‘Like to comment on that?’

References

1. Benson, Malcom
   1994 “Lecture listening in and ethnographic perspective.” InAcademic listening: research perspectives, ed. byJohn Flowerdew, 181–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bamford, Julia
   2000 “Question and Answer Sequencing in Academic Lectures.” InDialogue Analysis VII: Working with Dialogue, ed. byMalcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill, and Frances Rock, 159–170. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110941265‑013
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110941265-013 [Google Scholar]
3. Bamford, Julia
   2005 “Interactivity in Academic Lectures: The Role of Questions and Answers.” InDialogue within Discourse Communities: Metadiscursive Perspectives on Academic Genres, ed. byJulia Bamford, and Marina Bondi, 123–145. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110933222.123
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110933222.123 [Google Scholar]
4. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johannson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
   1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blagojević, Savka
   2015 “National Writing Habits as a Potential Hindrance to International Academic Communication.” InAcademic Discourse across Cultures, ed. byIgor Lakić, Branka Živković, and Milica Vuković, 6–19. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Campbell, Julie, and Richard E. Mayer
   2009 “Questioning as an Instructional Method: Does it Affect Learning from Lectures?” Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition23 (6): 747–759. 10.1002/acp.1513
   https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1513 [Google Scholar]
7. Chang, Yu-Ying
   2012 “The Use of Questions by Professors in Lectures Given in English: Influences of Disciplinary Cultures.” English for Specific Purposes311: 103–116. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.002 [Google Scholar]
8. Chesnokova, Olga
   2017 “Spanish communicative strategies in teaching of Spanish to Russian Students.” InProceedings of 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN17), ed. byLuis Gómez Chova, Agustin López Martínez, and Ignacio Candel Torres, 10094–10101. Barcelona: IATED. 10.21125/edulearn.2017.0907
   https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.0907 [Google Scholar]
9. Chuska, Kenneth R.
   1995 Improving Classroom Questions. A Teacher’s Guide to Increasing Student Motivation, Participation and Higher-level Thinking. Bloomington: Phi Beta Kappa Educational Foundation.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Crawford Camiciottoli, Belinda
    2008 “Interaction in Academic Lectures vs. Written Text Materials: The Case of Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics401: 1216–1231. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.08.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.08.007 [Google Scholar]
11. Dafouz Milne, Emma, and Davinia Sánchez García
    2013 “‘Does Everybody Understand?’ Teacher Questions across Disciplines in English-mediated University Lectures: An Exploratory Study.” Language Value5 (1): 129–151. 10.6035/LanguageV.2012.5.7
    https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2012.5.7 [Google Scholar]
12. Dudley-Evans, Tony
    1994 “Variations in the Discourse Patterns Favoured by Different Disciplines and their Pedagogical Implications.” InAcademic listening: Research perspectives, ed. byJohn Flowerdew, 146–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Flowerdew, John
    1986 “Cognitive style and specific-purpose course design.” English for Specific Purposes5 (2): 121–129. 10.1016/0889‑4906(86)90018‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(86)90018-9 [Google Scholar]
14. Flowerdew, John, and Lindsay Miller
    1995 “On the notion of culture in L2 lectures.” TESOL quarterly29 (2): 345–373. 10.2307/3587628
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587628 [Google Scholar]
15. Flowerdew, John, and Lindsay Miller
    1996 “Lectures in a second language: Notes towards a cultural grammar.” English for Specific Purposes15 (2): 121–140. 10.1016/0889‑4906(96)00001‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(96)00001-4 [Google Scholar]
16. Gibbons, Pauline
    2002 Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning: Teaching ESL Children in the Mainstream Classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” Speech Acts [Syntax and Semantics 3], ed. byPeter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
19. Hofstede, Geert
    2001 Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jin, Lixian, and Martin Cortazzi
    1993 “Cultural orientation and academic language use.” InLanguage and culture, ed.David Graddol, Linda Thompson, and Mike Byram, 84–97. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kiš, Nataša, and Ivana Savić
    2007 “O nekim tendencijama u izboru jezičkih sredstava u situaciji obraćanja, oslovljavanja i pozdravljanja.” Prilozi proučavanju jezika381: 243–248.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Koshik, Irene
    2002 “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction35 (3): 277–309. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2 [Google Scholar]
23. Košarac, Biserka
    2018 “Položaj sociologije kao temeljne društvene nauke na savremenom univerzitetu.” DHS-Društvene i humanističke studije3 (6): 225–234.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lin, Chia-Yen
    2012 “Modifiers in BASE and MICASE: A Matter of Academic Cultures or Lecturing Styles?” English for Specific Purposes311: 117–126. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.003 [Google Scholar]
25. Maksić, Slavica, and Pavlovic, Jelena
    2019 “Implicitne teorije kreativnosti univerzitetskih nastavnika.“ Andragoske studije261: 67–85.
    [Google Scholar]
26. McCormick, Dawn E., and Richard Donato
    2000 “Teacher Questions as Scaffolded Assistance in an ESL Classroom.” InSecond and Foreign Language through Classroom Interaction, ed. byJoan Kelly Hall, and Lorrie Stoops, 180–200. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mehan, Hugh
    1979 “‘What time is it, Denise?’: Asking Known Information Questions in Classroom Discourse.” Theory into Practice281: 285–294. 10.1080/00405847909542846
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846 [Google Scholar]
28. Morell, Teresa
    2007 “What Enhances EFL Students’ Participation in Lecture Discourse? Student, Lecturer and Discourse Perspectives.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes61: 222–237. 10.1016/j.jeap.2007.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.07.002 [Google Scholar]
29. Mrazović, Pavica, and Zora Vukadinović
    1990 Gramatika srpskohrvatskog jezika za strance [A Grammar of Serbo-Croatian for Non-native Speakers]. Novi Sad: Dobra vest.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mrazović, Pavica
    2009 Gramatika srpskog jezika za strance [Grammar of Serbian for Foreigners]. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Navaz, Abdul Majeed Mohamed
    2020 “Questions in English Medium Instruction Undergraduate Lectures in a Sri Lankan University: Why are they Important?” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research19 (12): 208–229. 10.26803/ijlter.19.12.11
    https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.12.11 [Google Scholar]
32. Nesi, Hilary
    2001 “A corpus-based analysis of academic lectures across disciplines.” InLanguage Across Boundaries, ed. byJanet Cotterill, and Anne Ife, 201–218. London: BAAL.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Neuliep, James
    2018 Intercultural Communication: A Contextual Approach 7th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Netz, Hadar
    2016 “Designedly Incomplete Utterances and Student Participation.” Linguistics and Education331: 56–73. 10.1016/j.linged.2016.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.01.001 [Google Scholar]
35. Olsen, Leslie, and Thomas Huckin
    1990 “Point-driven understanding in Engineering lecture comprehension.” English for Specific Purposes9 (1): 33–48. 10.1016/0889‑4906(90)90027‑A
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(90)90027-A [Google Scholar]
36. Papp, Klara K., and Frank B. Miller
    1996 “The Answer to Stimulating Lectures is the Question.” Medical Teacher18 (2): 147–149. 10.3109/01421599609034150
    https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599609034150 [Google Scholar]
37. Piper, Predrag, Ivana Antonić, Vladislava Ružić, Sreto Tanasić, Ljudmila Popović, and Branko Tošović
    2005 Sintaksa savremenog srpskog jezika [Syntax of Contemporary Serbian]. Beograd: Beogradska knjiga.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Radojević, Tamara, Jasmina Kovačević, Dragana Maćešić Petrović, Aleksandra Bašić
    2021 “Kvalitet nastave u visokom obrazovanju prema mišljenju studentata Univerziteta u Beogradu.” InOn-line nastava na univerzitetima, ed. byVladimir Katić, 218–221. Novi Sad: Fakultet tehničkih nauka Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rido, Akhyar
    2019 “What is Newton’s Law of Inertia?: The Use of Questions in Science Lectures.” Litera18 (2): 312–325. 10.21831/ltr.v18i2.21948
    https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v18i2.21948 [Google Scholar]
40. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sánchez García, Davinia
    2010 Classroom Interaction in University Settings: The Case of Questions in Three Disciplines. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sánchez-García, Davinia
    2018 “Teacher Questioning: Exploring Student Interaction and Cognitive Engagement in Spanish and EMI University Lectures.” Porta Linguarum, Monograph31: 103–120. 10.30827/Digibug.54304
    https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.54304 [Google Scholar]
43. Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Scollon
    1991 “Topic confusion in English-Asian discourse.” World Englishes10 (2): 113–125. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1991.tb00145.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1991.tb00145.x [Google Scholar]
44. Schleef, Erik
    2009 “A Cross-cultural Investigation of German and American Academic Style.” Journal of Pragmatics41 (6): 1104–1124. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.01.002 [Google Scholar]
45. Sinclair, John MacHardy, and Malcolm Coulthard
    1975 Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Suviniitty, Jaana
    2010 “Lecturers’ Questions and Student Perception of Lecture Comprehension.” Helsinki English Studies61: 44–57.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Šimić-Banović, Ružica
    2015 “Institutional Interaction in the Business Environment: Eastern European Versus Western European Countries.“ Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu65 (3–4): 439–480.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Thompson, Susan
    1998 “Why Ask Questions in Monologue? Language Choice at Work in Scientific and Linguistic Talk.” InLanguage at Work. Selected papers from the annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics held at the University of Birmingham, September 1997, ed. bySusan Hunston, 137–150. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Tsui, Amy
    1992 “A Functional Description of Questions.” InAdvances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, ed. byMalcolm Coulthard, 89–110. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Vuković, Milica
    2013 “The Discourse of Political Interviews: Interviewer Turns.” InAcross Languages and Cultures, ed. byIgor Lakić and Nataša Kostić, 159–170. Institute of Foreign Languages: Podgorica.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Wheat, Jerry, and Brenda Swartz
    2003 “Building a New University: Translating Western Academic Tradition into Balkan Culture.” Journal of Business and Economics7 (1): 105–108.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Yakhontova, Tatyana
    2002 “‘Selling’ or ‘Telling’: The Issue of Cultural Variation in Research Genres.” InAcademic Discourse, ed. byJohn Flowerdew, 216–232. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]