1887
image of Activity contamination in a problematic call made to the Korean emergency center
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines a single highly controversial emergency call made to the Korean emergency center which garnered significant media interest due to the caller’s use of authority to demand the call taker’s name. The analysis shows how the sequential context in which turns are produced and the treatment they receive have consequences for how the dispute emerges by using the notion of activity contamination (Whalen et al. 1988). A sequential analysis of the recorded call revealed how the call for help fails as soliciting and giving reason for the phone call is displaced by the activity of arguing with each other. The caller’s use of directives and commands when addressing the call-taker is examined in relation to the Korean “abuse of power” culture. The findings may contribute insights into cultural dynamics in emergency calls, at the same time providing suggestions to improve the effectiveness of Korean emergency service calls in the future.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22046.par
2025-04-14
2025-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahn, Joon-Yong
    2021, November14. Minjudang, “Lee Jaemyung, Kim Moon-soo-wa talli kongsa kyubyelhay 119-ey ilpan simin-ui casey-ro chimchak-kakey sinko-hay-ss-ta” [Democratic party reports that unlike Kim Moon-soo, Lee Jae-myung knew how to draw a line between private and public affairs.] Open News Report. www.onews.tv/news/articleView.html?idxno=98152
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Antaki, Charles, and Alexandra Kent
    2012 “Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.014 [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson, John, and John Heritage
    1984Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger, Israel, Celia Kitzinger, and Sonja J. Ellis
    2016 “Using a category to accomplish resistance in the context of an emergency call.” Pragmatics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse Studies: –. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  6. Choe, Sang-Hun
    2018, April13. “Sister of Korean ‘Nut Rage’ Heiress Accused of Throwing Her Own Tantrum.” The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/13/world/asia/nut-rage-sister-korean-air.html
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter
    2010 “Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445610370126
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610370126 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cromdal, Jakob, Håkan Landqvist, Daniel Persson-Thunqvist, and Karin Osvaldsson
    2012 “Finding out what’s happened: Two procedures for opening emergency calls.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445612439960
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612439960 [Google Scholar]
  9. Drew, Paul
    1997 “Open class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)89759‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7 [Google Scholar]
  10. Do, Hoa, Tran Huu Thuy Giang, and Ket Maj
    2018 “Vietnamese telephone openings: Both universals and particulars”, Language and Dialogue(): –. 10.1075/ld.00022.do
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00022.do [Google Scholar]
  11. Ervin-Tripp, Susan, Mary Catherine O’Connor and Jarrett Rosenberg
    1984 “Language and power in the family.” In: Language and Power, ed. byCheris Kramarae, Muriel Schulz, and William O’Barr, –. Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Garcia, Angela Cora
    2015 “‘Something really weird has happened’: Losing the ‘big picture’ in emergency service calls”. Journal of Pragmatics:–. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2017 “What went right: interactional strategies for managing crisis negotiations during an emergency service call”. The Sociological Quarterly(): –. 10.1080/00380253.2017.1331713
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1331713 [Google Scholar]
  14. Goffman, Erving
    1981Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, Charles
    1984 “Notes on story structure and the organization of participation”, InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage. London: Cambridge University Press, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin, Marjorie, and Charles Goodwin
    1987 “Children’s arguing”, InLanguage, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective, edited bySusan Philips, Susan Steele, and Christine Tanz, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, –. 10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
    2006 “Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences.” Text and Talk(): –. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.021 [Google Scholar]
  18. 1983 “Aggravated correction and disagreement in children’s conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(83)90089‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90089-9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Greatbatch, David and Robert Dingwall
    1997 “Argumentative talk in divorce mediation sessions.” American Sociological Review: –. 10.2307/2657457
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2657457 [Google Scholar]
  20. Head, Jonathan, and Tessa Wong
    2022Itaewon crush: First emergency call came hours before crush. BBC news report. www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-63467204
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change of State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action: Conversation Analysis, edited byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2015 “Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008 [Google Scholar]
  23. Heritage, John, and Steve Clayman
    2010Talk-in-Action: Identities, Interaction and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444318135
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jefferson, Gail, and John R. E. Lee
    1980 “The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’”. Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(81)90026‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction”. InConversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, edited byGene H. Lerner. Amsterdam: Benjamins. –. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  26. Jeong, Han-ul, and Gyewon Jo
    2019 “An empirical study on Gapjil culture in Korean society.” Korean Political Studies(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jeong, Ji-eun
    2011, December29. Jin Jungkwon “Kim Moon-soo cisa-tawesseya”.. taytomin kongkaysakwa yokwu. “Jin Jungkwon says “Kim Moon-soo should have acted like a governor”… He should apologize to the do-residents. https://news.mt.co.kr/mtview.php?no=2011122910033737181&outlink=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fsearch.naver.com
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kent, Alexandra, and Charles Antaki
    2019 “Police call-takers’ first substantive question projects the outcome of the call.” Applied Linguistics(): –. 10.1093/applin/amz002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi
    2019 “Inside the emergency service call-center: Reviewing thirty years of language and social interaction research.” Research on Language & Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1631038
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631038 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2021 “Calming emotional 911 callers: Using redirection as a patient-focused directive in emergency medical calls.” Language & Communication: –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2021.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ko, Jieun
    2024 A conversation analytic study on Korean emergency calls: The collaborative construction of indirect help requests. Sungkyunkwan University. Doctoral dissertation.
  32. Kim, Hyeri Stephanie
    2015 “Resisting the terms of polar questions through ani (‘no’)-prefacing in Korean conversation.” Discourse Processes(): –. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.954950
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.954950 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, Joo Hwan
    2019 March15. “119 shinko hankang twusinca-ey swuyenghamwe cenhwa cal-hanta …taywon 3 myeng cingkye.” [119 call Han River drownee “you’re calling while swimming?” … Three officers under disciplinary measures.] Yonhap news. https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20190315145851004
  34. Koole, Tom, and Verberg, Nina
    2017 “Aligning caller and call-taker: The opening phase of Dutch emergency calls.” Pragmatics and Society: –. 10.1075/ps.8.1.07koo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.1.07koo [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, Seung Hee
    2006 “Second summons in Korean telephone call openings.” Discourse and Society: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lindström, Anna
    1994 “Identification and recognition in Swedish telephone conversation openings.” Language in Society, (): –. 10.1017/S004740450001784X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001784X [Google Scholar]
  37. Laforest, Marty
    2012 “The False Report during an Emergency Call: Using Discourse Analysis to Detect Deceit.” Proceedings of the International Association of Forensic Linguists’ Tenth Biennal Conference, –. Birmingham: Center of Forensic Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Osvaldsson Cromdal, Karin, and Cromdal, Jakob
    2022 “A weak case for solitary confinement: Categorisation, collegiality and accountability arrangements in a special residential home”. Qualitative Social Work(): –. 10.1177/14733250221124211
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250221124211 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sacks, Harvey
    1992Lectures on Conversation, Volumes I and II, edited byGail Jeffersonwith Introduction byEmanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings”, American Anthropologist(): –. 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  41. 1979 “Identification and recognition in telephone openings.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited byGeorge Psathas, Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 1987 “Analyzing single episodes of conversation: an exercise in conversation analysis.” Social Psychology Quarterly: –. 10.2307/2786745
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786745 [Google Scholar]
  43. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2014 “The conversation analytic role-play method (CARM): A method for training communication skills as an alternative to stimulated role play”. Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351813.2014.925663
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.925663 [Google Scholar]
  44. Stokoe, Elizabeth, Bogdana Humă, Rein Ove Sikveland, and Heidi Kevoe-Feldman
    2020 “When delayed responses are productive: Being persuaded following resistance in conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  45. Tracy, Karen
    1997 “Interactional trouble in emergency service requests”. Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3004_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3004_3 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tracy, Karen, and Robert R. Agne
    2002 “‘I just need to ask somebody some questions’: Sensitivities in domestic dispute calls”. InLanguage in the legal process, edited byJanet Cotterill, –. New York: Palgrave McMillan. 10.1057/9780230522770_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522770_5 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tracy, Karen, and Sarah J. Tracy
    1998 “Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing face and face attack.” Human Communication Research(): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1998.tb00444.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00444.x [Google Scholar]
  48. Tuccio, William, and Angela Cora Garcia
    2020 “‘I’d a set that back at the chocks’: The personal hypothetical ‘I would’ in aviation flight instruction.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  49. Robinson, Jeffrey
    2007 “The role of numbers and statistics within conversation analysis”. Communication Methods and Measures(): –. 10.1080/19312450709336663
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336663 [Google Scholar]
  50. Whalen, Jack and Don Zimmerman
    1987 “Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help.” Social Psychology Quarterly: –. 10.2307/2786750
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786750 [Google Scholar]
  51. Whalen, Jack, Don Zimmerman and Marilyn Whalen
    1988 “When Words Fail: A Single Case Analysis.” Social Problems(): –. 10.2307/800591
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800591 [Google Scholar]
  52. Zimmerman, Don
    1984 “Talk and its occasion: The case of calling the police.” In: Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications, edited byDeborah Schiffrin, –. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 1992 The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In: Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, edited byPaul Drew and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22046.par
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: activity contamination ; directives ; dispute ; Korean emergency calls ; conversation analysis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error