1887
image of Unspoken evaluation of impoliteness
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims at examining the evaluation of impoliteness not manifested in utterances or actions. The focus is on how speaker-hearers conceal their negative evaluation and the reasons underlying their behavior. The data were collected from a WhatsApp group conversation, from a Focus Group discussion with WhatsApp group members, and through questionnaires. The study approaches the data using relational work and rapport management theories. The study shows that hearers conceal the evaluation of impoliteness by affiliating with the topics evaluated positively instead of negatively evaluated utterances. The behavior can cause contested meanings of unmarked utterances between the hearers and the speakers. Although speakers perceive their utterances as politic or appropriate, the hearers observe them negatively. Furthermore, the Focus Group discussion showed that the WhatsApp Group members conducted the unspoken evaluation of impoliteness to maintain the equanimity of social relationships. The questionnaires indicated that concealing negative evaluation is a recurrent action of native speakers of Javanese.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22031.nor
2025-04-30
2025-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alba-Juez, Laura
    2021 “Fast and Slow Thinking as Secret Agents Behind Speakers’ (Un)Conscious Pragmatic Decisions and Judgements.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.016 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bandelj, Nina
    2012 “Relational Work and Economic Sociology.” Politics & Society (): –. 10.1177/0032329212441597
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329212441597 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baratta, Alex
    2014 “Military impoliteness as an (eventually) Unmarked Form: A Comment on Bousfield (2007).” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barokah, Dwi Reka
    2019 “Kominfo: 83% Pengguna Internet adalah Pengguna Whatsapp.” [Kominfo: 83% of Internet Users are WhatsApp Users] Gatra.com. https://www.gatra.com/news-457263-teknologi-kominfo-83-pengguna-internet-adalah-pengguna-whatsapp.html. Accessed8 April 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berman, Laine
    1998Speaking through the Silence: Narratives, Social Conventions, and Power in Java. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195108880.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195108880.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertrand, Romain
    2008 “A Foucauldian, non-intentionalist analysis of modern Javanese ethics.” International Social Science Journal (): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2451.2009.00681.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2009.00681.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos
    2009 “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: the ‘Culture Wars.’” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture (): –. 10.1515/JPLR.2009.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2009.014 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boellstorff, Tom
    2004 “Gay Language and Indonesia: Registering Belonging.” Journal of linguistic anthropology (): –. 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.248
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.248 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bolander, Brook, and Miriam A. Locher
    2015 “’Peter Is a Dumb Nut’: Status Updates and Reactions to them as ‘Acts of Positioning’ in Facebook.” Pragmatics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bousfield, Derek
    2007 “Beginnings, Middles and Ends: A Biopsy of the Dynamics of Impolite Exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brenner, Suzanne A.
    1995 “Why Women Rule the Roost: Rethinking Javanese Ideologies of Gender and Self-Control.” InBewitching Women, Pious Men: Gender and Body Politics in Southeast Asia, ed. byAihwa Ong and Michael G. Peletz. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bresnahan, Mary Jiang, Sachiyo Morinaga Shearman, Sun Young Lee, Rie Ohashi, and David Mosher
    2002 “Personal and cultural differences in responding to criticism in three countries.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology (): –. 10.1111/1467‑839X.00097
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00097 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang, Wei-Lin Melody
    2018 “Emotivity and Face: Displaying and Soliciting Emotivity in Chinese Mediation Interactions.” Lingua: –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chang, Wei-Lin Melody, and Michael Haugh
    2011 “Evaluations of Im/Politeness of an Intercultural Apology.” Intercultural Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/iprg.2011.019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.019 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheng, Cecilia, Shu-Fai Cheung, Jasmine Hin-Man Chio, and Man-Pui Sally Chan
    2013 “Cultural Meaning of Perceived Control: a Meta-Analysis of Locus of Control and Psychological Symptoms Across 18 Cultural Regions.” Psychological Bulletin (): –. 10.1037/a0028596
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028596 [Google Scholar]
  17. Çiftçi, Hatime, and Camilla Vásquez
    2020 “Co-Constructed Oppositional Stance and Facework in an Office Hour Interaction.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2017‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0013 [Google Scholar]
  18. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2012 “Politeness and Impoliteness.” InPragmatics of Society, ed. byGisle Andersen and Karin Aijmer, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Handbooks of Pragmatics 5)
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
    2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: with Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00118‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2 [Google Scholar]
  20. Donaghue, Helen
    2018 “Relational Work and Identity Negotiation in Critical Post Observation Teacher Feedback.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  21. Eelen, Gino
    2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Vol. 1. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellis, Carolyn, Christine E. Kiesinger, and Lisa M. Tillmann-Healy
    1997 “Interactive Interviewing: Talking about Emotional Experience.” InReflexivity and Voiceed. byRosanna Hertz, –. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Errington, J. Joseph
    1985Language and Social Change in Java: Linguistic Reflexes of Modernization in a Traditional Royal Polity. Athens, O.: Ohio University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1988Structure and Style in Javanese: A Semiotic View of Linguistic Etiquette. Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press. 10.9783/9781512815764
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512815764 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fukushima, Saeko
    2004 “Evaluation of Politeness: The Case of Attentiveness.” Multilingua: –. 10.1515/mult.2004.23.4.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.23.4.365 [Google Scholar]
  26. Geertz, Clifford
    1960The religion of Java. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Geertz, Hildred
    1989The Javanese Family: A Study of Kindship and Socialization. Long Grove, Ill.: Waveland Press. [originally, 1961].
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Goffman, Erving
    2005Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Pulishers. [originally, 1967]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gunarwan, Asim
    2001 “The Speech Act of Criticizing among Speakers of Javanese.” InPapers from the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, ed. byKaren L. Adams and Thomas J. Hudak, –. Tempe, Ariz.: Arizona State University
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Harb, Mustafa
    2021 “Disagreement among Arabic Speakers in Faceless Computer-Mediated Communication.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2017‑0045
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0045 [Google Scholar]
  31. Haugh, Michael
    2010 “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)Affiliation, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018 [Google Scholar]
  32. Irvine, Judith T.
    1992 “Ideologies of Honorific Language.” Pragmatics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Isosävi, Johanna
    2020 “Cultural Outsiders’ Reported Adherence to Finnish and French Politeness Norms.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jauhari, Edy, Djatmika Djatmika, and Riyadi Santosa
    2020 “Criticism in the Javanese Arek Cultural Community: Its Expression Context and Strategy Use.” Pragmatics and Society (): — . 10.1075/ps.16032.jau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16032.jau [Google Scholar]
  35. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  36. Keeler, Ward
    1990 “Speaking of Gender in Java.” InPower and Difference: Gender in Island Southeast Asia, ed. byJane Monnig Atkinson and Shelly Errington, –. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Koentjaraningrat
    Koentjaraningrat 1985Javanese Culture. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Locher, Miriam A.
    2004Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. (Language, Power and Social Process, 12) 10.1515/9783110926552
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110926552 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2020 “Moments of Relational Work in English Fan Translations of Korean TV Drama.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  41. Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
    2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. byDerek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110208344.2.77
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344.2.77 [Google Scholar]
  43. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
    2013 “’Just Click Like’: Computer-Mediated Responses to Spanish Compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2015 “Jocular Mockery in Computer-Mediated Communication: a Contrastive Study of a Spanish and English Facebook Community.” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0012 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mapson, Rachel, and George Major
    2021 “Interpreters, Rapport, and the Role of Familiarity.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.020 [Google Scholar]
  46. Mills, Sara
    2003Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2004 “Class, Gender and Politeness.” Multilingua: –. 10.1515/mult.2004.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.004 [Google Scholar]
  48. Oakes, Michael P.
    2009 “Javanese.” InThe World’s Major Languages, ed. byBernard Comrie. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Omura, Mieko, Teresa E. Stone, and Tracy Levett-Jones
    2018 “Cultural Factors Influencing Japanese Nurses’ Assertive Communication. Part 1: Collectivism.” Nursing & Health Sciences (): –. 10.1111/nhs.12411
    https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12411 [Google Scholar]
  50. Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo
    1969 “Wordlist of Javanese Non-Ngoko Vocabularies.” Indonesia (): –. 10.2307/3350808
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3350808 [Google Scholar]
  51. Silverstein, Michael
    2003 “Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life.” Language and Communication (): –. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  52. Smith-Hefner, Nancy J.
    1988 “Women and politeness: The Javanese example.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500013087
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013087 [Google Scholar]
  53. 1989 “A Social History of Language Change in Highland East Java.” The Journal of Asian Studies (): –. 10.2307/2057377
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2057377 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2009 “Language Shift, Gender, and Ideologies of Modernity in Central Java, Indonesia.” Journal of Linguistic AnthropologyVol. (): –. 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2009.01019.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2009.01019.x [Google Scholar]
  55. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2008 “Face, (Im)Politeness and Rapport.” InCulturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, edited byHelen Spencer-Oatey, –. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Terkourafi, Marina
    2005 “Beyond the micro-level in politeness research.” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237 [Google Scholar]
  57. Triastuti, Endah
    2021 “Indonesian Women Bloggers: The Role of Bahasa Gaul in Negotiating Public/Private Connections.” The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology(): –. 10.1080/14442213.2021.1882548
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2021.1882548 [Google Scholar]
  58. Watts, Richard J.
    2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Wolff, John U., and Soepomo Poedjosoedarmo
    2002Communicative Codes in Central Java. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University. (Cornell University Southeast Asia Program Publications.)
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Zayts, Olga, and Stephanie Schnurr
    2013 ““[She] said: ‘take the test’ and I took the test”. Relational work as a framework to approach directiveness in prenatal screening of Chinese clients in Hong Kong.” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
  61. Zelizer, Viviana A.
    2000 “The Purchase of Intimacy.” Law & Social Inquiry (): –. 10.1111/j.1747‑4469.2000.tb00162.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2000.tb00162.x. [Google Scholar]
  62. 2005The Purchase of Intimacy. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22031.nor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22031.nor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error