Irit
    2009 ‘Northern residents, Cellcom is with you’: The Rhetoric of Israeli Advertising during the Second Lebanon War. Media, War & Conflict2 (2): 191–211. 10.1177/1750635209104654
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635209104654 [Google Scholar]
  30. Zeevi, Irit. and Deborah Dubiner
    2016 Outdoor Signage as a Trait in the Linguistic Landscape during Operation Protective Edge. Linguistic Landscape2 (1): 80–103. 10.1075/ll.2.1.04zee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.2.1.04zee [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22013.van
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22013.van
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): affective regime; appropriation; Covid-19 signs; linguistic landscape; solidarity; support
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error