1887
Volume 15, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines the speech act of criticizing in online comments on the COVID-19 lockdown breaches in Jordan in 2020. Drawing on speech act theory and the face-saving perspective of politeness, the study investigates the strategies used to criticize these breaches. The analysis of 356 online comments revealed that Jordanians used ten strategies to criticize these lockdown breaches: Insulting, Appealing to the divine, Intertextuality, Rhetorical questions, Stylized threats, Framing criticism as request, Framing criticism as advice-giving, Framing criticism as warning, Invoking legal authority, and Invoking religious ‘haram’. These criticisms were driven by safeguarding the collective interests of community members rather than merely expressing personal condemnation of the breaches. The breaches were constructed in these criticisms as communally reproachable, legally answerable, and religiously proscribed. Given their public nature, these criticisms appear to be motivated not by politeness but by expressing strong emotions, showing in-group solidarity, and aligning with other community members.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22089.bad
2023-06-12
2025-02-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdel-Jawad, Hassan
    2000 “A Linguistic, Sociopragmatic and Cultural Study of Swearing in Arabic”. Language, Culture and Curriculum131: 217–240. 10.1080/07908310008666600
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666600 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anchimbe, Eric, and Richard Janney
    2011 “Postcolonial Pragmatics: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics431: 1451–1459. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.027
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.027 [Google Scholar]
  3. Badarneh, Muhammad A.
    2020 “‘Like a Donkey Carrying Books’: Intertextuality and Impoliteness in Arabic Online Reader Responses.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict81: 1–28. 10.1075/jlac.00027.bad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00027.bad [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    1981The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnes, Renee
    2018Uncovering Online Commenting Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑70235‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70235-3 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bigo, Didier, Elspeth Guild, and Elif Kuskonmaz
    2021 “Obedience in Times of COVID-19 Pandemics: A Renewed Governmentality of Unease?” Global Discourse111: 471–489. 10.1332/204378921X16158113910675
    https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921X16158113910675 [Google Scholar]
  7. Böwering, Gerhard
    2003 “The Qur’ān as the Voice of God.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society1471: 347–353.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Rong
    2001 “Self-Politeness: A Proposal.” Journal of Pragmatics331: 87–106. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00124‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00124-1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Xinren, and Doreen Dongying Wu
    (Eds.) (2023) East Asian Pragmatics: Commonalities and Variations. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Clancy, Patricia, Noriko Akatsuka, and Susan Straus
    1997 “Deontic Modality and Conditionality in Discourse: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Adult Speech to Young Children.” InDirections in Functional Linguistics, ed. byAkio Kamio, 19–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.36.05cla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.36.05cla [Google Scholar]
  12. Cruz, Manuel Padilla
    2019 “Qualifying Insults, Offensive Epithets, Slurs and Expressive Expletives: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict71: 156–181. 10.1075/jlac.00023.cru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00023.cru [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis, Boyd, and Peyton Mason
    2004 “Trying on Voices: Using Questions to Establish Authority, Identity, and Recipient Design in Electronic Discourse.” InDiscourse and Technology, ed. byPhilip LeVine and Ron Scollon, 47–58. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. De Ruiter, Jan Jaap, and Mona Attwa
    2021 “Allah, Allah, Allah: The Role of God in the Arab Version of The Voice.” Religions121: 412. 10.3390/rel12060412
    https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060412 [Google Scholar]
  15. El-Dakhs, Dina, Fatima Ambreen, Maria Zaheer, and Yulia Gusarova
    2019 “A Pragmatic Analysis of the Speech Act of Criticizing in University Teacher-Student Talk: The Case of English as a Lingua Franca.” Pragmatics291: 493–520. 10.1075/prag.18028.eld
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18028.eld [Google Scholar]
  16. Feghali, Ellen
    1997 “Arab Culture Communication Patterns.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations211: 345–378. 10.1016/S0147‑1767(97)00005‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(97)00005-9 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fraser, Bruce
    1998 “Threatening Revisited.” Forensic Linguistics51: 159–173. 10.1558/sll.1998.5.2.159
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.1998.5.2.159 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics141: 237–257. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  19. Gasparov, Boris
    2010Speech, Memory, and Meaning: Intertextuality in Everyday Language. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219111
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219111 [Google Scholar]
  20. Giles, Howard, and Tania Ogay
    2007 “Communication Accommodation Theory.” InExplaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars, ed. byBryan B. Whaley and Wendy Samter, 293–310. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Haugh, Michael, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang
    2019 “Indexical and Sequential Properties of Criticisms in Initial Interactions: Implications for Examining (Im) Politeness Across Cultures.” Russian Journal of Linguistics231: 904–929. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑2019‑23‑4‑904‑929
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2019-23-4-904-929 [Google Scholar]
  22. Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe
    2003Power and Politeness in the Workplace. Harlow: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Holton, Judith A.
    2007 “The Coding Process and its Challenges.” InThe Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, ed. byAntony Bryant and Kathy Charmaz, 265–289. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 10.4135/9781848607941.n13
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941.n13 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hyland, Fiona, and Ken Hyland
    2001 “Sugaring the Pill: Praise and Criticism in Written Feedback.” Journal of Second Language Writing101: 185–212. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(01)00038‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ide, Sachiko
    1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua81: 223–248. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jauhari, Edy, Djatmika Djatmika, and Riyadi Santosa
    2020 “Criticism in the Javanese Arek Cultural Community: Its Expression Context and Strategy Use.” Pragmatics and Society111: 524–544. 10.1075/ps.16032.jau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16032.jau [Google Scholar]
  27. Jauhari, Edy, and D. Purnanto
    2019 “Indirect criticism in the ethnic Madurese community: Its various semantic formulas, lingual markers, and context of use.” InUrban Studies: Border and Mobility, ed. byKerr, Thor et al., 137–144. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jia, Mian, and Guoping Yang
    2021 “Emancipating Chinese (Im)politeness Research: Looking Back and Looking Forward.” Lingua2511: 103028. 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103028
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103028 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kádár, Dániel
    2019 “Introduction: Advancing Linguistic Politeness Theory by Using Chinese Data.” Acta Linguistica Academica661: 149–164. 10.1556/2062.2019.66.2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2019.66.2.1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Koshik, Irene
    2002 “Conversation Analytic Study of Yes/No Questions Which Convey Reversed Polarity Assertions.” Journal of Pragmatics341: 1851–1877. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00057‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00057-7 [Google Scholar]
  31. LeVine, Mark
    2009 “Doing the Devil’s Work: Heavy Metal and the Threat to Public Order in the Muslim World.” Social Compass561: 564–576. 10.1177/0037768609345985
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768609345985 [Google Scholar]
  32. Limberg, Holger
    2009 “Impoliteness and Threat Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics411: 1376–1394. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Locher, Miriam, and Holger Limberg
    2012 “Introduction to Advice in Discourse.” InAdvice in Discourse, ed. byHolger Limberg and Miriam Locher, 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.221.02int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.221.02int [Google Scholar]
  34. Mao, LuMing Robert
    1994 “Beyond Politeness Theory: ‘Face’ Revisited and Renewed.” Journal of Pragmatics211: 451–486. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90025‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90025-6 [Google Scholar]
  35. Màrquez Reiter, Rosina
    2021 “Confessions of Lockdown Breaches. Problematising Morality During the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Pragmatics1791: 61–69. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.022 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh
    2008 “Criticizing in an L2: Pragmatic Strategies Used by Vietnamese EFL Learners.” Intercultural Pragmatics51: 41–66. 10.1515/IP.2008.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2008.003 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ohlander, Erik
    2005 “Fear of God (Taqwā) in the Qur’ān: Some Notes on Semantic Shift and Thematic Context.” Journal of Semitic Studies501: 137–152. 10.1093/jss/fgi007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgi007 [Google Scholar]
  38. Overstreet, Maryann, and George Yule
    2001 “Formulaic Disclaimers.” Journal of Pragmatics331: 45–60. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00125‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00125-3 [Google Scholar]
  39. Piamenta, Moshe
    1979Islam in Everyday Arabic Speech. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pilch, John
    2014 “Insults and Facework in the Bible.” HTS Theological Studies701: 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pino, Marco
    2016 “Delivering Criticism Through Anecdotes in Interaction.” Discourse Studies181: 695–715. 10.1177/1461445616668069
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616668069 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ren, Wei
    2019 “Emancipating (Im)politeness Research and Increasing its Impact.” Acta Linguistica Academica661: 289–298. 10.1556/2062.2019.66.2.8
    https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2019.66.2.8 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rudanko, Juhani
    2001Case Studies in Linguistic Pragmatics. Lanham: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Searle, John
    1969Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  45. 1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society51: 1–23. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  46. 1979Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
  47. Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin
    1998Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tang, Chihsia
    2016 “Managing Criticisms in US-Based and Taiwan-Based Reality Talent Contests: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison.” Pragmatics261: 111–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tao, Yingnian
    2021 “Who Should Apologise: Expressing Criticism of Public Figures on Chinese Social Media in Times of COVID-19.” Discourse & Society321: 622–638. 10.1177/09579265211013116
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265211013116 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tracy, Karen, Donna Van Dusen, and Susan Robinson
    1987 ““Good” and “Bad” Criticism: A Descriptive Analysis.” Journal of Communication371: 46–59. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1987.tb00982.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1987.tb00982.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Tracy, Karen, and Eric Eisenberg
    1990 “Giving Criticism: A Multiple Goals Case Study.” Research on Language and Social Interaction241: 37–70. 10.1080/08351819009389332
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819009389332 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tracy, Karen, and Jessica Robles
    2013Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Vandergriff, Ilona
    2013 “Emotive Communication Online: A Contextual Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication Cues.” Journal of Pragmatics511: 1–12. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu, Xiaoping, and Richard Fitzgerald
    2021 “‘Hidden in Plain Sight’: Expressing Political Criticism on Chinese Social Media.” Discourse Studies231: 365–385. 10.1177/1461445620916365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620916365 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22089.bad
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22089.bad
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): criticizing; cultural situatedness; face; fatalism; politeness; speech acts
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error