Identity dynamics in text messaging

References

1. Adams, Aubrie, and Miles, Jai
   2023 “Examining textism convergence in mediated interactions.” Language Sciences991,101568. 10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101568
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101568 [Google Scholar]
2. Benwell, Bethan, and Stokeo, Elizabeth
   2006 Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748626533
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626533 [Google Scholar]
3. Bolander, Brook, and Miriam, Locher
   2010 “Constructing Identity on Facebook: Report on A Pilot Study.” In: Performing the Self, ed. byJunod, Karen and Didier Maillat, 165–185. Tübingen: Narr
   [Google Scholar]
4. Booth, Wayne C.
   2004 The Rhetoric of Rhetoric: The Quest for Effective Communication. London: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brinberg, Miriam, and Ram, Nilam
   2021 “Do new romantic couples use more similar language over time? Evidence from intensive longitudinal text messages.” Journal of Communication71(3), 454–477. 10.1093/joc/jqab012
   https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab012 [Google Scholar]
6. Bunz, Ulla, and Campbell, Scott W.
   2004 “Politeness accommodation in electronic mail.” Communication Research Reports21(1), 11–25. 10.1080/08824090409359963
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090409359963 [Google Scholar]
7. Cappallo, Spencer, Svetlichnaya, Stacey, Garrigues, Pierre, Mensink, Thomas, Snoek, Cees G. M.
   2019 “New modality: Emoji challenges in prediction, anticipation, and retrieval.” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia21(2), 402–415. 10.1109/TMM.2018.2862363
   https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2018.2862363 [Google Scholar]
8. Chen, Lisha, Chin, Fei, Goh, Sun, Yifan, and Amran Rasli
   2017 “Integrating guanxi into technology acceptance: An empirical investigation of WeChat.” Telematics and Informatics34(7):1125–1142. 10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.003 [Google Scholar]
9. Clark, Herbert. H.
   1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
10. Eisenlauer, Volker
    2014 “Facebook as a third author (semi)automated participation frameworks in Social Network Sites.” Journal of Pragmatics721: 73–85. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.006 [Google Scholar]
11. Fairclough, Norman
    2001 Language and Power. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Feng, Siyuan
    2020 Private Tutors’ Perceptions of Mixed Identities and Negotiated Roles: A Sociocultural Investigation in Zhengzhou Tutorial Centres, China. (Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gallois, Cindy, Ogay, Tania, and Giles, Howard
    2005 “Communication Accommodation Theory: A Look Back and a Look Ahead.” In: Theorizing about Intercultural Communication, ed. byWilliam, B. Gudykunst, 121–148. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gasiorek, Jessica, and Dragojevic, Marko
    2017 “The effects of accumulated underaccommodation on perceptions of underaccommodative communication and speakers.” Human Communication Research43(2), 276–294. 10.1111/hcre.12105
    https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12105 [Google Scholar]
15. Ge, Jing, and Ulrike Gretzel
    2018 “Emoji rhetoric: a social media influencer perspective.” Journal of Marketing Management34(15–16), 1272–1295. 10.1080/0267257X.2018.1483960
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1483960 [Google Scholar]
16. Gibson, Anna
    2019 “Free speech and safe spaces: how moderation policies shape online discussion spaces.” Social Media Society5(1), 1–15. 10.1177/2056305119832588
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119832588 [Google Scholar]
17. Giles, Howard, Edwards, America L., and Walther, Joseph B.
    2023 “Communication accommodation theory: Past accomplishments, current trends, and future prospects.” Language Sciences991, 101571. 10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101571
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101571 [Google Scholar]
18. Giles, Howard, and Powesland, Peter
    1997 “Accommodation Theory.” In: Sociolinguistics: A Reader, ed. byNikolas, Coupland, and Adam, Jaworski, 232–239. London: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑25582‑5_19
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_19 [Google Scholar]
19. Giles, Howard, and Wadleigh, Paul M.
    2008 “Accommodating nonverbally.” In: The Nonverbal Communication Reader: Classic and Contemporary Readings, ed. byLaura, K. Guerrero, and Michael, L. Hecht, 491–502. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hogan, Bernie
    2010 “The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society30(6), 377–386. 10.1177/0270467610385893
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893 [Google Scholar]
21. Kiong, Tong Chee, and Kee, Yong Pit
    1998 “Guanxi bases, Xinyong and Chinese business networks.” The British Journal of Sociology49(1), 75–96. 10.2307/591264
    https://doi.org/10.2307/591264 [Google Scholar]
22. Kobakhidze, Magda Nutsa
    2016 Teachers as Tutors: Shadow Education Market Dynamics in Georgia. London: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Liao, Wang, Bazarova, Natalya N., and Yuan, Connie Y.
    2018 “Expertise judgement and communication accommodation in linguistic styles in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups.” Communication Research45 (8), 1122–1145. 10.1177/0093650215626974
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626974 [Google Scholar]
24. Liu, Dewen, Gong, Chenyiming, Zhang, Sikang, Ma, Yongbin
    2022 “The influence of firm’s feedbacks on user-generated content’s linguistic style matching–An explanation based on communication accommodation theory.” Frontiers in Psychology131. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.949968
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.949968 [Google Scholar]
25. Marko, Karoline
    2022 “‘Depends on who I’m writing to’: The influence of addressees and personality traits on the use of emoji and emoticons, and related implications for forensic authorship analysis.” Frontiers in Communication, 71. 10.3389/fcomm.2022.840646
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.840646 [Google Scholar]
26. McGlone, Matthew, and Giles, Howard
    2011 “Language and interpersonal communication.” In: The Sage Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, ed. byKnapp, Mark L., and Daly, John A.201–237. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
27. McSweeney, Michelle A.
    2018 The Pragmatics of Text Messaging: Making Meaning in Messages. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315142340
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315142340 [Google Scholar]
28. Merriam, Sharan B., and Tisdell, Elizabeth J.
    2009 Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Lohn Wiley & Sons. Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Muir, Kate, Joinson, Adam, Cotterill, Rachel, and Dewdney, Nigel
    2017 “Linguistic style accommodation shapes impression formation and rapport in computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology36(5), 525–548. 10.1177/0261927X17701327
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17701327 [Google Scholar]
30. Ou, Carol X. J., and Davison, Robert M.
    2016 “Shaping guanxi networks at work through instant messaging.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67 (5), 1153–1168. 10.1002/asi.23447
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23447 [Google Scholar]
31. Parkwell, Corina
    2019 “Emoji as social semiotic resources for meaning-making in discourse: Mapping the functions of the toilet emoji in Cher’s tweets about Donald Trump.” Discourse, Context & Media301: 100307. 10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100307
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100307 [Google Scholar]
32. Sampietro, Agnese
    2019 Emoji and Rapport Management in Spanish WhatsApp Chats. Journal of Pragmatics1431, 109–120. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009 [Google Scholar]
33. Schandorf, Michael
    2012 “Mediated gesture: Paralinguistic communication and phatic text.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies19(3): 319–344. 10.1177/1354856512439501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512439501 [Google Scholar]
34. Schneider, Stefan
    2010 “Mitigation.” In: Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. byMiriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 253–269. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214338.2.253
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.2.253 [Google Scholar]
35. Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne, Wong Scollon
    2001 Intercultural Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Searle, John R.
    1979 Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
37. Soldo, Andrea, and Jokić, Boris
    2013 “The Role of Teachers in the Decision Concerning Use of Private Tutoring Services.” In: Emerging from the Shadow: A Comparative Qualitative Exploration of Private Tutoring in Eurasia. ed. byBoris, Jokić, 115–164. Zagreb: Network of Education Policy Centers.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tomsha, Luke, and Hernandez, Roberto
    2013 “Communication Accommodation Theory.” In: Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application, ed. byRichard, L. West, and Lynn, H. Turner. 465–482. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Walton, Douglas
    2007 Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511619311
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619311 [Google Scholar]
40. Wang, Haiyan, and Crosthwaite, Peter
    2021 “The affordances of WeChat Voice Messaging for Chinese EFL learners during private tutoring.” Computer-Assisted Language Learning22(1), 223–245.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Watson, Rod
    2009 Analyzing Practical and Professional Texts: A Naturalistic Approach. Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Wodak, Ruth, de Cilla, Rudolf, Reisigl, Martin and Liebhart, Karin
    2009 The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Xiong, Tao, Li, Qiuna, and Hu, Guangwei
    2020 “Teaching English in the shadow: identity construction of private English language tutors in China.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education43(1), 73–85.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Yen, Dorothy A., Abosag, Ibrahim, Huang, Yu-An, and Nguyen, Bang
    2017 “Guanxi GRX (ganqing, renqing, xinren) and conflict management in Sino-US business relationships.” Industrial Marketing Management661,103–114. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.07.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.07.011 [Google Scholar]
45. Yung, Kevin W. H., and Yuan, Rui
    2020 “‘The most popular star-tutor of English’: discursive construction of tutor identities in shadow education.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education41(1), 153–168.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Zhang, Wei, and Bray, Mark
    2020 “Comparative research on shadow education: Achievements, challenges, and the agenda ahead.” European Journal of Education55(3), 322–341. 10.1111/ejed.12413
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12413 [Google Scholar]
47. Zhang, Yan B., and Giles, Howard
    2018 “Communication Accommodation Theory.” In: The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, ed. byYoung, Y. Kim, 95–108. Hoboken: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Zhang, Yiqiong, Wang, Min, and Li, Ying
    2021 “More than playfulness: Emojis in the comments of a WeChat official account.” Internet Pragmatics4(2): 247–271. 10.1075/ip.00048.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00048.zha [Google Scholar]
49. Zhou, Ling, & Zhang, Shaojie
    2018 “Reconstructing the politeness principle in Chinese: A response to Gu’s approach.” Intercultural Pragmatics15(5), 693–721. 10.1515/ip‑2018‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0024 [Google Scholar]