1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics and Society
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Gendered subtle bias in Danish TV election debates
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Trust in society is related to a perception of fairness and lack of bias. But bias has many faces. This article presents a conversation analytic study of the initial introduction of the debaters in so-called ‘presidential’ TV debates during the final stages of the general election campaigns in Denmark. The data represents a rare possibility to compare almost identical debate contexts: two different elections, but same TV channel, host, presidential debate setup and campaign contexts. The analyses show how male party leaders were given a chance to construct themselves as experienced, engaged, and hardworking politicians, while a female party leader was merely positioned with regard to her gender and age and as an underdog meeting a strong opponent. This allows us to explore how bias is not just about what is actually said and done but also about what could (based on the comparison) have been said and done.

© 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22109.nie
2024-03-08
2024-12-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ps.22109.nie
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Álvarez, G., Oeberst, A., Cress, U., Ferrari, L.
    (2020) Linguistic Evidence of In-Group Bias in English and Spanish Wikipedia Articles about International Conflicts. Discourse, Context & Media, : . 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100391
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100391 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen, J.
    (2008) Partiskiftere og politik som oplevelse. MedieKultur, : –. 10.7146/mediekultur.v24i44.1303
     https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v24i44.1303 [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson, M.
    (1988) Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London & New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Austin, J. L.
    (1962) How to Do Things With Words. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Balmas, M. and Sheafer, T.
    (2010) Candidate Image in Election Campaigns: Attribute Agenda Setting, Affective Priming, and Voting Behavior. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, (): –. 10.1093/ijpor/edq009
     https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq009 [Google Scholar]
  6. Benoit, W. L. and McHale, J. P.
    (2004) Presidential Candidates’ Personal Qualities: Computer Content Analysis. In: Hacker, K.Presidential Candidate Images. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bode, L. and Hennings, V. M.
    (2012) Mixed Signals? Gender and the Media’s Coverage of the 2008 Vice Presidential Candidates. Politics & Policy, (): –. 10.1111/j.1747‑1346.2012.00350.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00350.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Burghartswieser, D., Rothmund, T.
    (2021) Conservative Bias, Selective Political Exposure and Truly False Consensus Beliefs in Political Communication about the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Germany. PLoS ONE, (): . 10.1371/journal.pone.0259445
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259445 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cameron, D. and Shaw, S.
    (2020) Constructing Women’s “Different Voice”: Gendered Mediation in the 2015 UK General Election. Journal of Language & Politics, (): –. 10.1075/jlp.19086.cam
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19086.cam [Google Scholar]
  10. Carlin, Diana B. and Kelly L. Winfrey
    2009 “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clin- ton, Sarah Palin and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage”. Communication Studies(): –. 10.1080/10510970903109904
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970903109904 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carpiac-Claver, M. L. and Levy-Storms, L.
    (2007) In a Manner of Speaking: Communication Between Nurse Aides and Older Adults in Long-Term Care Settings. Health Communication, (): –. 10.1080/10410230701310307
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230701310307 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clayman, S.
    (1992) Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case Of News Interviews. In: Drew, P., Heritage, J. (Eds). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Clayman, S. E. and Heritage, J.
    (2002) Questioning Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication: –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02572.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Clementson, D. E.
    (2017) Truth Bias and Partisan Bias in Political Deception Detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, (): –. 10.1177/0261927X17744004
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17744004 [Google Scholar]
  15. Coleman, S., Morrison, D. E. and Anthony, S.
    (2012) A Constructivist Study of Trust in the News. Journalism Studies, (): –. 10.1080/1461670X.2011.592353
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.592353 [Google Scholar]
  16. DellaVigna, S. and Kaplan, E.
    (2007) The Fox News effect: Media Bias and Voting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, (): –. 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187
     https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187 [Google Scholar]
  17. Devitt, J.
    (2002) Framing Gender on the Campaign Trail: Female Gubernatorial Candidates and the Press. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, (): –. 10.1177/107769900207900212
     https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900212 [Google Scholar]
  18. Entman, R. M.
    (2007) Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power. Journal of Communication, (): –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00336.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Faucheux, R.
    (1994) The message. Campaigns and Elections, (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Flint, A.
    (1997) The Culture of Spin: Just Part of the Landscape Now: How Modern Communications Techniques Are Ingrained in Campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, (): –. 10.1177/0002764297040008016
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040008016 [Google Scholar]
  21. Garfinkel, H.
    (1964) Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities. Social Problems, (): –. 10.2307/798722
     https://doi.org/10.2307/798722 [Google Scholar]
  22. (1991) Respecification: Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Method, Etc. In and as of the Essential Haecceity of Immortal Ordinary Society (I) – an Announcement of Studies. InButton, G. (Ed). Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611827.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611827.003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gerber, A. S., Karlan, D. and Bergan, D.
    (2009) Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, (): –. 10.1257/app.1.2.35
     https://doi.org/10.1257/app.1.2.35 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gidengil, E. and Everitt, J.
    (1999) Metaphors and Misrepresentation: Gendered Mediation in News Coverage of the 1993 Canadian Leaders’ Debates. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, (): –. 10.1177/1081180X99004001005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X99004001005 [Google Scholar]
  25. Goodwin, C.
    (1979) The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp.–). Irvington Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Greatbatch, D.
    (1986) Aspects of Topical Organization in News Interviews: The Use of Agenda-Shifting Procedures by Interviewees. Media, Culture and Society, : –. 10.1177/0163443786008004005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443786008004005 [Google Scholar]
  27. Groeling, T.
    (2013) Media Bias by the Numbers: Challenges and Opportunities in the Empirical Study of Partisan News. Annual Review of Political Science, (): –. 10.1146/annurev‑polisci‑040811‑115123
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040811-115123 [Google Scholar]
  28. Haraldsson, A. and Wängnerud, L.
    (2019) The Effect of Media Sexism on Women’s Political Ambition: Evidence from a Worldwide Study. Feminist Media Studies, (): –. 10.1080/14680777.2018.1468797
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1468797 [Google Scholar]
  29. Heritage, J.
    (2002) The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content. Journal of Pragmatics, : –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00072‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3 [Google Scholar]
  30. Heritage, J., Greatbatch, D.
    (1992) On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews. In: Boden, D., Zimmerman, D. (Eds). Talk and Social Structure. Polity Press, Cambridge, pp.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Higgins, Michael and Fiona M. McKay
    2016 “Gender and the Development of a Political Per- sona: the Case of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon”. British Politics(): –. 10.1057/bp.2015.44
     https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.44 [Google Scholar]
  32. Huls, E. and Varwijk, J.
    (2011) Political Bias in TV Interviews. Discourse Society, : : –. 10.1177/0957926510382836
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510382836 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hutchby, I.
    (1996) Confrontation Talk. Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Lawrence Earlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. (2011) Non-Neutrality and Argument in the Hybrid Political Interview. Discourse Studies, (): –. 10.1177/1461445611400665
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611400665 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jamieson, K. H.
    (1995) Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195089400.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195089400.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jefferson, G.
    (1990) List-construction as a Task and Resource. In: G. Psathas (Ed) Interaction Competence. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University of America Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. (2004) Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction. InG. H. Lerner (Ed). Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, –. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  38. Jørgensen, C., Kock, C. E., Rørbech, L.
    (1994) Retorik der flytter stemmer: hvordan man overbeviser i offentlig debat. Gyldendal.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kahn, K. F.
    (1994) The Distorted Mirror: Press Coverage of Women Candidates for Statewide Office. The Journal of Politics, (): –. 10.2307/2132350
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2132350 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kondratyuk, N. and Peräkylä, A.
    (2011) Therapeutic Work with the Present Moment: A Comparative Conversation Analysis of Existential and Cognitive Therapies, Psychotherapy Research, (): –. 10.1080/10503307.2011.570934
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2011.570934 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lang, G. E. and Lang, K.
    (1978) The Formation of Public Opinion: Direct and Mediated Effects of the First Debate. InBishop, G. F., Meadow, R. G. and Jackson-Beeck, M. (Eds). The Presidential Debates: Media, Electoral and Policy Perspectives. New York: Praeger, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Langer, A. I.
    (2007) A Historical Exploration of the Personalisation of Politics in the Print Media: The British Prime Ministers 1945–1999. Parliamentary Affairs, (): –. 10.1093/pa/gsm028
     https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm028 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. & Gaudet, H.
    (1944) The people’s choice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Madsen, K.
    (2006) Duellen – En analyse af halduellerne mellem statsministeren og oppositionslederen i danske folketingsvalgkampe. Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Meeks, L.
    (2012) Is She ‘Man Enough’? Women Candidates, Executive Political Offices, and News Coverage. Journal of Communication, (): –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2011.01621.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01621.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Meeks, Lindsey
    2013 “All the Gender That Fit to Print: How the New York Times Covered Hill- ary Clinton and Sarah Palin in 2008”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly(): –. 10.1177/1077699013493791
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013493791 [Google Scholar]
  47. Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., Semin, G. R.
    (1989) Language Use in Intergroup Context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, , –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.57.6.981
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.981 [Google Scholar]
  48. Peng, Y.
    (2018) Same Candidates, Different Faces: Uncovering Media Bias in Visual Portrayals of Presidential Candidates with Computer Vision. Journal of Communication, (): –. 10.1093/joc/jqy041
     https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy041 [Google Scholar]
  49. Peters, J. D.
    (2008) History as a Communication Problem. In: B. Zelizer (Ed). Explorations in Communication and History. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Pomerantz, A.
    (1980) Telling My Side: “Limited Access” as a “Fishing” Device. Sociological Inquiry, : –. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00020.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00020.x [Google Scholar]
  51. (1986) “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies: –. 10.1007/BF00148128
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J.
    (2011) Conversation Analysis: An Approach to the Analysis of Social Interaction. Invan Dijk, T. A. (Ed). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd Ed., pp.–). SAGE. Revised version ofPomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997) Conversation Analysis: An Approach to the Study of Social Action as Sense Making Practices. Invan Dijk, T. A. (Ed). Discourse as social interaction (pp.–). SAGE. 10.4135/9781446289068.n9
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446289068.n9 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rohrbach, T., Fiechtner, S., Schönhagen, P. and Puppis, M.
    (2020) More Than Just Gender: Exploring Contextual Influences on Media Bias of Political Candidates. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2020, (): –. 10.1177/1940161220912694
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220912694 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ross, K.
    (2017) Gender, Politics, News: A Game of Three Sides. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118561652
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118561652 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sacks, H.
    (1972) On the Analyzability of Stories by Children. InJ. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp.–). Rinehart & Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A.
    (1979) Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons and Their Interaction. InG. Psathas (Ed). Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking For Conversation. Language, : –. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  58. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”. Sociological Inquiry, (): –. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00018.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00018.x [Google Scholar]
  59. (1993) Reflection On Quantification in the Study of Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, : –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5 [Google Scholar]
  60. Schröter, M. & Storjohann, P.
    (2015) Patterns of discourse semantics: A corpus-assisted study of financial crisis in British newspaper discourse in 2009. Pragmatics and Society, ():  – . 10.1075/ps.6.1.03sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.1.03sch [Google Scholar]
  61. Tolson, A.
    (2012) “You’ll Need a Miracle to Win this Election” (J. Paxman 2005): Interviewer Assertiveness in UK General Elections 1983–2010. Discourse, Context & Media, (): –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2012.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2012.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  62. Van der Pas, D. J. and Aaldering, L.
    (2020) Gender Differences in Political Media Coverage: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Communication, (): –. 10.1093/joc/jqz046
     https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz046 [Google Scholar]
  63. van Nijnatten, C., Jongen, E.
    (2011) Professional Conversations with Children in Divorce-Related Child Welfare Inquiries. Childhood, ():–. 10.1177/0907568211398157
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568211398157 [Google Scholar]
  64. Velasquez, A., Barnidge, M. and Rojas, H.
    (2021) Group Consciousness and Corrective Action: The Mediating Role of Perceived Media Bias and of Proattitudinal Selective Exposure. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, (): –. 10.1177/1077699020949249
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020949249 [Google Scholar]
  65. Whorf, B. L.
    (1956) Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Edited byJ. B. Carroll. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Wilkins, C. L., Wellman, J. D., Flavin, E. L. and Manrique, J. A.
    (2018) When Men Perceive Anti-Male Bias: Status-Legitimizing Beliefs Increase Discrimination Against Women. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, (): –. 10.1037/men0000097
     https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000097 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22109.nie
Loading
Gendered subtle bias in Danish TV election debates
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22109.nie
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22109.nie
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.22109.nie
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: conversation analysis (CA) ; Bias ; gender ; mediation ; membership categorization analysis (MCA) ; televised election debates

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error