Societal pragmatics

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Austin, John. L.
   [1962]1975 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, Penelope
   1980 “How and Why are Women More Polite: Some Evidence from a Mayan Community.” InWomen and Language in Literature and Society, ed. bySally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker, and Nelly Furman, –. New York: Praeger.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
5. Caffi, Claudia
   2005 Mitigation. Amsterdam; London: Elsevier. 10.1163/9780080466224
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080466224 [Google Scholar]
6. Cann, Ronnie, and Ruth Kempson
   2017 “What Do Words Do for Us?” Dialectica(): –. 10.1111/1746‑8361.12180
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-8361.12180 [Google Scholar]
7. Culpeper, Jonathan
   2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research(): –. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
   https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
8. Culpeper, Jonathan
   2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
9. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Marina Terkourafi
   2017 “Pragmatic Approaches (Im)politeness.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_2
   https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_2 [Google Scholar]
10. Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    (eds) 2017 The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7 [Google Scholar]
11. Fetzer, Anita
    2006 “‘Minister, we will see how the public judges you.’: Media References in Political Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.017 [Google Scholar]
12. Goffman, Erving
    1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Grice, Paul
    1957 “Meaning.” Philosophical Review: –. 10.2307/2182440
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182440 [Google Scholar]
14. Grice, Paul
    1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Haugh, Michael
    2007 “The Discursive Challenge to Politeness Research: An Interactional Alternative.” Journal of Politeness Research: –. 10.1515/PR.2007.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.013 [Google Scholar]
16. Haugh, Michael
    2008 “The Place of Intention in the Interactional Achievement of Implicature.” InIntention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. byIstvan Kecskes, and Jacob L. Mey, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110211474.1.45
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211474.1.45 [Google Scholar]
17. Ide, Sachiko
    1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua (): –. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
18. Ide, Sachiko
    2006 Wakimae no Goyooron (Pragmatics of discernment). Tokyo: Taishukan.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jary, Mark
    1998 “Relevance Theory and the Communication of Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)80005‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)80005-2 [Google Scholar]
20. Kikuchi, Yasuto
    1997 Keigo (Honorifics). Tokyo: Kodansha.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lakoff, Robin T.
    1975 Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London; New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
24. Matsumoto, Yoshiko
    1989 “Politeness and Conversational Universals — Observations from Japanese.” Multilingua (): –. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.207
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.207 [Google Scholar]
25. Matsushita, Daizaburo
    1924 Hyojun Nihonbunpoo (Standard Japanese grammar). Tokyo: Kigensha.
    [Google Scholar]
26. McCurry, Justin
    2020 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/06/japan-poised-to-declare-state-of-emergency-over-coronavirus
27. Mey, Jacob L.
    2001 Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mey, Jacob L.
    2016 “Pragmatics Seen Through the Prism of Society.” InPragmatics and Theories of Language Use, ed. byKeith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑43491‑9_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_6 [Google Scholar]
29. Mey, Jacob L.
    2021 “Adaptability and Truth.” InThe Pragmatics of Adaptability, ed. byDaniel N. Silva, and Jacob L. Mey, –. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.319.01mey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.01mey [Google Scholar]
30. Mey, Jacob L., and Mary Talbot
    1988 “Computation and the Soul.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90056‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90056-2 [Google Scholar]
31. Oishi, Etsuko
    2013 “Apologies.” InHandbooks of Pragmatics: Volume 2 Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. byMarina Sbisà, and Ken Turner, –. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214383.523
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214383.523 [Google Scholar]
32. Oishi, Etsuko
    2014 “Evidentials in Entextualization.” Intercultural Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/ip‑2014‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0020 [Google Scholar]
33. Oishi, Etsuko
    2015 “Follow-ups as Speech Acts in Mediated Political Discourse.” InThe Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-ups, ed. byAnita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence N. Berlin, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.259.02ois
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.259.02ois [Google Scholar]
34. Oishi, Etsuko
    2016 “Austin’s Speech Acts and Mey’s Pragmemes.” InPragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. byKeith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑43491‑9_18
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_18 [Google Scholar]
35. Oishi, Etsuko
    2017a “Illocutionary Effects, Presupposition, and Implicature.” InPragmatics at its Interfaces, ed. byStavros Assimakopoulos, –. Boston; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501505089‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505089-005 [Google Scholar]
36. Oishi, Etsuko
    2017b “Discursive Functions of Japanese Personal Pronouns.” Russian Journal of Linguistics(): –. 10.22363/2312‑9182‑2017‑21‑2‑305‑319
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-2-305-319 [Google Scholar]
37. Oishi, Etsuko
    2020a “Discourse Markers as Indicators of Connectedness between Expositive Illocutionary Acts.” Pragmatics and Society(): –. 10.1075/ps.17028.ois
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.17028.ois [Google Scholar]
38. Oishi, Etsuko
    2020b “De Se Attitudes in Discourse.” Intercultural Pragmatics(): –. 10.1515/ip‑2020‑3005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-3005 [Google Scholar]
39. Oishi, Etsuko
    2021a “Speech-act-theoretic Explanations of Problems of Pure Indexicals.” InInquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics — Theoretical Developments, ed. byFabrizio Macagno, and Alessandro Capone, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑56437‑7_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56437-7_6 [Google Scholar]
40. Oishi, Etsuko
    2021b “How Do We Adapt Ourselves in Performing an Illocutionary Act?” InThe Pragmatics of Adaptability, ed. byDaniel N. Silva, and Jacob L. Mey, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.319.02ois
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.02ois [Google Scholar]
41. Oishi, Etsuko
    2022 “Illocutionary-act-type Sensitivity and Discursive Sequence: An Examination of Quotation.” Intercultural Pragmatics(): –. 10.1515/ip‑2022‑3005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2022-3005 [Google Scholar]
42. Oishi, Etsuko, and Anita Fetzer
    2016 “Expositives in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.03.005 [Google Scholar]
43. Oishi, Hatsutaro
    1983 Gendai Keigo Kenkyuu (The study of modern honorifics). Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Pizziconi, Barbara
    2011 “Japanese Honorifics: The Cultural Specificity of a Universal Mechanism in Japanese.” InPoliteness in East Asia, ed. byDániel Z. Kádár, and Sara Mills, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511977886.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977886.005 [Google Scholar]
45. Sbisà, Marina
    1984 “On illocutionary types.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90066‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90066-3 [Google Scholar]
46. Sbisà, Marina
    2001 “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00060‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00060-6 [Google Scholar]
47. Sbisà, Marina
    2002a “Cognition and Narrativity in Speech Act Sequences.” InRethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, ed. byAnita Fetzer, and Christiane Meierkord, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.103.04sbi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.103.04sbi [Google Scholar]
48. Sbisà, Marina
    2002b “Speech Acts in Context.” Language & Communication: –. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(02)00018‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00018-6 [Google Scholar]
49. Sbisà, Marina
    2006 “After Grice: Neo- and Post-perspectives.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.007 [Google Scholar]
50. Sbisà, Marina
    2007 “How to Read Austin.” Pragmatics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Sbisà, Marina
    2013 “Locution, Illocution, and Perlocution.” InHandbooks of Pragmatics: Volume 2 Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. byMarina Sbisà, and Ken Turner, –. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214383.25
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214383.25 [Google Scholar]
52. Sbisà, Marina
    2014 “Evidentiality and Illocution.” Intercultural Pragmatics: –. 10.1515/ip‑2014‑0021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0021 [Google Scholar]
53. Searle, John R.
    1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
54. Searle, John R.
    1979 Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
55. Searle, John R.
    1983 Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173452
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173452 [Google Scholar]
56. Searle, John R.
    1989 “How Performatives Work.” Linguistics and Philosophy: –. [Reprinted inEssays in Speech Act Theory, ed. byDaniel Vanderveken, and Susumu Kubo 2001 –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.]10.1075/pbns.77.05sea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.77.05sea [Google Scholar]
57. Searle, John R.
    1992 “Conversations.” In(On) Searle on Conversation, ed. byJohn R. Searle, Herman Parret, and Jef Verschueren, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.21.02sea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.21.02sea [Google Scholar]
58. Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken
    1985 Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [2nd edn 1995]
    [Google Scholar]
60. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1997 “Remarks on Relevance Theory and the Social Sciences.” Multilingua: –. 10.1515/mult.1997.16.2‑3.145
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1997.16.2-3.145 [Google Scholar]
61. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    2015 “Beyond Speaker’s Meaning.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy: –.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Strawson, Peter F.
    1964 “Intention and Convention in Speech Acts.” Philosophical Review: –. 10.2307/2183301
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2183301 [Google Scholar]
63. Terkourafi, Marina
    2007 “Toward a Universal Notion of Face for a Universal Notion of Cooperation.” InExplorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects, ed. byIstvan Kecskes, and Laurence R. Horn, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198843.3.313
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198843.3.313 [Google Scholar]
64. Tokieda, Motoki
    1941 Kokugogaku Genron (The theory of Japanese linguistics). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Tsujimura, Toshiki
    1992 Keigo Ronkoo (The study of honorifics). Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Yamada, Yoshio
    1924 Keigohoo no Kenkyu (The study of honorific usage). Tokyo: Hobunkan.
    [Google Scholar]